Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1.  @Americansikkunt  What question? I forgot and I'm not going to look it up. (Who cares?) And Trigger was a horse. Or, was Roy Rogers insensitive to name him the equivalent of shell shock? 🤣 Anyway, blocked.
    1
  2.  @Americansikkunt  No. I was asking for the actual source for your opinionated arse. Of course that's meant jokingly. I don't expect you to know. You just have tropisms.
    1
  3. 17:20 "curiosity deficit disorder" Will never forget that.
    1
  4.  @deadpoolgaming997  There is some good evidence that vaccination plus a mild case of COVID gives the strongest immunity. Dr. Campbell has presented some of those studies. Know that right now, everything is still preliminary.
    1
  5.  @deadpoolgaming997  I would have done the same. :)
    1
  6. Isn't a nanoparticle 1/100 to 1/1000 the size of a red blood cell (comparing diameter to diameter)? Who would have that injected into them as a vaccine -- rather than, for example, as a cancer treatment?
    1
  7.  @trinitytwo14992  You made a mistake there. Let's not use bad arguments against the vaccines. There are plenty of good ones.
    1
  8.  @ryanthomas4069  I see. And this is literally meaningless without knowing exactly what the RATE of myocarditis among unvaccinated youth who have contracted COVID infection is, compared with the RATE of myocarditis caused by the vaccination itself -- and in particular, the rate of COVID-induced myocarditis in unvaccinated people who have contracted an Omicron variant, since the more deadly variants of COVID are all long gone.
    1
  9.  @ryanthomas4069  False. You don't understand Bayesian probability. If your risk of X is very, very tiny, then clinical outcome is less important in making a cost-benefit analysis regarding preventative strategies and their risks than when the risk of X is higher. Do young people contract severe COVID with myocarditis at all? If they don't, or very, very rarely, then the fact that it presents a danger to them is not a reason to take a vaccine known to cause an apparently milder case of myocarditis more often than COVID itself does, especially where, as this study acknowledges, there were a handful of myocarditis deaths associated with vaccination. The study also listed the 90-day time frame as a possible limitation on the value of the data. This simply acknowledges the fact that we don't know long-term outcomes for either COVID or the vaccines. I'm an attorney who specialized in the federal rules of expert witness testimony under Daubert. This is the common sense interpretation of risk analysis, and it is also the law. You're the one who has projected feelings (and dumb slogans) into the discussion, for some reason. Some obscure reason.
    1
  10. Do what you believe is best and don't worry.
    1
  11. A substantial number of people were exposed and asymptomatic. This is like a naturally acquired vaccination. With all the people you interacted with, it's more likely you were exposed than it would be for most people who were never sick.
    1
  12. You are quibbling. Use the term "discontinued" if you prefer. It was discontinued BECAUSE OF that particular side effect.
    1
  13.  @hazmat5118  I accept that. Will you agree that it was discontinued, and is no longer recommended, because it apparently causes a potentially lethal side effect, namely TTS? Any of us can click the link to the Australian government website and see for ourselves that AZ was discontinued because a serious side effect was directly attributed to that vaccine, namely thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (TTS). I agree that there is no indication that anyone will go to jail if they administer that vaccine, or that existing stockpiles were confiscated and destroyed.
    1
  14.  @hazmat5118  I read the website. It didn't speculate that way. It said TTS has been attributed to the vaccine. Bad faith. Blocked.
    1
  15. You know how. (I realize you know.)
    1
  16. ​ @np1324 Dr. Campbell has been on blood pressure medicines since his booster. He has expressed concern, but he's British. He won't whine.
    1
  17. @np1324  This problem is CONSTANT on YouTube. The new thing is to "deamplify." This means a reply is only visible if you sort by Newest tab. Then all replies not deleted reappear. I'll try.
    1
  18. ​@np1324 Links are always removed. In any case, this was a long time ago. I won't do a search, thanks. I have a good memory. I know pi to 57 decimal places. Believe me or not, as you choose.
    1
  19. @phillip wareham What do you think the risks are of increasing hippocampal neurogenesis? It sounds like a formula for cancer! I check the research every so often on the older drugs, like tricyclics, where the profit motive is absent, and no one seems to think they pose long-term harm to the brain of that nature, . . . So far! I have to wonder.
    1
  20.  @joncumberbatch852  So astute, and well said!
    1
  21. Right. This one was exaggerated. No, I mean it.
    1
  22. In a real emergency, no vaccine or treatment would carry patent protection, nor would its formulation be the subject of trade secrets. Everything would be shared, and studied everywhere -- especially where liability protection were lifted. Clue Number 1 of something else afoot.
