Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "DW News" channel.

  1. Safety and comfortable feeling are desires not human rights. It's your own duty to ensure that you're living comfortable and in safe.
    28
  2. @中国的主人 and how is Z different from swastika? xD
    26
  3.  @СергейМонин-д7с  And why is that a reason?
    25
  4.  @karakondzula1388  Russia literally lost territory they gained during war. Also not just that but they made NATO stronger while Russia is back to ww2 era of equipment. Basically... Russia lost, the more time you spend in ukraine the more you will lose.
    25
  5.  @yahyaky9854  several of my friends who moved did adopt. Why move to another country if you don't want to be part of their culture?
    19
  6.  @superdudehello  "nature breaks out human rights" This proves that you don't even understand what human rights are. They are all related to freedom of the individual. Not from avoiding reality.
    16
  7.  @klaus6578  Sweden never invaded middle-east. They did invade finland thought but you don't see Finnish people going there and bombing malls or shooting in public places.
    16
  8.  @zeissiez  Ruzzia is not people's best interest. Ruzzia is guaranteed way for extinction of all life on earth. Also proxy war? First of all Okraine is independent country. USA didn't send it's troops there.
    15
  9.  @superdudehello  Should a cave man thousands of years ago have same comfort as an average man right now? Was their human rights broke by the nature when their life wasn't as comfortable as modern humans have? This is how easy it's to break your flawed reasoning. Also what is comfort is highly subjective. For some it's comfortable that no one ever talks back at them. For psychopaths it's comfortable that you never report to cops on their actions.
    14
  10.  @4X10S  last time Finland was neutral the Ruzzia invaded them. Finland always had military near border. Friendly country? would you be friendly with someone who killed your people and stole your land?
    14
  11.  @meso8848  NATO has literally no article forcing anyone to join offensive war. It's literally defensive pact.
    13
  12.  @meso8848  expand more to east? First of all people apply to NATO USA doesn't force them to be part of NATO. Nor do those countries have to pay to USA. It's literally defensive alliance which only requirement is to help each others while being invaded. Also even if it were military alliance, it would still be better alternative than being under ruzkiez. Ruzkiez are enemy of humanity
    12
  13. Fun fact, finland joining nato is far bigger risk to ruzzis than okraine
    11
  14.  @wolfswinkel8906  never prevented. Only men of service age. Remember when ruzkiez did the same and even now are doing harsher drafts? XD
    9
  15.  @meso8848  Actually no. Iraq war was not NATO operation. Afghanistan was USA helping local government fighting back against terrorist who declared war on USA. Libya was just making no-flight zone to cover civilians from carpet bombing and Syria wasn't invaded either but it was about fighting ISIS. Same foe that Syrian government fought against as well. Nato played no parts of any of these conflicts. Not just that but USA didn't try to annex any of these nations either.
    8
  16.  @wolfswinkel8906  it's not a warcrime to defend one's country. However ruzzian nazies broke international treaties by making surprise attack and even without official declaration of war.
    6
  17.  @miketackabery7521  soft laws worked well for decades until the immigrant numbers exploded.
    6
  18.  @konstantinbush295  they pushed farther in shorter time than ruzkiez had before and what allied forces in ww2 had. Ruzkize are on the run and soon their evil empire will fall.
    6
  19.  @mrityunjaytripathi5588  USA wasn't there to annex Afghanistan. They were there to kill Taliban leader. Which they did. After that they stayed for a while in attempt to help local government to stablize situation. Also ruzkiez lost in single week more men than USA lost within 20-years.
    5
  20.  @-108-  Still better than being murdered by ruzkiez
    5
  21. @Equa nimity lol bunch ruzkie delusions
    4
  22.  @Nizmo718  Because Putin wants to be remembered as a man who destroyed Ruzzia?
    4
  23. Russia: "we want to secure independence for these states... Also Russia: "aaaand now were going to annex them"
    4
  24.  @grrr3500  If your friends laugh at your misery... Then they aren't your friends. Find actually good people to befriend.
    4
  25. ​ @blackpanthar906  rofl such as? 😂😂😂
    4
  26.  @calvinhoward3808  so you admit that west has better technology than ruzkiez?
