Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "David Pakman Show" channel.

  1. dffykvn 1. I think I did already mention that it's only advantage if you deal with racist person. And it's also disadvantage if he deals with a racist who is black. You don't get any advantage out of your color unless you're dealing with racist person. 2. Yes you keep making long ass comments without providing anything insightful. Or is it because you lack one? 3. Evidence or didn't happen. 4. Did you even read the wikipedia page you provided to me? 5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_O'Reilly_(political_commentator) I'm sorry but his birthplace clearly had no affects on his success. It's pretty clear that he WAS (used to be) talented individual who did achieve his status with hard work. Also do you know what part means? I have already said before that your skin color only helps with to deal with racist which prefer your color. I never denied that there would be absolutely no difference. However when someone comes and says that he got where he was because he was privileged whiteman then it's a very different. And "admitting" that it's PART of reason would just thrill idiots like you to think that he actually did reach his goals because of his skin color. 6.  Nah you don't acknowledge it. You're simply making excuses and trying to please people around you by saying it. Since you still haven't figured out that it only benefits if you  are dealing with racist person. It's double edged sword.   7. You don't seem to know what the word "trying" means? They don't OWN a part. It's same as you would just go and say that the bread they ate in morning OWNED a part in their success. The part it owned was SO FUCKING LITTLE that it shouldn't be mentioned in this case. How hard it's to get it?
    1
  2. dffykvn 1. So now you're denying that racist person wouldn't treat people of his race better than other races? Holy shit you really are dumfuck O.o. 2. Why don't you use your brains in order to figure out what I said instead of being grammar nazi? Puzzle too hard for you? 3. You made a claim and didn't back it up with any evidence. 4. Actually my reading comprehend is very good (full scores from tests), my writing is just bad. Only one who isn't getting point is you, and I doubt that it has nothing to do with language in this case. More like about your cognitive dissonance.  5.  "So his parents getting a quality home at a cheaper price just because of their skin color didn't improve the odds even a little bit?  You're a fucking idiot if you believe that. " And you thought that repeating same which you have been saying all the time would change the situation. You're fucking retarded of believing that. It's not like I have actually answered to that question multiple times already. Looks like memory and thinking isn't your strongest forte. "Are you quoting me or are you asking me that question?" Rhetorical question from my side pointing out that you clearly can't even speak your own language. "But that isn't true.  If you grow up with things that people who didn't share your skin color couldn't have had access to then you've benefited from white privilege." This comment makes no sense at all. You ignored my comment totally and started to talk something which is irrelevant to it's point. "Yea why should anyone acknowledge objective reality." False, again he should be forced to admit that eating a yogurt also had it's part. And in matter of fact ADMIT THAT EVERYFUCKING THING FROM THE SMALEST ATOM DID. In a way they did, but their part like his skin color played so small part that it shouldn't even be mentioned.  6. "Actually I did acknowledge it.  Do you have a learning disability?" No but you really seem to have that one by looks of it. Since you like to repeat same arguments over the my rebuttal that did just counter your argument previously. You're going in circles idiot. Rest of the comment is again irrelevant to the point which I made. You just keep repeating yourself while totally ignoring what I have said by looks of it.
    1
  3. Yep.. Bernie fanboys are overly zealous. Seriously for them he is like second coming of Jesus for christians.
    1
  4. Bullshit, really bullshit. I have literally known people who could be called as geniuses ( according to Mensa's IQ test) even though they have been eating a lot of fast food.
    1
  5. How can you learn something without looking it up in the first place?
    1
  6. kay jay Says person with so low IQ that she can't even provide actually argument why I'm wrong.
    1
  7. We all knew that Creative assembly is ran by satanists.
    1
  8.  @Shurbsss  clearly it worked.
    1
  9.  @area-ww2my  Precisely how it works with ignorant and illogical people who are superstitious.
    1
  10.  @area-ww2my  Haha seems like I'm dealing with I0vv lQ person. Did I say anything about god? I was refering to his worshippers. In your particular faith they are highly superstitious and not really as bright as you like to think.
