Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Willy OAM" channel.

  1. So he pretty much openly admits to be a CIA asset - or at least wants to be.
    177
  2. The fact alone to have a supply lane directly flanked by the enemy, no matter if direct control over it or not, is just desastrous.
    102
  3. Sorry, but in these days even faking high quality pictures is easy. And most of the time they don't even care to make it look realistic, like burn marks on the gruond and alike. The idea that weapon system of that size are destryod without any effect on the ground is utterly absurd. On top of that for such srike you clearly need some kind of monitoring - what thye could easily show, but you never see that. Ukraine and NATO are lying since start, both having a massiev industry that exists solely for propaganda. News from teh eastern front - we are winning so much. It's nothing new.
    65
  4. Blast of that obliterates concrete walls. Easy guess what it does to a squishy human body... @ FAB3000.
    62
  5.  @Norrs-fd6zr  Ask the USA, they trained and armed them for that - as they do since decades worldwide.
    61
  6. Was clear from the start. Such shit only works in movies an games, because then a bad writer just decides that it will work. In reality, this is sheer insanity over absolute nothing. Even in best cases: what exactly should they do there? What should they do that couldn't easily be done from the other side? This was 100% sacrificing humans lives by the hundreds and thousands just for an absurd PR victory of "look, we are at the other side of the river".
    53
  7. Ukraine is doing a lot of what you could call meatwave, just not in the typical offensive way. Take that small area across the river. Absolutely pointless to hold it in the first place. No way to go there with heavy equipment. But they kept sending in soldiers, no matter that many died just on THE WAY there and with ZERO chance to hold it. You could say the same about the towns - at least at that point where they were surrounded. To not pull out then and instead keep on sending soldiers into that 100% death trap, that's meat wave. A cauldron is the worst situation you can be in, but the coup regime tends to even create those for themselves when they attack. They even did that 2014 and 2015, when it was just against the people in Donbass, what was one of the main reasons they were not able to succeed. And likely all who go against that insanity they just get rid off.
    51
  8.  isrraelkumiko8214  Was western media who said that, not Russian one. Russia never gave ANY time plan. And the destroyed the coup regimes NATO proxy army meanwhile at least 2,5 times.
    47
  9. Ukraine is doing that when they attack civilians, not military. That's the difference.
    38
  10.  @gregchijoff9959  Indeed, it was the Soviet Union that reacted to NATO, not the other way around. And that MANY years later - at the same time where the USA stationed its nukes right at the eastern border of NATO in Europe. Soviet Union tried for ten years to get a peace treaty after 2.WW, what by the way include to draw back from most eastern European countries. Russia never wanted to keep those - they were forced to. Else the USA would have pushed their nukes up to Moscow - and they had just used such nukes some years ago back then. TWICE. On civil cities. Then few years later carpet bombed Korean cities with Napalm. They were KNOWN as monsters who did not care for genocide to reach their goals.
    38
  11. New to how fascism works?
    32
  12. If international law had any meaning, the coup in Ukraine would never have been accepted and the military violence from the coup regime against east Ukraine would have been condemned from day 1 - instead of delivering them money and weapons for it.
    29
  13.  @Perplexer1  See, you are typical example of propaganda that just lies to yourself.
    28
  14. lol? Hitting the bridge with these drones? They would literally do nothing. You need massive warheads to damage a bridged, especially one massive one as the Kherch bridge, which is build to withstand the sea. For drones to do anythign you would need to make them 10+ times biggers and even then you would maybe damage the surfcace a bit.
    26
  15. Was alread one of the reason they failed between 2014 and 2022. They had more forces and more and better equipment, but constantly went into these traps. It's likely that anyone who mentioned that on the coup regime's side simply lost their position (or life).
    23
  16. NATO fired over 300 HIMARS missiles into Belgorod and what you see is ONE destroyed air defense system. That's a horrible bad succes rate.
    23
  17.  @DonaldPrizwan  Russia does not caer to gain territory, they gain territory as side effect of your beloved Nazi front collapsing here and there. But even that is mainly movement in front of the actual frontline, which is far behind the lines on the map.
    22
  18.  @dustinhamabata902  "Funny" is, that majority of peopoe got zero clue of the Soviet-Afghan war and how US fascism pumped billions of dollars into creating a world wide connected network of extremist terrorist and did not even give much money, arms and training to Afghans, because those were too moderate and often talked to the soviets. Soviet Union also did not conquer Afghanistan, but just held certain positions and overall went in to prevent a collapst and abuse by NATO of that. Soviets were sure that the CIA and co tried to regime change Afghanistan to make it another proxy. And well, they were right, they tried. The reason Soviets went out of it was Gorbatchov trying to end Cold War in general - what was of course absolutely naive. NATO started Cold War and would never end it from their side.
