General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Mint
Binkov's Battlegrounds
comments
Comments by "Mint" (@mint8648) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.
Previous
4
Next
...
All
@台灣是一個國家 bruh
1
Juan Frede are you ok? britain is not even in the eu, meaning those countries you mentioned are gonna be on france's side.
1
Juan Frede spain was not saved, it was being invaded by the royalists with british support.
1
Juan Frede canada with only half of the population of britain won't be able to give the degree of support to britain the eu will give to france.
1
Juan Frede spain wasn't a colony, it was its own nation under french king. spain was always under foreign leaders, even today the king is french, historically they were french or austrians. and no spain did not fight in ww1 or ww2, so go read some more history before presenting inaccurate information.
1
Juan Frede theres a difference between colony and ally, joseph was king of spain, but the royalists tried to overthrow him. how tf would ottomans or japanese colonize spain? france didn't even want to colonize spain, they only wanted to influence it and take catalonia.
1
Juan Frede explain
1
Juan Frede bro france has stronger military than britain, and there's always a nuclear option, which france would still win with a pyrrhic victory.
1
Juan Frede you are forgetting that the dutch and scandinavians also allied with france until france fell.
1
Juan Frede today's germany's policy is not based on the germanic race, but more about continental politics. which means france is closer to germany. both merkel and macron have dissed the uk for leaving brexit.
1
Juan Frede ok so lets compare the distance from canada to england to the distance of europe to england. even if britain has naval and air superiority (which they don't) logistics would completely negate that. just look at how long it took d-day to be planned.
1
Juan Frede again, sweden, holland, spain, and poland are not the same countries they are in 1648. historical rivalries have long since been gone, and they are all part of eu.
1
Juan Frede french and british air power are equally matched, british has slightly better planes and recon while france has the numbers, on the seas the french and british are equally matched as well, french have a massive aircraft carrier. so transport ships would be disrupted, further emphasizing the logistical problem.
1
Juan Frede that doesn't mean anything. poland saved austria in 1683, did austria help poland later on? no, they annexed poland. also, poland and hungary weren't saved by the british in ww2, they were conquered by the soviets.
1
Juan Frede one can't look at history alone. france, spain, and uk are not the same countries today as they are in the past.
1
Juan Frede major wars uk has won since 1700 (excluding colonial conflicts) -war of spanish succession (debatable) -war of austrian succession (debatable) -seven years war -war of sixth coalition -war of seventh coalition -crimean war -world war one -world war two major wars france has won since 1700 (excluding colonial conflicts) -war of quadruple alliance -war of first coalition -war of second coalition -war of third coalition -war of fourth coalition -war of fifth coalition -crimean war -world war one
1
Juan Frede all colonial wars fought against weaker nations.
1
Juan Frede so has france, they are currently fighting four wars in africa.
1
Juan Frede france captured sevastopool and committed three times as many forces as britain to the war.
1
Juan Frede technically yes, since the french army would destroy any commonwealth invasion. but eu will be on france's side.
1
Juan Frede experience isn't everything, plus there is always the nuclear option if things go wrong for france, which it won't.
1
Juan Frede there is also -logistics -numbers -tech -morale -leadership -organization -geography
1
Juan Frede if france starts losing (which they won't) they'll nuke uk and they can lose less than the uk in nuclear war warhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwxjN2w1sZo
1
Juan Frede source? spain's army should be closer to france and germany than uk.
1
Juan Frede no way british troops will take out two french for one brit, british experience and technology isn't that much higher.. and morale will be low considering all of europe would be against uk. english ppl don't see europeans as bitter enemies either, might sue for peace. especially with growing unrest in scotland and ireland.
1
Juan Frede clearly your claims are false or biased. and even if that were the case, which isn't, the governments would have to support france anyways. germany has abandoned all historical rivalries with france, they now have very good relationship that is further binded after brexit. im starting to think you're just trolling.