    3
  27.  @StrongRespect  stop lying ruzkie. I know people from region. None of them likes ruzzianz. Also Okraine has alright to fight for their land.
    3
  28.  @kaloyanrosenov2123  Because NATO can't answer without clear declaration of war. The ruzzian forces were cowards and didn't take responsibility for it but instead called it as accident. Thus proving that ruzkiez are cowards who aren't manly enough for direct conflict.
    3
  29.  @grigol101  Not true, if you actually read how they "won" any war it comes down to: 1. They were allied with rest of the world. 2. They were supplied by their allies. 3. They burned their own cities and towns as scorche earth tactic. 4. Military loses for Ruzzia has always been huge. They always lose more men than their enemy in each and every war. Best strategist in the world eh? Why is it then that for every 1 finnish man it took 20 ruzkiez to take down one? "This is a chess game where pieces are sometimes " Reputation, entire economy and all the army they had... "sacrifice". You do realize that West already won this war? There is literally nothing for ruzkiez to gain from gaining Okraine by now. it's nothing but ruined cities so they can't even provide enough tax revenue for ruzkeiz to pay back the loses ruzkeiz suffered in war. Meanwhile west literally lost 0 men in this war. "has the largest territory. " You do realize that 99% of that territory is nothing but unhabitable tundra and forest where no person could live so therefore there is no strategic interest to compete for it? "ALWAYS returns its territories with a bonus of new territories." Oh and when you're going to get back Poland in that case? Or Finland? Estonia? Latvia? :DDDDDD Ruzkie trying to clown hard. Your evil empire will be destroyed by hands of justice.
    3
  30. Most of that coast can't be used. Only part that is usable is right next to Finland and Norway. Meaning that they can storm that region in less than couple hours and ensure that those ports won't be used.
    3
  31.  @gilh3947  we always knew that, we finally had perfect timing to join NATO without Ruzzia having ability to react with army.
    3
  32.  @bonnie7898  but ruzkiez make unrealistic claims of destroying more thanks and aircraft than there ever was on the Okranian soil xD
    3
  33.  @marktsvetanov6038  Okraine has pushed further than Ruzzia had during it's offense and is still pushing.
    3
  34.  @Nobody-Nowhere  It's good geopolitical interest to defend world from ruzzian evil.
    3
  35.  @leonne07  actually they were
    2
  36.  @ringsaphire  You go to jail for not paying taxes, around as long as for murder. If you think that taxes are paid for safety then you're wrong.
    2
  37.  @Steve992.1  And you think that your state media is more trustworthy? XD
    2
  38.  @IbnWobbler  country with aging population losing ablebodied men who would normally work and provide tax income. 300k people gone in the air is huge loss.
    2
  39.  @4tress300zx  Does it matter whose weapons they use? That has nothing to do are they winning or not
    2
  40.  @StrongRespect  Not true, this has been refuted. Also speaking ruzzia does not make one ethnic ruzzian.
    2
  41. Just like how you threw Finland in ww2?
    2
  42.  @casiopea1979  doing the opposite of left wing economic politicies have always LITERALLY ALWAYS led into better economic situation.
    2
  43.  @ElusiveTy  so why did ruzzia draft civilians if they aren't lacking in military?
    2
  44.  13ased_American  correction, Ruzzia is hiding behind Belrus. Belrus is just puppet. The region belongs to Germany historically.
    2
  45.  @Writeous0ne  except it's not based on anything factual. If you actual look at data Ruzzian GDP has collapsed.
    2
  46.  @wokeaf1337  It's not if you understand anything about making business. Them being more expensive means that diamonds from elsewere get priority of being bought.
    2
  47.  @onlyme112  And that is bad why? Why is it bad that Ukranians defend themselves and why is it bad that other countries help them in doing so?
    2
  48. in history of humanity, ruzzia has never been held accountable on any crime they have committed toward humanity...
    2
  49.  @Adcabrer  north-east some regions that aren't villages or cities and lack any strategic value. Meanwhile Okraine's advancements on gaining city that is vital for supplying crimea and other cities that ruzkiez hold. Ruzkiez aren't known from strategic thinking thus it's easy to defeat them.
    2
  50.  @naszadynastia  it was lower in ww2
    2