Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Probably are already
    2
  2. Any day now
    2
  3. Khinzals have an accuracy of a blind and crippled man playing freesbe
    2
  4.  @ИльяИлья-ж2й7э  Remember Victoria and Hindenburg ?
    2
  5.  @ИльяИлья-ж2й7э  great trick . Now kyev is pro American .
    2
  6.  @ИльяИлья-ж2й7э  It shouldn't be russian
    2
  7. Mariupol, rebuilt , with 75% of the population now refugees in either Eu or Ukraine
    2
  8. The su-57 only flies in theory
    2
  9.  @mortuus4601  16 himars did
    2
  10. Cep , 10000 km
    2
  11. Kinda like himars
    2
  12. ​ @rick7424  permanently imminent
    2
  13.  @TP-ie3hj  in a few weeks you'll be wrong . Currently russians are stalled . On a good day they take a few villages
    2
  14. Top 10 delusional rants
    2
  15. No
    2
  16. China has 350 nukes USA has 5k even then he rules them out because then it would boring
    2
  17.  @dannydanny2789  Ukraine does have some 60 fixed wing aircraft left , + you need AD forces and EW forces too who won't be on the frontline
    2
  18.  @jackdewipper187  after 20 years the Afghan army failed . Nato with way less troops was able to keep the country together . Those troops shouldn't have been trusted . Russia barely won chechnya
    2
  19. 6k nukes do good enough if a job but basically they need the army to occupy smaller nations while another part of the army assists pro russian forces mainly separatists
    2
  20.  @АндрейИнкогнитов  Crimeans don't matter in the face of international law and treaties which Russia it self signed Crimea is only russian because Russia has more tanks than Ukrainie hopefully that changes and Crimeans are forced to obey the law
    2
  21.  @SunRunn3r  well legally its Ukraine
    2
  22.  @youarenotassmartasyouthink5587  you'd probably get ethnically cleansed
    2
  23. They need to make the costs too high
    2
  24.  @shayshay8448  the fact that they have nukes still makes it basically impossible to mess with them
    2
  25. ​ @RomanianReaver  USA took Baghdad in 6 days Russia hasn't even taken Bakhmut after 9 months
    2
  26. ​ @Doomer1984  which orthodox church? Odessa saw both sides throw Molotovs
    2
  27. ​ @AnnedolfFrankler911  how is annexing donbass a defensive move
    2
  28.  @guywilloughby5443  doubt it's that good . A carrier will just bomb the country before it gets into range
    2
  29. And russia and china and Pakistan and India
    2
  30. ​ @caribbeanchild  gepard&shilka:
    2
  31. Syria with russian air defence hasn't even managed to shoot down 1 jet of America
    2
  32. Russia lost a ton more . Ukraine has lost 400 tanks , Russia 1500 tanks
    2
  33.  @milosmitrovic3239  bruh . I can get pictures backing up each claim . Check out oryx
    2
  34. This video is a hypothetical
    2
  35. Doctrine wise USA isn't really for for dog fights
    2
  36. Unlike Russia American tests aren't staged
    2
  37.  @trojanhell7639  they lost 3 aircraft while the ussr lost at least 8
    2
  38.  @rgarcia_ru  it's not the Americans dropping bombs in Kyiv
    2
  39. do georgia vs armeina
    1
  40. do Georgia vs Armenia
    1
  41. do georgia vs armeina
    1
  42.  @wamnicho  Russia doesn't have as established of an arsenal of medium strength missiles as the US does but it does have a decent force . It wouldn't be able to take out mobile platforms but it could theoretically attack communications installations , supply depos , junctions , powerplants , factories airports etc but it's unlikely that it could neutrualise Ukraine to the point that Americans did with Iraq . You'd most likely see an initial barrage of missiles against known and fixed targets then a weeks long campaign by the russian air force to eliminate the Ukrainian air defences , air force and anti ship forces after that a ground invasion which would be successful but would face major problems such as high causality rates in engagements against heavily defended spots and losses against javelins and other anti tank systems which Russia would have no good way of dealing with other than just taking the hits . Imo the invasion would be successful but costly
    1
  43. Japan would stand with the us not china
    1
  44. Us is strong in conventional military sense as it has tons of air craft ships and ifvs and tanks . Austria Hungary had a smaller army even compared with its neighbouring countries like Germany russia and the ottoman empire
    1
  45.  @SFDPSFDP  you could use autonomous drones .
    1
  46.  @dauzlee2827  not really as often times the missiles of aa are ment for air craft and cost more than the drones do
    1
  47.  @dauzlee2827  but drone missile have a longer range than anti aircraft guns
    1
  48. Russia spends more Money by percentage on its army than the USA does
    1
  49.  @Mortablunt  SNAP BACK TO REALITY If USA has anything in stock it's jdams. The defunked air force bombed two air bases inside Russia just a couple weeks ago . Bombed Crimea, bombed Belgorod, bombed milerovo. More will come
    1
  50. do georgia vs armeina
    1