Comments by "S Andersson" (@sandersson2813) on "heretics. clips" channel.

  1. @phily8093  I don't get the pronoun insistence. If I'm talking to someone then a *pronoun" is a superfluous thing. There may be genuine "trans" people but I think it is a miniscule number. Perhaps 1 in 10,000. You're absolutely right there are far too many on a band wagon judging by the absurdly lopsided generational adherents or celebrity child adherents.
    8
  2. No he didn't.
    5
  3. I'd be interested to hear what your disagreements are.
    4
  4.  @phily8093  I know it's not compulsory, I just wanted to know what you disagreed on, and I'm not sure you gave any decent examples You said some topics, but not where in those topics you disagree. We pretty much all disagree on topics at some point on the scale or spectrum, and saying she goes a little too far to the right doesn't really explain any further, because saying someone is "far right" has just become a bit of a lazy trope. You said for example "the trans issue". What about her views do you disagree? I don't think she's said anything controversial on that particular issue, so I'd be interested to hear what your views are and actually what you disagree on.
    4
  5.  @paddywic  Tell you what, why don't you pray to your god to reveal itself to me by the end of today. When it doesn't I'll know that either your god doesn't exist, or it doesn't care.
    4
  6. Please don't say "fun fact"
    3
  7.  @FasterThanJesus  Indeed. I would hope there isn't anyone in the entire world you'd agree with everything on.
    3
  8.  @paddywic  He has no justification to he a Christian just as an Iranian has no justification to be Muslim or an Indian has any justification to he Hindu. Religion is indistinguishable from a fairy tale and you have no reason to believe ANY of them.
    3
  9. Show me a country that didn't .
    3
  10.  @charlesd4572  Believing without evidence is gullibility. The Bible really is truly disgusting.
    3
  11. Calvin is a moron.
    3
  12.  @SAIAUM-567  why? The guy is a deluded idiot.
    2
  13.  @paddywic  You're right, I don't care about indefensible fairy tales, but you claim there is a god, so prove it.
    2
  14.  @bigmikey1344  This is moronic reasoning. What did your god create the universe from if there was nothing? If everything needs a creator, what created your creator? It's infinite regress, but even if there was a god, why would it be the god of a repulsive book like the bibull?
    2
  15.  @Reprobus3  You're making claims you can't possibly justify. Given that there is absolutely zero evidence a god exists or that the universe was created by one, how could you possibly know anything about that god? Do you not realise that you are in a circular and preposterous belief system which you can't defend? Why is your god the world hide and seek champion?
    2
  16.  @pompousprick6143  Ha ha ha. What did your god make the universe out of if there was nothing?
    2
  17. I don't see why anyone rates Calvin Robinson. The guy is just a fool and an ignorant oaf.
    2
  18.  @rodriguezmystic  Like what? Give me an example of something that can't be explained as a coincidence. Simply thinking of someone and then them phoning is not anything remarkable at all.
    2
  19.  @robertseavor4304 They didn't exist. There is no evidence anywhere that they existed.
    2
  20. I get the feeling this woman is a bit of a conspiracy nut.
    2
  21.  @CanadaFree-ce9jn  Unconscious Boas isn't science.
    1
  22.  @CanadaFree-ce9jn  Hard to tell when a north American is being sarcastic.
    1
  23. How is it bigoted. He doesn't want to be part of a catch all group. What's wrong with that. Do you think a fraudster should be lumped in with a kiddie fiddler because they're both criminals?
    1
  24. Do you want a 100w bulb in his face like the Gestapo?
    1
  25. @jessehamm3573  you expect an interrogation light?
    1
  26.  @annemerson5339  Tommy Robinson is a moron. It was out in newspapers before he mentioned it anyway. So pipe down.
    1
  27. He's awful. I'm not sure why Andrew wastes time on such an immoral idiot as Calvin.
    1
  28.  @paddywic  How is that proof? That isn't proof of anything. Is that really the best you can do?
    1
  29.  @paddywic  The point to believe in something is when it is supported by evidence. There isn't a single scrap of evidence for a god anywhere, far less the god of any particular religion. There is nothing good done by religion that can't be done without it, so why would you bother? They are immoral, disgusting things.
    1
  30.  @paddywic  Religious books are just fairy tales. They aren't true and have been debunked.
    1
  31.  @toshiba1134  No it doesn't. You can find Muslims all over the world, doesn't make it true. There is no evidence which supports ANY religion being true, and you can't even prove ANY god exists, not even a deistic god, far less the god of any religion, especially one as immoral, stupid and flawed as the god of Christianity. The point to believe something is when evidence can be used to corroborate the claim. Christianity, in common with ALL other religions has NO EVIDENCE to support it, there doesn't even exist any contemporary evidence that Jesus even existed far less any at all that he was divine, performed miracles or was resurrected. It is fairy tale nonsense and trying to use an argument and populum is plumbing the depths of indefensible apologetics
    1
  32.  @toshiba1134  Ha ha ha. The geographical spread of a fairy tale has no bearing on whether it is true. Islam is in as many places as Christianity, but you don't think that is true. Hilarious you think that the argument ad populum is helpful to proving a preposterous bronze age myth to be true. There is isn't any evidence any god exists anywhere, and even if there was a deistic god, it couldn't get you to Christianity. Your belief is no more credible than believing in Santa Claus. It's just another man made load of nonsense, at best all you have is an ordinary man called Jesus, you don't have a scrap of evidence for divinity, miracles or resurrection. It's indefensible to believe in.
