Comments by "Glamdolly" (@glamdolly30) on "COURT TV" channel.

  1. I agree the parents knew their precious mommy's boy wouldn't survive prison - another inmate would surely have attacked the evil little runt. So they helped him escape justice. They helped mould him to be that scumbag narcissist who abused then strangled his girlfriend to death. They have Gabby's blood on their hands too.
    6
  2. Vinnie is 100% correct, Baldwin's talking the talk but not walking the walk. If he really cared about cooperating over this tragic death that he played a central role in causing (albeit unintentionally), he would be saying "I've cooperated fully from day one - I even handed my phone to investigators long ago". But he's not saying that. He's claiming the moral high ground and saying he's helping investigators, but hasn't surrendered his phone and is making investigators work to get hold of it. There has to have been a middle ground, whereby he restricted the phone data he gave them to the day in question - or even possibly including a day or two either side of the tragedy. Had he done that, I think we'd all be more willing to respect his claims. Instead his position is clearly one of protecting his own ass as priority.
    6
  3. Yep, forget hairdo - that's a hair don't! Crazy is nuttier than squirrel shit. And he's going to Hell via death row, as all nasty domestic abusers should. He's giving the jury an action replay of what his poor girlfriend and children were on the receiving end of, behind four walls and a locked door where they couldn't get help. If his surviving, traumatised 11 year old son is made to face him in court it will be an outrage. The justice system should protect all victims of crime, but especially child ones.
    6
  4. I think that's a huge smoking gun to Read's guilt. She saw him laying under 4 inches of snow from the back of the car, but the driver and front seat passenger didn't? Then she's hysterical and says "Did I hit him?" That's pretty much a confession.
    6
  5. Agreed poor Suzanne - she would have given her life for those two selfish daughters. Sadly by being too giving, she raised two narcissistic adults, who turned out just like their father. Their disloyalty to their murdered Mom, and deluded loyalty to the monster who killed her, their dad, is horrific to witness.
    6
  6. Lately we are hearing hints that all is not well within the Adelson family - cracks have appeared in the relationship between Wendi and her parents and brother, as she distances herself from them, terrified of following Charlie and Donna to prison. Imagine how angry Charlie must feel at his little sister, the spoiled family princess he will now die behind bars for, all because he was good enough to 'eliminate her problem', at their mother's urging? Ditto Donna, furious that her only daughter, who she stuck her neck out for, plotting her hated ex husband's murder, now barely visits or talks to her. I bet Donna and husband Harvey hardly see their grandsons either, because Wendi is so terrified of visiting them or being seen to be close with them - and then being judged guilty by association. Is it possible Charlie and Donna could be so angry at taking the fall for Wendi, they decide to take her down with them - either now or at a later date? After all, the eldest son Rob Adelson is fully estranged from the family and may give evidence for the state at his mother's imminent murder trial. So this family has a history of explosive fall outs - and of turning on each other! The plot thickens...
    6
  7. Police should have caught the killer within a fortnight - 4 weeks, tops. Because of their shocking failure, there is doubt over Richard Allen's guilt. Police messed up, big time.
    6
  8. High time Dan's ex wife Wendi Adelson was jailed - her narcissism and entitlement on the stand were sickening. How tragic the two sons he loved so much, have been raised by his evil killers.
    6
  9.  @MedusaxXx_  Precisely! That particular commentator keeps repeating the same, obvious point about it being the defendant's right to quiz his 11-year-old son. Clearly it is his right, we are well aware of that - that's why he's able to do it! The point is, he shouldn't be allowed to do it to a child. Laws can be amended - and in the interests of child protection, that one certainly needs to be! This video's comments show many people are appalled that a murder defendant's rights outweigh the right of a child not to be terrorised and traumatised as part of due process. I hope this murder trial will prompt a big public debate about child witnesses in serious criminal trials, and what can be done to better protect them. People parroting 'It's his right/It's the US Constitution', like that means it can never change, are ridiculous.Amendments can be made to the Constitution through a democratic process. If bad laws could never be changed, America would still have slavery!
