Comments by "Hasan Al-habbobi" (@hasanal-habbobi4018) on "Doug DeMuro" channel.

  1. cingratta key word.. Wagon. Its the fastest wagon/estate. Panemera is not a wagon... Its a sedan with a hatchback design. Also it costs nearly 2 times more than the e63.
    1
  2. LamboPlays panemera is not a wagon and costs two times more. And no i did not make that up. Look up the definition of quick and fast. Not to mention many review channels point out this distinction between the two words.... Like moter trend in the model x vs bentayga video.
    1
  3. Victor Jensen did the sport turisomo lap the ring with that time? No.
    1
  4. Tjade Looman they are not. Cls compares with the panemera.... And a Cls shooting break would be a closer comparison in terms of design. Its not a wagon. Its a sedan with a hatchback rear end. .
    1
  5. Tjade Looman similar but not the same.
    1
  6. cingratta no its not invalid because the turisomo was not the car that lapped the ring with that time. You can't cherry pick different cars based on the generic name. And the price is still very much relevant. just because the cars discussed are more expensive doesn't mean price is thrown out the window. And I didn't say that means they are not comparable. I am just saying to take that into consideration.
    1
  7. cingratta yes it does change things believe it or not. Its a different set of rear aerodynamics of the car. But even then.... That's not the point I'm trying to say. When they lap it around the ring it will be the fastest. But officially its not the fastest. I have nothing against the Porsche. All I am saying is that Doug is accurate and not incorrect when he says its the fastest wagon to date to lap the ring.
    1
  8. Rafael_Santos its basically stock...
    1
  9. Because YouTube"s refresh rate can't keep up with the incoming traffic watching the video. If you refresh youtube you will see it update itself...
    1
  10. From a classic Ferrari to a Mitsubishi.
    1
  11. Review the Arteon.
    1
  12. That right indicator though...
    1
  13. Joostin J 1.its not half a million dollars. Its 200k. 2.thats still hypocritical of him because you can't hate on a car for having the same design and then praise another car for doing the exact same thing. Regardless of the difference of price its a really pathetic double standard to have.
    1
  14. JDM racing by your own logic the wrangler is a box. The g wagon is nice simple boxy timeless design. Just like how a square never gets old and has that powerful millitary look.
    1
  15. Doug DeMuro its not about the price. Its about the philosophy. You can't hate on a car that doesn't change its design much from the last then praise the jeep for doing the exact same thing. Price doesn't matter because at the end of the day the customers still buy it because they like the design and don't want it to change. If its not broken then don't fix it. Regardless of the price.
    1
  16. Best looking Corvette. . Best looking Chevrolet.
    1
  17. This is not a mini van. It's a working van. And it is one of the best very reliable and can take a lot of abuse.
    1
  18. ThePhiltastic design wise yes. Technology wise the mercedes aged better
    1
  19. Hell Yes, I knew you would eventually review it!
    1
  20. mashed potatoes what why?
    1
  21. +Hoch134 You are buying cars for the wrong reason then....you buy a car for YOU not for others!.....also that is just a stereotype and way over exaggerated.
    1
  22. +Hoch134 Thats true this will differ depending on where you are in the world but my friend that is still not an excuse. You don't owe anyone a justification, its none of their business, its your car not theirs! This is just a stereotype.....for example......"asians cause car accidents" is a stereotype thats ridiculously overexaggerated....doesn't mean asians have to start justifiying being asian. I am not saying you have to like bmw, I am just saying you are hating bmw for the wrong reasons. Don't hate a car company just because of its fans.....direct your hate to the bad drivers not the company. Hope you understand.
    1
  23. Hoch134 alright but just know that you buying a car doesn't mean you support the bad drivers... Two very different things
    1
  24. They should make the air vents on the door for the new 8 series like they did for this old one.
    1
  25. Swole Team 6 well regardless of whether you like it or not the fact its rare and will hold and appreciate it value makes it a worthy investment for a rich person even at 450etc. That's nothing for the people who buy these cars especially not when the car will appreciate and make them money in the long run. A car that will make you a profit when you buy it is by definition worth its price tag no matter how outrageous it may seem to us.
    1
  26. Jose Pina not neccesaarly rarely drive them. That's generalizing. There are many collectors out there who actually drive them.
    1
  27. Jose Pina you are putting words in my mouth. I never said they constantly drive them.... You said they rarely drive them which is not true.... It's a balance in between.
    1
  28. +Jose Pina Lmao I am the kid? If I am a kid and you're an adult then you are an adult that acts worse than a kid! Not constantly is rarely? Constantly means you are always doing that action. Rarely means you hardly ever do it. I said its in between. You are putting words in my mouth by claiming that I said otherwise. If for sake of argument hypothetically speaking I don't brush my teeth constantly....does that mean I am hardly/rarely brushing my teeth? No, not necessarily that doesn't neccessarly mean I am rarely brushing my teeth, it just means I am not brushing my teeth 24/7 every single second of every minute of every hour of every day of every week of every month of every year. I am saying that they take them out in between rarely and not constantly (i.e often).... So for example every week or two they will drive it. That is not constant but neither is it rare. Rare would mean driving it once a year which is not the case.
    1
  29. They should make a hard top version of it like the RF miata.
    1
  30. Oh Yeah yes its mainly bought as a status symbol to show off but it does have an undeniable road presence off road capability and luxury. It rides like crap because its supposed to be stiff like that for offroading. Believe it or not some people some stiff rides like that. The amg ones are to maje what is already crazy even more crazy with a lot more power etc.
    1
  31. NotPewDiePie to you and me yes its not worth that much money. But objectivly speaking basic Economics tell us that its worth that much. If people are willing to buy it and it sells like hot cakes then its clear that that price tag is justifiable. Its basic supply and demand.
