Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1.  @HeartDocAndrew  I'm . . . Not incoherent.
    1
  2.  @HeartDocAndrew  blocked
    1
  3. You and your daughter are on a good road now. This nightmare is ending, you'll see.
    1
  4.  @sophiesnuffy2563  You posted this in the wrong thread.
    1
  5.  @AndreaWKR  Please look it up. Can't use those words. NYT, Guardian, you can find it in MSM.
    1
  6. What? Their statement reasonably calling for additional studies, given their surprise in finding these mRNA remnants in roughly 10% of the sample, OR their conclusory statement that the study should not be interpreted to contradict the mantra that "the vaccines are safe and effective?" You call that "cherry picking?" I say we do more studies, as Campbell just stated.
    1
  7. What "some are saying" is the direct result of what these irresponsible governments have done to us.
    1
  8. Well, more death is becoming usual. Hence, more than usual is now usual. Simple.
    1
  9.  @btudrus  Agree in part, of course; this is a novel virus. This variant, however, presents much like the flu in a patient. Thank God.
    1
  10. No expert has drawn that conclusion. Believe me, when it shows up in Northern California among the richest, people look hard. ADHD may well be underdiagnosed. Autism is not.
    1
  11. False
    1
  12. For those who don't believe this to be possible: remember Rotherham.
    1
  13. Isn't a nanoparticle 1/100 to 1/1000 the size of a red blood cell (comparing diameter to diameter)? Who would have that injected into them as a vaccine -- rather than, for example, as a cancer treatment?
    1
  14. Look up the Swiss ministry of health vaccine recommendation for people who have had a proven case of COVID. I am afraid to repeat it. It is usually removed, even if I demonstrate where I found it. Keep clicking until you find it. You'll be glad you did.
    1
  15.  @christopheredwards7846  I'm telling you what they had all said prior to this pandemic, and prior to the vaccine rollout as well. I find that reading stuff about vaccines from before 2019 is quite eye-opening.
    1
  16.  @christopheredwards7846  P. S. You call this a vaccine?
    1
  17. @christopheredwards7846  Yes, I accepted the designation, since we are all using that term and it therefore speeds communication. It is unlike any other vaccine that has ever been proposed to me. Offering four innoculations in under two years, and it is still unable to prevent contraction or transmission, and it has not eliminated all need for hospitalization, either. It has not performed as promised by any stretch.
    1
  18.  @robuk3723  Which one is for that??
    1
  19.  @robuk3723  There is no beta blocker "for anxiety." Nor is that a common off-label use.
    1
  20.  @poempadgett4664  Beta blockers are NOT anxiety medications. That is not even a common off-label use. Arrhythmia is a heart condition, and like all heart conditions, anxiety will have a harmful affect on it, and will need to be treated in some judicious manner.
    1
  21.  @robuk3723  No it is not.
    1
  22.  @robuk3723  Actual, clinical arrhythmia is not due to anxiety. It is, however, exacerbated greatly by anxiety -- more so than most illnesses are; often more than high blood pressure is. But it is not a psychological or emotional disorder. People may not even know they have it without a Holter monitor. Most people know if they're anxious. Pretty well all know, absent severe psychosis.
    1
  23. ​ @S.Wally. You're right, it doesn't.
    1
  24. The lips still give it away.
    1
  25. BTW, this was only if you tested positive and showed symptoms of COVID. But yes, she acknowledged a potential overcount.
    1
  26.  @negrildoc  "From your mouth to God's ears" is the phrase that comes to mind. :)
    1
  27. It is going to be very difficult to figure out the contribution of vaccines and the contribution of COVID and COVID exposure to these syndromes. Among other things, people were pushed to get vaccinated after recovering from COVID(!!!) No one tested any vaccines on this population. Multivariate analysis is needed, and to do it right, researchers have to do it honestly. It takes impeccable ethics and careful judgment. Do you have faith in the system to do that? There was a doctor on YouTube who removed every post that mentioned "multivariate analysis." How many more are like him?
    1
  28. @evancoates2186  Well, with any luck at all, you have 20 more years to be young, then another 20 to be middle-aged. Fight back by eating well and exercising every day. Try that first. My late mom used to say, when times are tough, food comes first.
