Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "WION" channel.

  1. Yeah it's as if your neighbors doesn't trust you. I wonder does it have to do with common history they had to endure due to Ruzzian aggression and constant modern bullying?
    8
  2.  @crude-za  funny how all ruzkiez are so mad that they talk about nuking Finland 🤣🤣🤣 U mad brah?
    6
  3.  @jonkite0071  NATO is military defense pact. Not governing body. All it requires from members is to defend each others if one is attacked.
    6
  4.  @ktrimbach5771  Ruzzia is literally only one talking about global dominance and restoring their lost empire.
    5
  5. It's unprovoked, war started 8-years ago by ruzkiez when they invade crimea just because Okraine wanted to trade with EU.
    5
  6. No one is saying that Ukraine is winning. It's right now a humiliating stalemate for russia.
    4
  7.  @JoshuaB-p8c  First of all. Okraine having revolution doesn't justify ruzzia sending their troops there. Second of all, there wasn't revolution. It's well recorded that those "rebels" were all part of Ruzzian army who didn't wear national colors. When caught they all were found out on pay list of Ruzzian military. Even their leader was officer in ruzzian army. There was never any real revolution but simple green men operation. Which btw is against international laws. Soldiers have to wear insignias of their countries when doing operations.
    4
  8.  @fingerprint8479  Finland is right next to ruzzia. Meaning that Ruzzia would be basically radiating their own cities if they ever launched nukes here. Plus Finland actually has nuclear shelters... Ruzkiez do not.
    3
  9. Issue is that NATO is about North Atlantic treaty... that's where the name comes from. Though I do agree that they should change name and accept other than western countries to be part of it. Every free and democratic country should join in unision against these genocidal dictatorships.
    3
  10.  @rami8896  It's the otherway around. Those countries used to be vassals or ruzkiez and they joined to NATO in order to leave their evil overlord.
    3
  11.  @readminote8966  Better fight on side of NATO and USA than fight alone.
    3
  12.  @abc_0_10_11  Reminder, ruzkiez actually instigated civil war in Finland
    3
  13. We always were, now we can target our nukes at you in return.
    3
  14.  @soccer9199  Finland and Sweden asked to join NATO. NATO didn't force or even ask them to join. While for Ukraine NATO never asked them to join nor did Ukraine even consider joining NATO.
    2
  15. Were joining NATO precisely because we know that we would be next target for invasion after Ukraine. Ruzzia had clear pattern of invading their neighbors with justification of getting back their historic borders.
    2
  16. It healed long time ago
    2
  17.  Gambit Odsey  Finland actually scores high on average when it comes to IQ and they generated lot of modern technology that even you are using right now.
    2
  18.  @josephalvinalmedatv8  Lol Finland actually could survive nuclear war, due to being prepared for it for decades. Now if ruzkiez dare to attack us they will all face nuclear power of the west and Finland will survive that.
    2
  19. Bear? More like a rat
    2
  20.  @viralfunnyvideos2067  Ruzzia already had nukes near enough to bomb europe and USA. This Belarus talk is just some PR move. IT doesn't literally change anything but make them look more like movie villains.
    2
  21.  @anilpatil8199  Ukraine never tried to join NATO before ruzkiez attacked them.
    2
  22. Finland actually has nuclear shelters. Ruzkiez don't. The moment you use nuclear weapons is the moment when Finland will be standing and no ruzzian will be alive.
    2
  23.  @dotmarceo  USA had literally nothing to do with this. Finland asked to join because they saw pattern in behavior of Ruzzia and knew they would be next unless they join now.
    2
  24.  @debater452  latest garbage?
    2
  25.  @rajpanda5065  You do realize that Russia started WW2 by allying with Germany and making pact with them on how to share Europe? Thus Ukraine should be free and Russia shouldn't hold any country that it took before ww2.
    1
  26.  @rajpanda5065  Nope, Read actual history books. Originally Russia signed Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. This pact enabled Germany to invade Poland and Russia to start waging war against neighboring countries as well. Pact was secret and was revealed decades later, which ended up contributing to the fall of soviets. Since it made Russian holdings illegal.
    1
  27.  @rajpanda5065  It was against soviet laws to occupy other countries by force. The pact proved that those occupations were done by force and not to "liberate" them. Every European? Name one beside Germany.
    1
  28.  @rajpanda5065  During 1930-44? I don't remember such thing happening, and again why does this matter again? Since it's literally in soviet's constitution that they aren't allowed to invade other countries and the pact proved that Russians broke the constitution.
    1
  29.  @rajpanda5065  So you totally disregard that they didn't colonialize any new countries at the time and that USSR broke their own laws?
