Comments by "voteZDLR" (@voteZDLR) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. 4
  2. 4
  3. 4
  4. 4
  5. I actually don't think he's crazy though, to be completely frank. For one thing, the universe is so incomprehensibly large that the idea that we are the only place life exists is completely ridiculous. The universe is so large we don't even have the technology yet right now to even be able to see like a microscopic fraction of a percent of what has to be out there otherwise. So yes, I think "aliens" as we have defined them have to exist with 100% certainty. Whether they're behind us or ahead of us in terms of space travel though, like, maybe they are, some are, but some aren't, but if any of the ones who actually have the tech to actually visit us wanted to take us over I think they'd have already done it by now. I subscribe more to the benevolent theory of aliens in terms of them coming explicitly to help people do things. For example, helping people to make the Sphinx. Helping the people in South America to make the Mayan temples and other installations in those places. Things that are so impossibly large in scale for the time they are date marked and technologies involved, that there is just simply no way that it could've just been made like that even with the most dedicated slave labor of all time. No. There's more to it. For instance speaking of the Mayans there are these long, miles long things built from the ground that could only be appreciated from the sky about 2000 years or so before airplanes ever existed. Why build something so large and clearly meant to be appreciated from above when not even the ruler himself who ordered it supposedly could ever see it himself? What if those ancient peoples who made contact with them a long ass time ago revered the aliens who visited them as Gods, as you can imagine they only could have if they back then encountered them what with their limited technology vs what they must have seen if any of it is true to begin with? In both examples above, they built what they did for someone ABOVE to be able to see it, that's for sure. They wanted it to be seen from ABOVE for a reason. That coupled with logic only makes me think that not only do aliens actually exist but they've been aware of this planet for quite some time now. But you also have to realize some of these alien civilizations may still be in cavemen years, that's also the thing we're sure to be ahead of some of those life forms. But we're not ahead of all of them, but the good news I think is that I think they must be benevolent or else why not invade and kill us all by now?
    4
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29.  @Deliverygirl  No, I didn't read it. I just responded blindly to something I saw that had your name preceding it. Yes, I read your comment. It's a good thing "you didn't like it". But you're not framing your sentence correctly, you are saying you DIDN'T like it because you felt like you enjoyed it so much that you were at risk of getting addicted if using it again. So you did in fact like it. You just don't like the prospects of getting addicted, which is where I can say either way that's a good thing. If you didn't like it a la putting your hand on a stove, you wouldn't feel at risk of doing it again. Now if you were to tell me that you were scared of it because you DID like it, that makes more sense. If you didn't like it, obviously there would be no inherent risk of getting addicted to it for you personally just by matter of fact that you aren't going to be regularly consuming it. Either way, I guess if someone was just held down and forced to use it for a week straight biologically speaking the chances are good they're on their way to being addicted. It's just that rarely happens outside of human trafficking circles, at least from what I can imagine. Waste of dope. But you have to understand that most people who get addicted to opiates of any kind whether they're pills or heroin they didn't take it like "Oh this was great! I'm terrified now I better stop! Oh gee willickers!" they are like "This is great. I can probably get away with using it a few more times before getting addicted. Or I can only use on weekends, can't get addicted as a weekend warrior!" but the point is BECAUSE it is good they keep using where that is what you are insisting is your anchor point in not using. Whatever it takes for you to avoid it I guess but for most people in general who could be at risk of becoming "druggie scum" or whatever you view them as with the sneak diss at druggies above the best thing that could possibly happen is if you avoid it altogether. Don't even let it have a chance to create a bookmark in your brain that "this is good. I should do this more often". That's what opiates are famous for doing.
    2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33.  @farhan007  You need a college education for common sense? To think critically? Holy shit they got you good. Contrary to what you have been led to believe, clearly, you don't need some $20k + a year establishment to have common sense. Period. "My fast food example is irrelevant" Go fuck yourself, it's not irrelevant, it's actually perfectly relevant, I know someone who had a "safe" degree and found out like many other people that they couldn't do shit with it after the fact. It's relevant. Here's the thing though I don't have the time, energy or desire to jerk off here with you all day. "It's not relevant" yeah and you should probably consider suing your former college or the one you're currently attending cause they fucked up for you in the common sense department. According to you that's something you should've gotten from them by now! Fucking fool LOL College is a racket. Enjoy being in debt until you're 45, here's a little extra homework for you ass-plug, go Google the number of unemployed undergraduates that went to a decent school ($20k a year and above) and how they're faring in the private sector now. Telling me my information is irrelevant, it couldn't be more relevant derp a derp, talking about the futility of higher education FOR ALL and naming personal examples, people I knew personally, who got the shaft up their posterior in a very major, serious way after the fact. I was 19 on my way going into college at the time, they were just finishing college and working for about $35k a year at a Pizza Hut. There was probably barely room for groceries on top of paying back those student loans and putting a roof over the poor girl's head. Nice try correcting me though, faggot, LOL at you though thinking one of the things college is going to do for you is teach you common sense. Sense enough to recognize a scam/racket when you see one, sense enough to realize that people who have fallen for it found out the hard way it doesn't mean shit to have a master's degree even in the post 2009 recession in the American economy. Sense enough to a realize a relevant anecdote and the difference between that and an irrelevant one. It's on topic, it's completely in line with the conversation. It's relevant. And you still have no common sense faggot LOL
    2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42.  @returnofthemak592  You're more likely to get caught if you use a PO Box. You should use your home address. You should also use your real name, the one on your ID. The reason for this is because the mailman who delivers to you already knows your name. Some people think it might be smarter to put a fake name on your address, but they'll immediately recognize it as a fake name on the address. But a PO Box I mean it is possible to do that but if you do go that route order a bunch of stuff online first and have it sent there so it's not just like "Oh I got a new PO box and all of a sudden I am sending a ton of USPS packages to it from California or Colorado" or whatever. They're onto that. The other problem with the PO Box is you have to show ID and sign for it every single time. The very idea that you're showing up to the PO Box and signing for the package is in itself a form of controlled delivery, where they'd normally have to show up at your house then essentially trick you into signing for it (thereby admitting you not only ordered it but were expecting it) but if you had just sent it to your house, they'd deliver it normally, no signature required. If you have to sign for it as a USPS package, that is the biggest red flag imaginable. The only other thing you can do is receive the package, then don't open it for at least 3 days. If you open it and they catch you in the middle of using it after raiding you a few days later, that is an admission of guilty legally speaking. You aren't getting out of that one. But that's unbelievably unlikely and rare. Just a precaution above all other things.
    2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1