    1
  11. +bewilderedkettle Not realistic at all. He doesn't understand economics. He doesn't understand that markets fluxate easily, and that british economy will be back up around 2-5 years. People simply sold their stocks because they wanted to get most profit out of them, so that they could buy even more stocks when the prices are still slow. Investing 101.
    1
  12. Shadowtechnik Has been done before. In fact Finland did destroy lot of tanks in WW2 with simply infrantry troops. You see you don't need another tank to stop a tank.
    1
  13. Bura Shimazaki rekt is slang word, google it up. Samething but shorter. "I also doubt you're Scandanavian." Born and raise in Finland. In fact my account also has and my wall people mentioned few times years ago. How about you provide actual arguments instead of embarrass yourself with ad hominems?
    1
  14. +mcintyrec1981 And? You think being racist and hating gays is the same thing?
    1
  15. rudy van buren That's funny, because even left wingers use bad language, and call others racists when they have no arguments. Right wing, left wing. Doesn't matter both are retarded idiots.
    1
  16. OrderedChaos010 I don't see him saying that. But aren't people allowed to change views they holded when they are young? Just look at some of those footages, some of them are many decades old. It's like you people hold stubbornness as ultimate value.
    1
  17. OrderedChaos010 At drop of a hat? Okay now you made demonstrable claim. Please provide evidence that his views did change all the suddenly the moment he wanted to become president. In other words you need to show that 1-3 years before his candidacy, his position did change. " Don't forget Trump was a major democratic supporter and close freind to the Clintons until just a few years ago." Don't forget that democrats of the pasts were more like republicans of modern day.
    1
  18. OrderedChaos010 "nd with that giant load of bullshit we are done. " Rofl yep keep ignoring how republicans stance over slaves etc has changed. Or interracial marriages. "We are talking about just a few years ago, not decades ago." Yet you cannot provide a slight evidence for your claim. " I mean he was actively supporting Hillary during her last presidential run. " And? Hillary is in his pockets. "t I'm tired of arguing with people who deny what is right in front of their eyes." I'm tired with arguing people who refuse to bring facts to the table, but keep making huge claims.
    1
  19. Aguila701 "The facts are in the video itself. Either he is playing us all for chumps (left, right, Mexicans, U.S citizens, young, old, celebrities, politicians, foreigners. extremists, etc) or he's gone senile. " How about the option that corrupted media tries to show him in bad light and everything he has said has been taken out of context? It's astonishing that there still are people who believe that modern media isn't corrupted. "The only sensible candidate is Bernie " So it's sensible to praise genonicalp tyrant (castro) and love soviet russia?
    1
  20. Aguila701 "Hey, are you like a member of Trump's inner circle or something?" I don't need to be inner circle in order to do background checking for claims made about it. something that you should do. " Or maybe you live inside his head." Or maybe you're still brainwashed by mainstream media. Shame that you're not capable of doing fact checking. Instead you accept everything as truth that articles say. "Silly me why would I trust the media when I can trust a complete stranger online that is deluded into believing that Trump is perfect in every way. " First of all, I never called him perfect nor do i think so.  Second, You're not suppose to trust me. You're suppose to think on your own. Go and do the investigation, I will guarantee that you will find the truth the moment you stop reading the articles but go to the sources instead. " Well I guess if you are the Nihilistic" you clearly don't know what Nihilism means.
    1
  21. Aguila701 I don't need to make case for trump. Burden of proof is on you. You're the one who has been slandering him, not me.
    1
  22. Aguila701 "All you keep spouting is "argh liberal bias" " It's not about shouting liberal bias when my argument was that news media in USA is corrupted. Haven't you heard about gamergate yet? That thing alone did prove it? "So go on, make your case. Don't be shy." I already did. Burden of proof. If you don't understand what that is, then google it.  You have made the positive assertions about Trump without ever giving any evidence for them.  It's not my job to debunk your delusions. It's your job to prove them.