    1
  32. BLB13films no its not. Looks are subjective
    1
  33. Don't fix what isn't broken. Its a simple clean timeless boxy design.
    1
  34. WheatSnackBread no its not a turd. Look in the mirror before you call anything a turd. Exactly my point, you are clueless.
    1
  35. Tyvek Homewrap I'm not a fanboy. I'm a fan. Major difference. And just so you know I would never buy a g wagon even with the money. I would never buy it nor plan to buy it. But that doesn't change the fact that its not overpriced since it sells like hot cakes at that price. Yes one costs 5 times more so what? Still doesn't hinder my argument at all. Its not about the price. Its about the philosophy. Many people like its design and don't want it to change. If its not broken don't fix it. Regardless of the price.
    1
  36. skileg10 it doesn't lack features. It has the features it needs. Otherwise by your logic then rr lacks features and a lot of technology... To the point where even a ford is more well equipped with technology than a rr.
    1
  37. manah56 better ia subjective. Many people actually like the stiff ride of the g wagon believe it or not. I mean I wouldn't buy it but clearly many people do which is why it sells like hot cakes even at that price.
    1
  38. Kifo in what way??? Lmao Countless of ways.. Better luxury, better build quality, better offroad capabilities, better looks, better interior, better engine and exhaust note, better and more presence ... I could go on and on Yes g wagon does have aftermarket support. A ton actually. Go look at Jon Olisoms g wagon.. He moded the hell out of it. There are also brabus kits etc https://youtu.be/2E5bthgftKw Costs more than 2 times more because its more than 10 times better. Ride is not worse if you opt for the right suspension. And g wagon definitely has way more offroad capabilities than the jeep. In particular the 4x4^2 and 6x6 It doesn't have a higher roll center. Weight is not necessarly all that bad m. It keeps the csr planted and gives it more traction and deeper footprint into the surface which is great for offroading. It has tons of significant customizablity. You are clueless dude. It does have aftermarket what are you talking about!?! Quick making assumptions! No it doesn't just have a more powerful motor as I already explained above. Yes there are tons of g wagons that can not only do extreme rock crawling but will humiliate the jeep. Not the amg variant but the other g wagons for sure can do offroading significantly better.
    1
  39. Sarcasm right Doug?
    1
  40. Kia really hit it out of the park with the stinger!
    1
  41. You guys are utter morons, it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......to a family it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run. it lacks a lot of technology and features so that it's more reliable....with less technology less can go wrong,...hence more isn't a mini van. It's about ultimate reliability and utility in the context of a working van be it cargo....moving construction workers and used for air port transport.....it's meant to last long and take a lot of abuse. That's what the companies are paying for the, which to them, is not only pocket change but an investment because the van will make them profit in the long run.
    1
  42. The other cars are most definitely not boring. They are not just bigger engines, and they are not for old people. Tons of young celebrities, entrepreneurs, lawyers dentists etc drive them. And the priority for these cars is to be luxurious, if you want handling as main priority then get amg gt or r8. Or if you want a 4 door thats sporty and luxurious then get a rs6 or e63. So its not boring at all quite frankly. Besides the panemera competes with a7 and cls and 6 series not s class or a8. Those are above the panemera, are more luxurious and comfortable.... with far more features...and are light years ahead of it in technology. Having said that though the panemera is unquestionably beautiful and won't disappoint. But that doesn't make the other cars boring at all.
    1
  43. Will they ever make a new one?
    1
  44. You're talking so fast for the Doug score. slow down! ;)
    1
  45. Maybe if you were not so bloody ignorant you would realize how clueless you are..........its not a minivan..... it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......to a family it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run. it lacks a lot of technology and features so that it's more reliable....with less technology less can go wrong,...hence .it isn't a mini van. It's about ultimate reliability and utility in the context of a working van be it cargo....moving construction workers and used for air port transport.....it's meant to last long and take a lot of abuse. That's what the companies are paying for the, which to them, is not only pocket change but an investment because the van will make them profit in the long run.
    1
  46. Ch6in Re6ction g70 doesn't have a hatchback like design which has its own appeal. It would be nice for example to have the g70 as the sedan (like an a8) and then the stinger as hatchback genesis model (like an a7). The reason is... As much as its annoying that people badge whore........... Badges do make a difference ............ it would make the stinger look and feel more premium..... even more than it is already. Its fine with the KIA badge but it would be even better with something like a genesis badge imo.
    1
  47. Ch6in Re6ction no it doesn't. How? GM recycle the same car. Totally different thing. I'm saying this should be a genesis model. It doesn't matter if it a KIA. Its just that as a genesis it would be arguably better.
    1
  48. Elijah Whitesell the KIA doesn't suck. Especially not for a first attempt at this kind of car. And neither does genisis suck.
    1
  49. Anton Zuykov no its good quality even at base. Ofcourse you pay more you get more that's how it works. Mercedes is for fairly wealthy people not peasants. Mercedes allows you to choose what you want... Hence why so many things are optional... Not everyone wants to pay for a certain luxury or technology they don't care about compared to others they do. So this gives the customer complete control and flexibility and so frankly there is nothing wrong with this kind of approach. The KIA can't touch the Mercedes in terms of build quality and luxury. You get what you pay for with the merc. Even look at carwows new review of the stinger... They openly point out how e class and the Germans have much better build quality than the stinger. And frankly that goes without saying. Kia dash is plastic.... You just can't compare that with the elegant ambient lighting, leather stitched, wood trim quality finish of the e class. E class is a whole different league of luxury and build quality. I agree that looking strictly at just the price..... KIA offers a lot of quality... But with the e class the amount of quality is in your hands and easily 100 times better if you want it to be.
    1