Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1.  @janbeck7989  Oh my God. Her family and friends must break through her shell and get her out. She will die from this. No one can live like this.
    1
  2. How many need to be vaccinated to prevent one death? How many who are vaccinated experience serious side effects from the vaccine? These are numbers that need to be very carefully vetted in order for people to make their decision -- and it should be up to them. Lots of doctors opposed to mandatory mass vaccination do believe some people should be vaccinated (such as all people over 70, most people over 50, those who are obese, etc.). Clearly they are doing the cost-benefit analysis with the data they have.
    1
  3.  @register1430  Your remarks had nothing to do with answering the questions I posed. That is because we do not have firm answers. I believe we should find out. I believe the answer won't be easy to arrive at, because multivariate analysis is hard. I believe we should start the serious inquiry now. Many first responders were fired from government jobs for declining vaccination. Australia came close to strapping people to chairs. I don't deny the existence or seriousness of long COVID. All non sequiturs. Why do you bother?
    1
  4. I think he is saying what he believes to be true.
    1
  5.  @mcomeadow  Calling on epidemiologists and virologists to verify what other countries are doing, and analyzing whether it is helpful -- nearly 20 MONTHS into a pandemic -- is "rubbish?" It should have happened without saying.
    1
  6.  @brianc5581  thank you
    1
  7. Here's a thought: watch Lex Fridman's interview of John Abramson. Absolutely crucial.
    1
  8. Stop misspelling slurs. At least prove you can spell before you criticize.
    1
  9. I looked up the 2024 booster recommendation in Sweden. They recommend, but do not require, universal boosters for those age 80 and over. I always want to know what other countries are doing. Switzerland never gave more than one shot of the two-shot regimens to those who had recovered from a proven case of COVID. Russia, China, and India never approved mRNA vaccines -- Russia and China, very likely for political reasons, but India's decision was purely scientific. The only country I know of recommending these vaccines to people under 40 is the United States, that great leader in public health. /s It's really interesting when you read a lot.
    1
  10.  @lazm3518  Campbell caused illnesses and deaths? You are all crazy. Or else you are false flags -- with your hyperbole, you function as such.
    1
  11.  @philtucker1224  In the US, at birth, the life expectancy of a man is about 76 years. How is that much longer than a decade after retirement? For women, it is about 80 years, so that is longer. For men, it isn't at all. Full retirement in the US is now 67 for most people, and over 66 for just about everyone.
    1
  12.  @orladowdsroddy3983  People who suffered side effects are silenced, and if they persist, they are depersoned. They don't count.
    1
  13. A nanoparticle's diameter is 1/100 to 1/1000 the diameter of a red blood cell.
    1
  14. Now you know why they cannot admit the true origin of this virus. Now is a good time to reread Glenn Greenwald: With Liberty and Justice for Some Find out how the powerful are shielded from having to take any responsibility for their actions, while we suffer for our own mistakes and theirs, of course. Someone has to.
    1
  15. There's a Quora takedown of Dr. Clancey that relies on our not reading. It cites a paper they say supports the benefit of the vaccines because myocarditis is more commonly due to COVID than to vaccines. Except that the paper admits that vaccinated people can catch COVID, that there were deaths from the vaccine, and that men under 40 were over six times more likely to develop myocarditis from a vaccine than an infection. The data was from the UK, December 2020, through December 2021 -- when a more dangerous variant was circulating.
    1
  16. How dare they politicize this? Everyone should support a careful analysis of data, which requires advanced statistical techniques and a lot of fair judgment and time. If there is EVER a vaccine we actually need, millions will, of course, refuse it. What is wrong with these politicians?
    1
  17. That IS significant. Anyone with any scientific background knows two things: This is a bona fide signal that must be investigated immediately. We don't know why this is happening; too many variables could have a bearing.
    1
  18. I'd like to know the truth about the relative "safety" (i.e., relative RISK) of Sputnik V. I am not holding my breath to find out.
    1
  19.  @christopherrobinson7541  I knew this was a bad idea from the start. I would never, ever knowingly take anything prepared that way.
    1
  20. Not according to this talk.
    1
  21. No, you wake up.
    1
  22. Because there is no evidence that the vaccine is preventing infection for more than a very, very short time, and the burden of proof is on the proponent.
    1
  23. So, how does COVID compare to a severe flu? We have never locked down for flu, even when various forms were killing children.
    1
  24. I can imagine. It's not easy, but I can do it. /s
    1
  25.  @emtee40  What question do you have in mind?
