Comments by "Hasan Al-habbobi" (@hasanal-habbobi4018) on "carwow" channel.

  1. Hamza Ahmed *in the opposite direction e63 estate destorys the utter crap of the rs6. It is light years more advanced in technology, has far more feautres and is more luxurious and comfortable with a miles better looking interior too. Not to mention its faster than the rs6 in acceleration! So yes its supercar like performance. Audi is outdated and behind!
    6
  2. jamviator that is total bs. You are a toxic BMW fanboy. By your own logic BMW have to bring out competition package and cs version to stay relevant/competitive. According to your own logic. So cut the double standards. These cars are equally matched.
    6
  3. Mark Wright and id have the e63s ;)
    6
  4. ECHLN its not about power. Its about power to weight ratio. Even though m5 is less powerful its also lighter so it can make up for it. So your arguement is totally flawed.
    6
  5. xIVIx Yes you did say that.... When you say... "Just different lights and lengths" then thats exactly what you are implying. Less effort? The heck would you know about effort. Looks are subjective. So just because you don't like it doesn't make it a bad design. In fact this year the c e and s have been selling incredibly well. So the market has spoken loud and clear. People love the new designs. Its still fun. Especially the Amg versions. They are still unique designs especially the interior as I just explained before. Theh are not generic. They are elegant classy and beautiful. Huge difference. The older ones were way to edgy and boxy. The new ones are much more rounded elegant and classy and far better looking. "Design language " is not overused. Its a timeless phrase. If each car is completely different then their is no identity for the company. So there has to be a use of effective design language. Only the c class and e class look similar while still being very much distinguishable. Every other Mercedes is significantly different looking from the outside. You have to be blind to not tell the difference. Yes you can tell them apart. The a class is significantly smaller for starters and no where near as wide. Furthermore its diffusers are completely different to that of the cls.
    6
  6. It doesn't look ugly. Its not the best looking car but that doesnt make it ugly. It looks nice and simple... Like a modern version of the mcleran f1 or clk gtr. By your logic then the f1, clk gt r and noble look ugly since they share some similarities in design langauge.
    6
  7. Soulx CrusherX no problem dude I love bmw too I just want us as car enthusiasts to respect all cars and what they bring to the table even if we don't necessarly like them!
    6
  8. Buhnanafone Youtube you guys are crazy. You would complain no matter what they did. Its a facelift. If they had done the dual screens then you would complain that the designers were lazy and just copied the a class. Plus a class is going to be getting a sedan so you guys would complain why buy a c class instead of an a class if it has the same interior. This interior is unique for the c class and sets it apart a lot from the rest of the Mercedes line. And its a great design which makes the screen looks like its floating which is really nice especially now that its wider and more frameless making it look more modern.
    6
  9. Jank Paul hell no, nissan gtr fanboys are the most toxic fanbase in the car world.
    6
  10. AntiLag BoostAddiction lmao in your freaking dreams. Dragsters do 0-100kmph in 1.8 seconds. Wayyyyyy quicker than the Nisan. The Dragsters make the nissan look like its standing still! You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.
    6
  11. colt1998 they are not glued screen by your logic then BMW and Volvo have cheap looking tablet screens
    6
  12. ehem what!? Best interior?! man that must be a joke!
    5
  13. Goot naw I love the rear, it looks like it's a concept car but it's actually the real deal!
    5
  14. *****​​ lmao 'crap', porshe fanboy alert!!! "Can't touch" Yes it can, just like it did last time!
    5
  15. I completely disagree - in person its amazing and it looks like its floating which makes it look really nice as opposed to being stuck onto the dash board. i think tho that if it were bigger maybe more people would like it.
    5
  16. *****​ I don't think it looks cheap. Small maybe. I think if they made it bigger people would change their minds. I sat in it in person however and it was actually good.
