Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1.  @LawsonEnglish I've heard Campbell discuss future variants and what increases risk. Here is another perfectly viable hypothesis: a person contracts Omicron and a coronavirus cold at the same time. They are healthy, and hardly sick. They think they had a simple rhinovirus. It mutates in them.
    1
  2.  @LawsonEnglish  There have been several peer-reviewed studies in major medical journals that found previous infection to be marginally superior to vaccination. It is true that only the vaccinated who then contract mild COVID appear to be extremely well protected. Many countries do not advise boosters for this subgroup generally, absent special circumstances (immunity issues, co-morbidities, and so forth).
    1
  3.  @LawsonEnglish  How do we know this? It remains to be seen. We know new variants of other viral respiratory diseases can arise in this way. I doubt that it's the only way. I've never seen data on how frequently this happens in various classes of virus. Well, we don't know for sure how this virus arose.
    1
  4.  @LawsonEnglish  Here's a thought: watch Lex Fridman's interview of Abramson. Absolutely crucial.
    1
  5. Well, it's obvious. Unvaccinated mice are at fault.
    1
  6. You can look up the (German) Paul-Ehrlich-Institut safety report, English language version. You can see what other countries' ministries of health are recommending (like Switzerland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, etc. -- the civilized places).
    1
  7. Robert Whitaker was just published in the BMJ. He is a journalist and leading authority on the politics of psychoactive medications. Everyone should read his book.
    1
  8. Why do facts scare you? Long COVID includes depression -- which always has multiple causes, the COVID politics being one! Compassion for anyone with COVID aftereffects is just as important as compassion for anyone with vaccine aftereffects. Most long COVID is not "serious." It will not kill or disable the vast majority. We can help the depressed. Let them acknowledge how they are suffering, for starters. Making them stay quiet is placing a burden on them.
    1
  9.  @lukebandolino882  Okay. You know what style message is best for you. I have been shocked by the fearmongering, and I hate it. I guess this video didn't bother me. I think fearmongering exacerbates symptoms, of every illness.
    1
  10.  @lukebandolino882  So he told us both sides. I think that's excellent.
    1
  11. @capnpugwash5403  Yes, and what a disaster that the vaccine has such poor effectiveness on top of everything else. We will need a good coronavirus vaccine.
    1
  12. @westleyjohnstone4719  No we won't say that. COVID is clearly a dangerous disease that can affect multiple organ systems and bodily processes. Too bad we don't have a good v____ for it. We will need one.
    1
  13. @sharonlawrence4830  We have GOT to act, it's true.
    1
  14. @RogerMcMillan  Anecdotes lead to case studies, and case studies lead to devising testable hypotheses. That's the impetus. That's why there is a yellow card system, VAERS, etc. They are not pure data, no. They are not vetted. Yet we collect those anecdotes. Surprised to hear this about kids without arms. Thalidomide is banned, correct? Yes, it was iatrogenic.
    1
  15. Retracted. Why?
    1
  16.  @cogit8able  Nowhere did I say anything even remotely ressembling that. I'm being sense ored. Don't you get it? I never took that thing you think I'm shilling for.
    1
  17. 💯
    1
  18. When I lived in France, injection-quality vials of zinc could be bought over the counter, and consumed by holding it under the tongue.
    1
  19. Note to self: For every "crisis," look for how to make money off of it. That's the program, obviously.
    1
  20. You haven't been the freedom fighters. You've been the slave mongers.
    1
  21. Read the paper. It's from Yale. I never take anyone's word, especially not in the media . . . but then, I know how to read technical material.
    1
  22. @billgreen8966  What context is lacking? You assert that these EUA vaccines have "saved tens of millions." What is your source for that? It's a phrase that's been repeated many times, hence you want to hear it repeated again? It is only now that some epidemiological researchers have conceded that the "lockdowns" may have cost more lives than we realized. The real problem is that we don't have definitive answers yet --- concerning the risks and benefits of any of the mitigation measures employed so far. And the people who should know better are refusing to concede the limits of their current knowledge, or to show the basic honesty and intellectual curiosity and integrity needed to answer these questions. We should know a lot more than we do by now. A lot of unexplained -- or inadequately investigated -- data has been accumulating. Did severe COVID spare Africa? Did countries that declined to approve mRNA-type vaccines have better outcomes? Why have some studies shown that those who received more boosters have also contracted more COVID? Why are so many vaccinated and boosted people dying of COVID now? (Or are they simply dying with COVID?) Previous vaccines have been withdrawn upon determining that one potentially fatal side effect per 100,000 doses was present. This is because under the Precautionary Principle, the burden of proof is on the proponent of a vaccine to prove safety and efficacy, not on the patient to justify his reluctance. That's the right context. Moreover, these vaccines were forced on people. That's unethical. You can see what was written about the anthrax vaccines for a rational discussion. "Context" has become just another phrase. You forgot "nuance." That's big now, too.
    1
  23.  @billgreen8966  I wonder if my very cogent, factual reply was shadowed. Soften us up to believe in AI.
    1
  24. @billgreen8966  I don't have an audience. I don't tend my channel, nor do I intend to. You didn't respond to my points. This isn't a job for me. No one pays me.
    1
  25.  @billgreen8966  I'm the one who did take a broad view. Do you pay attention to what other countries did? Three of the BRICS authorized no mRNA vaccines, and Africa is largely unvaccinated. What were their results and why? Any ideas about what they did right or wrong? Shows how little we know.
    1
  26.  @billgreen8966  I said no such thing. If coherent posts I have made are not visible, that's not on me. That's what social media algorithms do, and we all know why.
