Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. Dr. Campbell is a wonderful person.
    1
  2. Try vegan for 25 out of 30 days per month. That should help.
    1
  3.  @nellyross8761  I agree wholeheartedly.
    1
  4.  @nellyross8761  💯 agreement
    1
  5. Does it require really good technology? Mine is very slow.
    1
  6. We should not imagine. We should know, or we should admit we do not know and be diligently analyzing the data to find out.
    1
  7.  @Jayjayuk12345  It's not at all impossible. Multivariate analysis and other statistical techniques are what led to the conclusion that mRNA vaccines present a risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, especially in young men and adolescent boys, and that AZ had an unacceptable risk of TTS. It's also why in 1976 the flu vaccine was withdrawn due to increased GBS risk. It's not easy, but certainly possible -- and necessary.
    1
  8.  @Jayjayuk12345  Okay, buddy. A second ago you said it was impossible to know. Blocked. Time waster.
    1
  9.  @Dez083  The fact is that polio vaccines BMGF promoted throughout Africa and India -- oral live attenuated vaccines to be precise, which are no longer used in any developed country and haven't been for years -- carry the risk of seeding vaccine-derived polio outbreaks, because they can and do replicate and mutate. This is amply documented and has been known for years. (If you're not much of a reader, that's not our problem.) And Gates' claim that safe, modern polio vaccines are logistically harder to deliver to the global south is a LAUGH. He can't afford it? Oh, that's right. Jeff Epstein promised him money, at those dinners. But he failed to deliver. Notice I haven't even touched on the shambles he has made of education in many communities with his experiments, or his dubious promotion of GMOs in food, or the self-dealing characteristic of his foundation that has been described at length. But more to the point is his quite obvious inability to connect with other people in any normal manner. Compassion is missing. It's evident that it is, and it does matter. No one is required to trust someone like that. Get him off the world stage. If he wants to direct how global health is handled, when he has zero qualifications, then that is not generosity. That is buying power over others' lives. That is all he's been good at doing.
    1
  10. 💰💰💰💰
    1
  11.  @hertugen.online  That was true for a long time. Dr. Campbell will never know for certain whether the vaccine contributed to his high blood pressure at the time it emerged. Multivariate anaysis requires large samples. It is not counterfactual speculation. What was the cause of the alleged "too much stress?" That's not a common cause of high blood pressure; it is a cofactor in some cases.
    1
  12.  @akb811  Know that lives will be saved thanks to people like you.
    1
  13.  @akb811  I'm so sorry. Our family has had its share of life-changing medical mistakes. Every doctor would have urged you to have him vaccinated. Never blame yourself.
    1
  14. I found the (German) Paul-Ehrlich-Institut safety report, English language version. You might want to take a peek, to verify. It is always a good idea to go to primary sources to verify anything a politician says. Do we have firm numbers on how many people must be vaccinated in order to save one life? In order to prevent one crippling case of COVID? Please tell me where to find the current data. I'm interested in reality, no problem.
    1
  15.  @pmm8621  Prove that up. I indicated where anyone can find the German report cited by the MP. There is plenty of evidence to warrant a careful inquiry. No one knows how that will turn out a priori, because a multivariate analysis has to be done, and that is neither easy nor quick. A lot of things could be happening -- people who already had COVID might be at higher risk from vaccination, people with low vitamin D levels may be at risk for COVID or the vaccines or both. Being shut in may have contributed to obesity or excess drinking, and that plus stress could be behind the various heart issues, more so than any other factors. We need to find out. You, apparently, need to trash the people sounding the alarm. You need to ask yourself why.
    1
  16.  @pmm8621  So you joined just this summer, for this purpose? Cha-ching, I hope. Then I would understand. And if not, then I have even less respect.
    1
  17.  @pmm8621  Well, that may be true. I don't interact with others in the way that you do, so I couldn't know. Yet you attacked me personally, thinking I was stupid. Perhaps fewer people are as stupid as you think. I don't know that, and you have a lot more information to form an opinion about it than I do. But maybe I've made you think some, which can only be to the good.
    1
  18.  @pmm8621  I don't tweet. I'm not on Facebook and never have been, etc., nor Twitter. I only joined here to save videos during the lockdown, and I'm not sure it was worth it.
    1
  19.  @pmm8621  I'm reminded of the possible breast cancer cluster in the San Francisco area, which took a LONG time to analyze. It turned out that the number of cases, though higher than what may have been expected, was within the norms of the demographic affected, and the "cluster" was not statistically significant. Yet it was important to let women know to be vigilant, and do what little we could determine might lower risk (such as exercise, occasional fasting, more plant-based foods, vegan days, etc., and of course regular mammography). Similarly, we DO have a problem with vaccine injury, and we DO need to get to the bottom of it. Screaming at the victims is vile. Multivariate analysis is not easy, and takes a long time to complete because there are unavoidable judgment calls to be made. The report from Germany is a basis for starting a serious inquiry. I don't prejudge how it will end. There is too much signal amidst the noise. Dismissing it is bad faith, and does nothing to reassure the public concerning the integrity of the medical system.
    1
  20.  @pmm8621  Did you know, for example, that last year the Swiss Ministry of Health recommended only one dose of an mRNA vaccine to all those who had recovered from a proven case of COVID? My closest friend received her first dose, not knowing she had already been exposed to COVID, then was sick from COVID, then was rushed into her second dose as if she had never had COVID by her doctor and the state health department. Her side effects were massive, and included a serious bout of memory issues. She should have waited three months for the second dose. She now refuses boosters. Do you grasp why? Please think it through. No one would admit to her that they did not know what was best, and no one would apply the usual principles, such as the Precautionary Principle and the Hippocratic Oath, to her case. No one treated her as an individual, and now she has lost faith. NOT GOOD. Don't try to lay this at the doorstep of the John Campbells of the world.
