Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. 7:46 WHAT could possibly be objectionable about THIS??
    1
  2. I found the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut safety report, English language version. You might want to take a peek, to verify. It is always a good idea to go to primary sources to verify anything any politician says. Obvious.
    1
  3. The study wasn't designed to determine the frequency of the syndrome. It was designed to understand the symptoms of those who do indeed have it, to try to find out more about it and to help them. Crazy, I know.
    1
  4. Yes it is, but you can recover from it. It takes a lot of work, like most things of this nature.
    1
  5.  @bevturner2258  What does "completed" mean? Were the animals, mothers and pups, allowed to live out a normal lifespan under observation, or were they all dissected? According to this video, we don't have the data. I find that puzzling.
    1
  6.  @bevturner2258  I would really like to see a real animal test: a mammal with a short lifespan, have young, and watch those young. If some had been kept alive, we'd have a lot of information now. Thanks for writing!
    1
  7.  @bevturner2258  What is your opinion about vaccine safety overall, but especially in pregnant and nursing women?
    1
  8.  @bevturner2258  My feelings exactly. The more I give it thought, the more I realize that my initial desire to get vaccinated was simply because this drug was labeled a vaccine. But I also decided to wait.
    1
  9.  @bevturner2258  Thank so much for your thoughtful posts. Truly heartening.
    1
  10. If there is further evidence that this vaccine is safe and effective, I want it. This seems to me to be the right approach. We cannot ignore the possibility of politicized information, on anyone's part.
    1
  11. You beat me to it.
    1
  12. The irony is that one of the early peer-reviewed studies showed that people with good levels of Vitamin D had fewer side effects from the vaccines and better antibody production. STILL we were being censored when we tried to discuss it.
    1
  13. In the US, almost no one took boosters in 2023. Correlation is not causation; it is a reason to look for indicia of causation. I was suspicious all along of "excess deaths" --- due to COVID included. There is a lot of data that remains unanalyzed, and I don't expect solid answers this decade. This MP gave the best speech I've heard yet --- the most rational. What a relief!!
    1
  14. Full indemnity + full patent protection + little or no funding for compensating the injured = cannot be honest; literally impossible.
    1
  15. Besides, with all the elderly who died in the pandemic, shouldn't excess deaths have declined by mid-2022? See how this analysis is actually pretty hard?
    1
  16. ​ @scottekoontz The data I saw was in the elderly, and only from COVID.
    1
  17. And they are STILL subjecting these comments to sense or ship. WHY?
    1
  18. So then why did he participate in it?
    1
  19. One of the articles (Medical News Today) linked the wrong article to support their claim that there is less cognitive decline in people with good Vitamin A levels, and the error was repeated in the description box. I was wondering how Dr. Campbell made the mistake because he never does.
    1
  20. I'm embarrassed to laugh but I can't help it. Discharge of tension by laughing is often good for you. I like that excuse.
    1
  21. The researchers even published a paper, in preprint. This is all incredible and insane. Of course there are worse experiments we know nothing about.
    1
  22. First of all, no one can confirm that means anything more than the traditional childhood vaccines in use for many generations. As for COVID, Brazil has accepted a lot of non-mRNA vaccines, such as those from China. I agree, though, no child should be obligated to take a vaccine against COVID.
    1
  23. But France made it categorically illegal to ask a minor their vaccine status. France had more resistance than most places.
    1
  24. @gerafinali4384  Still, I have to concede -- this much compliance from the French is appalling. The pro-Atlantist, petit bourgeois mentality has penetrated much too far. Really out of character.
    1
  25. They believe the first primes your body to attack the spike protein, and in rare cases its own tissues. Then when presented with that spike protein again, the risk is higher.
    1
  26. The truth is, that's a good possibility but we don't know yet.
    1
  27. Very thorough examination of this study. Thank you, Dr. John! Everyone should listen to the whole thing, to understand what happened. There were inaccurate, hysterical reports on this case, which serve as a cover for dangerous research ("only conspiracy theorists and illiterates oppose this necessary science").
    1
  28. Read the paper. It's the severity and onset that matter. It's totally plausible, given that people who have had the infection commonly experience it for two to twelve weeks after getting better, even if their COVID was quite mild. WHO does not recommend doing any sort of work-up for "long COVID" before 12 weeks post infection.
    1
  29. Appears to be a higher risk. We don't know for certain, as you can see here. :/
    1
  30. When the first shot has clearly unusual effects, and we KNOW this is a new type of drug shown to have significant side effects in many people, WHY is a second shot given? I'm starting not to believe in innocence.
    1
  31. I followed these links to find a draft copy of the WHO Treaty itself. First, you are correct: at the very start, the WHO Treaty reaffirms individual state sovereignty. But this raises two questions: what does the mean legally, and what does it mean in practice? We would need an international legal expert to answer the first question. In the US, treaties generally have the force of federal law, which preempts state law. We need to know the scope of "sovereignty" in this document. As for the second question, would powerful governments and private NGOs and their foundations have the ability to tell WHO what to recommend, and then would politicians use that as a cover? This time, their recommendations may or may not have saved lives, but trillions in wealth certainly changed pockets.
    1
  32. Don't scare people. We have no reason to be SO pessimistic. He's not pessimistic, nor is Dr. Campbell.
    1
  33. Let's keep our eye on the ball. Who created this virus, how was it released, and why was the world not warned about it immediately?
    1
  34. ​​ @cj-bd3ql  Say. It's not supposed to cripple you. Right?
    1
  35. We need real vaccines, and the effective treatments to be available to all.
    1
  36. Wow, my doctor (now retired), who is not at all a fan of anything "complementary," started testing me a decade ago. There must be a way to get this information.
    1
  37. Will this take as long to admit as Rotherham?
    1
  38. We ALL have got to get on this program! I sort-of knew that. 😢
    1
  39. But read up how Vioxx turned out to be dangerous. How was that uncovered?
    1
  40. Did you listen?
    1
  41. I know that a "nanoparticle" is, generally, three orders of magnitude smaller than a red blood cell. I had concerns when I learned that. I had to verify it several times, I thought it had to be wrong. Someone else look again for me, to check. I can't go through this any more. Mathematics does not lie.
    1
  42. It should also be cheap to compensate properly.
    1
  43. No one is "conflating" the two. Dr. Campbell has called for two things: FIRST, suspend genneral use of mRNA vaccines pending further studies, and SECOND, we need to find out what is causing these deaths. We don't know. Among things we don't know is whether these vaccines are particularly dangerous to those who already had COVID. A lot of young people had COVID and don't know because they were expecting to be very sick and just had a cold.
    1
  44. Read White Coat, Black Hat.
    1
  45. 8:05 Can you show this in any animal, such as the mouse? Its generations are shorter.
    1
  46. Any of us can click the link to the Australian government website and see for ourselves that AZ was discontinued three weeks ago due to a serious side effect attributed directly to the vaccine: thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (TTS), and is no longer in use there, for anyone, for precisely that reason. But blab on.
    1
  47. We SHOULD have political leaders we can trust and who respect our intelligence. But, well . . .
    1
  48. ​ @christopheredwards7846  So consult the pro-vaccine Alliance For Science. Read carefully.
    1
  49. ​​​ @christopheredwards7846  EuroChoices, a journal available at the NIH library (open access): Is the Covid-19 Pandemic a Game Changer in GMO Regulation?
    1
  50.  @briandingle665  EVIDENCE?
    1