Comments by "bighand69" (@bighands69) on "Joe Scott" channel.

  1. Doing that in the 1970s would require a certain level of wealth that would not be such a casual wealth. No I am afraid there is something more to this story. It has all the hallmarks of something with careful planning and knowledge. First of all the amount of fuel it would require for a body to be burned to that degree would be quite large and not a trivial amount a single person could carry by them self. Then there is the fact this person seems to have no known family connections and is a loner.
    14
  2. That maybe the case but that would show an erratic manner and not a calculating and strategic behavior that would be required to leave so little information. The case is extremely strange.
    5
  3. You have to take the evidence with caution because we do not know if it was accurate or not.
    3
  4.  @davidmorgan156  Are you saying you spoke to somebody who was a witness to her in that period?
    3
  5.  Antony Stringfellow  You are assuming the details you are repeating are actually true or that they have not been added into the case by something playing at misdirection. Or even if the witnesses are truly identifying the victim at all and not somebody else.
    3
  6.  @QueenEra33  I am sorry by now such theory backs up she was a sex slave. You have just imagined that and it appeases your predisposition to such ideas.
    2
  7.  @MysticMetaKnight  A person that consumed an extremely large amount of a pharmaceutical, that was suicidal, that somehow decided to commit suicide at the top of a mountain, a person that appears to have erratic behaviors which all tends not to be normal behaviors. They most certainly do not demonstrate behaviors of deep planning. So what was the secret fuel that she used to burn her body to such a high degree that there is no evidence at the site of the remains. Did she somehow plan a means to have the fuel at the site and then hide such a fact. If you believe the case is suicide then you have to look at it from that angle and makes the case extremely complicated and very weird. It is to such an extent that it does not add up.
    2
  8. Just the art work on those alone would require thousands of people.
    2
  9. No the dates so far are only what can be established the whole region is full of sites that simply have not been analysed in any great detail. Stone cannot be carbon dated on the materials around the stone. So finding food or wood at a site to be dated does not actually tell you how old the buildings are. It also looks like a lot of the earth around the sites was put there 11000 years ago meaning there maybe other layers to the sites that are much older.
    2
  10. The golden state killer was different because they had amassed physical evidence that was forensically controlled. This case due to its location and circumstances does not have the same control factors.
    2
  11. It is not likely that those that built these structures are hunter gathers. The amount of labour that would be required to build a site of that size is beyond just simple tribal organizations. It would required varied trading but also specialized trading just for the civilizations to function. It would require things like food storage, transport, skills, education and so on just to make everything function never mind building those structures. Those sites required engineering, mathematics, craftsmen, designers, planning and so on. That site is only a fraction of what is actually in the area. But here is the thing it is not the only site on earth that falls into that ancient organised past. The sort of population for those types of developments must have been in the millions for the region.
    2
  12. There are no cases of spontaneous combustion. It is a fantasy and in some cases very poor forensic pathology.
    2
  13. She may not have been a spy but could have been a defector hence why she went to such great lengths. The hairspray can theory is ridiculous.
    2
  14. All that fancy ai that we are seeing right now will create a whole level of new healthcare options for people and if you are young enough and healthy enough you will get to experience it. It is our boomer parent generation that will most likely miss out on the advances as they are already elderly.
    2
  15. You never know what could happen.
    2
  16.  @klittlet  The problem with most of this is people's lack of understanding of the science and forensics of such events. There simply would not be enough energy held in the burning of clothing to char the remains to such an extent. No this death required a fuel source such as petrol/gasoline to exhibit such behaviors. A small women like that would have struggled to carry such a large load. It would even have been a challenge for many able-bodied strong men to carry fuel to a location like that.
    2
  17. We do not know if it is pre-pottery or not as there simply has not been enough archeology to really understand the period. I find it extremely unlikely that they had knowledge of surveying, construction and so on but not the knowledge to work with clays and fire.
    2
  18.  @TTFerdinand  If she was murdered it most certainly was an exceptional effort. Suicide seems unlikely but not improbable. The amount of fuel it would have required to burn a body like that would have been large and not easy to carry up the side of a mountain. Taking a large volume of a pharmaceutical in advance to climbing up the mountain does not seem likely either. I suspect without any real evidence that there was a certain amount of misdirection at play here. I would take the intelligence communities assessment with a large pinch of salt.
    2
  19. The humour in this was not nice at all and not well placed either.
    2
  20. I am going to say something and please do not be offended by what I am about to say. Women should not be out on their own even in the countryside. Most men that they meet are good people that would not harm anybody and would offer assistance but there is a small subsection of men about 1% that are psychopaths' and it is they who maybe predators. That is not to say a women cannot go out on her own but she needs to understand these things. But I would also offer the same types of advice for many men. Going out after dark into remote places that other humans may frequent should only be done by certain men. Apart from humans certain environments have wild animals as well.