    5
  17. Mondo Music lmao rx f is a fat unsersteering pig, it sucks at lap times and looks hiduous from the front. Go look at bmw m4 which slaps the rx f or theredline reviews c63 which recos the Lexus Lfa is great car but ridiculously overpriced... For that kind of meiney you would rather get a Lamborghini aventsdor or Ferrari f12 or mcleran 675lt Gs f has ugly looking front with that weird grill and can't compete or be fun to drive as Germans as many reviews point out, see miter trends review if it be the Cadillac even the american car beat the japanese! FAIL!
    5
  18. Sheesh​​ haha OK much more fair argument now Well that's part of Mercedes' appeal. They have luxurious and elegant interiors and for those who want luxury combined with sportyness there is the amg line. I myself admittedly am a merc fanboy for this very reason along with the fact I grew up with the car which my dad owned. In my view Mercedes with its amg arm blends luxury elgance comfort and sportyness the best. Having said that tho I don't let my fanboy ness get in the way of my appreciation for the other German masterpieces. I am a big time beemer porshe and Audi lover. For example I like m3 over c class sedan for example especially the legendary e46 m3 👌. Actually you would be surprised there are beemer girls tho yes probably more merc girls! But the point is that Luxury and sport see no age. It's for anyone who is enthusiastic about it or enjoys it I am perfectly OK with people liking other cars over mercedes... I am not OK with stereotypes and fanboyism and hatred. As car enthusiasts we should learn to appreciate all cars in general rather than fight like rats about them That's why I am against people always calling merc old mans car or bmw cars without blinkers. They are just over exaggerated stereotypes that create unnecessary hatred in the car community
    5
  19. TAXI is Sexy
    5
  20. ahmed amjad lmao you haven't proven anything except how stupid you are!
    5
  21. I couldn't disagree more, I think it looks the best of the bunch, its the most elegant and has the best interior too. And the c63s really looks bad ass!
    5
  22. Cheok Zi Hin​ exactly that argument is old itself ironically. You don't need to be old, you just need to have a bit of cash... Name one BMW that can even touch the amg gt r for example? None ! The Old man's car bs is long gone.
    5
  23. Jeppe Werring no its not, of course their will inevitably be some plastic, but its hidden and hard to find, and not noticeable unless your are nit picking and doing a spot check around the whole interior car and even then there aren't that many believe it or not, same goes for the other 3. The quality of the seats and the wood trim finish of the c class is superb! I have sat in almost all these cars so I know! It made feel like I was cocooned in luxury, absolutely amazing!
    5
  24. No it isn't. S class is still the king of luxury in this segment despite the fact it came 4 years before the a8. That's how good it is.
    5
  25. Vlogging Kid if you're blind.
    5
  26. Patriots Legend expensive to maintain? Sure. But they are reliable if you take care of them.
    5
  27. Fanboys everywhere! Its gonna be a close race.
    5
  28. No it wouldn't have. This is a vantage not a corolla or Prius. The Aston is Largly about noise... That's part of its character. Just like the last one.... Which is why there was even a v12 version.
    5
  29. Definitely not.
    5
  30. Kushal Betgov says the biased BMW fanboy/nutsack ironically. "F off" After you! You hypocritical butthurt snowflake!
    5
  31. S7667 Forever let me fix that for you Rs6<E63s
    5
  32. +Claudiu S. So they can take another extra year to beat the Merc? This m5 is already over a year newer. Before this video you guys were non stop talking about how the m5 would beat the e63s. Now even when reality has spoken it looks like you haven't learned you yet and say oh oh competition package will win lmao. by the time the cp version comes out the e63s will be two years old. Furthermore this e63s is meant to compete with standard m5. the s for mercedes is just a naming convention for 4wd and more power and trim differences. The E63 S 4matic+ w/performance package will compete with the m5 cp. BMW fanboys you think it's more fair to compare the 571 hp E63 with the 600 hp M5? The M5 has 29 more hp, weighs 200 kg less and is 0,2 seconds faster to 60 mph than the E63. There is no question about which one is the fastest. The M5's real competitor is the E63 S. Both are claimed to do 0-60 in 3,4 seconds, and despite the fact that the E63 S has 12 more hp than the M5, the M5 is 200 kg lighter so it should be a fair match So Quit fanboying. Both these cars are equally impressive beats.
