Comments by "Glamdolly" (@glamdolly30) on "COURT TV" channel.

  1. Bad enough Debbie Collier chose this tragic end, and her family must live with that tragedy. But how much worse, that for a time, they were under widespread suspicion of harming her. This family deserves to be left in peace to find their way through this tragedy. My heart goes out to them. Debbie's light shone from photos of her, she was clearly a beautiful and much loved soul. So much sadness in this world - let's try to put our arms around each other, before we reach for each other's throats! God bless the Collier family.
    5
  2. That would attract ghouls, who would visit the house to see where the four victims died so horrifically, and re-live their knife murders. That would not be respectful to them or their loved-ones. It is a real life tragedy, not a theme park! A peaceful memorial garden on the site where the crime scene once stood is appropriate and will be a respectful solution. I am certain local residents can't wait to see that building demolished - it's a constant reminder of the cowardly crime.
    5
  3. I feel for everyone who loves and mourns the four murdered students, cut down on the brink of their adult lives, with so much promise - now forever unfulfilled. But my heart especially goes out to their mothers and fathers. Every loving parent's first and lifelong concern is keeping their children safe. Imagine steering your beloved kids successfully through their vulnerable baby and childhood years, only for an knife-wielding monster to invade their home, and slaughter them in their beds when they've only just become adults. Kaylee Goncalves' father Steve is entitled to be outspoken - on her behalf, and for her friends, all viciously murdered by a coward. Mr Goncalves makes an important point - if Kohberger is the killer, his background as a Criminology student suggests he will enjoy the notoriety of his crime. He must not be allowed to write books or profit in any way - be it financial or fame - from ending those four young lives. Kohberger is a fan of serial killer Dennis Rader, another twisted egomaniac, and so narcissistic he gave himself the title 'BTK'. These murders are a total outrage. There will be huge public interest in seeing the killer get justice in October.
    5
  4. She's a lousy actress - but we'll see genuine concern on her face when the jury declares unanimous GUILTY verdicts!
    5
  5. Judge is great, no nonsense, 100% focused and professional, and bang on the money with her pronouncements.
    5
  6.  @melmac685  Yep, he'd worked it out and thought he'd escape justice because he'd found such a clever way of destroying his wife's body in those works chemical sludge pools (there's a reason she left her dentures behind in the house - as her husband said, no teeth would be found to identify her). Respect to the two senior detectives who gave evidence. They knew in their gut Propokovitz killed Victoria, just as her children knew it. And they worked damned hard to provide sufficient evidence to prove it to a jury. Justice for a cruelly abused and murdered wife was a long time coming, but after 8 years it finally came. Propokovitz will die in jail as he deserves. His girlfriend already paid a far worse price for the role she played in his murder cover up - her suicide in custody last year. It's high time Jim started paying for his sins!
    5
  7. I'm angry at Maddie's vile, neglectful mother who enabled her rape and murder, and the system that failed to get a heinously abused child out of a highly dysfunctional and dangerous home. There will always be vile, perverted paedophiles like Stefan Sterns around, hiding in plain sight looking for opportunities to abuse vulnerable children - its up to parents, primarily, but also other relatives, teachers, doctors, counsellors etc, to be gatekeepers protecting minors from such men. Maddie's maternal grandmother hated Stefan Sterns - why wasn't she able to save her from him?
    5
  8. Yes, it was a heartfelt and eloquent speech. Gary's brother did him proud - they were clearly close siblings. What a terrible way to lose him. I believe it was only too obvious to family members who knew them well, that Melody had murdered Gary. Even her youngest daughter Amanda, who supported her mother, knew in her heart she had killed her father. I pray for her sake she faces the sad truth, as it will help her to heal and move on from this tragedy. How sad Gary didn't complete the divorce proceedings he launched against Melody years ago, it would have saved his life. With her usual deviousness, Melody locked herself in her bedroom for several days, so that Gary could not serve the divorce papers on her. She didn't love him, she just didn't want to lose her meal ticket.
