Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Looks at Ukrainie Croatia Serbia Bulgaria and Romania .
    1
  2.  @jbrazil3831  uhh what about the polish soviet war and checks and Slovaks fighting alongside the Germans
    1
  3.  @jbrazil3831  depends on how it starts
    1
  4. Because these missiles are actually accurate When was the last time a russian missile was on target
    1
  5.  @zazaza5295  Russian missiles are bad for 2 reasons Russian corruption meaning they often have subpar parts And Russia is relatively poor and cannot afford to spend the money on these missiles to iron out all the issues
    1
  6.  @zazaza5295  sure they were Also remind me what happened to the Ukrainian barracks in Kramatorsk. How multiple russian missiles landed definitely on target and definitely didn't miss and definitely wasn't an embarrassing failure for Russia
    1
  7.  @zazaza5295  early January
    1
  8. Just spray natrium hydroxide and and wash off the salt also the drones would get shot down
    1
  9. New atlas is a fool and a clown Himars destroyed video
    1
  10. There's an offensive ?
    1
  11. Didn't the russians invade your brethren in Moldova
    1
  12. Chernobyl
    1
  13. ​ @freetime5803  Saudis are incompetent
    1
  14.  @skalderman  Ever heard of escalation theory
    1
  15. Europe 3 times
    1
  16. Theoretically maybe . Usa doesn't allow north Korean ships in its ports so they'd have to either disguise it as different ship or sneak it onto a neutral ship but it's unlikely
    1
  17.  @jessythomas7284  most European nations were created around the same time as russia
    1
  18. That's only happening on RT .
    1
  19. More like 350k against 400k but hey . A man's gotta cope somehow
    1
  20.  @robertwilson214  no Kherson? 🥺
    1
  21.  @robertwilson214  my brother in Christ, you're siding with a man who's been in power since 1999
    1
  22. Ahhem Mongols British empire 1856 Japan 1904 Germany 1917 Finland 1939 Afghanistan 1989 Chechnya 1996
    1
  23.  @LB-oz9hv  still its not like winning wars against russia isn't a thing it happens . You guys aren't invincible
    1
  24.  @LB-oz9hv  those weren't battles those were wars
    1
  25. Both of them combined have a population of like 4 guys . Here is my analysis 2 Icelanders would go to Lichtenstein and beat the guy up with a bat.
    1
  26. GDP Ukraine 2022: 168 Billion USD GDP Ukraine 2023: 176 Billion USD I mean , if you sabotage the aid more you may get your wish
    1
  27. On average the us nuclear bombs are 25 years old and russian ones 30ish . Russia doesn't have that many tsar bombs
    1
  28.  @gags730  confirmed losses of Russia are higher than Ukraine's though just because you outgun your enemy doesn't mean you inflict more losses , after 1942 Germans were still outgunned but in most battles they still took more soviets than the soviets took out germans
    1
  29.  @KristianKG  what wilhiem , Victoria and Meji thought too . They were right
    1
  30. Does Russia have the air force for that
    1
  31.  @donaldmackerer9032  bomb with what ?
    1
  32. Stock market go brrr . Lots of russian cash reserves are in dollars pounds and euros
    1
  33. How would russia win with out using nukes?
    1
  34. Yes they can
    1
  35.  @EmperorFist323  nukes
    1
  36.  @EmperorFist323  300k are there so that Russia knows it can't get away with it
    1
  37.  @fenrir834  I mean . To train an infantry man to a level which they can go into combat is expensive ,so both sides have to pay the same to counter eachother . Armour on the other hand costs millions while at costs hundreds of thousands
    1
  38.  @fenrir834  sure a bullet is cheap but it's not like you can fire it without your own solders who cost the same as enemie . Having anti tank weapons is vastly cheaper than maintaining a tank fleet
    1
  39.  @fenrir834  sure tanks can do a lot but are they worth it? All the firepower will go to waste if you wage a war and your tanks are blown apart . What on the modern battlefield can do a job of a knight ? Still sending one into modern war is straight up suicide .
    1
  40. Ukraine managed to rig a few S-200 missiles to bomb a couple bases Russians have a lot S-300s , they'd probably use them. Those attacks still happen
    1
  41. Wagner HQ, makiivka, Kherson base , melitopol, etc
    1
  42. Neither would win cause both of them couldn't really reach each other
    1
  43. Because it's way too large
    1
  44. The problem with fighting farmers isn't that they win , its that they're stubborn
    1
  45.  @Ranyick  I said mass They have a lot of equipment too In Avdiivka Russians lost nearly 2x what Ukrainians lost in the counteroffensive but the Russians didn't give a damn so they kept pushing and eventually the defenders where overwhelmed
    1
  46.  @Ranyick  a lot of them are but then again the USSR spent 20% of GDP on the army so they just kept pumping out tanks
    1
  47.  @ИльяИлья-ж2й7э  it didn't . Russia forced it to in 2014
    1
  48.  @ИльяИлья-ж2й7э  when they gave back nukes and military equipment to Russia
    1
  49.  @ИльяИлья-ж2й7э  a pro Western nation wouldn't give Russia nukes
    1
  50. They were sending new and improved stinger in Afghanistan in 89
    1