1
Juan Frede polish people always side with britain? no, they depend too much on the eu, especially france and germany. they can't afford to help britain. and they haven't always sided with britain, in ww2 they sided with france, not just britain, and remember that it was french that liberated poland during the napoleonic wars, not britain... poland even mentions the french in their anthem.
1
Juan Frede spanish terrain would repel the brits, the commonwealth conquering spain would be a hard task even without french help. eu would help france, and nato would label uk as agressor. plus, france would also have international forces from polynesia to guiana to reunion.
1
Juan Frede nepal is under too much indian and chinese influence, they won't help the brits just because they did in the world wars.
1
Juan Frede lmao australians could barely handle the emus, they are not the same people as they were at gallipolli.
1
Juan Frede how would puny new zealand have any impact on the war?
1
Juan Frede ghanaian public may side with britain but that does not mean they officially will, ghana is facing rebellion in west togoland and it isn't part of commonwealth.
1
Juan Frede canada will be the only significant commonwealth help to uk, but france has all of eu on its side.
1
Juan Frede i'm not an expert at british politics but polls say that the snp still have a plurality. and uk has no electoral college.
1
Juan Frede bro you have to be trolling at this point, there is literally no historical, economical, or military reason for those countries to side with britain. and britain only won those 1v5s because russia or american had to step in and defeat the enemy for them, if the brits are gonna have higher morale because they want a challenge then they're all delusionsal, this is war, not a game.
1
Juan Frede alliances aren't dictated by historical ties today those countries are closer to spain because of eu. poland saved austria but austria repaid them with partition, so how does your logic work? and going by your logic, what did britain do to those countries you mentioned? scandinavia was traditionally hostile to britain ever since the vikings, and britain was at war with denmark and sweden during napoleonic wars, and britain was upset that norway and sweden wouldnt let them help finland during ww2... holland may be similar to england, but they had their fair share of war too, look up anglo-dutch wars and the seizure of ceylon and cape colony. as for those eastern european countries britain let them into soviet influence and let them into decades of ruin when they agreed with stalin to let eastern europe to him.
1
Juan Frede they may not have asked for peace, but they needed the russians or americans to do their work.
1
Juan Frede you serious? spain was europe's most effective military power in 17th century, and france doesn't just have more battles won than england, but they have the most battles won out of all countries in the world.
1
Juan Frede they were forced to side with the british because the germans were invading.
1
Juan Frede denmark is historically more friendlier to france... they cooperated in ww2 and napoleonic wars. while england and denmark were enemies since viking times up till british invasion of copenhagen.
1
Juan Frede what i mean is that by default, denmark was on britain’s side because they were both fighting against germany, but there was no formal alliance between them. and remember, denmark surrendered to the germans in only a few hours.
1
Juan Frede spain never interacted with denmark, but did britain ever help denmark? denmark is friendlier with france, they both allied against britain during napolenic wars. honestly you should stop repeating your arguments each time i shoot them down.
1
Juan Frede uk is dominated by england. whats the formal language of scotland and ireland? english.
1
Juan Frede haha denmark surrendered in two hours while france surrendered in nine months.
1
Juan Frede stop repeating the claims that the norwegians would support britain, they don’t they are closer to germany.
1
Juan Frede also, where are you from? your name sounds spanish, are you perhaps a salty latin american?
1
Juan Frede and that was the last time i heard from you...
1
Juan Frede only a small percentage of british troops have had experience in the afghan mountains and other global operations; they are not as committed to those places as the usa... what harsh british hills are you talking about? and why would gurkhas fight for britain? this isn’t ww2, britain has no influence in india anymore and therefore has no influence over nepal either. there are very few gurkhas left in britain, they won’t make a difference.
1
Juan Frede they aren’t colonies, guiana martinique and reunion are still part of france.
1
Juan Frede if the eu is not a family, then why do you even think those countries will support britain just because of the past?
1
Previous
4
Next
...
All