Comments by "Richard Stuczynski" (@Rjsjrjsjrjsj) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. This isn't a mystery wrapped in a riddle smothered by secret sauce. The Russians suck. Their equipment, their training, their tactics, all abysmal. Even historically they're a joke. Brute force and overwhelming numbers are the only way they accomplish anything. Just like their buddies the Chinese.
    33
  2. No. An emphatic no. Nothing even comes close.
    19
  3.  @Hayabusa-lo6bc  nope
    16
  4.  @umthefunjoker  that's flat out wrong.
    15
  5. Nothing without NATO 's recon? Well then I guess it's a good thing they got it. $uck it Russia. 🖕
    15
  6. Better check history. China's had it's @$$ handed to it time and time again.
    12
  7. All the US has to do is shut down seaborne trade to China. After several months China will just shut down. Then we stomp them. It's ridiculous to think we need to go toe to toe with them. 🙄
    12
  8. Yep. Otherwise the entire world wouldn't be pursuing it. U 🤡
    10
  9. Neither can Russia or China. The difference is US weapons hit what they aim for. Russians can only hit playgrounds and come close to pedestrian bridges. China has only shown the ability to hit mockups in their desert. So go ahead, throw a hypersonic at the US then say bye bye to your entire offensive capability. 👍
    10
  10. Problem? Same as the rest of their equipment. It's Russian. They should ask the US if they can buy some weapons. Like the Chinese. Buy foreign military equipment and then produce a domestic copy that sucks. 👍
    10
  11.  @umthefunjoker  Tell yourself whatever you need to. 👍
    9
  12. Building more garbage just means you have a bigger pile. Chinese "quality" is well documented. If China's so powerful, take Taiwan. What are they waiting for? Not scared of the US? Then help Russia. Honestly, they're not even a paper tiger, they're wet toilet paper.
    9
  13. No. It's not. China's a joke. So are you. Puppet.
    9
  14. Because the French are aggressively selling them to make up for the loss of that submarine contract with Aus. 🤣
    8
  15. You mean the ones they mock up in the desert? Because they've never hit a US carrier. Or ANY carrier for that matter. It's easy to say you can do something... until you actually have to do it.
    8
  16. The PRC doesn't have much time. They're aging out of existence and their economy is collapsing. Time to 💩 or get off the pot. Besides, I REALLY want to see them get demolished. Please, PLEASE invade. 🤞
    7
  17. You're funny. Like a 🤡. Are you a 🤡? 🤔
    6
  18.  @poling1990  "That word you keep using, I do not think it means what you think it means." 😁
    5
  19. We got plenty of money. But thanks for your concern. 😎
    5
  20. This reminds me of the chipmunks mobilizing in my back yard. They're cute and fun to watch too. 😁
    5
  21. China better hurry up and invade Taiwan before these hit the skies in numbers. The US will only need about 20 to flatten China. 🙂
    5
  22. Turns out your conclusions are completely wrong. Nice job. 👍
    5
  23.  @baptiste9017  🙄 okay. Tell you what. Hold your breath! I love watching people turn blue. 😁
    4
  24.  @paulwilson8061  That's some twisted logic there but you be you. Just ignore the fact that they were pushed back from Kyiv and had to regroup in the east. Not to mention the fact that this isn't even remotely over so taking a snapshot of the situation proves exactly nothing. Honestly. Get a grip.
    4
  25. Pretty obvious that this is about Russia. If Putzin ever gets Ukraine he'll be coming for Romania and Poland next. By that time Poland will be able to beat the 💩 out of him themselves. 👍
    4
  26. What? That entire post is illegible. 🤷
    4
  27.  @emmanuelreyes2380  Wow. Ad hominem attack with no facts to back up your assertion. You must be fun at parties. 🙄
    4
  28.  @drzavnalutrija  🙄 So Russia, China and even Iran aren't pursuing stealth? U m0r0n.
    3
  29. Consensus seems to be against you. U 🤡 🤣
    3
  30. "waist" 🤣 You're hilarious
    3
  31.  @hughmungus2760  🙄 Sure. Keep telling yourself that.
    3
  32. No. Not as big as Nimitz and all it does is float. It's a joke. Just like the rest of China
    3
  33.  @buddy1155  Syria? What are you smoking?
    3
  34. You just named 3 🤡's. Congratulations. All of them have been proven wrong time and time again.
    3
  35. That's easy. First minute: Belarus enters war. Second minute: Belarus defeated. You're welcome.
    2
  36. Because the Russians don't have any decent tanks for a mass offensive. Why are you a puppet?
    2
  37.  @paulwilson8061  Sure. The Russian population of 140 million has less manpower than the Ukrainian population of 40+ million. Where'd you go to school?
    2
  38.  @theengineeringscience  in any war there are going to be casualties on both sides. Are you trying to argue that because Americans died then the US somehow lost. That's true in literally EVERY conflict. What the numbers clearly show is that the US is dominant in every war for over a century. As for today, our Navy alone can flatten anyone. Or any viable coalition. Keep telling yourself how ineffectual we are and then ask yourself why no one has stepped up to challenge us. And, honestly, you have no idea what I think. Your accusations are just to make you feel better. 🙄
    2
  39.  @theengineeringscience  You miss the point. I posted that the Russians suck and you responded with some alternative reality about the US. It's mildly entertaining telling you you're wrong but it has nothing to do with the original comment. If you want to tell everyone how awful the US is then go start a YouTube channel. Just what do you think you're accomplishing here? Are you trying to convince me or yourself?
    2
  40.  @snslifestyleorg  They already are. Where've you been? And I wrote "wet toilet paper". They don't rise to paper tiger.
    2
  41.  @ub3rfr3nzy94  China's a joke. Their last war was against Vietnam. Right next door. And look! Vietnam's still there.
    2
  42.  @foxshoot3138  It's gibberish. 🙄
    2
  43.  @charlessmith8679  And they're still waiting for it to drop.
    2
  44. Wow. You're completely wrong. All China does is assemble. Their quality is 💩. Microchips for instance. The only ones they can build are the low end garbage. All the medium and high end come from other countries.
    2
  45. Uncle Sam is absolutely right. US Navy tonnage exceeds the next 13 Navies combined. That includes China
    2
  46.  @computernerd8157  For a "computer nerd" you have no idea what your talking about. Who is "our"? The US? We don't owe China anything. As for electronics, you're wrong about that too. But this is hardly the place to educate you. Go do your own research.
    2
  47. At least this post is legible. You're still a 🤡. Red bear brave... 🙄 Red bear red from bleeding all over the place. 😁
    1
  48.  @benjaminmathon7417  Are they? You'd think they'd be used to waiting after that debacle of a deal with the French. Plus the Aussies got more than Subs and they know the US would be there in any conflict. The French certainly wouldn't.
    1
  49.  @labechamel75  Sure. Quick! Go tell 'em! 🙄 U R A 🥜
    1
  50. Lucky us (US) there's no such thing as a near peer.
    1