    5
  9. Vinnie Politan's intro - Yes it was likely Alex Cox attempting to kill Tammy Daybell that day on her driveway, with a gun. But what VP failed to add, is he was allegedly making that attempt on Tammy's life, in cahoots with Tammy's husband - THE ACCUSED, CHAD DAYBELL. That is crucial information, and crucial context in this specific murder trial, in which the defendant is victim Tammy's husband Chad Daybell. It never ceases to amaze me how bad hard news reporters like Vinnie Politan (and other so called journalists), are, at reporting precise and accurate facts in true crime cases like this one. More to the point, many are entirely incapable of presenting facts in their proper, relevant context - the obvious context here being Alex working with Chad. As a British, NCTJ qualified national newspaper journalist and TV producer I say - Up your game and get your damn act together Vinnie & Co! The Lori Vallow/Chad Daybell murders are a complex murder case, involving at least FOUR homicide victims, and at least three defendants (one of them, Alex Cox, deceased). So accuracy, context and intelligent, insightful analysis by the broadcast/print professionals reporting it, is absolutely crucial.
    5
  10. Thank you for taking the time to write such a powerful and authentic account of this infamous domestic abuse case - and your very personal perspective and insights on the subject. I'm so sorry to hear of your childhood suffering, due to your abusive father. As you demonstrate, being an abuse survivor can give you highly developed empathy and a radar for the silent suffering and vulnerabilities of others, which I have no doubt you possess in spades. That's why you have called this situation so accurately, and correctly identified that the real domestic abuse victim is not Amber Heard but Johnny Depp. I believe anyone who has had the misfortune to be on the receiving end of narcissistic abuse, is likely to recognise it in Amber Heard's independently reported abusive (and in her general) behaviour. Victimhood is a favourite assumed identity of covert narcissists. Covert narcs are the most dangerous variety of narcissist IMO, as they can be very plausible and exploit a false victim status to great effect in order to wield power over others. They are control freaks who seek to possess their intimate partner, and resent sharing them with others. For the narcissistic Amber Heard, marrying superstar Johnny Depp was a trophy. But as a narcissist at the extreme end of the spectrum, she would/could not adapt to the limitations his VIP status inevitably put on her exclusive access to him. An obvious example of this was her rage that her physical and emotional abuses were frequently witnessed (and thwarted), by the intervention one of his security staff. According to psychologists, a classic tactic of narcissistic abusers is to isolate the victim from their family and friends to maximum their personal control - something Heard couldn't achieve with Depp whose status required a large number of staff pretty much 24-7. Thankfully these staff afforded him some protection from her assaults, helped him to physically escape her when she was kicking off at him, and would ultimately be invaluable witnesses to his abuse by her. As you probably know, Depp grew up with a mother who was physically and emotionally abusive to him and his 3 siblings (as the youngest, he undoubtedly suffered her wrath the most). His coping mechanism was to flee when he sensed his mother's rage building - he said her kids all knew to 'get out of the way' before something came flying at you - a fist, a kick or a flying telephone. They were copying their father's example, as he too tried to get away whenever their mom physically assaulted him, never retaliating (Depp said he twice witnessed his dad punch a wall in frustration, breaking his hand on one occasion). This is exactly the strategy Depp used with Amber Heard, taking evasive action as her anger built - typically locking himself in the bathroom, sleeping in one of his neighbouring apartments, or if they were travelling, escaping to another hotel room that had been booked especially for that purpose. Clearly this is not the default reaction to conflict of an abuser, but a victim. We've heard on the audio tapes that SHE secretly recorded, how verbally aggressive, belligerent and insulting she was with him at such times, knowing exactly how to inflict the worst emotional pain by calling him a lousy father to his kids, or a quote:"Fat, washed up actor". Her professional jealousy of Depp's success was frequently obvious in her verbal tirades. Again this is a narcissistic abuser's usual M.O., designed to erode the victim's confidence and self esteem, and heighten their own status. I believe Johnny Depp's traumatic, insecure childhood helped to make him a fantastic actor, as it equipped him with heightened empathy - the hallmark of the greatest stars, as empathy lets them access the authentic emotions and reactions of the characters they play. Unfortunately however, childhood abuse has many more negative repercussions for its adult survivors, one of which can be their subconscious attraction to abusers in romantic relationships. People may not know why they go through life with a series of broken relationships behind them. They are repeating old, familiar habits - namely doomed relationships with 'bad news' people like their abusive parent/parents! I hope when Depp has won this trial he will take some time out to see a great psychotherapist and work through the reasons he chose Amber Heard and even agreed to marry her after experiencing several serious incidents of abuse by her. At 58 he does not have a successful romantic track record behind him. As he approaches his 'golden years', it would be sad if that pattern of volatile, failed relationships were to continue.