    6
  10.  @SkinnyRob  You talk about emotion as if it automatically correlates to a lack of logic or judgement. That is a false assumption. Without emotion, man is nothing, and laws mean nothing. There is emotion behind every single great human achievement since time began my friend! It's a fundamental mistake to despise emotion. Emotion is the life blood of human civilisation and human advancement. There is a big question mark over this man's mental health, and that's one aspect of public concern over his being allowed to represent himself - with all the privileges that affords him. Human beings usually prioritise the safety and well being of children above every other consideration, and that is strongly reflected in the laws of every civilised society. That convention has sadly fallen through the cracks in this case, due to the priority the law gives to the rights of the accused and the legal presumption of innocence. While that presumption of innocence is a crucial cornerstone of every decent judicial system, many people feel that should not come at the detriment of children. Ronnie O' Neal's child has paid a heavy price for his father's presumption of innocence. I think the law should be slightly amended in this area, to satisfy both the defendant's rights and the rights of children not to be brought into direct contact with an adult charged with harming them. In my view O' Neal's assisting defence attorney could have put his questions to the child. My objection - and many others' objection - is that the child was forced by the existing system to interact directly with the accused. Who knows what additional psychological harm that could do to an 11-year-old, who is just starting to heal 3 years after his father murdered his mother and sister in front of him, and attempted to stab him to death. This is about as extreme a case of domestic violence as you'll find. Child psychologists in the UK have confirmed re-living a crime like that in court can be just as disturbing to a young mind as experiencing it was. And what more powerful and distressing way to take a child back to that event in his/her mind, than to make them speak with the murderer - even over Zoom - and hear his voice. As adults, we may struggle to empathise with that experience. But it's an experience that child will likely carry with them for the rest of their days, along with the crime itself. Last year the Scottish Parliament passed new legislation specifically to protect children from courtroom encounters like this one. It means that any child witness or victim in a serious crime case, will now give pre-recorded video evidence ahead of the trial, which will be played to the jury. The defendant's questions will be put to the child by a lawyer, during that pre-recorded evidence. This change in the law will not in my view compromise any defendant's rights, but will spare children the unnecessary trauma of a direct interaction with the defendant. The law of any country cannot be set in stone and unchanging. The law must be an organic thing, subject to amendment to reflect the ever changing values and morality of every society. If it were not subject to change, America would still have slavery! I hope we will see an amendment in the US law, to prevent any other child from the additional, courtroom injustice this child has undoubtedly suffered.
    6
  11.  @lesliepropheter5040  This thread - and video - is about Lori Vallow's niece and ex-wife of Brandon Boudreaux, Melani Pawlowski - it seems you are talking about Melanie Gibb, the friend of Lori Vallow. The names are the same but spelled differently!
    6
  12. Nah, Smollett is never moving on from this car crash, he doesn't have the talent or star quality. We all saw how dislikable he is, and now we know he's a lousy actor too, he's finished! Couldn't happen to a more deserving narcissitic prick!
    6
  13. Are you serious? That's the lesson you learned from this outrage? What planet are you on. And how's that lobotomy working out for you, lol!
    6
  14. Yep - the scumbag's silence throughout the trial spoke volumes. He did it and thank God he didn't get away with it as he expected to.
    6
  15. Sementelli sure lives up to her name in this nasty episode!
    6
  16. Allen contacted the authorities and admitted he was 'Bridge Guy' (there at the crime scene, on the bridge, at the relevant time, wearing the exact same clothes), within days of the 2017 murders. The witnesses present only ever saw one male suspect. Who else do you think it could be??? Richard Allen is the Delphi killer. Unfortunately police messed up big time, they should have arrested and charged him within two weeks of the murders when he first came forward, not five years later. And if they had, we wouldn't be having this conversation now - everyone would accept he's the killer. Unfortunately all the police mistakes under the bumbling, inexperienced Supt Doug Carter, have allowed conspiracy theories to thrive. And obviously Allen's defence team will exploit those police errors to the max, to get their guy off. But the evidence of his guilt is compelling. I sure hope the jury doesn't have any gullible people on it.
    6
  17.  @SkybabyandStar  Nothing 'selfish' about choosing to be child-free. What's selfish is having children and not raising them right. Not raising them right does not only mean abusing or neglecting them. It also means over-indulging them, and not setting down clear boundaries for good, respectful behaviour which will make them decent citizens. Sadly some middle-class parents are wilfully deluded about a disturbed child, and don't want to admit there's a problem with them and get them the professional psychiatric help they need. I bet there were many red flags in Chandler's behaviour as he was growing up. But the parents didn't want to think there was anything wrong with their son, and thought they could 'fix' him with love and support. Wrong! If you fail to set boundaries for your child, sooner or later society will. Chandler will spend the rest of his wasted life in jail - costing the taxpayer a fortune, as did his farcical trial. Bart and Krista are tragic victims. But they also failed as parents and played a key role in putting a dangerously dysfunctional man into society. Their part in this horrific crime cannot be ignored!