    2
  21. I am sorry but that theory is unlikely.
    2
  22. Drawing are notoriously inaccurate leaving many seeing what they want to see.
    1
  23. So as a mental health worker do you think such mental health breakdowns would involve high levels of detailed planning such as getting a large amount of fuel present for the burning or taking pharmaceuticals in advance but still being able to get up the side of the mountain. And then being able to make several interactions with people that cause conflicting information to arise. Then there is also the fact that the evidence in this case has to be approached with care because there is no way of knowing if it was planted or was just a mistake by the person presenting it. Did she really write the diary or did she steal it from somebody?
    1
  24. There are many aspect to it that are strange. No family member getting in contact within norway hints that she was not from norway.
    1
  25. Let us just entertain your case of suspicious cases of money issues. What if she was involved in something like that but died 6 months after the issues. How could we possibly know?
    1
  26. Bipolor and schizophrenia are probably unlikely explanations considering the amount of planning that probably went into the event. Secondly all the evidence outside of the crime scene needs to be taken with caution.
    1
  27. It really depends on what level the spy is working at. She may just be a facilitator or a criminal working for an agency. Or maybe she seen something she should not have. Who really knows.
    1
  28. To carry out such a murder and at the same time to be witnessed would mean experts were involved in her murder. Such experts would have had the resources, skills and very careful planning to carry out the murder.
    1
  29. Including the people who claimed to smell such.
    1
  30.  @davidmorgan156  You could also find DNA patterns in that if you wanted to but it has little meaning.
    1
  31. Yes that is a possibility not not proof.
    1
  32. But how exactly did she commit suicide and why such a remote location?
    1
  33. Most of that evidence needs to be considered under caution as it may not be accurate. what if the person they smelled was not her?
    1
  34.  @MysticMetaKnight  While it is probable that she could have had a mental health breakdown I think that it is highly unlikely. The case seems to point to an event that was organized and it is not likely that a person that was suffering from such an episode would be capable of carrying out such an organized plan. One of the problems we have in the case is with certainty is establishing if every bit of evidence is actually genuine and not a plant or mistake. What we do know is that the amount of a fuel required to burn a body to such a degree is larger than what a person could carry by them self up a mountain, That she had consumed a large amounts of a pharmaceutical that would not have allowed her to travel up that mountain and that she had a certain level of wealth. Everything beyond that cannot be considered as reliable evidence.
    1
  35. European hotels do not require ID it really is at the discretion of the person running the establishment. In that era there would have been a more informal attitude in society meaning people would have been less likely to think ill of people.
    1
  36. There does not seem to be any sort of movement in those directions probably because there are is no public pressure.
    1
  37. Or certain things were added to the evidence that may not actually be connected or could have been planted. Mistaken identity is very common in these cases such as a person claiming to have come in contact with her.
    1
  38. Where are the UFO's.
    1
  39. If you are going with that theory you need to then factor in that the case becomes far more complicated. As there are more complex events that would have to be figured in such as how was such a large volume of fuel carried up there and how was a large amount of a pharmaceutical administered and why was so little evidence of merit present? And was it easy for a women to carry around two suitcases through so many cities. She was not a large strong person.
    1
  40. Why?
    1
  41. The amount of fuel that it would take to burn a women's body to that degree is not an amount that a women on her own could easily carry up onto the side of a mountain. Now it is possible that she could have walked up there in advance and stored the fuel later to return to it.
    1
  42.  @davidmorgan156  The wick effect is a highly theoretical scenario that is hard to really accept. The idea that a small source could with bad fat cause such an ignition event to occur is highly unlikely. To me it is on par with Sasquatch or mental telepathy.
    1
  43. Roman sites in the UK are so vast that no effort has ever been made to clean them out. There is so much material out there that is just laying around. There are fields in the UK that are just full of broken pottery and are actually part of the soil and to the naked eye they would look like stones.
    1
  44. Well I think their general scope is good and they do go into some good details on what is out there and not being discussed they do go into the field of speculation too much and also have weird theories that are self derived.
    1
  45. Every country has these weird cases from the past. Back then the media did not sensationalize things like they do today. Today the media would actively lie to use the story to fulfil some sort of political agenda. They would even smear people and when such smears are discovered to be malicious they would just move on and it would be forgotten.
    1
  46. Hairspray does not explain the level of charring that occurred on the remains.
    1
  47. Nor does it indicate it was her finger prints.
    1
  48. The vast majority of people that go missing in the US is just people moving and not telling people. That trend is also starting to become evident in Europe were people can move from country to country with the common zone. Most police forces do not have a means of actually tracking people who move.
    1
  49. We do not know how old the Minoans were. The estimations of their existence is always modelled in line with the fertile crescent because it has always been assumed that no civilization existed prior to that. The Minoans have to be now examined in the light of the findings of Göbekli Tepe and we have to stop calling them neolithic as well.
    1
  50. The problem with the garlic smell is the fact it is impossible to know if it had anything to do with her. People will make claims of smells all the time that groups of other people cannot even establish.
    1