Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. More people need to speak with a lawyer. The doctor is not meeting his responsibility to her.
    5
  2. ​@blujay9191 The rate of very serious side effects from the vaccines are at least that high. And most people had no reason to be vaccinated. No real benefit.
    5
  3.  @readtherealanthonyfaucibyr6444  ?? "The" author? Of what? The study is authored by a number of MDs and PhDs.
    5
  4. Most important speech by a politician that I have heard about COVID vaccines.
    5
  5.  @veramae4098  This happened.
    5
  6. Source? How many had COVID and the vaccine, versus the vaccine alone? How many had neither? (I would guess few or none, but that needs to be verified.)
    5
  7. ​@Countcho There are two sexes. Many languages have two genders. Some, like German, have more than two.
    5
  8. ​ @stoutz  THEN YOU CAN'T MANDATE THEM.
    5
  9.  @mabaker  India did distribute ivermectin, against WHO advice. Do we know the result? It would be nice to have an update -- even to say we don't know/confounding variables.
    5
  10.  @melianna999  I doubt that one is representative. People who are ill today are more likely to seek out alternatives to the mainstream allopathic doctor, who has lost their trust. That will skew the numbers.
    5
  11. Check the CDC statistics on maternal mortality rates in the US. Focus in particular on 2020 and 2021.
    5
  12. It was obvious from the start that the initial reaction to the spreading illness was too slow and timid, and then suddenly became hysterical. Horrible period to have lived through. It has most people primed to underestimate or overreact to reports of illness. They trained us to be irrational.
    5
  13.  @Americansikkunt  What rule, with what video? Good screen name for someone who opposes treating the new means of communication as free speech fora.
    5
  14.  @dylanzrim3635  Not exactly wrong. The point is that there is no solid evidence for the chemical imbalance model. Which means it should not have been promoted. Moreover, SSRI appear to benefit some people, above expected placebo effects. We do not know why.
    5
  15.  @JoleneMarie123  Thank goodness it all turned out all right. She must be thrilled.
    5
  16. @splinejones4489  👏👏👏👏👏 You saw this before I did.
    5
  17.  @malvient  Yeah, those people who insisted on full indemnity AND full patent protection, and hiding data, were abject cowards all right. But they made money.
    5
  18. ​ @MR..181  Read the opinion. It's up.
    5
  19. CDC statistics on 2020 and 2021 maternal mortality have been released. I dare not say more.
    5
  20.  @paulafraser-shaw1992  What makes you so sure that good health and good health habits are sufficient to avoid the side effects of a highly reactive vaccine? Why did healthy young men develop myocarditis? Possibly, vitamin D can reduce the risk of such side effects, but that is far from certain.
    5
  21. A qualitative question: In 1976, the rollout of the "swine flu" vaccine was mishandled, and rushed. There were grave warnings about the seriousness of this form of flu, and their were also serious side effects from the vaccine that were relatively rare, but considered important. Fewer than 500 people in total developed Guillain Barre Syndrome that we know of. The vaccine was withdrawn. Why did the system work that time, but not this time?
    5
  22. I did as well, because I read a description on the MIT website of how these mRNA vaccines work. First of all, I had symptoms of COVID in March 2020, and no test was available to me because I had not been outside the country or in close contact with anyone who had been outside the country -- though I had been very close to a known hotspot, and in lots of crowds shopping for groceries in advance of the shutdowns, in one case standing close to a woman who worked in a major hospital. So, I never found out for sure whether I had COVID. Second, after reading the MIT description, I decide to use the J & J vaccine instead. I could not find anyone who was offering it, and then it was pulled for a short time, because it had caused blood clots to the brain. That did it. I started asking questions. Those questions were met with the greatest derision and flat-out hatred that I have ever experienced, and that is saying a lot. Thats when I knew something was very wrong with this picture.
    5
  23. The CDC and the FDA refuse to tell us the true number of serious vaccine injuries. Therefore in the US, we do not know our relative risk/benefit.
    5
  24. I also express my condolences, but please know this is a different disease. The real crime is that no one will investigate what happened to your friend. They will pretend there is no causal connection.
    5
  25. The same people own WHO and the jails.
    5
  26. "I would have thought that [the new law] was true already." My thoughts exactly.
    5
  27. In the US, you could sue. If you lose, you cannot be liable for the other party's court costs or attorney's fees.
    5
  28. Dr. Malhotra is truly a tremendous human being, so brilliant and so kind.
    5
  29. The incompetence of these doctors is not just astounding but frightening. They don't have any idea what they are doing, but they think they know.
    5
  30. Let's hope they don't top it.
    5
  31. ​@destro1989 The data is even stronger on olive oil, salmon, sardines, avocados, pistachios, and walnuts --- and goat cheese in moderation. 😒
    5
  32.  @simonneep8413  You don't know whether the timing is irrelevant. That is exactly the question. It is a well-founded question.
    5
  33. ​ @goforitrazz A LOT of people who had a proven case and recovered were obligated to be vaccinated anyway -- in the US, at any rate.
    5
  34.  @alicewynne8242  Where did I say I "trusted" them? That's right, nowhere. I never did "trust" them. I once specialized in expert witness testimony in the federal system (US), and I never interjected "trust" into the evaluation -- at least not in the sense of blind faith, concerning data or anything else. Peer review does not come close to cross-examination on a particular data set, so it should be treated with more skepticism. Dr. Campbell frequently links to actual studies, and I always look at them. So, "there's no point and nothing will wake them up?" How do you know this and why should I believe you? That's a phrase designed to insulate your views from criticism. Either we are True Believers or we aren't, and "nothing will wake (us) up."