    22
  19.  @ComradeR-44  No, Hamas is entraped in Gaza, they literally can't fight anywhere else (whole Israel is smaller than Crimea with Gaza just a small fraction of it). Ukraine got a giant country where they could fight instead and of course the only positive effect on hiding in cities is using civilians as meatshield. You can call that smart but since it plays with the lives of civilians it was made a warcrime for just that reason.
    22
  20. What you mean with "now"? They are Nazis, that's their main goal since start. And with "they" I'm not talking about tha Banderas cult alone, but especially about NATO.
    21
  21.  @Kofferr  It's always the main aggressors fault, which in the last decades was in 99% of cases NATO.
    20
  22. You see maybe something between 1% and 5% of what is happening in Ukraine on the internet.
    19
  23. For Ukraine to accumulate warfare experience, they would need to survive. When you send your troops to an early grave and just keep pumping in replacement from the street you force into uniform, you don't build up warfare experience. And you can see that very well, since Ukraine is absolutel not learning from their mistakes at all, still doing the same insane, suicidal bullshit since start. Why do you think they need to force civilians into uniform and need to beeg for another yearly GDP in weapons from NATO? Because they are so experienced?
    19
  24. The only real, unwanted withdrawal was from Kherson city, because the bombarding of the dam made it way to risky to stay. That's the only success you see there. Everything else was a switch to a war of attrition after it was clear that the coup regime is stupid and insane enough and NATO disgusting enough to just sacrifice Ukraine as so many other nations before and wouldn't stop. Kiev was clear, since you can't take a 3 millione peopel city with a few thousand soldier, so of course there was never the plan to conquer it to begin with. Kharkiv is clear, since they did not even care to build up any defense lines. Obvious reason for that: you overall want your frontline as short as possible, especially when you went in with limited troops. Getting out of Kharkiv was strategically unimportant, but reduced the length of the frontline massively.
    19
  25.  @davidjones3712  A test is a test. Tests of new system are often made to test out limits and not run it in save or even normal modi. Testing old systems is more about to check if stuff is still running. People can't stop cheering for space x and all their stuff blows up constantly.
    19
  26.  @storyteller5931  No, it's not. You got hundreds of others radars which are doing that much better.
    17
  27.  @JD-nf3rd  Sure, and the assassine that is sniping your wife did that from the house of your neighbor, so the neighbor killed your wife, yes? No?
    17
  28. There are diaries of Wehrmacht and SS soldiers. It's fascinating how pissed they are about every 'subhuman' who dares to fight back against their genocide.
    17
  29. USSR SAVED Poland by intervening when Poland fell. Else the germans would have marched through and could have finished their cleansing without much disturbance. Neither Poland nor any other eastern, likely not any European country would exist today without Russia, ohly the third Reich. UK and France could have done shit and without the massive sacrifice of the USSR it's even likel the germanys would have finished the nuclear bomb first.
    17
  30. Not even the problem. The main problem is, that this first line is of little meaning if you don't have the second and third line behind it. The first line is to slow down the attacker so the 2nd and 3rd can destroy them. And some drones are not enough for that, no matter how much you focos on filming it.
    16
  31.  @S7UAEU  No, that's just wrong and makes no sense. If anythign than the one being attacked takes more casualities, because, duh, they are getting attacked. This isn't a sword fight with two guys with swords stand in front of each other and the more careful fighter make have an advantage by not jumping right into to other ones blade. This is one side bombing the shit out of the other side. And overall: without NATO there would be no Ukraine left. Take NATO money and weapons away and you got people without arms and wages. Ukraine has lost over four full armies meanwhile.
    16
  32. People get the stupid idea, that those navy drones are some cheap crap with explosives. Those are NATO drones with a hell lot of high tech on board, so you can control them at that range plus anti ECM and of course you need the whole infrastructure of NATO to control them, that's not some guys from their home pc. But even with all that, they are only good enough for low value targets. If this wouldn't be the case, they would send those after the actual warships and not some patrol boats or landing ships. They attack those, because those are weak enough targets that it is enough to overwhelm them. But of course the impact of these strikes is borderline zero. None of these ships plays a role. Overall the whole navy isn't of importance, since even the missile strikes can be done by everything else. With Crimea now Russian, they got something far better now anyway. The Black Sea Fleet was needed as defense. But Crimea itself is like a giant carrier in the middle of Black Sea and something you can't sink. Everything the Black Sea Fleet can fire all the system on Crimea can fire, too. So even if NATO would spend many billions more to really sink the Black Sea Fleet, it would change nothing. And of course Russia won't let this happen anyway. They already gave NATO a warning with the interception, that this patrol boat was enough now. And of course the strike against the soldiers Zelensky visited, likely those who were part of that navy drone attack was another message and the timing absolutely on purpose. Russia saw that visit. And they could have just done that strike 10 minutes earlier.
