Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. It's not like russians aren't
    1
  2.  @cattraknoff  I seriously doubt Russia has enough planes serviceable to carry out a terror bombing campaign against the second largest country in Europe . Russia hasn't even managed to ground the Ukrainian airforce
    1
  3. Russians broke communion with the patriarchate of Constantinople and don't recognise them as first among equals They're heretics not Christians
    1
  4. ​ @ChiefJustice  that was a loss due to politics not military failure
    1
  5. He said no nukes
    1
  6. USA will just bomb the middle sites with bombers from the mainland before any sort of naval action would take place
    1
  7. What about Afghanistan Poland Estonia ww1 first chechn war ect?
    1
  8. ​ @DreamyCheshire-up9rf  yeah after 5000th mission 1 was bound to get hit
    1
  9. Is Russia brave enough? Also Iraq had the world's 4th largest air force . Keyword: had
    1
  10. ​ @zoobomafoo1  name the American version of the vuhledar attack
    1
  11.  @vii7031  Greece , Cyprus, Bulgaria, Algeria , Slovenia, Azerbaijan, Vietnam , Egypt , Romania , potentially Turkey, etc
    1
  12.  @vii7031  no need to give up USA will buy and send to Ukraine maybe 10-15% of the stock Then that's enough for the next year and by that time they'll be switching to better systems
    1
  13.  @vii7031  considering majority of them have already sent aid yes Thats not going to be alone
    1
  14. It's not easy to go from a large Boeing 747 to a f-16
    1
  15.  @Zappina  So does everyone
    1
  16. History has numerous examples of cauldrons failing . Operation mars , Kursk , battle of the bulge come to mind .
    1
  17. not really , 1/3rd the number of western systems often time can match their Russian counterparts
    1
  18. Javelin/NLAW had a ton of effects , because of them Russian can no longer push forward easily because their tanks will be blown apart M777 also was instrumental, it had taken out a lot of equipment too
    1
  19. Huh ? The carriers there were actually very useful
    1
  20. In 2003 USA went into Iraq with 200k people against 600k Iraq's with an allied force of 45k In 2001 USA went into Afghanistan with a force of 20k special forces with additional 4k allies although the northern alliance played a big part in the fight
    1
  21.  @QODHardasiandickBAC  the fact that USA spends 800 billion USD and all of t doesn't go to waste it is just to big of a force to ignore
    1
  22. @UCG7gOOV4iwpptkoed4cjWcg https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_invasion_of_Iraq I forgot about pesharga
    1
  23. You could give the Saudis infinity stones and they'd still fuck up
    1
  24. 1856 Europe wins 1917 Europe wins
    1
  25.  @section7173  you sure about that ?
    1
  26.  @A_TAYLOR06  glonass has like 30 m error within Russia .
    1
  27. I mean they went through a mobilisation so the average quality went down but they're not dumb
    1
  28. The separatists would loose against nato tho
    1
  29.  @Giorg189  yeah but they'd loose to nato . Air support would get shot down . Nato would have more than enough men to overwhelm them and more than enough equipment to destroy important targets
    1
  30. India and China hate eachother
    1
  31. It's not that bad
    1
  32.  @cheeminthao7967 how are Americans poor ? the average American is overweight , takes prescription medicine , drives a car and owns the latest phone USA is heaven on earth compared to Russia
    1
  33.  @Testbug-dy6tj  Are you going to live on a Mexican wage ?
    1
  34.  @Testbug-dy6tj  on a mexican salary ?
    1
  35. Fun fact both of those times the side attacking Russia had a smaller population
    1
  36. Bribes aren't that hard to make operational art wasn't involved in Crimea
    1
  37. Except for turkey and America didn't loose I'm Afghanistan or Iraq . They installed new governments . Not being able to exterminate an insurgence isn't the same as bombing isis
    1
  38. because they spent 25% of GDP on defense
    1
  39.  @t.n.h.ptheneohumanpatterna8334  i don't know man , just look at China . They have 52% of the worlds shipbuilding capacity and are the largest industrial power. The USSR was an inefficient communist state which was facing the USA , a far more unified country which lost far less in ww2 Meanwhile China is 91% ethnic Han , more or less capitalist and with a 3/4 fold population advantage
    1
  40.  @MrSkoresh  a coup only according to Russia. Read the Ukrainian constitution . Article 111 clearly states that the parliament had the right to remove the president
    1
  41. Not really
    1
  42.  @andrewjohnson6216  new javelin versions actually have fragmentation capabilities which keeps them effective
    1
  43.  @andrewjohnson6216  enough to damage a lot
    1
  44. I doubt they'd give one to India since theoretically russian could get a look at end engineer a counter
    1
  45.  @EmperorFist323  at like 10 sq km a day and you people sabotage the aid
    1
  46.  @bentoo09  and then you have the OMSK metro , do you think it's impossible for Russia to fail ?
    1
  47. If Russia launches nukes then Britain and France would launch their own ones
    1
  48.  @salavat294  and so will the Kremlin and the red square .
    1
  49.  @salavat294  then the Europeans will go down with the russians and noone wins
    1
  50.  @salavat294  ok then why isn't Russia attacking china or the us or India . They all are as strong or stronger than Russia .
    1