    5
  11.  @adriannedelacy2100  I'm sure that's ALL it was - a straw, and the typical blustering we see from defense attorneys with guilty clients. This is the 'phoney war' - Let's see how convincingly Trezell and Jacqueline West's defence holds up in their jury trial!
    5
  12. Exactly right! Some murders don't have a motive that makes sense to a non-psychopath! It's good to read an intelligent comment here, along with the predictable "I don't think he did it", and "the cops framed him" bullcrap you always read on murder cases. I just hope those idiots never get to sit on a jury!
    5
  13. I'm British and never made a movie. But as a former TV producer I fail to understand why real, functioning guns were fired on set at all. In these days of CGI, dummy replica guns could be used (authentic to the historic period), and the sound of the shot/s and even gun smoke added on in post production. Safety should always be the first and last consideration above all others! In 2021 when this tragedy occurred I would not have believed a tragedy like this possible. I doubt the victim, an experienced movie director would either. It's beyond dumb! Whatever the outcome for Alec Baldwin or anyone else involved, I hope this woman's totally needless, violent death will ensure a similar disaster can never happen on a movie (or TV) set ever again.
    5
  14. Now that is a distinct possibility. I don't believe the victim in this case was so innocent, but nor do I believe the Sheriff was squeaky clean. May have been a lot of mutual finger pointing going on, which culminated in murder. Sheriff's big mistake was doing it on camera - had he ambushed the judge after dark outside his home, he may have got away with it. The list of suspects would be long!
    5
  15. Of course Durst's guilty, who else killed them??!!
    5
  16. Kelly's a lousy reporter sadly, and it's doubtful she'll improve. She can't tell a clear narrative, was vague, misleading and even inaccurate (she actually said Alex Cox killed Charles Vallow 'in self defence', when it's accepted Cox ambushed and murdered the unarmed Vallow when he entered Lori's home to collect JJ for an access visit). Repeating a killer's lies as though they are accepted truth, is appalling journalism!
    5
  17.  @kevinhornbuckle  Oh dear God - is there no end to the obstacles this woman places before justice? Poor Jorge - his agonising murder exploited for a money-spinning book, no doubt benefiting his killer in multiple ways. Shame on that attorney - he clearly came to Boone's aid at the 11th hour in bad faith, with ulterior motives. Sickening.
    5
  18. Yeah well we already know Derek Chauvin is a coward and a bully. He bullied police colleagues into letting him abuse the public with impunity. And that kind of bad behaviour, unchecked, escalates. One day he went too far and killed a man - because yet again, his colleagues were intimidated by him into not confronting his disgusting, bullying, abusive conduct. Please God Chauvin finally gets justice and his rampage is stopped - but how tragic that a man had to DIE a horrible death, for it to finally happen!
    5
  19. Amen. I was glad to hear that traumatised little boy has been adopted by one of the detectives who investigated the murders. It's the first time he's lived in a family free of his father's abuse. I just wish his beautiful mom has been able to escape that evil father, with him and his sister. O' Neal had a long history of domestic violence and she had called cops on him many times. Women who wind up with dangerous men need help to survive them. It is only by huge luck that Ronnie O' Neal didn't succeed in killing both children, along with their mother. Thank God that little boy survived to tell the truth and contradict his scumbag father's lie that his mother had killed his sister and tried to kill him. O' Neil is trying to escape the death penalty with the lie that his girlfriend killed their daughter and stabbed their son, and he killed her in self defence. As if! The jury will not buy it - he's headed to death row. I think it's wrong the defendant gets to interrogate a child witness like this, even over Zoom. It is unacceptable.. Just hearing his dad and would-be murderer's voice could seriously traumatise that child and set back his recovery. The defendant could write down his questions, for a defense attorney to ask them. The law needs to change, to protect child victims of crime.