    6
  18.  @NavajoSunBeauty  Lord yes - sad to say a ton of police failings in that case, How Lori Vallow and her equally psycho brother Alex cos weren't arrested after they murdered her husband Charles I will never know. And as a direct result of that failing, two children - Lori's daughter Tylee and adopted son JJ - and Tammy Daybell, were also murdered by them! As a police officer, that case must really frustrate you?
    6
  19. Yep, divorce would lose Lori and Chad their breadwinner spouses (both Tammy Daybell and Charles Vallow worked hard to pay all the bills and ensure neither Chad nor Lori had to work), plus half the marital property and assets. But murdering them would not only wipe out the 50/50 division of marital assets in a divorce settlement and have each of them inherit the lot, they stood to get very wealthy indeed from each spouse's substantial life insurance policy. Lori knew she was the sole, named beneficiary of Charles' $1 million insurance payout ('was' being the crucial word, as unbeknown to her he had secretly switched the recipient to his sister Kay Woodcock, so she wouldn't get a penny). And Chad kept adding to the premium on wife Tammy's policy in the months before her murder, meaning he received a staggering $430,000, which he collected within days of her death (he had an imminent beach wedding to pay for, after all). They killed Lori's children JJ and Tylee to enjoy a hedonistic, child-free marriage, and to keep receiving monthly benefits cash for both kids. I guess with JJ's father Charles murdered, and Tylee's dad Joseph also conveniently deceased, they thought no one would notice the children's permanent absence. I believe there was also an element of revenge on JJ's grandma Kay Woodcock, who had received the $1 million Lori was sure would be hers. Helped by brother Alex, she had killed Charles to get her hands on that cash, so in her warped mind she had earned it! Murdering Kay's beloved grandson JJ, rather than simply allowing her to take custody of him, was payback for the million dollars. But it seems Lori never banked on Kay and husband Larry contacting police when JJ's phone and FaceTime calls abruptly stopped, and they could no longer get hold of her. How sad that no one initially noticed Tylee's absence or reported it. It was only through JJ's reported disappearance that police realised his 16 year old sister was also missing. I guess in time her brother Colby would have raised the alarm (he was suspicious that texts purporting to have been sent by her, did not use her typical writing style). It is chilling to contemplate how lonely and vulnerable both Tylee and JJ were, in the last sad weeks of their lives. Tylee couldn't rely on her increasingly hostile and absent mother Lori, who was totally wrapped up in her married lover Chad Daybell (who unsurprisingly, Tylee loathed). She had not been able to maintain any friendships with kids her own age, thanks to her mother making her happiness a very low priority and constantly uprooting her from homes and schools. Her father Joseph died in mysterious circumstances in April 2018, and just over a year later her Uncle Alex murdered her loving stepfather Charles, who was her last potential protector. JJ too was very isolated after his dad Charles' murder. Just 2 months after losing him forever, Lori had his big sister Tylee murdered. JJ's two closest relatives were taken from him without warning or explanation. Then a strange man called Chad Daybell, appeared out of nowhere as a new 'father figure' - one who hated and disciplined him. After learning JJ's grandma Kay received Charles' $1 million life insurance payout, money she had assumed would be hers, a vengeful Lori stopped JJ's contact with her and his grandpa Larry. The two weeks between Tylee's murder and JJ's, must have been Hell for the little boy. Lori had long since stopped giving him the autism drugs that helped regulate his moods. And in yet another act of maternal betrayal, she got rid of his faithful service dog, Bailey, the Golden Doodle his dad Charles had got him as a best friend. Bailey immediately loved JJ and helped him to sleep through the night. Incredibly Lori tried to sell him to make herself a fast $2,500 dollars. A worker from the charity that had originally provided Bailey, spotted the advertisement and recognised Lori's fulsome descriptions of the wonderful service dog. She was forced to surrender him back to the charity, and he is now the beloved dog of another autistic boy. Bailey's loss must have been yet another terrible blow for JJ. No wonder he was 'acting out', as the babysitter said in her evidence today. Thanks to his evil mother, Uncle Alex and Chad Daybell, JJ's whole world collapsed around him in the last weeks of his short life. A few days before he was murdered, Lori belatedly told him his dad Charles was dead. Why tell him at all, when her plans to kill him too, were so close? The little boy was so devastated, he refused to believe it. His school teachers recalled he was inconsolable at the loss of his daddy. Charles was a wonderful father. Lori clearly hadn't given a moment's thought to the affect murdering Charles would have on his vulnerable little boy. But why would she? The child she had raised as her son from a baby, and who loved her as his mother, was clearly totally expendable in her eyes. A mother who would sacrifice her children for a man and money, is no mother at all. Yes Lori was influenced by the evil, manipulative Chad Daybell, and he fully deserves the death/life sentence that's coming to him - ditto Alex Cox, who through death, cheated justice. But Lori was the mother of two of her victims. It's hard to imagine a more heinous, despicable betrayal.
