Comments by "Night Raven" (@GiRR007) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

@Bryan-zh6kd That's called price fixing which is not only illegal but would lead to even worse outcomes than we have now. Not a good idea.
1
@jimbob28642 Oh no, they just took the money from you and gave it to them.
1
@solido888 Because America subsidizes the health care for the entire world. The only reason other countries can even think about universal health care is because the United States funds the research and development cost for new drugs and procedures out of pocket and other countries don't invest any where NEAR as much. As for the life expectancy is a completely different issue that has nothing to do with healthcare. In the US you are free to do almost whatever you want concerning your own health since it's not nationalized, so other people don't have to pay for YOUR bad health practices. Things like over eating, not exercising, eating unhealthy foods, is something Americans are allowed to do more of so they are on average less healthy. But this is a choice, a choice other countries don't have.
1
@solido888 other countries don't pay them, they just get the drugs reverse engineer them and make their own.
1
@solido888 Yes that is what freedom means. The ability to make choices for yourself whether they are good or bad for you. More freedom of care means that you can either get really good or really bad health care, compared to those other countries whose standard of care is average compared to the US. Right is the middle not the best but not the worst. Why do you think people come to the US to have some of the most complex surgery's done? If you can pay for it we have the HIGHEST quality of health care in the world.
1
@solido888 If you have the money and the right insurance you can make more choices. A universal health care model would reduce the quality of care for literally everyone, and because of how inefficient the government is, it would just end up making it more expensive overall. So you'd get lower quality health care that is MORE expensive. The expenses would just come out of your taxes. It's basic economics. What you'd want is LESS government interference in health care, not more. The government and its regulations are why health care is so expensive right now in the first place.
1
@solido888 No the data does not refute this, it says nothing about the QUALITY of care, only that more people will have access to it. For more people to have access to medical care than they already do you are GOING to have to increase prices SOME WHERE along that chain. Also no, very few country's health care systems have quality that scales with the amount of money you put in. Their quality is degraded because it has to universally serve such a large number of people.
1
@solido888 Those 2 things don't contradict, higher quality naturally cost more AND over regulation raises prices as well. High quality and over regulation don't conflict. And yes the health care QUALITY in the US is the best unless you for some reason are including the total coverage a countries health care system has into the statistic for some reason, which would be weird when we are talking about quality and not quantity. Or are using a polling at which is irrelevent.
1
@solido888 I mean when you have yet to refute anything Ive said otherwise yes I very much can just say it's the best.
1
@solido888 You haven't even sited any data and I don't even mean posting a link. You haven't even stateed a single statistic, youve made no counter claims. Literally all you've done is say "no this is wrong". Just the equivalent of a "nuh uh".
1
@God-ik6im You gonna respond or what?
1
@God-ik6im Wait can you not see the list I posted? Did YouTube delete it? Actually yes as it turns out YouTube did delete the list I sent so I'm gonna have to work around that and post the individual ones and then see which one YouTube erases.
1
@God-ik6im literally 1 by 1. Water gate
1
@God-ik6im MK ultra
1
@God-ik6im Edward snowden
1
@God-ik6im Tuskegee Syphilis Study
1
@God-ik6im I found out which one YouTube is deleting and no matter how I word it YouTube keeps deleting it so your just gonna have to go without that one for now.
1
@God-ik6im No they don't, is wager the vast majority of people have never heard of these. And yet people still trust the government and think conspiracies are impossible.
1
@God-ik6im No they don't, the barley care about these things and frankly would probably let the government do them again in modern times.
1
@terryknight7492 no he didn't He never even mentioned the fact that the second amendment was to protect the citizens from the government. He only talking about outside threats and insurrections. Not threats from the government itself.
1
 @autismspirit People like him cant understand this concept because he sees literally everyone on the other side as being literally evil.