    1
  23. Jason Cano Ah seems like Aguila did block me. Did he make any comment before it?
    1
  24. spark300c the amount of irony is great in you.
    1
  25. spark300c " I mean really tired to convict people do not vote for trump. " Maybe they are tired of hearing your obvious lies that you have heard from buzzfeed and other actually proven corrupted media sites?
    1
  26. spark300c It's actually pretty common knowledge that american newsites are bought. And no I'm not a trumper. I'm european, and I come from Finland. You know the place that bernie fanboys such as you think as a paradise. "we even got other counties warning about trump that gone through there dictators." You don't simply become dictator by being voted as president... It's clear that you don't even understand own system where you live in.
    1
  27. spark300c "it just it gotten so weak right now that it possible for trump to over power the people." You clearly don't understand how politics works. You have literally no evidence indicating that it's possible to become dictator in USA simply for being voted for president. you're as lunatic as far right nutjobs who think that obama would be new dictator.
    1
  28. spark300c Nothing to do with being bold, everything to do with their legal rights. You're simply scare mongering here just like buzzfeed and other crap media does.
    1
  29. spark300c Again it's impossible for him to become dictator in USA. Dictators are only possible to make if citizens back up that transformation, including majority in the government. So here we have... you having theorical nightmare situation without any actual evidence. You still repeating same old lies. What next? Call him racist and sexists without ever providing quote where he says anything racists?
    1
  30. spark300c "he only need the executive branch to back it up." Most politicians hate him him. There is no way that executive branch of corrupted shills would give power to a guy who wants to stript that corruption away. There is a reason why all media and politicians are against him. He is literally threat to their way of life of getting bribery money. "anyway all the bad thing about him that have prophesied about have came true. " Prophesies don't exists. "that he is a fake. the fracturing of republican party. in fact the party will not come together all the way to November." Democrats are clearly fractured as well. Oh wait already forgot how almost half of them are now socialists who won't vote for hillary? " people are echoing that he become a dictator with no prophetic insight"I " More like people with delusions are yelling that he will become dictator. "hear the Holy Spirit saying the man from New York will not save America." great... Delusional and religious fool. "Will govern with an iron hand and set himself up as a king, establishing a monarchy." Only possible as revolt. Constitution is pretty clearly against kings. Thank you for being perfect example of what sort of people are against trump. Delusional religious people. You actually made me huge favor by showing how much of a nutcase trump haters are.
    1
  31. spark300c "if that was true then they would hate ted cruz just as much but that not the reason why they hate trump." U what mate? Ted cruz is corrupted as fuck. Heck he even looks like some member of mafia gang. "there some politicians that have some morality left and they are not backing trump. " Please almost every politician in usa are against trump. "hey fear trump because they afraid he start another major war with being reckless with his words or he become a tyrant." He is literally only candinate that is willing to create better relationship with Russia. And he has been known from anti-war policies. Meanwhile hillary was one instigating war in syria.
    1
  32. spark300c I didn't go by look, look part was simply remark. Cruz is corrupted as fuck. Ah you're cruz voter... No wonder you're so delusional. Cruz lost already, and he never even had a chance. I love how you say that media let's only one side story on cruz but can't admit that maybe they do same for trump.
    1
  33. So people aren't allowed to change their minds? Very mature of you...  You're worse than Arnold with that attitude of yours.
    1
  34. yootoob1958 Actually that is a contradiction. You have right to call him moronic biggot but you have no right to tell him to stop using his freedom of speech.
    1
  35. Paulo Cesar Ferraro Actually things which restrict freedom of speech are not allowed in freedom of speech. You see it would be a paradox.