    5
  20.  @dianaprince3176  I'm not American and as my posts make clear, I understand US defendants' right to represent themselves and cross examine witnesses - even minors, as in this case. I thought my point was clear, but as you didn't understand it I'm happy to explain it for you again: I don't believe that right for defendants in serious crimes like murder/rape to directly question witnesses, should extend to children. YouTube comments on the case suggest many people are outraged on this little boy's behalf. I hope this murder trial prompts sufficient public anger to start a national debate about child witnesses, that leads to greater legal protections for them. In my view the US justice system is weighted too far in favour of the defendant, to the detriment of its most vulnerable victims, minors. Ronnie O' Neal should not have been able to directly quiz his 11-year-old son and victim, about the ordeal he and his murdered mother and sister suffered at his hands. Additional psychological harm could be done to that child, in having to once again face his father and would-be murderer (even over Zoom), and revisit that life-changing horror. This is about as bad as domestic violence cases get. Ronnie O' Neal killed his 9 year old disabled daughter with repeated axe blows to her face, head and neck, witnessed by his then 8 year old son. He chased his fleeing girlfriend with a rifle, shooting at her as she ran to a neighbour's house for help. When the gun jammed, he beat the mother of his children to death on the front doorstep, the impacts breaking the rifle into pieces. He then returned home and stabbed his son so viciously, when emergency services arrived his intestines were hanging out. The boy also suffered burns when O' Neal set fire to the house. No justice system is perfect but as a journalist I can vouch child witnesses/victims are better protected and prioritised in British courts. Last year the Scottish Parliament passed the 'Vulnerable Witnesses Act'. It ruled in the most serious crimes, young people under 18 do not appear in court live, either in person or remotely, as this little boy did. Instead, minors pre-record their evidence in advance of the trial, and it is played to the jury. The new law, modelled on the Scandinavian legal system, means children don't have to face the accused in court or be cross examined. Psychologists recognise that giving evidence in court re-traumatises a child and can be almost as distressing as the crime itself. The laws of a country are not set in stone, and nor should they be. They should be organic and evolve with the changing culture and values, to reflect modern morality. Most people watching this alleged domestic killer quiz his son will feel revulsion. That gut instinct kicks in when a situation just isn't right - and in many people's eyes, doing this to a child is very wrong. The drama that played out in that courtroom this week reflected very badly on American justice. It can and should do much better than that!
    5
  21.  @dianaprince3176  I don't believe the defendant's rights should be violated - I believe the assumption of innocence is a cornerstone of any fair and effective judicial system. But in just about every field of human endeavour the rights of the child trump every other consideration. That has not happened in this murder trail - because of the defendant's legal rights - and that has created a strange and unacceptable situation, as reflected in the many comments here condemning it. That you have no comprehension of why so many are offended at the sight of a domestic murder suspect quizzing the child he is charged with attempting to murder, speaks volumes about you! I'm a journalist and the US legal system while different to the UK's, shares many fundamental principles with ours. If you'd understood my earlier comments, you'd have appreciated I was arguing for the law to be amended in one specific area relating to child victims/witnesses, as recently happened in Scotland. No defendant could claim they had not received a fair trial, if that minor change to protect children was implemented correctly. They could still put questions to the child, just not directly. We haven't had any retrial here as a result of the change - no reasonable person would conclude a trial was not fair because the defendant didn't address the child in person! But the fact you use Emojis and call people 'Karen' confirms your understanding of sophisticated concepts is extremely limited! Your aggressive posts to myself and others are weird and inappropriate. I think your problem is you're just smart enough to know you're not very smart. And that's a real tragedy for you. Keep communicating in Emoji, that's clearly your level!
    5
  22.  @Jinka1950  Lol! I reckon you hit on their Facebook passwords - 'Slim Pickings' for him, and 'Fat Chance' for her!
    5
  23.  @BernadetteAnne907  I don't write a comment without knowing/researching the most basic facts on the subject, as the original poster did here. Does that answer your question?! 🙄
    5
  24.  @DixxonYass  Are you Vinnie's producer?! 🤣
    5
  25. Yes 100% agree, bless that little boy's brave heart! I hear the 11 year old will give evidence over Zoom and not have to face the defendant in court. That's good but even so, I hope the defendant won't be permitted to address the child directly over Zoom - a real attorney should step in and do it. It would be so traumatising for that child to even hear that creep's voice again after what he did!
    5
  26. Ronnie O' Neal is a narcissistic, grandiose clown - the king of nothing and nowhere! May the spirits of the innocents he so brutally murdered visit him in his nightmares!
