General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Janie Swanson
JRE Clips
comments
Comments by "Janie Swanson" (@janieswanson2549) on "JRE Clips" channel.
Previous
15
Next
...
All
@mattstiglic As expected you can't answer the very simple question and you resort to insults. Thanks for your concession.
1
@mattstiglic "I don't consume animal products." Okay? "Again, I follow a vegan diet." What does that have to do with my question? You USE animal products. use (noun) - the action of using something or the state of being used for a purpose. Why do you "USE" animal products? Ask your parents for help if this question is too hard.
1
@mattstiglic 3 weeks later and you're still searching for an answer?
1
You use products made with the same dead animals. Why do you use animal products needlessly while claiming it's unnecessary? I know you won't answer this plainly and honestly, but I just want everyone else to see your hypocrisy.
1
@jackmichaelpeter Sure I have. You just choose to ignore it in favor of your narrative. Do you need a phone? Most likely. Do you need to be making comments on youtube? No. Youtube's servers are made with and contain animal products. You're justifying using animal products that are easily avoided and not a necessity at all because you need a phone for work. That's no different than using your phone to order a meat lovers pizza and some chicken wings.....because "phone." So basically you're proving your hypocrisy by claiming it's okay to use whatever animal products you want as long as your phone connects to it..... I already explained this to you. I think I used too many big words last time. I probably did this time as well. Anyway...thanks for confirming you're a hypocrite again. Your concession is accepted.
1
@jackmichaelpeter Yeah....I'm not going to respond to comment spam. You use animal products intentionally and needlessly. Making comments on an entertainment platform is needless no matter how you want to spin it for your narrative. You keep mentioning "potential gelatin" while ignoring the fat and bones. Very typical of you liars and disingenuous hypocrites. You pick one thing apart while ignoring the rest. Bones are the industry standard for purifying mechanical grade silicon. You can shove your "potential gelatine" up your monologuing ignorant ass. You are literally a hypocrite. All of your appeals to emotion can be used to lambast someone else that disagrees with you. Your concession is accepted.
1
@jackmichaelpeter You have already been proven disingenuous and a hypocrite. There is nothing left for me to prove. You use animal products intentionally and needlessly. You use appeals to emotion by comparing human slavery to livestock farming. You use products made with the same dead animals everyone else uses. Even after I explained point number 4 to you no less than 3 times, you still attack strawmen. Its over. You lose. Go to google > Type "define needless" > Push search. It's not rocket science. This will be your canned reply. Your concession is accepted.
1
You're not making any sense. Everyone in the video eats and uses animal products.
1
@doctordaro2112 I stopped caring about convincing a long time ago. Now I just roll out some facts and make fun of liars and hypocrites.
1
@rasputozen "There are no animal products in glass or any of those things you mentioned." Bones are used to purify mechanical grade silicon. Fat is used in plastic and LCD screens. Gelatin is used in batteries because it is an inert substance. Anything else?
1
@rasputozen So a wall of text because you don't like being wrong?
1
@rasputozen And now you're name calling because you can't refute me. I expected as much. You're wall of text is full of "if" and "may" and more babble. I am typing about what "is." You can find the products sources using the MSDS site and contacting their public relations. Anything else?
1
@briantex2031 So you didn't see where he said this? "But I did decide to be vegan recently." "you shouldn't jump down their necks about not being perfect." Not part of the definition. "I'm vegan 6 years btw." You use animal products. You're not vegan.
1
@JulioNicoletti "You and and the people you are disagreeing with are basing your arguments on different definitions of veganism." You're wrong. I use the the same definition of "veganism" that they use created by the Vegan Society. You're confusing the definition of "vegan" which is "a person who does not eat or use animal products" with "veganism" which is a doctrine. "If your definition of veganism is" No....I use the actual definition of veganism when typing about "veganism." I don't lie and claim the definition of veganism is also magically the definition of vegan. "Vegans usually define themselves as people who seek to exclude, as far as is possible and practicable, animal products." Yay, more fan fiction. You're using the veganism doctrine again and conflating it with the definition of vegan. They are two different words with two different definitions. Vegan (noun) - a person who does not eat or use animal products. This is the official definition of "vegan" created by the Vegan Society. "Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose." This is the official definition of "veganism" created by the Vegan Society. No one practices veganism because it's to hard. So by the official definition of "vegan" and by your fan fiction, no one is vegan. Glad I could educate another ignorant person. Anything else?