    5
  33. Tom you're blind if you mistaken this for a cls. Period. Only the front is similar to a cls. That's it. Everything else is vastly different. And the reason they do this is for brand identity and image.... Specifically... The a class will be coming as a sedan which will replace the cla. The cla is like a baby cls....hence the similarity. Its not copy and paste. Its using similar design language. Huge difference.
    5
  34. xIVIx then you are literally blind. They are not the same car in different lengths... They are similar not the same. And Yes while they share similar design language they are very much distinguishable from each other. If you couldn't already tell by the massive size difference the s class (especially the face lift) looks completely different from the e and c. S class has three curve headlights, e class 2 curve headlights and c class single curve headlights respectively. S class also has a COMPLETLY different front grill. And each class has completely different front and rear diffusers as well. The s class has 3 taillights while the c and e have 2 taillights. Not to mention the s class has more defined and pronounced depth, body lines and proportions and also has a lot more chrome trim too. And the interiors are significantly different. S class dashboard surroundeds the screens in leather. C class is a floating screen that looks completely different. And e class is a combination of the two which makes sense since its inbetween the c and s... Hence it has the cengre console of the c class and dashboard of the s class however with the screens sticking out more. They are not soulless. You are. Their souls are full of elegance and luxury and have the perfect balance of classy and moderneess to them. Older c class and e class looked absolutely hidious and outdated interior wise and their outsides were far too boxy. These designs are far more elegant. And by sharing similar body language they strengthen brand image and identity. And even though they share similar design language they are still distinguishable in their own respect... Especially interior wise. And frankly there is abosolutly nothing wrong with this design philosophy as sales suggest. Nearly every single manufacturer does this one way or another....by your logic then we can say 5 series is a mini 7 series.... A4 is an a6 just with different lights and shorter length. And these cars are not meant to be flashy... They are meant to be under the radar.... Hence the concept of stealth wealth. So by sharing similar design language.... They are able to blend in better. Furthermore.... This makes sense when you think about it from the perspective of a customer.... Let's say someone is in the market to buy the e class but they don't like the exterior design of the e class but love the c class's exterior design. As a result of this that person may be compeled to go for the c class... And give up the e class and its better interior, and all the additional features and technology it has..... If not go for a different company altogether. So by giving the similar good looking design that person won't have to give up the better interior etc and will still get the design they like. So its a win win for both the customer and the company. So actually its far better than the old ones. New c e s and cls are significantly better than there old predecessors. The old ones look outdated already let alone next to the new ones.
    5
  35. xIVIx Yes you have your opinion just like I have mine. Sure..... most sold car doesn't mean its the most beautiful car. You are twisting what I said. What I mean is that the design overall improved from the last generation otherwise far fewer people would buy it. And yes the new Camry is gorgeous. Absolutely not. The pillars are different from each other furthermore when you look at a car you're not focusing on just the pillars but rather looking at the car as a whole from that angle. And each car has completely different proportions. Whether you like it or not... is an opinion yes (all be it a narrow minded one because face it... No matter what design they would have come out with you would still complain... This happens with almost every new car.... People just cling to the past and don't want to accept change right away)... But to say that the pillars are all the same is not an opinion. It's factually incorrect.
    5
  36. M I C H tacky?? Lmao if you're blind maybe. S class is elegant and classy.
    5
  37. Buhnanafone Youtube no I'm not trying to sell you anything. I am just explaining why your views are narrowminded and show how you don't understand the point of a facelift.