    1
  36. Paulo Cesar Ferraro Freedom of speech means that person is free to say his opinions without being intimidated, threatened or get attacked (physical) from it. Huge mob of people yelling "shut up" is pretty intimidating don't you think? "Freedom of speech means that you have the freedom to say what you want without government interference and that's it." False.  " You have the right to keep talking after someone tells you to shut up." Tell that to angry mob. ". And if the person trying to force you to shut up then it is aggression and the state must protect you." But with your reasoning they should be allowed to shut people up with force as long as government isn't doing it. "But you can be ordered to shut up" Order? Now you just lost this whole thing. Suggestions would've be better word for this.
    1
  37. Paulo Cesar Ferraro "Intimidation and threats are something else." And yelling "SHUT UP!" Isn't intimidating at all? Do you know why people yell in the first place if the hearing isn't the problem? "You're wrong. Freedom of speech is a negative right. My God. How do you not know that?" Literally you got rekt the moment you said that shut up is an order and indimitation is also wrong. "You are drawing a ridiculous scenario. " It's not when the OP said "we" which means more than one.  "No. This is aggression which is a crime." You clearly weren't smart enough to see the loophole in here...  "Manner of speaking. You are not required to shut up." Then it's not an order. "And the other person has the right to tell you to shut up" and why would someone say tell someone to shut up if the intention is not to restrict their freedom of speech?  Understand now?
    1
  38. yootoob1958 Yell that in real life and I might feel intimidated. You see nothing in your text implied that you would restrict yourself to yell shut up only on youtube. Fucking idiots can't even bring good arguments to the table...
    1
  39. yootoob1958 And you expect someone knowing that you meant forums only? You do realize that people can't read your mind?
    1
  40. Ben Warren No it's not subjective at all. It's objective. There is clear definition of what intimidation is. "The most recent example, white supremacists being able to gather and rally in any community. SOCTUS clearly disagrees with your definition. And, their opinion is the supreme legal opinion." Difference between you and me is that I'm willing to defend even their freedom of speech. While you are trying to stop them from engaging discussion. Some of us are smart enough to know that shutting your opponent won't change their minds, in fact you just make it worse. ""False" is not an argument. Care to explain how it is false?" I did, it's concept of people being allowed to speak up their mind without ANYONE interfering with it. "False. Forcing someone to "shut up by force" is a violation of their "freedom of speech"" First of all , you're not paul. So why the fuck are you trying to defend what he thinks? "So, you are misrepresenting his argument." And you know magically what he thinks. Dealing with retards... "No. Order is an imperative. I can order you to do anything. However if I do not have the authority to enforce the "order", you should rightfully ignore said "order". " Read the definition of giving an order. Dictionary disagrees with you. "And, "Suggestions would've BEEN better word for this." is more grammatically correct. " And I should care why? "What exactly is your point? " That both of you idiots are twisting words meaning to match with your agenda.
    1
  41. Paulo Cesar Ferraro "There is no way to define what is intimidating or not. " There is read the freaking dictionary.  "For example, on the Internet of course there is no risk of physical injury" Actually there is if the person can track you down. Not to mention mental damage can be worse than physical injury. We have multiple case of people killing themselves simply from being bullied online. "No, clearly you're an idiot. What the fuck? " So I'm idiot when you can't think? Wow that was new, oh wait it isn't. Usually the most retarded people are like you. "You can not understand that beat someone is not allowed? " Could you provide quote where I said that beating up someone is allowed? "You can not swing your fist in someone's face. You can not force someone to shut up." Says that to a criminal. In fact find a real life gangster and call his mom as a whore. Go for it! The fact that you don't do it is because you're intimidated by him. Because you scare that the might punch you. See my point now or are you seriously that retarded that you don't? "You can, however, exercise free speech and tell someone else to shut up. " It's not exercise freedom of speech when you are trying to deny someone's freedom of speech. Tell me, when a big muscular clearly a criminal yells you to shut up. Will you keep talking? "There is no loophole, the line is crystal clear." You must be sociopath. They usually see laws as a something that no one would break. "What? You have not done any sense. " Yeah I'm sorry, I tend to forgot that I'm dealing with mentally retarded person. "intent may be that you shut up and that's good. " any person who is for freedom of speech wouldn't try to shut anyone up for speaking their opinion. "The point is that you are not required to shut up and the government protects your right to express an opinion, although many people want you to shut the fuck up." Not the first time in the history of mankind when many people lynch someone for speaking their mind even though law is against lynching. The fear that mob will come to you if you don't shut up is real. Go ahead and call muhammed faggot to angry group of muslims when they are protesting something, and see my point. I bet you don't have balls to do that.
