Comments by "Sebastian Nolte" (@sebastiannolte1201) on "Primal Space" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13.  @ejaydc8198  How does that matter? Are there cameras or telescopes with the capabilty to zoom in infinetly? No. I can change "my naked eye" in my example with "my telescope" and higher numbers for the distances. But also at maximum zoom a big object will still be big and a small object will be small if they are at the same distance. And an object can still be so small, that I cannot see it through the telescope. And even if the smaller object is closer to me than the big object that can be the case. A telescope doesn't let you see further. Instead it makes objects bigger and increases the resolution. I can see the sun with my naked eye although it is 150 million kilometers away. So according to you I would not need binoculars for anything on earth, because I can see objects that are even 150 million kilometers away, then of course I can see ANYTHING that is closer? No matter how small it is? This guys here takes nice pictures of the Andromeda Galaxy with a normale camera lense, so not even a telescope. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr8KM9tYRJE Andromeda is 2.5 million lightyears away! Does that mean that with the same camera and the same zoom settings, he could take a picture of a book that is 10 miles away and you can read the text? Of course not. High zoom means "high resolution". They say in the video that Hubble has got a resolution of 0.05 arcsec. Feel free to calculate if you should see a flag on the moon with it. BTW there are pictures of the moon taken by Hubble: https://hubblesite.org/contents/media/images/1999/14/796-Image.html?news=true
    1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1