    6
  20. If he was remembering what happened, he was enjoying it - the entire purpose of his farcical not guilty plea was to have a full jury trial, at which he got to re-live his disgusting violence against the two people who loved him most in the world. The only time during the entire trial he showed any emotion was when his college room mate/boyfriend took the stand. That was purely selfish, because they can never be together after what he did. This freak cares about nobody but himself. He must have been highly dangerous for many years, it's tragic his parents didn't realise and get him psychiatric help.
    6
  21. Thanks for giving us a sneak peek at the bullshit the Defence will try on the jury. Thank God for Smartphones - the video evidence is damning - it's hard for any decent person to watch. Derek Chauvin sadistically and totally unnecessarily knelt on a man's neck for almost 9 minutes, ignoring the repeated pleas of a police colleague and the public, to desist. An elite athlete in peak physical condition could not have survived that horrific ordeal! The Defense will exploit any drugs in Floyd's system as their best hope of getting their cop client off a murder charge. I hope a smart, non racist jury sees through their victim-blaming. Derek Chauvin is a dangerous man, who has clearly got away with so much brutality over the years, it has emboldened him to believe he can get away with murder. That world-renowned pathologist Dr Cyril Wecht turned down the big bucks thrown at him by the Defense to bad mouth the victim, speaks volumes about the honourable man he is.
    6
  22. No sympathy for the dealers, but let's have some truth here. Matthew Perry was a grown man, who had umpteen fabulous opportunities open to him that most people only dream of. He chose drugs. $55,000 blown on that crap. He was not a gullible teen - he knew exactly what he was doing, and what he was risking. His squalid end was predictable, and entirely of his own making. No one 'took advantage' of the multi-millionaire star. He had free will, and immense power. Choices, my friends, choices.
    5
  23.  @anotherfishinthesea8660  Yep and he is banging out that begging bowl very aggressively these days - is he losing viewers?! 🤔🤔🤔
    5
  24. Charlie isn't half as good an actor as he thought!
    5
  25. I'm sure the bungling police - whose bodycam showed they misidentified Brian Laundrie as victim and Gabby as villain, and after he murdered her let him go on the run - will HATE Dog showing them up! Good luck to the Dogman, I hope he hunts that scumbag woman-killer down and brings him in - after giving the coward to good ass-wooping.
    5
  26. I kinda wish he had agreed, then turned on the Defense on the witness stand and showed the jury exactly why this was murder!
    5
  27.  @ThePrincessnady1  Thank you, I was waiting for exactly that predictable comment - and it took 45 minutes to arrive! You missed the point. If gun ownership worked, every female would carry one, and thousands of stalkers, killers, rapists etc, just like Gareth Pursehouse, would have been shot dead and taken out of society by their victim. How great that would be. But sadly it just does not happen. Even if Amie had carried a gun, she was taken by surprise inside her home and overpowered by a 6ft 4ins maniac twice her weight and strength. Chances are he would either have disarmed her, or turned the weapon on her. She had bought pepper spray to defend herself - no idea if she was carrying it when attacked, but if so she didn't use it. Alone, she had no chance against that monster. I wish guns kept good people alive, and annihilated the bad ones. But this and countless other murders prove they simply don't. Year after year, guns prove useless against killers like Gareth Purseglove.