    1
  42. Ben Warren "Strawman. I did not insinuate as such. In fact, I gave an example of a threat without violence; the judge in a court of law. Keep practising your mental gymnastics. You need it." It's not strawman when I have pointed out it multiple times that violence isn't only way to threaten people. Yet you keep insisting that it's. You're being dishonest here. So now since you admit that violence isn't the only way. Then you lost this case. Because people's freedom of speech can be restricted and you just admitted it. Yet you're not man enough to say it out loud. You lost this. Man up and admit it.
    1
  43. +dudev Name American politician that isn't flip flop or is trustworthy?
    1
  44. dudev Not changing your position isn't sign of not being opportunists or trustful.  Changing opinion over time is something that intellectually honest people do when they realize that they were wrong on something. But let's bring facts to tables. Bring quoted statements from trump that are in conflict what he had said before. Since many of those things mentioned in this video, are holded by him even by today. Remember... Provide context with those quotes too, aka source.
    1
  45. dudev You say all, but you cannot name them. "No one does that unless they're pandering." And what trump would be pandering here? Are you telling me that majority of americans believe that his ideas are good? If not, then it's not pandering. 
    1
  46. dudev No he isn't. Republicans hate him, haven't you noticed how badly his own party treats him? And again republican base is worthless unless you believe that their opinions have more people agreeing with. "if he's the nominee, you can expect him to flip back to the middle on several issues." Well middle is the best. Both left and right are retarded.
    1
  47. dudev Then you should ask yourself why leaders hate him. It's obvious that he is anti-corruption agent in these elections. But again why would he pander a party that would lose in your opinion?
    1
  48. dudev No, that is not true. They hated him since very beginning. He is literally strongest and best choice for republicans. He simply happens to be only politician who isn't bought. And he even mentioned this in his debates while pointing out that almost every politician there is bought. It's cold fact that media, political parties and corporations hate to be shown to public. " he's not an authentic conservative or Christian. " Then let him be first atheist as president. Though I haven't heard of him not being christian. "And I already explained that any candidate has to gain the support of the base in order to win. That's why he's pandering to them. " Again doesn't address my question. He could've been pandering democrats. In fact it's even easier to pander them without getting hate. Just say free weed for everyone and everyone votes you. " Independents decide elections, and he polls badly among moderates." The opposite, moderates actually favor him. REmember the people who make polls. Good example of polls being corrupted is how certain newstation removed results where bernie won hillary.
    1
  49. dudev Nah that is bullshit, Trump has huge support behind him, even from groups of people who hate him. Only one who has change against trump is bernie. "He has no experience in politics. " Why should him? LAst time I checked, people with long time experience in politics were actually incompetent people. "Trump has never shown any inclination towards religion." Why should he? " Suddenly he's quoting the bible in speeches at Liberty University. " And this is flip flopping why? I'm atheist, yet I still quote bible every now and then when it works with the context. "The GOP also needs to win the Hispanic vote" They love him, and trump isn't alienating them by saying that illegal immigration is problem. You see these hispanics who love him are legal.
    1
  50. dudev "Trump said the bible is his favorite book. If you believe that, then you're a gullible fool. " first of all I don't give a shit even if it wouldn't be his favorite book. Second of all, what reasons you have to doubt him?  " Even the conservative "news" " You do realize that conservative news are against him? Just like regressive ones? "admits that Trump's approval among Hispanic VOTERS is only slightly higher than that of Romney's in the 2012 election. And Romney only had 25% of the Hispanic vote. " And this is bad why?
    1