    5
  35. When I have posted the name of the statistical technique that would allow us to unravel the cause of these excess deaths, given that so many things very detrimental to physical and mental health happened all at once, my post is not merely shadowed but censored outright. I'll post the name of the technique separately. EDIT: is to test for sense or ship :) works sometimes . . .
    5
  36.  @karinavizcaya5094  I'm a vegetarian, and make some exceptions for wild-caught fish. I did extensive research prior to the latest fad diet before becoming vegetarian.
    5
  37.  @shotgunkawaii116  It has not yet been established that both types of vaccines have the same safety profile. It is simply not true that we know that "both have the same side effects." We are not clear yet on exactly how risky the mRNA vaccines are -- as the recent German study, which only came out in November 2022, can show you. Lots of people were vaccinated in the US long before anyone knew there was any myocarditis risk.
    5
  38.  @hazmat5118  1. "It's not about perfection" is too broad and vague: that could justify a lot of things that no one should accept. That sort of blather proves too much. 2. We were not informed about the risks and benefits, and stories of injuries were systematically suppressed; a vaccine that cannot protect others but only protects the one who takes it, and only for a matter of months, should not be mandatory. 3. I thought of that early on: if this is indeed the product of an accidental lab leak, we may need a vaccine to overcome it. It seems that recent variants are more transmissible and less lethal, which is exactly how natural viruses evolve, so that seems not to be a risk anymore, but we cannot be sure. The next variant could be much more lethal, just as we sometimes have an unusually lethal strain of flu. People have to admit they do not know what they do not know, and quit pretending they do. Interesting that Fauci suppressed the lab leak theory while insisting that everyone be vaccinated, when the lab leak theory could have furnished another reason to be vaccinated. All I can say is that thank goodness that corona viruses are something we have all encountered, or this would have a far more lethal pandemic. Too much of what happened over the past three years smacks too much of being a dress rehearsal for something worse.
    5
  39.  @hazmat5118  I think that any heart injury to a young person is a very big deal. I suffered one in my 20s, probably from a medication they should not have given me, so I know. Mine was trivial by comparison to myocarditis, and it changed my life.
    5
  40. PLEASE TELL HER TO STAY STRONG. She might want to research a new pediatrician.
    5
  41. What I also find very disconcerting is that there are vaccines that are beneficial for infants and children. How do we combine these with COVID vaccines, according to the doctors pushing this? I know of young teens who were supposed to get their first meningitis shots and got a COVID shot instead, AND had already had COVID and made a full recovery. What is going on?
    5
  42. So well said!
    5
  43.  @kathleenmccollum4040  Great news! Thanks! BMJ reported that vegans, vegetarians, and modified vegetarians (who eat fish) may be at substantially lower risk of severe COVID. DW (Germany) picked up the story right away. American media: silent. Could eating vegetarian for six weeks during vaccination cut down on the side effects, possibly? Has anyone studied that? (Is that a stupid question?)
    5
  44. For all of these stories, if you did not make a report, that is where I have no sympathy anymore. I am appalled by the people who jeer at those who followed medical advice in good faith and took the vaccine. They meant to help everyone. They deserve sympathy and respect. But if they were injured and no one reported it -- sorry. If you felt you should take this and you encouraged others to take it, then failed to report a serious injury, you became part of the problem. Step up and make a report. Otherwise, no one should believe you.
    5
  45. LOL
    4
  46. So sorry! For whatever it may be worth, back when we were in our teens and twenties, everyone I know who developed any serious viral disease -- mononucleosis, hepatitis A, meningitis, pneumonia -- took a full year to feel like themselves, meaning, as if they had never been sick at all. We were young people, and we weren't suffering from a novel virus. Then remember all the people who developed chronic fatigue after a viral illness? I was one, and we were in such despair -- even though it had happened to several of us at the same time. Well, it resolved, for nearly everyone, within a year. I realize we were lucky and that there is no guarantee that will be the case for everyone, but remember, we were told we'd never feel like ourselves again. Within in year, nearly everyone did; within two, everyone was clearly much better. Take good care of yourself! Walk in parks and forests.
    4
  47. What is the biggest surprise in this video? That Congress actually passed a law to declassify information on COVID origins.
    4
  48. This is an outstanding video, with complete references. We need to keep an open mind, with no holds barred whatsoever. It will not do to assume that the vaccines are to blame; it has to be examined honestly. There could be a lot of factors; my first concern after the vaccines were introduced was whether people who had had COVID needed these vaccines, or should have them. No answers. Then, the bullying came. Well, I don't want to make assumptions in response to assumptions. I want to see real gravitas for a change, I want complete honesty. The sheer stress caused by our politicians and public health officials certainly was harmful. Staying indoors for so long was harmful. Those "mitigation" measures may have been worse than the disease for anyone under 40, and a lot of people over 40, 50, 60, . . .
    4
  49.  @TaraSykes3  She is wrong about the law.
    4
  50. This comes as no surprise. Consider how unusual he is, being both obese and housebound. He undoubtedly needs Vitamin D. I hope he will feel like going out more.
    4