    5
  27. All will be revealed at trial and it will no doubt be proved beyond a reasonable doubt by a compelling combination of forensic and circumstantial evidence. That the prosecution are sure the boys were murdered way back in September, three months before they were reported missing, is in itself damning. It shows there is no proof of life for Cincere and Classic, beyond September 2020 - no photos of them, no sightings of them by friends, family, neighbours, no attendance at playschools or even on local CCTV etc etc. Police will have trawled hours and hours of CCTV and found a point at which the West family outings no longer feature their two youngest adopted children. That alone is a big clue to the date of the murders! The allegation they were murdered in September shows they died when the Wests were living at their previous Bakersfield address NOT the house from which Trezell West claimed they both wandered out of a gate as he was collecting firewood (a likely story!) Forensic experts will have examined that previous Bakersfield address in detail, and likely found evidence of violence/foul play, eg trace amounts of the childrens' blood after a clean up by their killers. No doubt the house move itself - which prosecutors believe occurred after the murders - was an attempt to escape justice. The trial will also feature evidence from the older four children living in the West family home. The indictment document is in the public domain, and it tells some of the story. It alleges the Wests ordered the older children to participate in acts of violence against the two, now (allegedly) deceased youngest children. It also alleges the Wests threatened witnesses not to give evidence against them - very likely, those four children. If Trezell and Jacqueline West are innocent, they should be confident and welcoming this trial, when they can prove it - not standing in court in matching grey pyjamas looking like terrified rabbits caught in the headlights! Let them have their 'day in court' and give evidence in their own defence, if they can prove the kids went missing from their yard - or were ever living at that new address - they have no problem!
    5
  28.  @bluegeorgia8922  Yep, an inadequate. cowardly woman-and-child-killing jerk, jerking around. That sums up Mr Angry pretty neatly! I don't believe in the death penalty as a rule, but sub-human scum who terrorise and kill women and children who love and trust them, deserve a long drop on a short rope. And a big audience to watch their final humiliation. If the scrawny loser is going to maintain that level of rage throughout, he'll be down to 50 lbs by the end of the trial!
    5
  29.  @nicoleloves9483  He totally did it alone. He had his parents' big house all to himself to 'deal with' their bodies (he repeatedly told his girlfriend not to come over/limited her time there, so he could finish what he euphemistically called 'his chores'). But like so many killers, he was over confident. Detectives and the forensic crime labs they use can pick up the tiniest speck of blood proving he location of the murder scene and the killer's connection to it. Who else could have killed and dismembered them in their own home but the son who lived with them? It's frankly ludicrous this 24 year old man is denying it. But he has nothing to lose, and no doubt enjoys all the attention he's getting at his double murder trial. He's secretly proud of what he did to his parents. There's no remorse or emotion from him when photos are shown in court of his parents' body parts. He shot them in the back then chopped them up - because they were about to uncover his many lies about himself and his life. He's not a man, but a man-child. He didn't want to grow up, leave home, earn his own money or be a man, as his elder brother had. He's an evil, entitled, cowardly freak, and the sooner he's locked up with bigger psychopaths, the better! Chandler Halderson killed the two people in the world who loved him deeply, and would have supported him no matter what. Who gives a damn about him now they're gone, and he killed them both so cruelly? He has a very lonely life ahead of him.
    4
  30. True - the Innocence Project has lost all credibility backing this wife and child killer. Anyone unfamiliar with the details of this notorious family annihilation by Scott Peterson, should check out Matt Orchard's superb video.
    4
  31. It's a bloody outrage!
    4
  32. Richard Allen came forward to the authorities right from the start and confessed to being 'Bridge Guy', ie the man in Libby's videos. He confirmed he was there at the crime scene/on the Monon Bridge at the exact same date and time as the murders, and wearing the same clothes. No other man was seen there that day by any of the witnesses - not one! It could only have been Richard Allen who stalked, abducted and murdered those two children.
    4
  33. Not every jury is fit for purpose, and not every verdict is deserving of respect. This was a clear miscarriage of justice by a jury who failed to do their duty and administer justice. History will record it as such, and shame them. And Curtis Reeves will get what's coming to him, one way or the other. If he's a God fearing man as he claims, he will know that - 'Thou shalt not kill'. But of course he doesn't give a damn about the Bible, or any morality but his own totally self-serving one. He'll learn the hard way.
    4
  34. 39:18 Were those pornographic drawings made by Maddie, as stated in this report? Others have said in the comments her killer Stefan Sterns made those sketches. If that is the case, @CourtTV got it very wrong and should post a correction here in the video description or comments. I feel those drawings are far more likely to be the work of a paedophile/child sex killer, than his young victim.
