Comments by "doveton sturdee" (@dovetonsturdee7033) on "History Debunked"
channel.
-
526
-
469
-
339
-
330
-
322
-
227
-
211
-
185
-
170
-
163
-
153
-
143
-
138
-
131
-
116
-
110
-
Actually, the Bengal Famine had a number of causes, among which were the number of refugees from Japanese held areas, the inability to import food from those same areas, harvest failures, stockpiling by hoarders and even the Bengal administration, which tried to minimise knowledge of the crisis. The worst that could be said of Churchill was that he should have known what was taking place, but didn't. After all, in 1943, he had little else to occupy his time!
You could also add the refusal of FDR to allow the transfer of merchant shipping, by the way. What is without dispute, except by those who choose to blame Churchill for everything since the Black Death, is that once he did find out, he transferred food distribution to the British Indian Army, and had grain convoys diverted from Australia to India.
The reality is, of course, that certain people have an agenda. Churchill is widely regarded as the greatest Briton for centuries. If he can be brought down by the indoctrination which has replaced education, then every other dead old white man can receive the same treatment.
110
-
Great news! The northern city of Preston is to have a megamosque built in Broughton. Locals did oppose it, as Broughton has few Moslems there (yet), but first Preston Council decided to sanction the construction, then an appeal by the local council and the people who actually live there was, as expected, rejected by what passes for the current government, in the form of one Lucy Frazer, minister of state for housing and planning, on behalf of the awful Michael Gove.
A friend who lives in the area said to me that, in Preston, what Moslems want, Moslems get. How true this is I do not know, as I am fortunate enough to live just south of Preston, but it seems that the opposition to the building was almost immediately rejected on grounds of Rac... I needn't complete the word, need I?
109
-
I recall the days when MPs were much as you describe. Labour tended to get many of theirs from the a union background in industry, whereas the Tories tended to be from senior management in industry or the military. There were, of course, a number of lawyers in both sides. Even when they disagreed, they were able to understand where each other's views originated, and there were many friendships across the political divide. Tony Benn and Enoch Powell being one of the most notable.
Now, politics seems simply to be a lucrative career. Get a PPE degree, become a political advisor, then find a safe seat. Onward and upward, without the least knowledge of the real world. Indeed, for many, it seems merely a matter of convenience which of the major parties they join, as their decisions are not driven by principle, but merely by potrential profit.
Rather depressing, isn't it?
97
-
90
-
86
-
84
-
84
-
82
-
75
-
69
-
69
-
67
-
65
-
64
-
60
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
43