    5
  28.  @Skitdora2010  Yes, Propokovitz got a fair trial and thankfully a jury smart enough to navigate a mostly circumstantial case, and recognise its power. Sadly some juries aren't up to the job, and lack the critical thinking skills to handle anything but a case with a ton of forensic evidence. Kudos to this jury, they delivered the right verdict. I hope this trial shows people circumstantial evidence IS evidence, and can be just as compelling of guilt as forensics. James Propokovitz didn't get away with murder as he assumed he had. After 8 years, the wife he abused and killed finally got justice. He will die in jail as he deserves to, and I hope all the people whose hearts he broke with his callous crime can now start the long road to healing.
    5
  29. 'Such a shame'. Is news anchor guy kidding??!!
    5
  30. Hold your horses - she hasn't been acquitted yet, and it's far from a done deal she will be!
    5
  31. Just as much domestic violence, violent crime and child abuse in the 'eighties, but it took longer to catch the perpetrators then without DNA technology, cellphones, CCTV and computers. Think I'll stick with today thanks - it's much harder for the scumbags to get away with it!
    5
  32.  @scovyaporsha777  Yep, poor kid. It's really unfortunate he was named after his psycho father too, I hope he can change his name if he wants to.
    5
  33. Actually Baldwin absolutely DID come forward and 'act devastated' because I don't doubt he was devastated. He didn't deliberately set out to kill that woman! Whatever he is, he's not a monster. How would you feel if you were unintentionally responsible for another human being's death? And what's more, a likeable, popular human being you were friends with? I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy. But obviously Alec Baldwin is a controversial/unpopular figure for some, because of his politics and 'take no prisoners' attitude. The question here is not about intent, but negligence and recklessness. I think it's pretty rich of Alec Baldwin to suggest he's only being held accountable because he is wealthy. HE pulled the trigger, and HE was a producer on the movie, so at least partly responsible for the almighty F-up which put a loaded gun into his hand. There are rumours of cost-cutting on the film, which put its cast and crew under unacceptable pressures and possibly played a critical role in the tragedy. For the sake of the young woman who lost her life, and for ALL movie sets in which a death like this should never be possible, there must be a full and frank investigation and the person/people responsible held to account.
    5
  34. No way - all the DA stated were FACTS, and very few of them! She was absolutely firm on shutting down any details of the case until trial. The Wests have a defense lawyer trying every trick in the book for his guilty clients - same as wife killer Barry Morphew hired aggressive attorneys. Please God we will see long awaited justice this year in both murder trials.
    5
  35. Yep - Karma's coming for that scumbag Curtis Reeves, he got away with NOTHING. He'll find out. Revenge is a dish best served cold - and boy is it coming for the evil ex-cop.
    5
  36. Agreed, I see no evidence of psychosis in the murder video, sheriff is cool, calm and fully in control throughout. It's plainly obvious the sheriff and the judge were both involved in the sex scandal and corruption generally.
    5
  37. @ Excellent point! The defense would have made a big song and dance about their client's height not matching 'Bridge Guy', if in fact that were the case. But the fact is, Richard Allen and 'Bridge Guy' are one and the same person - as Richard Allen and his attorneys have always known full well. He even confessed to that fact!
    5
  38.  @wuncieadams1352  Exactly. Aside from the fact her story is a bunch of bull that makes no logical sense, it's a totally different story to the one she told police in her first interrogation 4 years ago. Back then she made no mention of being afraid of him, or being a domestic violence victim. She just kept saying 'It wasn't intentional' over and over, thinking that would get her off the hook! She's not the victim here. she's the perpetrator and needs to be locked up for public safety. What else is she capable of? I hope her 14 year old son is free of her toxic presence for many, many decades to come.
    5
  39. If my husband text me to say he shot a racoon dead I would divorce him! It's a disgusting, disturbing thing to do. And yes, sadistic murderers usually started out attacking animals who have no voice, and no power. They find they enjoy causing suffering, it's a perverted power trip for them. Soon animals aren't enough - they want human victims. I think Chad will have all kinds of shady things in his past.
    5
  40. Only the evil and ignorant rejoice. Decent people worldwide are disgusted at this appalling miscarriage of justice. I can't put in writing what I hope to see happen to murderer Curtis Reeves. But I'm 100% content that karma is coming for that sub-human piece of excrement.