    4
  35. Off Topic - Chandley Painter lost a lost of weight, and it doesn't suit her face! I hope she isn't ill, and doesn't have an eating disorder - as so many women in the public eye do.
    4
  36.  @PeriwinkleSunrise  Thank you, I will be glued to this murder trial!
    4
  37. Amen, people who get into still-warm sheets with a new partner are asking for trouble. This girlfriend was just damned unlucky her lover's wife was prepared to use a knife. Horrific.
    4
  38. Exactly, Brian Laundrie cheated justice with his suicide - it's important he is correctly identified as the murderer who strangled Gabby Petito to death, dumped her body in the wilderness and stole her van and cash to get himself safely home to Mommy & Daddy. He and the parents who harboured him and refused to speak to Gabby's desperate family as they searched for her, deserve no sympathy whatsoever! They are scum who beget scum. I hope their son's evil crime haunts them for the rest of their miserable lives.
    4
  39. Yep, I reckon he did it too - look at his body language in court. That is not an innocent man, wrongly accused. He's guilty AF! I reckon one victim was the target due to a grudge, the others were killed as witnesses. Should be an interesting trial.
    4
  40.  @turntableone4356  No he doesn't! At 5:08 this pathologist effectively states that cop Derek Chauvin committed murder, by kneeling on George Floyd's neck for almost 9 minutes without any justification whatsoever. He says Floyd could have been equally well restrained in a sitting position, which would not have killed him - clearly that is not the Defense view! It is a mystery why the Defense asked this man to speak on behalf of their client, the cop - presumably they planned to throw money at him, thinking he could be bought. It's good to know they were wrong - Dr Cyril Wecht is one of the world's top pathologists, he believes it was murder, and he cannot be bought.
    4
  41. Excellent special report by Court TV. One by one, the Adelsons are falling like dominoes - first Charlie, who will die behind bars, next his mother Donna, the controlling spider at the centre of this family web, whose murder trial starts next week (she's done). And the really intriguing question now - has Wendi been clever enough to avoid prison for her role in her ex husband Dan Markel's murder? I agree with the final panel, Wendi Adelson's played a much smarter game than both her mother and her brother. But let's not forget, Wendi was the golden child in that family. The main reason she's escaped prosecution to date, is that her parents and older brother actively protected her, and kept her at arm's length from their grubby murder plot. However with Charlie's murder conviction and now Donna's prosecution, it seems cracks are appearing in their relationship with Wendi, the family princess. No doubt terrified of prison, Wendi is keeping her formerly close family at arm's length. Having done so much for her, Charlie and Donna are likely enraged. They may now be turning on Wendi. Could there be a third-act twist in this tale - will the Adelson family try to take Wendi down with them? The murder of Dan Markel was all about Wendi, first and foremost - and a family so massively egotistical they believed they could literally kill him, and get away with it. Wendi is involved in this crime up to her neck - she knew about it, and she endorsed it. Dan would be alive today, if his ex wife had wanted him that way. Wendi didn't want Dan alive, because he was beating her in the child custody courts and thwarting her having full control over their two kids - and by extension, full control over her life, and her family's lives. Interesting that we heard in this report prosecutors recently had a closed door meeting with Wendi's eldest brother Rob Adelson, long estranged from the Adelson family. Could he be called as a state witness at his mother Donna's imminent murder trial? His evidence would be dynamite, and keenly anticipated by the media. What is his insider take on the twisted family dynamics that got his former brother-in-law Dan Markel killed? We can be sure prosecutors are working hard behind the scenes to nail Wendi Adelson. An old girlfriend of Wendi's is talking to them, and spilling the beans about her in closed meetings. It's safe to assume she and Wendi are no longer friends! Like Wendi, Harvey Adelson, the family patriarch, has also been named as a conspirator in the murder for hire of Dan Markel. Could he be next to face a jury trial? This show will run and run.
    4
  42. Very good point!
    4
  43.  @lisas8244  LMFAO!!! I just mentioned this point to you in another thread! I'm dying to get a look at this guy now, I'm imagining a guy with movie star looks - but he'll probably be some scrawny geek she thinks is hot!
