Comments by "doveton sturdee" (@dovetonsturdee7033) on "History Debunked"
channel.
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
@jimmycampbell78 With the First Past the Post electoral system, the number of seats in the Commons is as follows, with the bracketed number being what it might have been, based on the percentages of those who bothered to vote, and ignoring the rest:-
Labour 411 (219) Conservative 121 (154) LibDem 72 (79)
Reform 5 (93) Green 4 (42).
This is what happens when a system designed to cater for two parties, Tory/Liberal and later Tory/Labour, remains in place when politics, and the number of parties, becomes more complex.
Of course, in the past, the Tories, similarly, have benefitted from this outmoded method, but as early signs suggest that the 2024 General Election may well be the last, isn't it ironic that a party which dropped some half a million votes between 2019 & 2024 should become so all-powerful?
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
@HistoryDenied I didn't suggest that it did. However, are you trying to argue that, when slavery was widespread at the time, the English/British should have refrained from the practise? It was, and to a degree still is, endemic in Africa.
Moreover, compared to the Ottoman Empire and Portugal, the British were mere amateurs. They were, however, among the first to condemn and abolish it.
Alas, you are naively trying to impose 21st century values on people from an earlier time. Would you, for example, condemn Marcus Aurelius for not introducing Old Age Pensions into the Roman Empire?
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12