Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. Too soon to tell. AstraZeneca turned out to be very dangerous.
    1
  2. Industry funding of the regulatory agencies seems to correlate somewhat with the degree of restriction imposed on the citizens during the pandemic.
    1
  3. His point in this video is that in Denmark, we cannot ascribe the presence of mRNA in the blood after 28 days due to faulty injection technique, because they do not use faulty injection technique. Hence this finding is exceptionally important. It's an a fortiori argument; wherever they do not aspirate, the risk can only be higher, not lower. :/
    1
  4.  @evad7933  Granted, I don't know that, but it's quite possible. Did any adult in the US get injected in the buttocks? Or into a vein on top of their hand or their inner arm? All right, those are extreme deviations, whereas correct injection technique at the correct injection site is more subtle. So, you could be right. I did, however, characterize the argument properly.
    1
  5. ​ @jeepstergal12  And his malpractice insurance should pay her the max.
    1
  6. False. Vaccines have been withdrawn at lower levels of serious side effects, once it was known the vaccine did, in fact, cause them.
    1
  7. ​ @penultimania4295 So . . . You have to use Cyrillic to be Eastern European? GOOD TO KNOW. /s
    1
  8. ​ @mattluszczak8095 Why? Is Eastern a slur now?
    1
  9. Check out Robert Whitaker 's book, Anatomy of an Epidemic -- about the explosion on mental illness diagnoses and the risky drugs used to treat them. The playbook is described there, and it works every time. He is an investigative journalist who has specialized in this area. He just had an article published in the BMJ describing a new antipsychotic drug for elderly people with cognitive impairment that didn't address their issue but did increase the risk of death.
    1
  10. The excess deaths figure cannot be ascribed to the virus alone, given the harm Western governments have done. I'm not familiar with what restrictions have done to the UK population, but in the US we have had record opioid deaths and other "deaths of despair" during this pandemic.
    1
  11. That was the rule prior. See how George Annas argued against mandates during the anthrax scare, which was a terrorist act that came soon after 9/11.
    1
  12. By whom? In the US, the law of false light defamation involves a civil tort, and it probably hasn't kept up with this. You have to find a lawyer to sue. And someone to investigate who made it. The person responsible might not have enough money to make it worth filing a case against them. Tech bros strike again.
    1
  13. Well, sounds like this one wasn't engineered, at least.
    1
  14. Look up the complaint yourself. Court documents are public information. I already have a copy.
    1
  15. Well, we do need a test in a neutral country (Sweden, non-NATO, comes to mind), to see if results are replicated. If they are, I want the Sputnik V because I trust this approach. I also suspect it is better for the future -- we will need boosters, for mutations, just as we do for flu, and this is a proven approach. MRNA every year is too new to trust.
    1
  16. "I will be staying to the end." Dr. Campbell is great. 😅
    1
  17. Expect silence.
    1
  18. Show me one vaccine that required four, five, or six innoculations in 24-30 months, and STILL did not prevent infection.
    1
  19. The idea was to describe the syndrome, not determine its frequency. They are trying to find out something about those who have it.
    1
  20. @timothywebber7404  I just reread the Discussion. This is precisely how you begin to probe the existence of a syndrome. It is analogous to case studies, where a careful description alerts us to what is possible, and may merit further investigation. It doesn't tell us anything about prevalence, or really anything else from which we can make any generalizations. What control group do you envision? There is no independent variable here except vaccination, which is correlated with the onset of certain symptoms within a one to eight day period. Once they define a constellation of symptoms that people who never interacted with one another independently report, would you recommend they try to find unvaccinated people experiencing the same symptoms and investigate them? I agree.
    1
  21. @timothywebber7404  In law, to illustrate the difference between probative evidence and proof (sufficient to meet a given standard, like "beyond reasonable doubt"), our evidence professor used to say, "a brick is not a wall." Nor does it have to be, to be a brick.
    1
  22.  @timothywebber7404  Correct. And?
    1
  23. @timothywebber7404  Perhaps the rush to vaccinate people with pre-existing comorbidities should not have been done? Is that a possibility? Did the clinical trials that led to EUA have any such people in them? Have they been followed since? You know, it is going to be very difficult to figure out the contribution of vaccines and the contribution of COVID and COVID exposure to these syndromes. Among other things, people were pushed to get vaccinated after recovering from COVID. No one tested any vaccines on this population, either. Multivariate analysis is needed, and to do it right, researchers have to do it honestly. It takes impeccable ethics and careful judgment. Do you have faith in the system to do that? I have my doubts. The money isn't there, for one thing. There is a doctor on YouTube who removed every post that mentioned "multivariate analysis" --- even though such analysis might show that the vaccines are safer than they appear to be so far. This doctor is a tool. How many more are like him?