    4
  44.  @yvonnehill7223  ...Or the beer-holder! 🤣🤣🤣
    4
  45. They can't take swabs from the wounds for animal saliva, to prove/disprove a dog attack???
    4
  46. That arrogant scumbag Brett Huck thought Misty was nothing, so unimportant that he could murder her and get away with it. How fantastic to see the shock on his face at the guilty verdict. Sure wiped the smirk off his face! Wonderful that the dog Misty bought for Huck as a puppy, helped to get her justice. That dog was a hero, he deserved a treat after the guilty verdict. But I doubt the killer's horrible family saw it that way. I pray they didn't take it out on the dog afterwards. This was clearly a case of like father like son. Brett Huck's father Michael, a convicted felon, turned up to support him in court. He raised a narcissist with no respect for females. The result is a young woman brutally lost her life, and his son will spend the whole of his, in a maximum security prison - till the day he's carried out in a body bag. Nice parenting, dad!
    4
  47.  @Bramattjo  Defence is the British spelling - Defense the American.
    4
  48. Utterly sickening when you consider the specific context and timing of this phone call. Letecia Stauch had murdered husband Al's much-loved 11-year-old child Gannon two weeks earlier, stabbing him 18 times, fracturing his skull with a heavy object, and shooting him three times with a firearm, the final bullet shattering his jaw and spine. That evil PoS made absolutely sure Gannon was dead! She then shoved his brutalised corpse into a suitcase and dumped it out in the February snow. Incredibly while he was missing, she visited his remains several times (unseen by idiot police, who should have been tailing her). Finally she took the body on a morbid,10 hour road trip across country, and hurled it off a freeway bridge. She gave sweet, innocent Gannon the most violent and squalid death possible. To hear her weeping and wailing for herself, as she tells Al Stauch a pack of lies, witters on about 'Immunity', and shows she cares only about saving her own neck, is totally enraging! This woman put far too much elaborate planning and forethought into that poor child's murder and the subsequent cover-up, for her to successfully plead 'Insanity'! It's crystal clear she knew right from wrong when she killed Gannon - because she poured so much effort into getting away with the crime, before, during and after. She's not mad - just BAD to the bone.
    4
  49.  @Rossi4040  I know nothing about this judge, so I'm intrigued by some of the very specific criticisms of her in this thread. I passionately disagree with her ruling to ban all broadcast media from Richard Allen's imminent murder trial. In my view it is an especially flawed and dangerous decision, when Indiana Police have run such a secretive - and fundamentally flawed - murder investigation throughout, resulting in the suspect not being apprehended for a staggering FIVE YEARS. If Allen is the guilty man as I believe from victim Libby's Smartphone video, and indeed his own, early admission to authorities he is 'Bridge Guy' within a week of the crime, then banning the media from the courtroom only potentially weakens the prosecution case against him and jeopardises justice.
    4
  50. ​ @AliceWilson-w9m  Richard Allen approached the authorities soon after the murders in February 2017 and pretty much confessed to being 'Bridge Guy', ie the man recorded following the girls across the bridge on Liberty German's Smartphone video. There's no question it's him - he said so himself! Allen stated he was at the trails/crime scene at the exact same time as the incident, confirmed he crossed the bridge, and even said he was wearing the same clothes seen on the man in the video. He was obviously panicked that video of him, as well as witness sightings, would identify him, and decided to 'get in front' of the story by putting himself forward as a witness, not the killer, and acting innocent. The chances of Allen being at the trails at the time of the murders, wearing the same outfit, as the suspect, and being recorded following the victims across the bridge (it's clearly him) - and NOT being the killer - are close to zero. I don't believe you have your facts right. Hopefully more reliable and detailed information about the case than is currently being peddled online, will emerge at trial. Sadly the bungled police investigation - and its crazy over-emphasis on secrecy - has inevitably allowed all kinds of misinformation and even elaborate conspiracy theories to fill the information void. It has also understandably weakened public faith that the guilty man has been charged. I'm confident had an experienced and competent team of detectives been running the show from the start, Richard Allen would have been arrested and charged within two weeks of the murders. If he had, there would be far less opportunity for the armchair detectives, naysayers and conspiracy theorists to make merry with the case. Senior police responsible for the severely flawed murder investigation, chiefly Supt Doug Carter, should be held fully accountable for their mistakes when the trial is concluded. Thanks to them, a highly dangerous man has walked free for five years. But the additional and prolonged suffering their incompetence has caused Libby and Abby's loved ones, is unforgivable.
    4