    1
  27. @billgreen8966  In the past, no vaccine with this poor of a safety profile had been allowed to be distributed. Actually, I don't agree with that, either: I think that informed consent is the right policy. Obviously, the danger of an illness, the efficacy of a vaccine against it, and the risk of the vaccines are factors for individuals to consider. Obviously, no vaccine this flawed should ever be mandated. I don't think it should be withdrawn except for minors.
    1
  28. @billgreen8966  I've posted no videos. So, what are you getting from my videos? I have none.
    1
  29.  @billgreen8966  You lied about my position. Why should I interact with you? Blocked from my feed.
    1
  30.  @billgreen8966  And I was just censored, for making a Socratic point about awareness of the limits of knowledge.
    1
  31. Three innoculations plus a case of Omicron --- I have never heard any legitimate doctor anywhere suggesting additional doses. See pro-vax Dr. Eric Topol in The Guardian, months ago. Even he won't suggest any such nonsense.
    1
  32. We have always withdrawn drugs when serious safety signals emerged. What's different now?
    1
  33. He has? Not all the lies spread about these vaccines by governments, possibly in order to enrich the already rich? (Of course, that might have been purely accidental. :) I don't tell anyone else what to do. I back off. It's too personal of a decision. I can't do anything for them if something should go wrong. Hence, I have no right to prey on their panic. Who is still distributing these vaccines to the general public, as opposed to targeted populations, such as the elderly in nursing homes, or those over 50 with certain comorbidities? No one in Europe. Campbell never suggested any vaccine was a cure, what a bizarre non sequitur. Effective vaccines have always provided more complete and long-lasting immunity than any of these did. They were recommending five inoculations during the first two years in the US. Have you ever heard of a single vaccine with such a protocol? Not once in history.
    1
  34. Any of us can click the link to the Australian government website and see for ourselves that AZ was discontinued three weeks ago due to a serious side effect directly attributed to the vaccine: thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (TTS). It is no longer in use there, for anyone, for exactly that reason and no other.
    1
  35.  @diegoharo7943  We can explain the 2020 excess deaths due to COVID. We know what those were due to. Are you so dense that you do not realize that some of the 2022 excess/unexpected deaths may be attributable to vaccine injury? Who is doing the analysis of the data? When many independent variables change at once, then they have to do a multivariate analysis to find out the contribution of each variable. You can't cover it up with handwaving, "we had shutdowns," blah blah BLAH. The German study of people who dropped dead unexpectedly at home had about 30% inexplicable deaths except for recent vaccination. These were based on autopsies. That is the most definitive method for figuring out what happened.
    1
  36.  @diegoharo7943  I think that's a good thing.
    1
  37.  @oscarlarmour  You joined last week, perhaps for this purpose.
    1
  38.  @oscarlarmour  No need to reply, already blocked you.
    1
  39. So, are the radiologist and lab techs who picked up evidence of pericarditis and myocarditis, and the cardiologist who diagnosed him and is still following his case, all mentally ill, too? It took the Soviets vastly more suffering to get to this point, you know. (Nah. You don't know.) Maybe it's simpler: you are jealous of athletes.
    1
  40.  @eelnoops5200  How could the patient create a blood test result that indicates inflammation of the heart muscle, or an MRI or CAT scan indicating the same issue? Could the persistent problems he is experiencing have an emotional component? You must know nothing about the heart. EVERY heart condition has an emotional component. That's why rehab has to be step by step. Your heart can handle more, but your mind is still getting scared, which can trigger a too-rapid pulse and hurt your heart again. Fear can trigger a vicious circle. You're rehabbing your heart muscle and your emotional control together. I'm so glad there are still real cardiologists in this world. Imagine if everyone sounded like you. Instead of recovering, people would be dropping dead.
    1
  41.  @eelnoops5200  You also have it backwards. If a patient presents with a possible mental health issue, the first step is to rule out a physical disease process. You know, like how George Gershwin was sent to psychoanalysis when what he had was a brain tumor. That is a mistake.
    1
  42.  @eelnoops5200  Can you read? Or is my post saying that every heart condition has an emotional component, and carefully explaining why, shadowed?
    1
  43.  @eelnoops5200  It's not up to a patient to self-diagnose. (??)
    1
  44. ​@thomasm1964 If there is no such thing as society, how did language come about? How is it that we all understand our core grammar? How did we all come to agreement concerning money?
    1
  45.  @thomasm1964  Of course I do. I was living in Paris when she said it. Everything out of her mouth was thoroughly ideological. But I know enough not to attempt to discuss this with you.
    1
  46. @thomasm1964  No I haven't. As for your post, you just presented a somewhat more cerebral version of the Welfare Queen/Pink Cadillac discourse. That anyone can still think such a thing, post 2008 and post pandemic, is worse than sad. Do you see the people responsible being held responsible? Or are power structures within society preventing that?
    1
  47.  @thomasm1964  LOL, that was coherent all right. Thanks anyway.
    1
  48. No it hasn't. Plaintiffs in a case will be allowed to present evidence that it is not a vaccine but a therapeutic. That's what the court ruled in the Los Angeles Unified Schools case, 9th Circuit.
    1
  49. MRNA as a type of vaccine is entirely new. Every major country had at least one COVID vaccine that was non-mRNA, though some of those had serious side effects.
    1
  50. And yet, neither China nor India authorized mRNA vaccines. China was probably politically motivated. India was science-based. (Pfizer declined to do a study in India, or to waive IP protection to let India do it themselves.)
    1