Comments by "Jacob Watson" (@jacobwatson3781) on "Lex Clips" channel.

  1. Well, you must have don't been around during 2016. Hillary Clinton.
    2
  2.  @JB-un2iv  you don't understand the point. To clarify, are you saying voting isn't a right?
    2
  3.  @chemicloud6443  Sorry, what is your point?
    2
  4.  @JB-un2iv  Point is, people seem to trust people more with a gun vs voting. That is just weird.
    2
  5.  @JB-un2iv  As long as you understand the point I was making, not saying you agree, just that understand my point.
    2
  6. See how Bernie said they didn't get the votes and admitted defeat? Didn't whine or lie. That's what America is about, you fight, but when you lose, you try and get better, not be a sore loser.
    2
  7. Who issues property deeds your libertarian ideal area?
    2
  8.  @golfscienceguru  Fair, that wasn't fraudulent though.
    2
  9.  @ethimself5064  There is a difference between fraud and needing a better machine to count ballots.
    2
  10. ​ @WhopyStompy Using Dickens to try and spin what the Civil War was about, that's a new one. The appeal to authority to Dickens, weird.
    2
  11. @Shiroi  How does someone get the position in the private justice system to issue property deeds and adjudicate disputes?
    2
  12. @Shiroi  this is objectivism, isn't it?
    2
  13. @Shiroi  It sounds like in the private system you want a person or corporation could simply buy the business that makes decisions and put in people who would rule in their favor.
    2
  14.  @blueberrymcphuckerson9821  I see you deleted the Dave Smith Sam Seder debate post. Did you watch that debate?
    2
  15.  @blueberrymcphuckerson9821  wait, so now you're saying the 2A protects people from corporations? Wouldn't the private security do that?
    2
  16. Joe is interested in anything that the gets the far right to watch. His grift is showing.
    2
  17. It's not that the power grid can't be updated right? Are you saying why update the grid if we don't have too?
    2
  18. If droughts always happen, wouldn't it be a good idea to try and either slow them down or try other options?
    2
  19.  @jacksonsparrow8865  Should the federal government have the power to end slavery?
    2
  20. @Jackson Sparrow  That's interesting. There are two other libertarians in this section that day 50% of libertarians haven't made up their mind, but you say libertarians don't think it's an issue.
    2
  21. @FAILG0AT  That is not accurate for libertarians in my opinion. Libertarians appear to say their personal freedom and personal property are paramount, no exceptions.
    2
  22. I work at a private local bank. I want to wear a tie that says all Jews should die. Can the bank fire me if I do not stop wearing the tie?
    2
  23.  @lokhtar  Exactly, I wish more would understand that.
    2
  24. @Crispy Christie  people are under the assumption free speech means anyone can say anything they want without consequences. That just isn't the case.
    2
  25. Your free to say what ever you want. You still can have consequences though.
    2
  26.  @enteringquery  So, can Twitter ban people who say all jews should die?
    1
  27. Yeah I had a business prof that kept on how conservatives balance the budget and do better at spending, wack jobs on both sides.
    1
  28. The whataboutism is nice. Issue is, words have consequences and most of the world doesn't want another country to be attacked for no reason. The war in Ukraine is based on nothing, barley even a lie.
    1
  29. ​ @Jagar_Tharn What
    1
  30. ​ @Jagar_Tharn Exactly
    1
  31. Would you rather live in the UK or Somalia? And defend your answer.
    1
  32.  @theblackpanda5860  you didn't answer the question.
    1
  33. No, that is a false equivalent. First, is immigration a good thing?
    1
  34. Is that what they were talking about?
    1
  35. @Can a Dark Elf say the N Word?  Rogan and Elon are grifting warriors. Example. Rogan supports gay marriage, Medicare for all, abortion, and reeling in of the military industry complex. But, he says to vote republican. Just a grift.
    1
  36. There have not been any examples of machine manipulation. So it's okay to want to look for manipulation that doesn't exist vs stopping gerrymandering that does exist? Who cares if gerrymandering is possibly legal, it's a proven wrong, not a made up wrong like manipulation.
    1
  37. How did you get into that kind of pretzel
    1
  38. Well, her view of Native Americans, hard to get beyond that.
    1
  39. The book wasn't peer reviewed if I remember correctly. I can understand why it was shunned for that reason alone. None reviewed opinions are conjectures, aren't they?
    1
  40. @Hadden Industries  okay, yeah, the books has many flaws and doesn't appear to have hard data to support its claims. It's a weird topic that people seem to want to defend.
    1
  41. @Hadden Industries  Yeah, it makes sense to a point. People are trying to fit a narrative vs. trying to reach a scientific conclusion. The book was originally not peer reviewed and lacked normal scrutiny. The book is conjecture at best.
    1
  42.  @havenbastion  Postmodern is a term used by drug addiction.
    1
  43.  @ZackEdwards1234  So poor whites in Appalachia, they do very well in school? Data doesn't lie there. The idea of IQ being affected by race really hurts me as a white person.
    1
  44. It's interesting the 4 things that caused the war, 3 of them are the West fault and 1 was the psychology of Putin. Shouldn't #1 be that Russia started the war, I know that's an oversimplification, but the 4 reasons are so weak. Yes Jordan doesn't like the West views towards Russua, but Russia invaded. It's not that hard.
    1
  45. @De Palma  So, no evidence found.
    1
  46.  @whiteymcwhiterson3974  alright that senate report, any evidence of a crime and any evidence the President knew or approved any criminal activity?
    1
  47. @whitey McWhiterson  I have read it, there is no evidence the president was part of any proven criminal activity.
    1
  48.  @julythrunov  just speaking facts
    1
  49.  @julythrunov  You're welcome.
    1
  50.  @julythrunov  No, you aren't able to understand there's issues with Trump.
    1