Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "euronews" channel.

  1. ​ @ТатьянаОрганова  donbass and Crimea are Ukraine Ukraine will open a second aushwitzch if they want and Russia has no right to stop them
    1
  2. Ok then why aren't you giving the north Caucasusians a state
    1
  3. Actually 67% were russians
    1
  4. And the gross violations of international law
    1
  5. Well it could be argued that its in both and what ethnic cleansing what barely 100 civilians died while in the 90s when russia kills what like 4000ish civilians its not ethnic cleansing
    1
  6.  @HHHPPP8  abkazia is a puppet tho .
    1
  7.  @HHHPPP8  how? You do know that recently georgia sued an American company
    1
  8.  @HHHPPP8  we kicked him out .
    1
  9.  @HHHPPP8  while Abkhazia is still a puppet . Iike 90% of Abkhazias gdp is just russian aid
    1
  10.  @HHHPPP8  how is that? Second class ? Mate despite being only 17% of the population durring the 90s they still got their own republic . If you are talking about the ussr then that's not georgia
    1
  11.  @HHHPPP8  ok then ? Does that justify anything ? Fact of the matter is that they were a minority group with the same rights as georgians with their own republic . They had no right to ethnically cleanse Abkhazia . Cause Abkhazia historically has always been georgian
    1
  12.  @HHHPPP8  firstly they illegally declared independence which could be considered an act of war and secondly georgia isn't just kartl-kakheti whenever georgia has been an unified nation Abkhazia has been a part of it . It was part of Colchis. It was a part of lazika part of the kingdom of georgia it was part of iberia it was a part of the 1918 republic it was a part of imereti for a bit.
    1
  13.  @HHHPPP8  so now history doesn't matter ? Also georgia has been recognised by everyone and had the permission of the ussr to separate while Abkhazia didn't have georgian permission or an un mandate .
    1
  14.  @HHHPPP8  how ? The un supports georgia . Also right to self determination doesn't mean right to ethnic cleansing and also you don't just declare independence its way more complicated
    1
  15.  @HHHPPP8  and we could do it because we had the permission of the Soviet Union. Abkhazia never got our permission or an un mandate making its independence ilegal
    1
  16.  @HHHPPP8  durring the referendum about the ussr becoming a federal state Georgians voted to leave . That referendum was authorized by Moscow making georgian independence completely legal
    1
  17.  @HHHPPP8  the formation of georgia was legal tho by you logic so is Russia an illegal state and doesn't have any authority . The fact of the matter after the central referendum georgia had the permission of Moscow to declare independence . If say that move was ilegal than every post soviet country is ilegal
    1
  18.  @HHHPPP8  Abkhazia declared independence from georgia not the ussr south Ossetia declared it within the ussr not as a sperate state actual decelerations of independence were post ussr and from georgia which makes their moves ilegal as they needed georgian permission or an un mandate they had neither only thing the in mandated there was peacekeepers not independence . Under international law of the time Abkhazia was considered georgian territories and people there had to abide by the georgian Constitution of 1921 which said that all changes to georgian territories must be done with a bilateral agreement with the georgian government . If we follow your logic so is chechnya a legitimate state Dagestan and Circassia . Georgia had the right to do this because it had the go ahead from the central government because of the referendum regarding the federative soviet states in which georgia voted to leave and was given the right to do so
    1
  19.  @HHHPPP8  also Abkhazia had no international recognition up until 2008 26th of August officially according to every in member state up until than Abkhazia didn't exist as a state and was a part of georgia . Same for south Ossetia
    1
  20.  @HHHPPP8  in 1921 there was no Abkhazian government . also to this day the UN supports georgia . Also technically the current Georgian government is the 1918 republic and so georgia technically didn't gain independence from the ussr they were occupied by it but even then georgia didn't separate . Also in 1921 Abkhazia was a part of georgia we even fought Bolsheviks there
    1
  21. 67%
    1
  22. How ?
    1
  23.  @flammenwerfer9645  you know that in the American Constitution freedom of speech wasnt written as a prank unlike the Russian Constitution
    1
  24. Uhh no
    1
  25. Well no matter the ethnic makeup of crimea the russian takeover was still a gross violation if international law
    1
  26.  Axios .king  you're*
    1
  27.  Steve Arthur  no one was forcing russia to take land . If they really wanted independence of those countries they could have done it through peaceful means .
    1
  28.  Steve Arthur  crimea For example .they basically set up puppet states in Georgia and Ukraine.
    1
  29.  Steve Arthur  also i asked Ukrainians and no they didn't .
    1
  30.  Steve Arthur  we don't need to ask everyone . Let's take 16 people would more less enough as most of them would average people who would have agreed with the revolution
    1
  31.  Steve Arthur  also russian pupets in georgia . Abkazia and south ossetia
    1
  32.  Steve Arthur  also under international law the annexation of crimea was deemed illegal
    1
  33.  Steve Arthur  also crimea returned to russia by being attacked first . Also didn't documents come out which found that referendum was faked .even then legally russia had no right to take it . It even had recognised it before the war as a part of Ukraine.
    1
  34.  Steve Arthur  no . Also how ? Can you explain ? I mean i think Ukrainians would know if the public supported the 2014 coup or if it was a western back affair.
    1
  35.  Steve Arthur  also under international law the annexation was illegal .
    1
  36.  Steve Arthur  also russia violated multiple international laws and treaties . One of them was they would agree not to attack Ukraine in exchange for the nukes which were in Ukraine .
    1
  37.  Steve Arthur  the presence of military force without the permission of the internationally recognised government can be considered an attack
    1
  38.  Steve Arthur  russian troops . That could considered military force
    1
  39.  Steve Arthur  in crimea . Putin even admitted to that fact
    1
  40.  Steve Arthur  or lugansk or Donetsk
    1
  41.  Steve Arthur  also do you really think Ukrainiane is so incompetent that it wouldn't be able to defend its territories from small uprisings .
    1
  42.  Steve Arthur  really despite having the numbers advantage having the equipment advantage and having the money advantage ? Also there were troops on crimea and lugansk and Donetsk . Putin admitted to that fact. Also even if they didn't russia still wasn't neutral in this war supporting an illegal military action . Which is illegal .
    1
  43.  Steve Arthur  ?
    1
  44.  Steve Arthur  what have i said which is wrong
    1
  45.  Steve Arthur  also the un did find the annexation of crimea illegal
    1
  46.  Steve Arthur  i am from georgia . Also russia is a member of the un security council. The un condemned the us invasion of iraq and un has criticized the us for its conduct of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The un isn't puppet of the us . And please can you explain to me what is so wrong with my statements . I mean russian troops were in there . There is evidence to support that claim.
    1
  47.  Steve Arthur  5 members are permanently in the security council . one of them is russia .
    1
  48.  Steve Arthur  yeah the 1997 agreement which also said that russia wouldn't interfere with the internal affairs of Ukraine and respect its sovereignty.
    1
  49.  Steve Arthur  google it .
    1
  50.  Steve Arthur  so what any member of the security council can veto anything .
    1