    1
  21.  @pmm8621  Where did you copy these talking points from? It's what is known as "boilerplate." It is simply inaccurate to say that "the COVID vaccines" have the same safety profile as "other vaccines." First of all, "the COVID vaccines" don't all have the same safety profile as each other, by any stretch. Moderna, for example, has already stopped being used for males under 30 in MANY COUNTRIES. Those of us who are actually informed have been doing things like reading articles from major medical journals and watching to see what the ministries of health of other major European nations are doing. Germany, France, Switzerland, and every Scandinavian country is following different protocols than the CDC; vaccine mandates and passports for people under 18 have already been made illegal in France, and the French Left took the lead. It's easier to demonize and cast aspersions on anyone who doesn't toe the line in the English-speaking world than it is in other European countries. Those of us who are multilingual and multicultural sure do know that, from bitter experience.
    1
  22.  @pmm8621  Now that I see how much SOLID information I contributed to this thread, I also see how disrespectful it was to foist that irrelevant boilerplate on me. Sorry I responded. I would never trust you for unbiased information. Go do whatcha gotta do. I'm blocking you from my notifications thread.
    1
  23.  @pmm8621  By the way, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is now strongly disfavored where I live. They were giving it to walk-ins for months and months, no appointment necessary, at an outpatient clinic affiliated with one of the best hospitals in Chicago, last year. Now they recommend that people take an mRNA vaccine unless there is some reason they cannot. YOU are misinforming people. It's not working out too well, either.
    1
  24. Or humanized mice . . . 😒
    1
  25. I don't see that. No one cares about kids whose parents aren't PMC millionaires.
    1
  26. 11:30 Brilliant, absolutely moving statement by Dr. Campbell.
    1
  27.  @spinafex5729  Jonas Salk knew personal sacrifice. He tested the polio vaccine on himself, and then refused to apply for a patent. (P. S. But look who he married. ;) You agree with the proposal to offload risk to the most vulnerable instead, and talk it up as noble. Emblematic of the rotten times we live in. How come you haven't noticed?
    1
  28.  @spinafex5729  I never, EVER said that no one got vaccinated for altruistic reasons. I myself have, many times. (I don't think utilitarian means what you think it does, by the way.)
    1
  29.  @notuber1435  So beautifully stated. :)
    1
  30. I wish -- not exactly. But almost. It ruled that that old smallpox case from over a hundred years ago can't apply to COVID vaccines to permit mandating them for work unless they actually prevent COVID. It still might be wrong to mandate them, but all these different government entities relied on that old case to require the vaccine. The 9th Circuit said nope. It also made fun of the CDC phrase "safe and effective." The court said, "Safe and effective for what?" 😏
    1
  31. @lucrum8  We can't, yt won't allow. Try LAUSD + vaccines + case. That should work.
    1
  32. Very interesting post! Thanks.
    1
  33. Astounding. My doctor, who retired just before the pandemic, was very "conservative" as far as testing and supplements were concerned, and he started checking Vitamin D years ago, possibly a full decade.
    1
  34. The greatest doctors in the world who always understood the Precautionary Principle have been sounding the alarm for years now. The fact that so few younger doctors understand it is of even greater concern than the current vaccine fiasco. This is a fundamental flaw in their ethics. This has got to be fixed now. If we let this go, count on seeing worse.
    1
  35. "If we want a healthy country . . . " But the top 10% wants big quarterly dividends.
    1
  36. ​ @Memphis2010GFC Exactly. Being trans is not a qualification of any kind.
    1
  37. I even saw a pro-vaccine study that found that people with good vitamin D levels had a better response to the vaccines with fewer side effects. STILL our governments said nothing. (What? They were afraid it would cut into boosters??)
    1
  38. When they have to lie about what you said and smear you, the game is OVER.
    1
  39. ​ @LTPottenger CORRECT. And most likely, nothing short of it does.
    1
  40.  @emilys5024  VERY Official CDC numbers
    1
  41. ​​@Graham Hodge Other studies have said exactly the opposite. Chances are excellent the study you cite pertains to the original virus and perhaps its first variant. Does it pertain to the Omicron variants?
    1
  42. ​@Graham Hodge Just read the methodology. A meta-analysis that fails to distinguish between variants is likely flawed and should not be the basis for giving current advice to men under 50 without special risks factors, and certainly not to teenaged boys.
    1
  43. Look closer
    1
  44. What party ran him? Lol
    1
  45.  @jellyfishi_  You know what? I think that was brilliant. You've got it. Add in the new media. If memories were short before, the new media has made them almost nonexistent.
    1
  46. This is a court case. Have you seen the complaint? An AG is unlikely to fabricate supposed facts and file a complaint containing falsehoods because he can and will be disciplined, and the case will be dismissed. That is certain. That doesn't prove the claims are true. It means he will get an opportunity to prove them in court. Political slogans are irrelevant here. Think it through.
    1
  47. @SillyGrandma99  Oh. I see, you read and analyzed the complaint. Where did you go to law school, tell me again?
    1
  48. Is the information cited from Germany true or false? Simply provide the keywords, as links are likely to be shadowed. We'll gladly verify a politician's assertions.
    1
  49. Never mind, I found the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut safety report, English language version. You might want to take a peek. It requires a knowledge of basic algebra, however.
    1
  50.  @scottekoontz  You clearly did not read the report. I suggest it's time to get serious.
    1