Comments by "snuffeldjuret" (@snuffeldjuret) on "Scott Manley" channel.

  1. isn't there many governments that does not have the social obligations of governments? :P
    1
  2. could be, but I am curious how it differs between e.g. Orion, Starliner, Soyuz and Crew Dragon.
    1
  3. that is, in my understanding, the main issue with nuclear power. Accidents can "easily" be dealt with, but who will do it if it hurts the one dealing with it? But then again, there are lots and lots and lots of people who willingly and knowingly risk their lives for their work.
    1
  4.  @TheEvilmooseofdoom  refueling makes it sounds like it will emit ~4 times the greenhouse gases than it actually will.
    1
  5.  @RhelrahneTheIdiot  so many times in a row, that hasn't happened. SN5, SN6, SN8, SN9, SN10, SN11, SN15 all launched without exploding. Landing is another thing.
    1
  6.  @RhelrahneTheIdiot  "Super Straight flag, opinion discarded with prejudice transphobe." never go full woke.
    1
  7.  @RhelrahneTheIdiot  "Do remember he called one of the heroes ..." I only consider those who risk their lives heroes, and that dude didn't risk his life.
    1
  8.  @RhelrahneTheIdiot  I know what it is about, and you presenting your biased understanding of it doesn't change a thing. Unsurprisingly, it is not the only topic you spout nonsense about here.
    1
  9. they say it won't be much of a pressure wave, compared to a "real explosion". On paper they say it should be no worries for the capsule :o.
    1
  10.  @nikolatasev4948  not from NASA though, right? They got that after reaching orbit?
    1
  11.  @aporiac1960  we think we laugh at their stupidity, when we in fact fear their capability.
    1
  12. main customer seems to be starlink.
    1
  13. 12:12 reminded me of when a toilet is flushed but the water just keeps building up :P.
    1
  14. I would assume that they had "look out the windows time" as well as "play time for the camera".
    1
  15. oh yeah, the lack of dramatic music is so nice. And other things as well ofc. :).
    1
  16. I miss the robe though :D.
    1
  17. yea, and it seems like a waste to land once you are up those 150 meters, just to reset and then get back to the point before landing :P. Might as well go all the way up.
    1
  18. I am amazed that the 2nd stage "survived". Is it because there is less fuel in 1st stage and that the fuel there is is closer to the engines? (compared to the on pad explosion)
    1
  19.  @davidskidmore3442  it is also not that easy to bring aid to the world.
    1
  20. so cool
    1
  21.  @TheEvilmooseofdoom  pretty much everywhere, can't wait to hear Scott talk about the Polaris Program.
    1
  22.  @TheEvilmooseofdoom  just google it.
    1
  23. how do you define "doesn't seem to care"?
    1
  24.  @TheJohnreeves  who says that? You?
    1
  25. Should have told them to fly safe Scott, should have told them to fly safe... :'(.
    1
  26. who hold the rocket back if it is ready to go? If it is ready to go at T-2, might as well let it fly!
    1
  27.  @djbeezy  is there any reason to not think it is about saving money?
    1
  28. doubt it as you can see the same shaped object on missions with successful landings.
    1
  29. you can see that on almost every falcon 9 mission.
    1
  30. 11:33 we want Patel!
    1
  31.  @totalermist  technically though, the rocket doesn't reach space, right? Only the capsule.
    1
  32.  @jtit2025  you are joking, right?
    1
  33.  @totalermist  yea, but when you barely reach the Karman line, the difference can become significant, especially for the 100.535 km apogee flight right before the SpaceX landing :P.
    1
  34. not if it is cheap.
    1
  35. the salt from all the Elon haters is quite delicious.
    1
  36. Didn't Scott comment on that one?
    1
  37.  @korbit360  it happens often. I have seen the same object with that shape, size and during the same time period many times before. It always becomes a big talking point when there is a failed landing, not so much when there is a successful landing.
    1
  38.  @ChrisUK27  yea he is going to have to eat those words, unless he considers 2 or 3 years many.
    1
  39. I'd argue that it is more ethical. The rich person doesn't have to do it to get by, he does it 100% voluntarily.
    1
  40.  @mzaite  you have too much hate in your heart mate.
    1
  41.  @mzaite  I never said that. If you need to exaggerate to try to make a point, you don't have a point at all.
    1
  42.  Carlos Saraiva  taming fission is in many ways similar to taming fire. The potential for it to act as an unstoppable force has to be respected.
    1
  43. ​ Carlos Saraiva  my point being that if you eliminate all irrational fears, what remains should hopefully be the rational ones.
    1
  44. Sounds like very good news then!
    1
  45. the video we all've been waiting for :).
    1
  46. wow, that ending! My guess was that orange = 1 and white 0, seemed obvious. But then I thought most sense would be each line from center to edge of the chute would be a four digit binary number, pairing up to make hexadecimal code.
    1
  47.  Patrick Kazan  you?
    1
  48.  @EnglishMike  he doesn't say a few thousands will be enough, so why do you?
    1
  49.  @EnglishMike  all I am asking is that you use the same number as Elon does, and he guesses a million might do it.
    1
  50.  @EnglishMike  that is your opinion.
    1