1
@MrNoblethread So? Are they joes children? Because those are the only children he would be responsible for. Parents should pay more attention to what their kids watch. Dont then try and censor the rest of society because OTHER PEOPLE cant take care of their own kids. When has joe ever even ATTEMPTED to appeal to kids? Easily influenced adults are responsible for themselves as well, no one else is. Thats the meaning of being an adult.
1
@rainmind Its been like that for a while, people can EAISLY fake things on the internet ALREAYD even without the help of ai. People should be using context more than they do currently but noooo everyone is so gun ho about being the first to hear about something and needing to immediately have an opinion on it instead of waiting and finding out more. Maybe with AI people will finally learn though. If not then they deserve to be misled.
1
@RonAbernathy27 never said anything about ai People want to shift responsibility off themselves for what the believe SOOO badly as if they are completely faultless for being foolery when they are the type of person to believe the first thing they hear on the internet of all places. I'm talking about PEOPLE getting better at detecting if something is fake or not.
1
@YesuAiNimen exactly, so what more do you want?
1
@ScMc-pe7ez exactly , so what more do you want.
1
@funfun5656 exactly, so what more do you want? You can't make it MORE illegal 🤣🤣🤣 People are going to use it regardless
1
@@beefbusiness52 exactly, so why do you think making it MORE illegal is gonna help?
1
@YesuAiNimen too late
1
@JT-wq9gz exactly So what more do you want from ai? You can't make it more illegal, people are gonna do the illegal things anyway.
1
@nikyabodigital The laws we have are enough. Adding more laws would just make things worse.
1
If you've done nothing wrong You have nothing to hide.
1
Screw the fda.
1
@theSafetyCar companies have incentive to keep people happy as well AND companies don't have actual power over you, the government does. How they are elected doesn't change that. Politicians profit off of misery even more so.
1
What do you mean held accountable for views? Someone being loud and platformed doesn't make them any more legitimate than anyone else. The truth is the truth whether its broadcasted all over or suppressed. Something being platformed doesn't make it more truthful. Its the controlling types of people who love to appeal to authority that say things like "something being platformed means its more legitimate".
1
@freesk8 Actually this is a common misconception/myth. Its not poverty that drives crime, if anything its the opposite, crime driving poverty. If crime did drive poverty you would think you'd see places that are the most impoverished having the most crime but this isn't the case. The poorest places in the world routinely have a lower crime rate than even certain places in the United States. In the US at least it's not poverty that drives crime it's REALITIVE poverty/aka inequality/aka jealousy that drives crime. People seeing others with more than them and thus stealing and commiting crimes against those who they deem to be undeserving. In a free market liberty driven society naturally people are going to have the ability to make choices, since humans aren't perfect some of these choice are going to be just logically incorrect. These incorrect choice will lead to these people having a lower quality of life than their peers. For a society like the US which prioritizes liberty above all this consequence of people being naturally unequal is acceptable as everyone should be responsible for their own life and choices and consequences of said choices. Where as if you have a very top heavy form of government that focuses more on equality than liberty people are gonna have less liberty but those people who would be normally impoverished get taken care of by the state.
1
@freesk8 They shop lift for drugs, not to feed themselves. You give them food instead of money they trade the food in for more so they can buy drugs. Ive seen it happen numerous times. Like just think about pan handling. Unless thats illegal in your country or something.
1
@olska9498 That's not the same as the states in the US.
1
@olska9498 worse?
1
@olska9498 It's still much easier to change states in the US than it is to go to Switzerland from it's neighbors and become a citizen. There is MUCH more state migration in the US compared to immigration to Switzerland.
1
@bucket6386 Nnnno? Because they wage gap also doesn't exist like people claim it does. All the wage gap represents is the AVERAGE earnings between ALL men and ALL women. There are SO many variables that go into that stat such as men over all choosing higher paying jobs and men taking less time off from work than women do.
1
Liberal types it seems literally CANNOT under stand this concept. Its like they see other people as less than them and that they should be the ones who decide what other people should and should not be able to hear as if they see others as less them them which hints at narcissisms or an extremely controlling personality disorder.
1