Comments by "Sebastian Nolte" (@sebastiannolte1201) on "carwow"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"It's time to support a company that had the balls to detach themselves from old dinosaur fossil fuels"
You don't need balls for that if you are a new company that only produces BEVs. But as a big car company it is not easy to decide how much effort the should put on EVs. They cannot just stop producing ICE cars. They would be bankrupted then, because most people still want ICE cars.
"One beautiful example about how far is Tesla's technology in the electric realm is when Tesla remotely enhanced the battery capacity, and therefore driving range, of its Tesla vehicles for owners in Florida who were trying to escape the impact of the recent Hurricane Irma. "
I accept that Tesla is leading in some aspects, but that is really a bad example. Tesla used to sell a series of cars with a 75kWh battery, that are sold as 60kWh cars because the capacity is artifically limited. And you could later upgrade to 75kWh just by a simple Software Update. I don't know if that is really a cool thing. It is the same as if Apple would only produce iPhones with 256GB Storage, but would sell a version with only 64GB storage for a cheaper price. The storage would be limited by software to 64GB, but you could later get the full 256GB via Software Update for charge. When Tesla released this "60kWh" version there were many people who critizied that - they feel that Tesla would sell artifically crippled cars and then asks for money to de-cripple them. Some feel pranked by that business model.
There are also people who are skeptical about the OTA-Update /Remote thing in general. If Tesla is able to enhanced the battery capacity via remote (and as I said: It was reduced before; actually Tesla doesn't sell this pseudo-60kWh-Model anymore), they could also reduce it via remote. Many people don't want that the manufactorers can do stuff with your car without your permission. And they also think of "DLCs" like in Computer games. So there you buy a full price computer game that should be complete. But they squeeze more money out of you by selling stuff for extra charge. Somebody of Porsche also said in an interview, that they think about Power Upgrades via OTA-Update in the Future. That could also mean "I want to have fun at the weekend, so I buy 100 extra-horsepower for two days". Many people get the impression: If my car is capbable already is capabale of this (So 15kWh more battery capacity or 100HP more" then why do you artificially cripple it down?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AdamsDetail
" and their car is twice the cost with half the range. "
Half the range? Don't listen to EPA range, but real life instead. Here actual tests (OK, It is "Model S long range vs Taycan 4S" and not "Model S Perfomance vs Taycan Turbo S") at 120 km/h:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VK0oC83y4L8&t=1311s
376 km vs 424 km is in no way "half the range".
"However yes the Taycan does beat the Tesla in one category"
Only one? You really think that if there is a usually compolete review of the two cars, the Taycan would only win in one category?
" So out of the 2 categories that really matter 0-60 and Qtr mile"
They really matter? Maybe in the USA. Here in Germany nobody cares about drag races, it is a weird sport to us. I have never understood why Tesla focus so much on 0-60 numbers as the only quality for the perfomance of a car.
"On the other hand Tesla still makes a faster VEHICLE than Porsche, its called a rocket ship. "
Are you kidding? No, Tesla doesn't make rocket ships. You mean SpaceX? A complete different company, that just happened to have the same CEO?
"Tesla's cars literally drive themselves.
"
German cars, too. In several tests there were no big differneces in the self driving systems of Tesla vs other car makers. Tesla just makes a better marketing for that and allow their cars to do more, while the other call there system more carefully "assistance".
We have just a drag race here between a Tesla and Porsche and the Porsche wins. That's it. So why all these excuses that I hear from the Tesla fan boys? Why cannot they just say "Hey, cool, congratulations to Porsche"? And why do you make a discussion about how cool American companies are, which has nothing to do with all this? I am not a Porsche fanboy (actually I am not even a real car guy, I am insteresting in what's going on in the industry an how technology progresses, but I don't even own a car, I walk, use my bicycle ad use public transportation), in other discussion I even often defend Tesla when others have prejeduces and talk bullshit about them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
And I wonder why they even offer the smaller battery
a) Range ist still an issue for many people when it comes to electric cars, and even with the bigger battery the range of the Taycan is not that great
b) the bigger battery does not only provides better range, but also more power and higher charging speed
c) It is "only" 6500 Euros! In other EVs with different battery sizes, it is usually they main difference between two versions of a car, and the relative price difference for the bigger battery is quite high. So that for some peoply there is a reason to take the smaller battery when they think, the range is enough for them. But here? The base price is already 105000 Euros! And the bigger battery is just one option among tons of others. And obviously Porsche-Customers are willing to pay much extra money for (sometimes even gimmicky) options: Electrcic Sport sound 500€, Sports seats: 2000 €, dynamic chassi control 3200 €, ceramic breaks 9000 €, park assistance 1400 €, leather interior 4000 €, electric charging port 620€, ambient lightning 400 €... and the list goes on and on...). So why the hell should anybody not buy the bigger battery?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1