    5
  41. What kind of world has Chad Oulson's little girl been born into, where her daddy can be shot dead on a date night with her mom, and his killer walks away without serving a single day in jail???
    5
  42. I'm especially worried about Melanie Boudreaux's kids - she should not be allowed unsupervised access with them, after her close links with child killers Auntie Lori and Uncle Alex.
    5
  43. 1:00 Her BROTHER was 'mysteriously shot dead'? No - Lori Daybell-Vallow's brother Alex shot her husband Charles Vallow dead last summer (Lori lured Charles to her home where her brother lay in wait with a loaded gun - the motive was largely money, Lori expected to pick up $1 million from Charles' life insurance but later discovered he had changed the beneficiary to his sister!) Alex is also believed to have murdered Lori's children (his niece and nephew) on her instructions, JJ and Tylee were murdered a few months later, 2 weeks apart in September 2019. Alex was apparently his sister Lori's personal hitman. I wish these professional commentators would get the facts right!
    5
  44. Agreed, Gary gave Melody a life of wealth and luxury through his talent and hard work, and she treated him like dirt, using him as a cash cow and flaunting her affairs in his face. Today we see the monster she is and always was, so greedy she killed him to take his entire $4.5 million estate. She broke her children's hearts too, a wicked individual.
    5
  45.  @Jennifermcintyre  Agreed - Unbelievable incompetence!
    5
  46. She has shown zero remorse or sadness for her heinous child cruelty, so I'm not sure why there is the possibility of parole. However, on the plus side she is 22 so will not be released before the age of 62. By that time she cannot produce any more innocent babies. In the UK she would be out in 10 years, tops!
    5
  47.  @squarehammer4619  Glad it made you smile, I just made it up - yes, I really am that brilliant, lol!
    5
  48. Apparently the child will give evidence and be questioned over Zoom not in court. But I agree, he is eleven years old and should not have to interact with his would-be killer, and the killer of his mom and sister, directly even over Zoom. I hope the justice system is sensitive enough to all victims of crime, but especially child victims, to prevent that interaction between victim and perpetrator from taking place. The defendant should be replaced by a defense lawyer at that point IMO.
    5
  49. Having seen the defendant's ugly aggression and arrogance on police bodycam, it's not surprising the women in his life were suicide cases. He's a woman abuser and he killed his wife, no question.
    5
  50. Tylee was a smart girl, becoming a young woman. She saw right through that big fat fake Chad Daybell - unlike Lori, she wasn't taken in by his pseudo-prophet garbage. I'll bet she told her stupid, deluded mother exactly what she thought of him. And surprise, surprise, soon after, Chad branded her 'Dark' and a 'Zombie'. Chad Daybell is a narcissist who demands to be placed on a pedestal, he would not tolerate Tylee's disrespect. Tylee's position was already vulnerable once Chad Daybell was on the scene, because she had seen and heard too much and had all the dirt on her mother's and his crimes. She saw what really happened to her stepfather Charles Vallow - he walked into that house unarmed and unsuspecting, to take son JJ to breakfast, and he was ambushed and shot dead by her Uncle Alex. It was murder - by a convicted felon who had done prison time for assaulting his sister's previous husband Joseph Ryan. The baseball bat/self defence story her mom and uncle coached her to tell police, was pure fiction. Poor Tylee likely witnessed the whole murder. Charles had loved her like a daughter, and remained supportive of her after her mother's adulterous affair and toxic, deluded conduct went off the chart. Charles had purchased Tylee's jeep for her - the same jeep Alex used in the first attempted shooting murder of Tammy Daybell, and the failed attempt on Brandon Boudreaux's life, after both Charles and Tylee's violent deaths. Charles was Tylee's last surviving protector, after her father Joseph Ryan's suspicious death just over a year earlier. With Charles dead, Tylee was pretty much alone, and desperately vulnerable. I think she knew it. She had no one to turn to. Most girls of 16 can rely on their mom for support. Tylee could not - Lori only had eyes and ears for Chad Daybell. Tylee tried speaking to her grandpa in the last weeks of her life, but her pleas for a private talk went unheeded. I think she was frightened of the energy in her home - and she was right to be. Because the same vile energy that killed her stepdad Charles (and I suspect her father Joseph in 2018), would soon destroy her and JJ. Sweet Tylee must have been the loneliest girl in the world.
    5