    1
  24. Follow the money?
    1
  25.  @brockreynolds870  Did anyone force the lady to take Advil? Did politicians and doctors actively lie about the risks associated with Advil? Was the lady threatened with loss of livelihood if she were to decline to take Advil? Did Advil first come on the market in 2021, as a Emergency Use Authorization drug? Did anyone tell her that her failure to take Advil could kill grandmas everywhere? No, huh?
    1
  26.  @brockreynolds870  "Might as well be mandated, because everyone takes it." Ha ha ha . . . if everyone does it, it's the same as being forced. You really are intellectually bankrupt. Who hires you to do anything? BTW, I have never once taken an Advil. There are safer ways to deal with pain.
    1
  27. Which ones? Where?
    1
  28. @easy_sheetmusic_play_along  Those were either studies her organization promoted, or where she was a case study and described her experience.
    1
  29.  @easy_sheetmusic_play_along  I responded. Cents erred
    1
  30. Not what the actual reports say. The surge in opioid deaths alone created a higher excess death rate than that.
    1
  31. I clicked the link and found it.
    1
  32.  @mattbarneveld815  Wow. Thanks. Yes, "banned" is too strong a word here. It was not made illegal; existing supplies were not confiscated or destroyed; they may have been retired from use. Other probable side effects that Dr. Campbell asserts have reported do not appear to have been taken into consideration when AZ was discontinued, but TTS -- which is very serious and has resulted in deaths -- certainly was explicitly cited by the Australian government. Considering the draconian penalties attached to declining a vaccine, this is a BIG STORY. Sadly. Look at the big picture. It is not pretty.
    1
  33. What is truly a shame is that there are a handful of traditional vaccines that we know, based on generations of use, are beneficial for the vast majority of young people -- but any intervention has got to be individualized. In any case, kids are now getting this JUNK, and skipping the beneficial vaccines. Unbelievable. Of course people have lost faith. The establishment has broken faith with us.
    1
  34. I have to say, I would have thought the king and his daughter in law both being diagnosed with cancer would have raised real questions, without assuming an answer. But I didn't see many people ask real questions, open to any answer, and strictly based on scientific evidence. How did this happen??
    1
  35. Dr. Campbell, your outrage is a gift. In the US, it's simply assumed that the "malcontents" are primitive right-wing losers and of course jealous. Nothing matters here except the dollar. You still care.
    1
  36. $75 billion in two years is well over $4.1 million per hour, 24/7/365. Understand these numbers.
    1
  37. How common this syndrome is was not a research question. The point was to describe the syndrome, based on what those who researchers can determine actually have it, have to say about it. The pre-print gives a very detailed description of the symptoms those people are experiencing, including their severity and persistence through time. Is there some reason to lie, when the link is right there?
    1
  38.  @davidyoung6331  Read the paper. It's from Yale.
    1
  39.  @davidyoung6331  Thanks for that. I hope your patients know.
    1
  40.  @davidyoung6331  Or they just didn't tell you. For the last time, Campbell is not the source of this information. He is reporting on a study. And yes, its source does have some bearing on its credibility. It is not a guarantee of its having been well done, but it certainly increases the chances. I go to good doctors, so this exchange is puzzling, to say the least.
    1
  41. @davidyoung6331  Drbeen Medical Lectures addresses all the points you've raised in detail --- by showing exactly what the study says. Reading and thinking should suffice.
    1
  42. We were never told these mRNA COVID vaccines had been tested on animals having a short lifespan, so that they could be observed throughout an entire life cycle, to see what would happen to their pups. Isn't that what we used to do with laboratory rats and mice? Why wasn't this done here?
    1
  43. Not only that, but the US has barely any inflation.
    1
  44. She is turning to the federal courts for help. The NIH helped as well. It was Biden who gave OSHA unconstitutional powers. Trump put on a show, but basically listened to Fauci where it counted.
    1
  45. She is turning to the federal court for help.
    1
  46. If someone were to tout bee pollen, meditation, and southeast Asian snails for breast cancer, all right, take it down. But Dr. Campbell is a lifelong educator in the field, and always posts a link to the actual study or data he reviews. He should never be removed from the "airwaves." YouTube is too lazy to post an advisory? I guess it is. Too lazy, too dishonest.
    1
  47.  @Americansikkunt  When did Fauci provide access to a single study he relied on? When did he encourage reading actual studies? He said opposing him was opposing Science. Either bully or charlatan, often both.
    1
  48.  @Americansikkunt  I'm not a member of any cult. Only the hopelessly stupid or tragically disordered ever fall for that. Also, not having America parents, and growing up bilingual and secular, well . . . Never mind. 😂
    1
  49.  @Americansikkunt  And you use the word TRIGGER! 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  50.  @Americansikkunt  "Trigger" was a horse, I think. Or a dog. Probably a horse.
    1