    1
  23. @Christopher Edwards  You missed the sarcasm. I think that by the Omicron waves, the danger was clearly exaggerated. Perhaps it was exaggerated before that. This pandemic had the same natural history as viruses usually do: the very first wave is dangerous, and each succeeding variant is more contagious and less lethal.
    1
  24. So read the d*mned paper.
    1
  25. We need a multivariate analysis. Do you trust researchers at this point? Multivariate analysis is very difficult, and requires careful judgment. It takes time and COSTS MONEY. Need I go on? You know that the CDC has reported soaring maternal mortality rates?
    1
  26. Confidentiality
    1
  27. I personally look for the times when prenatal supplements are on sale, and buy only when there are plenty on the shelf, not to deprive a mom. Supplements are concentrated, as are spices. So you cannot try to save money and give up on quality. You have to shop quality. Sad with today's prices, though. :/
    1
  28. ❤ 😊
    1
  29. Actually, we do not know what is behind this wave of non-COVID excess deaths. (If you go to the anti-Campbell websites -- don't; I did it for you -- you will find them insisting that not getting vaccination is causing excess deaths. Of COURSE they have no idea.) The point, however, is that we need a dispassionate assessment, that a multivariate analysis must be done, that it is complex, not easy to do (you can't leave it to an "algorithm"), and takes time and prudent judgment --- all the essential things we lack, thanks to the mass hysteria that has been directly imposed on us by our governments, MSM, and the elites who direct them.
    1
  30. So, the typical case is like a bad cold, the kind you cannot run around with even if it were ethical.
    1
  31. ​ @drewthompson7457 Who trusts them for such a thing anyway? I don't trust the ethics of organ harvesting.
    1
  32. ​ @stanweaver6116 Amen.
    1
  33. The armed forces have been saying for years that most young adults are unfit for service.
    1
  34. In most of the English-speaking world, the people who made serious money in their prime will have outstanding medical advice and care for the rest of their lives. As far as they are concerned, the rest of us should hurry up and kick that bucket. In my city, before the pandemic, the very richest neighborhood had a mean life expectancy very close to 90. The very poorest, about 60. Yes, the richest live almost 50% longer on average than the poorest, though of course the concentrations of excess deaths among the poor are in infancy, and then again after 65 or so (no point in having them collect a SSA, i.e., government, pension).
    1
  35. For a young man, it probably is.
    1
  36. I just made a math post. I pointed out how large a mere 15% of __ is. It was scents erred. ChatGPT doesn't like math, either. 😂
    1
  37. He never did. He presents the facts. You are unfamiliar with this channel. Or you are a false flag!
    1
  38.  @Farhadmusic29  He's not pushing the vaccine. He has reported favorably on ivermectin. Sounds like someone gave you a medal to fabricate stuff. (That's why you mentioned medals. That's how it usually works.)
    1
  39.  @Farhadmusic29  💩
    1
  40. If he sounds like a robot, some people think that's wonderful. WEF people, Silicon Valley people, even Wall Street and City of London people . . .
    1
  41.  @harmonys2102  ME TOO.
    1
  42. Only do the minimum necessary. And start checking out the ministries of health of relatively civilized places like Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, etc., to find out their v policies. Prepare to be very surprised.
    1
  43.  @briandingle665  Evidence?
    1
  44. @TheMansfieldlad  Wrong. I'm an attorney, and evidence is my area of expertise, as are burdens of proof. So . . . I really mean it. You are welcome to believe that I shouldn't mean it, but whether, in fact, I do is not something you get to dictate.
    1
  45. @TheMansfieldlad  By the way, have you ever been in a classroom where someone whips out a smartphone, (apparently) to check a fact, and announces it to the class? How are other people supposed to weigh that? Hmm? 🤔 They have no idea what he's looking at on his Magic Phone.
    1
  46. @TheMansfieldlad  The first comment was general, the second, specific. Glad I could clear that one up.
    1
  47. @BrokenGlass2024  My Circuit had a giant class action against CPS for exactly such overreach, and the parents won on most of their claims. Prominent attorneys who are known in the field and a major law firm took their case. They also sought damages for defamation, but I don't remember at the moment how those were framed. Do you know what a Circuit is? (Federal Court of Appeals) Do you know what "overreach" is? (Stuff like this.) Do you know how to find a published case? Have you ever seen one? Is your legal education from your Facebook friends?
    1
  48. @BrokenGlass2024  You'll notice I took no position on whether the doctor was legally mandated to report her because of this in UK. I don't have any idea. If the case is unusual, and made the papers for that reason, then I have to wonder. Do you think it was ethical not to warn her that she was mandated to consent? In any case, the class action I mentioned dealt with these specious assertions of neglect against parents -- if you can see that reply.
    1
  49.  @sachavanmeir1591  I'm so sorry. I hope you will recover.
    1
  50. I thought they had moved on to puberty blockers.
    1