    1
  30.  @ktrimbach5771  You're clueless. Finland was subjugated by Ruzzia since ww2. They had to pay huge amounts of money to them and were forced to sign defence pact with ruzkiez. The moment soviet ruzzia collapsed Finland took opportunity to escape from ruzziaz's grasp and joined EU. Then bit by bit closer to NATO in order not to provoke early ruzzian invasion. Now that Ruzkiez invaded Okraine, it was perfect moment for Finland to join NATO without ruzzia having chance to invade them. As Finnish person I say this clear. For over 100-years Finnish people have hated ruzzianz for their constant invasion, bullying and genocide of our people. Also border treaty? Rofl... Treaty was made with soviets not with Ruzzia, thus it's invalid. Plus it needed to be ratified once every 5-years. Which haven't been done for two decades. Typical low IQ ruzkie making lies here
    1
  31. Actually it's best decision we ever made. Now ruzkiez can no longer threaten us.
    1
  32.  @sinaoladeji3555  First of all those are not NATO operations. Second of all we rather be part of NATO than be invaded by ruzkiez. USA nor NATO isn't threatening us with genocide. Ruzkiez are.
    1
  33. ​ @sinaoladeji3555  Yugoslavia was country with loads different ethnic groups who all lived in separate areas and were forced to be together. They all separated and civil war happened (just like in ruzkiez soon). Serbia was trying to conquest all of these regions and was actively committing genocide there. UN had literally asked NATO to send troops there as PEACEKEEPING FORCES. Aka they ensured there was peace, no invasion nor any bombing was happening by their part. This is just bunch of whataboutism and you are delivering misinformation on purpose. I don't even need to address rest of your comments since your first one was already proven to be a lie. Only ruzkiez lie as much as you do.
    1
  34.  @fingerprint8479  Not really.. not only you would get nuked by Finland's allies but you would be also radiating yourself. "And live their indefinitely?" They don't need to? Man you really seem to have low IQ. Radiation from nukes dissipates pretty fast. Unlike Ruzkiez Finland can actually survive the blast. "The surface will be radioactive for centuries." Wasn't the case with Japan and we have modern technology able to clean radiation. Meanwhile ruzkiez can't even afford to keep their roads fixed. "Welcome to the NATO family! " Far better option than being invaded by ruzkiez and then having entire population mass murdered. Which is what you were planning in the first place. Now... If you mess with us, you mess with 31 nations as well.
    1
  35.  @relaxsleepheal6979  So you fear that west will attack you so much that you start nuclear war with them that you're guaranteed to lose?
    1
  36.  @aeye9772  Easily. :D Ruzkeiz are a joke
    1
  37.  @aeye9772  Hah, you do realize that NATO countries have nukes at well? You keep threatening with nukes without realizing that same fate would be applied to you as well. Only difference is that NATO countries have prepared for this and they can survive the fallout. While ruzkeiz can't even keep their roads in shape.
    1
  38.  @theshowoflife1075  They have consistently bullying every baltic and eastern-european country. And they started invasion of Okraine 8-years ago just for them wanting to trade with EU. Ruzzians are pure evil and everyone in eastern europe and baltics knows this. This is why they all joined NATO.
    1
  39.  @JoshuaB-p8c  Lol say that to Chechens, Georgia and Ukraine. Not just that but ruzkiez are constantly threatening us with war for past 70-years. PS: Give us back Karjala if you don't admit that ruzzia invaded Finland in WW2.
    1
  40.  @shehrozrajput9174  NATO countries is not same as NATO, also none of these countries claimed to annex any of these regions. Plus in multiple cases the other side declared war on them.
    1
  41. Oh.. .Let's be honest. No one in NATO countries cares about Russia. Russians have this weird paranoia that entire world is there to get them and that justifies their invasions and mass murdering other people.
    1
  42. Last time Finland was neutral Ruzzia invaded them. Being neutral next to ruzzia is basically free meal for ruzzia.
    1
  43.  @JoskyJojofan  No one attacked because they are afraid of their unified power. Especially ruzzia that is filled with cowards.
    1
  44. Okraine was never part of NATO and Ruzkiez never had balls to invade any NATO country. In fact with this move Finland secured it's independecy and avoided future war with ruzkiez.
    1
  45.  @chienthangniemtin4839  How is that "destroy in 3 days" still going on after an year?
    1
  46.  @Chapter7129  Where else military bases should be placed than next to country that openly threatens with invasion all the time?
    1
  47.  @DT-mw3ge  Only small numbers yet they are running out of supplies and DRAFTING CIVILIANS. Hilarious. Also Ruzkiez did Threat Finland every single year. Now we have nukes protecting us from ruzkiez.
    1
  48.  @peabase  Ruzkiez IQ is too low to understand what radioactive poisoning is.
    1
  49.  @rsuriyop  The frick you're spouting? Had been so happy with Ruzkiez? Ruzzia stole our territory and made us pay huge amounts of money for decades while using us as sacrificial buffer zone. Finnish people have always hated ruzkiez and always will. We joined NATO because we knew that you people are evil and you would invade us next.
    1
  50.  Gambit Odsey  We also have nukes now so nuking us would mean mutual destruction. Man you ruzkiez have low IQ
    1