1
@JulioNicoletti Again, glad I could educate the ignorant. It isn't my "perspective." I am using objective facts instead of lies and fan fiction.
1
@PogeyMane You should probably stop using a depressing text to speech program then. So nothing to refute me? Anything else?
1
@tomoakley760 "people like you are why vegans get a bad rep." People lying about being vegan while practicing hypocrisy are why they have a bad rep. You whine about semantics and then use extreme semantics to try to make a point...LOL Vegan (noun) - a person who does not eat or use animal products. Smart phones, computers, routers, and servers are made with and contain fat, gelatin, and bones. No one on the internet is vegan. Very simple.
1
@tomoakley760 Exactly. I am not vegan nor have I ever claimed to be. Glad you understand.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke "A vegan is a follower of veganism." There is no official definition that says this. This is fan fiction on a wiki. Vegan (noun) - a person who does not eat or use animal products. This is the official definition of vegan created by the Vegan Society. "The definition you bring up about a person who "does not use animal products" is just a simpler, shorter explanation." You're making things up. The word "vegan" predates the word "veganism" by almost 10 years. It's hilarious that you believe it's the other way around because someone told you some fan fiction. No one follows veganism. It is too hard. The same people who claim they follow veganism also use animal products intentionally and needlessly for convenience, entertainment, and virtue signaling. "Come on, stop trolling now." And more name calling because you're using lies and fan fiction instead of facts. "No one's that thick." Apparently you are and more. You're making things up to push a narrative you don't even believe in.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke "The Vegan Society only defines the word "veganism", they do not define the word "vegan" on their website." Glad you agree that you were wrong. "A vegan is obviously a follower of veganism." Already debunked this lie. The word Vegan predates the word Veganism. "Why else would the Vegan Society post the definition of "Veganism" on their website?" Vegan and veganism are still different words. This is automatically debunked by the fact the word Vegan predates the word Veganism. "And what would you call a follower of veganism if not a vegan?" I will let you know if I ever find someone who follows veganism. Please hold your breath. Using your logic everyone is just as vegan as everyone else.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke "I hate to have to be the one who breaks this to you but language is an evolving thing." You were debunked so you decided to go around the definitions with lies? LOL Please post proof from the Vegan Society that the definition of "veganism" has replaced the definition of "vegan" and they are now the same exact thing. Get back to me when you find it. See ya never. Thanks for reinforcing my win. Youtube's servers and routers are possible and practicable to avoid. Using your own logic you're not vegan and you don't practice veganism. Anything else? Maybe you want to babble about something else?
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke "I'm not vegan by any definition." I know. Neither is anyone else. And just more name calling without being able to refute the facts. Thanks for your concession. Anything else?