    16
  33. When you call tear gar as chemical weapon, you take all meaning out of the word. It's the same as when you say "sexual assault", but this is everything, from the sheer existenec of someone you don't want to have around you up to crimes like rape. Especially absurd to go full screech propaganda about tear gas as "war crime", when it is constantly used against citizens because they protest against things.
    16
  34. They make the same mistakes since 10 years meanwhile, see no reason why this should change all of sudden, especially not for the better.
    16
  35.  @1k20a  You mean those fictionals guys from coup regime fiction stories?
    16
  36. "Tying up Russian forces" also simply ignores how much of the coup regime's forces are tied up there... Such a strategy only works out if you use way less forces than the enemy or threaten something of most importance - like Russia did when they sent those few thousands soldiers to Kiev. Since Kiev is the capitol, the coup regime HAD TO react to that. Of course some few thousand soldiers would not be able to take over a city the size of Kiev, but it's way to important to not focus most of your forces to defend it. Meanwhile Kursk is just some open field and villages and it binds at least as many coup regime forces as Russian ones, so what's the point?
    16
  37. ""Suddenly everyone fell in love with rare earth metals", is such a stupid thing to say. This has ALWAYS been about resources. ALL wars are.
    15
  38. You can literally see the secondary explosions and also hear them when you got videos with sounds. And nothing in a home depot explodes like that.
    15
  39. Russia conscripted 300k, but there were also additiona volunteers which are around 100k+ and Wagner and Czechs are also not counted in. So overall this can easily reach 500k additional(!) troops from that alone, though not all of these troops are fighting forces. Many will work in anti terror, security and support for the new Donbass areas and of course logistics.
    15
  40.  @sneakyviewing4391  US wars mainly kill more civilians than militias. So accuracy is the last thing US military is about.
    15
  41. Anymore? It never did.
    14
  42. @Pax.Alotin Communism and Nazism are the EXACT opposite, kid. You clearly neitehr got clue what Nazism is nor what communism means. Nazism is ultra right wing, driven by mass murderous racism (right wing), capitalism (right wing), warmongering (right wing). But you likely also don't know what left (egalitarian = all humans are equal in worth) and right (elitism = servants and rulers, class systems) means.
    14
  43. That's a propaganda movie not even close to the truth. If you want to know about Mariupol there are hundreds if not thousands of interviews with the people there, including now, while it is rebuild.
    14
  44. It's actually normal that people unite behind the government when there is a threat from outside. Western governments love to abuse this (since pretty much centuries) for just that reason, mostly making up threat. In case of Russia, its government does not need to make anything up. Russian people DO look at western press and what it says about Russia and of course hear when western politicians talk about how Russia must be brought down, ruined, destroyed and alike. There is only one situation when something like that leads to a new government: when the people think that the current government is too weak to response to it. So you wouldn't get people vote for a pro west government, but an extremely anti west government. Thankfully Russian people are was smarter than our western ones...
    13
  45. Or what about the over 4000 prisoners which die every year in US prisons. That's around one every 2 hours.
    13
  46. It's NATO money, NATO intel, NATO orders, NATO weapons (even most of the soviet stuff is from ex soviet NATO countries) - and Ukrainian 'meat' and future sacrificed...
    13
  47.  @itsallminor6133  Mach 20+ are ICBMs child and not what is meant when talking about hypersonic missiles.
    13
  48. That's not how it works. Attacker losing more than defend is, when you got the same equipment on both sides, but one side got the advantage of a build up defense. Defending meanwhile plays zero role when it comes to bomardement, in contrary, bombardement mostly means that the defender got problems, since the point of a defense is to be quite unmoving - what makes it easier to bombard. Range (and quantity of range weaponry of course) played always a quite crucial role in warfar, going up from melee where a spear is better than a sword, especially when it comes to mass combat, then of course bows able to rain havoc upon an enemy and today it's even worse, with weapon systems firing on you from beyond the horizon. While NATO (and it's NATO, not Ukraine) can fire some ATACMS and cruise missiles here and there with equal range as Russian systems, there is an obvious lack of mass, while Russia got many times more, plus of course the overwhelming mass of FAB bombarding, what is more brutal than any ATACM or cruise missile and with 100 times the quantity plus there is near to no chance to intercept glide bombs, so while 90% of NATO missiles get destroyed before hitting something, 100% of those FABs get through. And those are a pillar on their own. Russiad also got way more missiles AND drones.
    13
  49. They attack landing ships because those are barely if at all armed. They simply are unable to hit actual war ships.
    13
  50. When fantasizing about the enemy during your planing, you should fantasize about them being stronger than you think, not weaker. The idea to go into a war with the utter delusion that the enemy will just be stupid, incompetent, corrupt and only fighting with crap simply means that you got no plan at all, leading to catastrophic losses.
    13