    1
  29.  @julieoelker1865  PLEASE read White Coat Black Hat. This is by an MD who decided to go into philosophy and is currently a professor of philosophy. Pristine credentials. You will not believe what you'll read about the pharmaceutical industry. They own everyone. The book dates from 2010.
    1
  30. @euclidy2681  A very small, phenomenally rich ruling class, whose collective net worth exceeds that of some countries, and who have inordinate power over (supposedly) democratic governments to set public policy for the rest of us. Trace the roots of pandemic policies. Then look at the 2008-2009 crisis again. Or maybe for the first time.
    1
  31. @euclidy2681  I think they will let you read my reply, this time.
    1
  32. Calculating excess deaths in the US poses an important problem: we have had a surge of opioid deaths and a (much smaller) surge of suicides. We have also had more traffic accidents; at least some are due to the COVID mitigation programs, and some are due to long COVID/brain fog, and quite a few are both (an abnormal life following COVID is going to mean a slower complete recovery).
    1
  33. The lunatics who forced this catastrophe on us are not even capable of being happy that the virulence of COVID has finally declined, much less apologize and atone for all they got wrong.
    1
  34. I admired you before, now I love and admire you. This is so, so hard.
    1
  35. Good for Dr. Campbell, for stressing the point that this somewhat milder variant is sheer luck.
    1
  36. Why? It's well known. This time, we have dubious jabs on top of it.
    1
  37. Any of us can click the link to the Australian government website and see for ourselves that it was discontinued three weeks ago due to a serious side effect attributed to the vaccine: thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (TTS), and is no longer in use there, for anyone.
    1
  38.  @rexxx777  It's the first one in the description box to the video. If I give you the link here, I might be automatically shadowed, as links are too hard to monitor for TOS violations.
    1
  39. ​ @mikewilder6728  They are used twice.
    1
  40.  @davidbarry6900  "Vanity project," LOL. Because they should have taken Pfizer and Moderna instead, hm? No mRNA vaccine has been approved in China. Considering their drive to attain (the unattainable) Zero COVID without destroying their economy (a significant incentive right there), you would think they would have adopted mRNA as quickly as possible.
    1
  41.  @shotgunkawaii116  What lie did I tell? That different vaccines have different risk profiles? That is true. Look up any European ministry of health known for its excellent public health: Switzerland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden. See what they recommend. When you talk about several billion people, then 0.5% is important. One-half of one percent of one billion is 5 million. Stop your lying about mathematics. It's so awkward.
    1
  42.  @shotgunkawaii116  You wrote: "By the way the current global mortality rate for covid 19 is 1% to 2% since day one regardless your are vaccinated or not." I supplied the emphasis. So, why get vaccinated?
    1
  43.  @ewhite1546  J&J is not a live, attenuated virus at all, or an inactivated virus.
    1
  44.  @shotgunkawaii116  In 2022, J&J is no longer recommended at all in my state, and this is where the governor got one of the first doses at the state fair grounds vaccination center (I commend him for that, actually -- lead by example and do what you ask other to do).
    1
  45.  @shotgunkawaii116  I am, too, and I can reference ministries of health who have determined the differences to be significant. Every one of them has a web page in English. YOU ARE COUNTING on other people to be too lazy and ignorant to check for themselves. That is not wise, not on this channel. Blocked as another bad faith time-waster.
    1
  46.  @davidbarry6900  That makes sense, because of the extreme refrigeration needed.
    1
  47.  @goh123superman  Interesting, given the costs of refrigeration.
    1
  48. I had read of a study where as many as 49% of visits to ER for heart-attack related symptoms were for panic disorder. The article at the time, from a Harvard publication (Harvard Heart Letter or Harvard Health Letter, I don't remember), was immensely compassionate, and urged everyone to go to ER and rule out the heart. No responsible doctor would ever diagnose any emotional illness without first excluding a physical one. I've known psychiatrists who declined to diagnose and treat for anxiety before being satisfied a heart issue had been excluded. Not to mention that both together are not exactly rare, and the psychiatrist needs to know that.
    1
  49. BTW, are you a doctor?
    1
  50. ​ @geniegenie2453  ​The rate is much higher in young men, a group least likely to need the vaccine. Swine flu vaccine was withdrawn for ONE case of Guillain Barre per 100,000. Myocarditis in young men from this drug is more than five times that rate. How is this all right, when it does not prevent transmission? What is the reason for it? You are not protecting others. Hence it should be up to you.
    1