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke "So the founder of the Vegan society, Donald Watson, wasn't a vegan either." He was by the definition he made. It was changed by Leslie Cross when he and his extremists voted Donald Watson out of the Vegan Society and veganism was invented after that. "Great argument you've got there." I know because you keep learning new things you didn't know. "Btw, your whole argument is based on a lie." Fan fiction. "Nowhere does the Vegan society define the word "vegan"." Blatant lie. They do in their literature which is available by request. "They only define "veganism" because it's self explanatory that someone who follows veganism is a vegan." The word vegan predates veganism. This was already debunked. Stop lying. "Donald Watson's original definition was "non dairy vegetarian" but a lot has changed since then and the latest definition is clearly stated on their website." It was changed by Leslie Cross when he and his extremists voted Donald Watson out of the Vegan Society and veganism was invented after that. "Nowhere do they say that a vegan is someone who doesn't use animal products." And another lie. You just can't help it I guess. They do in their literature which is available by request. "So, I've just proven how your entire argument is based on a lie." You're entire argument is based on a lie while using fan fiction. Thanks again for the easy win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke "I know more about the history of the Vegan Society than you do." You're making things up. "Leslie Cross didn't vote Watson out." I never said he did it alone. He and his fellow extremists voted Donald Watson out of his position. Building strawmen doesn't refute me. "So you embarrassed yourself again there by mixing up facts." I am not embarrassed at all. I am using actual facts instead of fan fiction. "Your base argument doesn't make any sense." It wouldn't to people who refuse to understand the facts. Thanks for your concession. Since you're arguing in bad faith using fan fiction and lies it proves you're unable to refute me.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke "You are wrong again. " You're lying. See comment above. I will paste it for you since you have poor reading comprehension. I never said he did it alone. He and his fellow extremists voted Donald Watson out of his position. Building strawmen doesn't refute me. "Watson wasn't voted out, he left on his own." And again.... I never said he did it alone. He and his fellow extremists voted Donald Watson out of his position. Building strawmen doesn't refute me. "I'll be awaiting your apology." It doesn't exist. Thanks again for your concession. I win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke "I said that Watson left on his own" After he was removed from his position by Leslie Cross and his extremists. Remember this: He and his fellow extremists voted Donald Watson out of his position. This is the third time I have added it to a comment. Maybe you will be able to read it this time. I doubt it. You will ignore it and continue babbling. "Watson wasn't voted out at all." Yeah he was. " It wasn't until two years later that Cross became president and revoked Watson's honorary lifetime membership." So....he removed him from his position? Exhibit A: He and his fellow extremists voted Donald Watson out of his position. Thanks for finally agreeing that I am right and you have been entirely wrong. Your concession is accepted. Youtube's routers and servers are made with animal products and are possible and practicable to avoid. No one on youtube is vegan nor do they practice veganism as defined by the Vegan Society. Checkmate. I win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke Your concession is accepted. Youtube's routers and servers are made with animal products and are possible and practicable to avoid. No one on youtube is vegan nor do they practice veganism as defined by the Vegan Society. Checkmate. I win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke Your concession is accepted. Youtube's routers and servers are made with animal products and are possible and practicable to avoid. No one on youtube is vegan nor do they practice veganism as defined by the Vegan Society. Checkmate. "No, it clearly states seeks to exclude. " Intentionally commenting on youtube's servers isn't seeking to exclude those animal products. Thanks for the final and absolute win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke Look at you twisting yourself in circles trying to find a loophole. It's hilarious. Until you actually refute me This will be your canned reply. Thanks for the easy and irrefutable win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke Look at you twisting yourself in circles trying to find a loophole. It's hilarious. Until you actually refute me This will be your canned reply. Thanks for the easy and irrefutable win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke Look at you twisting yourself in circles trying to find a loophole. It's hilarious. Until you actually refute me This will be your canned reply. Thanks for the easy and irrefutable win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke Look at you twisting yourself in circles trying to find a loophole. It's hilarious. Until you actually refute me This will be your canned reply. Thanks for the easy and irrefutable win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke Look at you twisting yourself in circles trying to find a loophole. It's hilarious. Until you actually refute me This will be your canned reply. Thanks for the easy and irrefutable win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke Look at you twisting yourself in circles trying to find a loophole. It's hilarious. Until you actually refute me This will be your canned reply. Thanks for the easy and irrefutable win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke Look at you twisting yourself in circles trying to find a loophole. It's hilarious. Until you actually refute me This will be your canned reply. Thanks for the easy and irrefutable win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke Look at you twisting yourself in circles trying to find a loophole. It's hilarious. Until you actually refute me This will be your canned reply. Thanks for the easy and irrefutable win.
1
@GrammarOfficerKrupke Look at you twisting yourself in circles trying to find a loophole. It's hilarious. Until you actually refute me This will be your canned reply. Thanks for the easy and irrefutable win.
