Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1.  @denisekoltys3019  So who told you what the kid was trying to do? That you see fit to repeat it? 🤣
    2
  2.  @sketchartist1964  Psst. People will say anything they get paid to say. Have you noticed? 🤣
    2
  3.  @sketchartist1964  SMH. If state schools ignore due process, the taxpayers will be on the hook. Do the math.
    2
  4.  @laertesindeed  Say. I have an idea. Shut up and read the briefs. Your identification of me? I bet you don't even know whether I'm a man or a woman. You don't strike me as too swift on the uptake. You would also benefit from a good book on writing. Style: Ten Lessons In Clarity and Grace is my favorite. Also, Orwell's essay on Politics and the English Language. A must-read.
    2
  5. ​ @cindygreleski5376 Yup, loved it.
    2
  6. Wow is fundraising waaaay too easy for politicians these days.
    2
  7. ​ @Superassassinman15  Don't be jealous.
    2
  8.  @Lauwit  The consequence is always money changing hands.
    2
  9. He was? Now I understand.
    2
  10.  @Baratheon.  Where do you have proof she lied? She failed to answer the question in a substantive way.
    2
  11.  @christ-centeredcrypto  There is a big difference between this case, and the guy (th/s/he/y) who turned out to be a serial suitcase thief. God help us. I see no other solution.
    2
  12. This guy made more sense than any of the Ivy League presidents.
    2
  13. So Depp isn't your darling anymore.
    2
  14. No it's not. We have a Fifth Amendment and a First Amendment. So, she refused to bend. Fine, vote her down. Leave it at that.
    2
  15. ​ @sdilluminatigrandfounder1813  It's all there if you sort by Newest. You saw before you posted.
    2
  16.  @sdilluminatigrandfounder1813  Amazing how different this thread looks under the Newest sort. 😁🤡🌎
    2
  17.  @nikitaw1982  So that's who has them. 😂😂😂
    2
  18.  @totoroben  Cool. Thank you. Agreed across the board.
    2
  19. First of all, Justice Barrett was examining the argument that they should be held guilty in violation of a specific subpart of a specific federal statute, contrary to what this lawyer is arguing. He's trying to get the case overturned. Justice Barrett seems skeptical of his argument. Second, there is no word salad, from anyone. Look at the opening brief if you actually care about what's going on. The first page will tell you.
    2
  20. Thank you for that.
    2
  21. Fictional, of course. I think of the people they assassinated. That's why I respect this lady -- it's obvious no one could get her to do such a thing.
    2
  22. All of the final pool from which they draw the students they will admit are eminently qualified. That's what this fight is really about -- there are far, far fewer seats than there are truly qualified applicants, of any race. Also, you might not be aware of this, but at Harvard, "blacks" are often children of African immigrants or are actually Africans themselves. Children of prominent Africans are often admitted to Harvard, another Ivy, or Oxford, or Cambridge. Congrats on your college career. That's a perfect strategy.
    2
  23. Because some other group wrote a letter? I thought we were against cancel culture.
    2
  24. ​ @chadwalrod795 😂😂😂
    2
  25. The politicians should never influence you either for or against vaccination. Tune them out. They will never give you sound health advice.
    2
  26. The statute has no definition of "near." There have been decades of pro-life rallies held near the Supreme Court, all of which were protected speech and assembly. First Amendment. A lot of people are going after the First Amendment lately. Watch for that move. This one looks like a good-cop, bad-cop routine with one goal in mind, and it's not to help you.
    2
  27.  @christophereverett2353  Who are you talking about? Jack Phillips, the Christian baker in Colorado? There was a ruling against him recently, for refusing to create a birthday cake for a transgender woman celebrating her "rebirth" after her transition. It is currently on appeal, I believe.
    2
  28.  @yolandabrinkman2653  There is no general "hate crimes" law. Who told you there was?
    2
  29.  @DeadPresidents408  False. Every intelligent person does.
    2
  30. I think it's worse. I think she really doesn't know. She didn't expect to have to know.
    2
  31.  @verityveracity6704  If that's true, OMG. More money changed hands?
    2
  32. The purpose of the deficit is to juice the stock market.
    2
  33.  @magnump.i.7700  Too much information. (We know you always start with yourself.)
    2
  34.  @barbaraculy121  Oh, mob justice? Your favorite flavor. Too bad your mobs are soooo old.
    2
  35.  @giganoob1968  Fundraising for these Congressional clowns has become too easy. You'll have more show trials, less governance, while they up the ante on surveillance and support for war.
    2
  36. Except that we didn't fight a civil war to eliminate racial discrimination.
    2
  37.  @obediahpolkinghorniii564  Look up the articles, which predate the controversy and the pandemic. It will be up to independent experts to decide on the scope and limits of the term "gain-of-function" within the meaning of the regulation, and then determine whether it applies to the facts. Or, you could just let the government office that is under scrutiny swear they didn't violate any regulations. I don't care anymore. I'm emigrating by 2025 at the latest. I don't understand your wager. I only know the attacks on me have been nonstop. So. Who cares?
    2
  38. Yes, and there are easily 1000 students who did exactly that for every one seat at an Ivy League school. What do you think this debate is about? I'd love to know how many veterans over the age of 25 they admit. How about the decorated ones, who really distinguished themselves? That would increase black and Latino enrollment right there, as well as contribute to diversity.
    2
  39. I disagree. They can vote as they like, every time. They have her posts, so they know. I admire her refusal to answer these questions BECAUSE it is a First Amendment issue. So let them vote her down. I like backbone. So, vote her down. Why do you want her to bend as well??
    2
  40. For a second, I thought of the president, lol.
    2
  41. Why are set-theoretic replies hidden from view?
    2
  42. Yes she will.
    2
  43. Oh now I get it. The letter was from a group with MORE MONEY than the groups that then got investigated and banned. Silly me. That took way too long.
    2
  44. 1. No sympathy lost for Dershowitz. I truly dislike him. 2. All of his points are very well taken. 💯
    2
  45. Seth Waxman is very likely the best lawyer for Supreme Court arguments that America has. He was Solicitor General and is friends with all the Justices.
    1
  46. ​ @TheRoxinatoR  Which cases are you referring to?
    1
  47. @MattSlash-di4oy  Did you read the Colorado Supreme Court opinion, and the one US Supreme Court case on the subject?
    1
  48.  @MattSlash-di4oy  Most of it, yeah. Not all of it yet. It is quite complex, actually. I'm a lawyer. It's what I do.
    1
  49.  @AdrianneJH  Which opinion are you referencing?
    1
  50. @roxinator69  I didn't say you did. I know he has not been. Did he make an appearance as intervenor in either trial court?
    1