    1
  33.  @toshiba1134  You cannot be that naive? You're using the argument ad populum? Do you realise how moronic that is? Islam is everywhere too, so what mechanism do you determine that one is true and the other isn't when you have no evidence to support either?
    1
  34.  @toshiba1134  You cannot be that naive
    1
  35.  @bigmikey1344  How do you know it is beyond human comprehension? I simply said there is no evidence for a god, and there isn't. Do you have any evidence of this god? No, so why believe in it?
    1
  36.  @StColeman  Atheism isn't a result of being woke. Atheism is the non belief in a god based on the fact there is no evidence to support the existence of one. You're an atheist in regards to every god you don't believe in. Did that require any "woke" lecturer? No, you don't believe in them because you have no reason to, if only you could apply that to the unjustified belief that you do hold in the other god you say does exist.
    1
  37.  @timflelter5566  How can all of them be real?
    1
  38.  @timflelter5566  To claim that reality is just in your mind is solipsistic nonsense. The arrogance to think that you created everything in your head is absolutely laughable. Why didn't you create in your head that your reality is that you're a billionaire? You didn't, so why not? You could imagine the best life anyone could imagine, but you're not living it so demonstrably reality isn't in the mind. Reality is a physical manifestation, and which you are a tiny insignificant part.
    1
  39.  @timflelter5566  What point are you actually trying to make? Of course everything experiences things from their own perspective, but that doesn't mean that your experiences reflect reality and it certainly isn't a reason for any bloody god existing . You sound like the sort of moron who thinks the two slit experiment is proof of water having memory or a consciousness. Consciousness doesnt exist without a brain
    1
  40.  @timflelter5566  What point are you actually trying to make? You're all over the place. No one "created" your reality, you experience reality.
    1
  41.  @timflelter5566  There is no evidence for any intelligent source for the universe, everything points to the natural. My actions interact with reality, they don't create it. Reality is a constant we just experience it and interact with it differently.
    1
  42.  @timflelter5566  Why would ANY god exist? Do you think on that basis that a Universe Creating Pixie also exists? Based on your argument, ANYTHING you think of could exist. That's so ridiculous. The point to believe something is when there is evidence to support it, and there is absolutely no evidence to support ANY deity anywhere.
    1
  43.  @Reprobus3  Prove to me there is anything non material. What standard am I judging god? I can't judge anything that is indistinguishable from a fairy tale, so I treat the idea of a god the same way I treat Santa Claus. Prove to me is anything other than a man made concept.
    1
  44.  @Reprobus3  I haven't run away at all. First of all prove to me that we need a god for morality. Do you think the bible is moral? I don't.
    1
  45.  @Reprobus3  What makes you think the bible is a standard? The bible condones incest, subjugation of women, genocide, torture, slavery, beating of slaves, extermination of children who don't ho our their parents, human sacrifice etc etc etc etc. You just need to be a well balanced human being with an understanding of well being, society and empathy to realise those are not things that should be promoted. If morals came from the bible, why do we find them so repulsive? I don't need much of a standard to se
    1
  46.  @Reprobus3  I'm judging it by the standard of societal well being. I don't think that society benefits ( or has ever benefitted) from subjugating women, incest, condoning genocide, slavery, beating slaves, stoning children, human sacrifice etc, do you? Your bible thinks all these things are fine
    1
  47.  @Reprobus3  I have answered it repeatedly, but my answers keep being deleted. I judge the disgusting immorality of the bible by societal wellbeing.
    1
  48.  @Reprobus3  If you're trying to prove a god, why can't you? Societal good. Do you think slavery, genocide, subjugation of women, incest, torture infanticide are good for society? Your bible thinks they are all ok. I don't see any situation where society benefits from these things, but they are either direct commandments in the bible or the bible deems them ok. I can't believe you thought H1tler and St@lin were good examples seeing as we directly took them on in either direct warfare or cold war precisely because they were bad for society.
    1
  49.  @Reprobus3  How do you think your proving of god is going? Societal health, well let me see. Can you think of a situation where incest, slavery, genocide, torture, infanticide, subjugation of women, substitutionary atonement, human sacrifice etc are good for society? I can't, yet your bible either commands them or is ok with them. Bringing up despotic dictators is a poor example given we fought against them PRECISELY because they were bad for society.
    1
  50.  @Reprobus3  Forget about trying to prove a god, you've repeatedly failed and continue to fail. If you can't prove something like a god, Santa Claus, leprechaun, alien, fairy, loch Ness monster etc you have no justification to believe in it. Why do you believe in a god? What convinced you?
    1