    5
  38. If you're blind.
    5
  39. Andrew Hutchinson in your dreams. Mercedes build quality makes the Lexus look like a toyota corolla.
    5
  40. +Pioneer So they can take another extra year to beat the Merc? This m5 is already over a year newer. Before this video you guys were non stop talking about how the m5 would beat the e63s. Now even when reality has spoken it looks like you haven't learned you yet and say oh oh competition package will win lmao. by the time the cp version comes out the e63s will be two years old. Furthermore this e63s is meant to compete with standard m5. the s for mercedes is just a naming convention for 4wd and more power and trim differences. The E63 S 4matic+ w/performance package will compete with the m5 cp. BMW fanboys you think it's more fair to compare the 571 hp E63 with the 600 hp M5? The M5 has 29 more hp, weighs 200 kg less and is 0,2 seconds faster to 60 mph than the E63. There is no question about which one is the fastest. The M5's real competitor is the E63 S. Both are claimed to do 0-60 in 3,4 seconds, and despite the fact that the E63 S has 12 more hp than the M5, the M5 is 200 kg lighter so it should be a fair match So Quit fanboying. Both these cars are equally impressive beats.
    5
  41. Mansour Anonimous no. Amg gt r won that comparison. And also their is the clk gt r which is the ultimate legend and real gtr.
    5
  42. Samson Okoro haha definitely not miles ahead of German interiors. Its great but definitely not better than German interiors.
    5
  43. Car Freak in your dreams. We all know you're just a Mercedes hater. The German military and many militaries use the g class which not only is better at offroading and more rock solid but it also as the looks of a military veichle as well.
    5
  44. G class alone would beat the landcruiser let alone the 4x4 squared or 6x6 which would plow through it like a piece of cake.
    5
  45. anurag sharma​ yes when the long wheel base version came out I absolutly loved it, i just think they ruined it by squishing the back into the car, i think it looks much better as a long wheel base version, makes it look beatiful like the proportions of an audi a7
    4
  46. Royal Bridgeman there are no tears to wipe. E class interior looks great and the display hasn't stopped people from buying it because its not pathetic it's just not as good as the competition that's all. But interior wise it's the best looking
    4
  47. Looks much better than the old clown face normal steering wheel imo
    4
  48. indelebilis they are heavy sure but they also have a lot more horsepower to make up for that hence why this Mercedes was able to beat the BMW.. It's not about weight, it's about power to weight ratio And please take your BMW bias out of it
    4
  49. Mondo Music​​​​ lmao you are very ignorant. 1- German car are presently the leader of innovation, as I explained in my last comment which you failed to prove otherwise 2 - if German cars broke down every few hundred miles no one would buy them. Clearly that is anything but the truth so shut up 3 - they do not look identical, they look SIMILAR. Major difference. This is nothing new, go look back then 1990's c/e/s they looked similar back then. Go search it up right now on Google and you will be proven wrong. They do not look the same. They look similar. Yes they undeniably have similar body language however they are still distinguishable . If you couldn't already tell by the major size difference....S class has a COMPLETELY different frill from c and c. It also has crystal front lights as opposed to normal single curve led lights of c class and two line curve of e class . Furthermore they all have different front and rear diffusers. S class had 3 tail lights whereas c and e have 2 tail lights. Not to mention s class has more chrome and has more pronounced depth to it's lines and proportions. So you are blind if you think they look the same. Quite frankly all companies do this... It's part of brand signature. Es and ls look very similar. All Lexus have same grill and check mark lighting. All infinite have same grill. All new acura have diamond grill. You have to realize that there is nothing wrong with this kind of design philosophy... It is part of what defines brand identity/signature. And as sale suggest it's clear people sent getting sick of it any time soon 4- guess what. Your experiences -besides the fact you have provided zero evidence for - do not speak for the rest of reality If it broke down all the time then capitalism would kick in and people would stop buying them. CLEARLY THAT ISNT THE CASE so again stop bringing this duales point up 5- wth? Bells and whistles? You can't even get technical and serious when it comes to this and yet you try to talk like an expert? Guess what the tech that mkbhd was testing was an update of the autopilot which already exists in the e class today. In fact it existed from the s class in 2014. He was testing a new update to the system. The point is I dont see a production ready Lexus autopilot anywhere being tested I don't understand what it is with your hatred for Germans. I don't mind if you like Japanese cars more. No problem I respect that. But that doesn't mean you should talk shit about other companies just because you don't like them. That is the very defnition of being close minded
    4
  50. no they are not, its actually looks the most elegant of the bunch imo
    4