    1
  26.  @emtee40  no clue who or what you are, but thanks for letting me know to block you . . . always appreciate cleaning up my thread
    1
  27.  @mb-3faze  You really believe this rot? I am for targeted vaccination based on INDIVIDUALIZED health care, always mindful of the three pillars of human health and ethical treatment: the Precautionary Principle, informed consent, and the Hippocratic Oath --- is that what you call "anti-vax?" "Muzzle the loudmouths for the good of the nation" is a totalitarian proposal. What's the point of saving lives, even assuming you will save them and not ruin them, if it is to live without basic human dignity and civil rights? I don't know what our government wants, or what the UK or any of the Five Eyes want; their record is poor and their willingness to jeopardize human health with risky experiments is legend. They serve the major corporations first, and the rest of us as an afterthought, if at all. I have every reason to suspect that reducing the average lifespan is not something they are averse to doing, and I know the US has no plan whatsoever to stem gun violence or youth suicide. I look to the ministries of health in the Scandinavian countries, Switzerland, and even France to see what I should consider doing, not the FDA or the CDC. The Precautionary Principle places the burden of proof of every new drug or other intervention on the proponent, to show that it is safe, effective, and suitable for the individual patient for whom it is being prescribed. We don't have to justify saying no. The burden of proof is not on us. BTW, you heard about the New York case, I hope? Fired workers reinstated with back pay. Is that why you are out of sorts today?
    1
  28. The US CDC recognizes the soaring maternal mortality rate, figures finalized through at least 2021. I didn't believe it until I saw it. Soaring.
    1
  29. My cousin's father in law did.
    1
  30. You know what else Pfizer did? In the multi-page fine print statement you were supposed to read before consenting to receive the shot, it attenuated its positive claims. But on the television programs Pfizer sponsored, newscasters made HUGE promises -- safe, effective, conferring full immunity, protecting your family, everything. They also greatly berated anyone skeptical of these claims as cowards and worse.
    1
  31. In America, they will study better means of persuasion and deception. Be sure of it.
    1
  32. Multivariate analysis EDIT: testing lol There are medical websites that removed this term . . . can you believe it?
    1
  33.  @gailwendtland5970  You probably signed that away in your admissions papers. They are required by HIPPA to keep it confidential, however.
    1
  34. @nevillegoddard4966  Generations of Indians were and continue to be vegetarian from birth. Their population is not exactly declining. Nor do they lack brainpower, for that matter.
    1
  35. BMJ ran a study that suggests vegetarians have lower rates of serious COVID, and urged further study.
    1
  36. I saw that law. Your statement is not correct. Nor has the law passed. There are several more steps before it becomes the law. Don't get me wrong, I oppose the law. But it is more on the order of an anti-euthanasia measure, to stop charlatans from urging ineffective treatments that could cause a vulnerable person to reject lifesaving care. I am afraid it is too broad for that purpose. But it is not pro-mRNA. France stopped using that. Look it up.
    1
  37. ​ @debbieking3442 Inaccurate story. Language/culture barrier.
    1
  38. ​ @nikkygovier3783  This law is against assisted dying.
    1
  39. @craigfrith7024  Look, I happened to know what the proposed law says. (It is not part of the Code Pénal yet.) I was censored when I explained it. I'm not creating more content for Google, aka Alphabet.
    1
  40.  @craigfrith7024  A look around? Lol
    1
  41. I'm so sorry. Saw a heartwarming video on the channel of a mainstream French news magazine called l'Obs of the CGT-organized demonstration of VACCINATED health care workers in support of their unvaccinated colleagues. All the comments were positive and polite, and praised the demonstrators for their humanity. CGT is a hard left labor union, and has actual communists among the leadership. Shocker, I know. "How far we've fallen."
    1
  42. We live under rabid capitalism, you fool.
    1
  43.  @billwatcheshere  Any of us can click the link to the Australian government website and see for ourselves that AZ was discontinued three weeks ago due to a serious side effect directly attributed to the vaccine: thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (TTS). AZ is no longer in use there, for anyone, for this reason. You are quibbling.
    1
  44. What scares me is that we wouldn't be able to trust them in the event of a truly serious disease. Very few people had more than a 1% chance of death, but what if we were to have a virus with a 20% fatality rate? And a poor vaccine??
    1
  45. Most people will be all right. Don't listen to anyone who claims your life will be shortened; that is nonsense. The problem is that, from everything we are able to glean, the risk-to-benefit ratio for these vaccines was far outside of anything that was considered acceptable for any other vaccine, or any other drug for that matter, since we started keeping records. This is unprecedented. Live super clean. It's not easy, and it's expensive. An anti-inflammatory diet, organic and non-GMO foods, etc., as well as health clubs, yoga, massage, etc., are very expensive. But accept that you very likely need this now. Don't cut corners any more. ;/
    1
  46. Sadly, it is a true statement.
    1
  47. @ravishankarsrivastava2212  I always follow research done outside the US or other English-speaking countries. I'm sure it's not corrupted.
    1
  48.  @ravishankarsrivastava2212  Blocked from feed. Yeesh. Calm down. Target someone else.
    1
  49. I found the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut safety report, English language version. You might want to take a peek, to verify. It is always a good idea to go to primary sources to verify anything a politician says.
    1
  50. That's how you communicate vital information? With clarity? LOL
    1