1
@andrewunthank3521 Name one person who actually practices that I can look up who is healthy. Just one. If you can't name one then you admit it isn't.
1
@andrewunthank3521 You didn't do that's either? No one does that's either because "that's either" doesn't make sense. So nothing else? Cool.
1
@andrewunthank3521 Good to see you still have nothing for my original comment to you and are reduced to further whining. I accept your concession.
1
@JB.zero.zero.1 Just like in plants dippy. Why do you use animal products needlessly for entertainment while pretending to be against it? You're just another wannabe playing pretend because you derive more worth from the claim than the actual practice.
1
@Indrave_2274 "Also notice how you don't need to do these things to live a vegan lifestyle." You're making things up again. "You're just painting vegans as pompous, cushy elitists when that's about as true as the sentiment that only asain people have brown eyes." Vegans don't exist in the modern world. There is no such word in the English dictionary as "asain." It is quite possible for a mythical people to have a certain color eyes. Elves can have purple eyes. "so you're vegan if you cut out the unnecessary suffering from your current lifestyle." Thanks again for agreeing with me that vegans don't exist. No one cuts out unnecessary suffering from their lifestyle so no one is vegan. "Hell, this could technically mean simply eating less meat " Nah... Vegan (noun) - a person who does not EAT or USE animal products. Less meat = not vegan. No meat + animal products = not vegan. You = not vegan. You're just a virtue signaling liar and hypocrite pushing an agenda you don't even follow yourself. Practice what you preach.
1
@Indrave_2274 "Do you eat meat or animal products?" You already claimed I "eat" meat in another comment. Prove it. It's hilarious that you have to make things up just to argue against me and when you get caught in a lie you resort to going to another comment to question me about the lie you already told.
1
@Indrave_2274 "Sure, you can argue that." I did. "However, you haven't answered my question." You haven't proven your claim. You're a liar.
1
@Indrave_2274 "Yeah, well, I assumed you eat meat because you're kind of a useless tool." You are a proven liar so now you're admitting to your lies while name calling. "Now, are you going to answer my question of whether or not you eat meat or animal products?" That is my business. You made the claim that I do. So it is up to you to prove it. Good luck with that. "If not, I will take that as a concession." You already lost when you admitted to being a liar. "That would be the easiest win of them all" I already won. I predict you will reply again with another inane comment.
1
@Indrave_2274 Glad you admit that you're a liar, hypocrite, and you virtue signal for attention. The ultimate win. When all I do is pointing out virtue signaling liars and hypocrites, it's nice having one of them admit to being the trash they are.
1
@Indrave_2274 "I'm trash? How so?" Because you admit to being trash by admitting you're a virtue signaling liar and hypocrite. I won. Everything after this is just you devolving into whining about me calling you trash for being an admitted virtue signaling liar and hypocrite.
1
@Indrave_2274 "For one to be a virtue signaler, one needs to fit the definition of what it is to virtue signal." virtue signaling - the action or practice of publicly expressing opinions or sentiments intended to demonstrate one's good character or the moral correctness of one's position on a particular issue. You do that. "Likewise, for one to be a hypocrite, one needs to fit the definition of what a hypocrite is." the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; You do this as well. "However, the term "trash" is different." trash (noun) - a person or people regarded as being of very low social standing. Liars and hypocrites are at the lowest of social standings. "But, of course, you wouldn't want to get into morality with me haha." Virtue signaling again while you use animal products. You automatically lose. Thanks again for the easy win. I predict yet another inane reply.
1
@Indrave_2274 Two replies? Triggered? Unable to keep your thoughts together on your diet? Just as I expected. You decided to go with inane comments. Why don't you tell us all about "asains" with brown eyes, whatever that means.
1
@Indrave_2274 "You're avoiding argument and have nothing to add but ad-hominem lol." You're lying again. You're derailing the original argument because you lost. Quote the ad hominem. You should probably look up the definition. "Thanks for the easy win. Nothing but babble, as expected." Fake it until you make it? Still not going to tell us what a "asain" is?
1
Previous
15
Next
...
All