Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Alexander Mercouris" channel.

  1. Remember: Hundredthousands, way over a million, fled to Russia since 2014 from the Nazi terror and Russia cared for them, while being sanctioned, while being blamed.
    669
  2. Not sure what's suppossed to be embarrasing about an accident, especially when in action. There is not much talk about it, but armies lose stuff to accidents all the time, as does everything else. Was more emberassing, when the US Navy lost a much bigger ship right in its homeport also to fire.
    143
  3.  @jamesmorrow1646  Mh17 was 99,9% likely shot down by Ukraine and we deny that for the same reason we deny the Nazis. Also it was the coup regime that kept shelling the crash site.
    132
  4. Sorry, look at Falkland war and how many ships UK lost there. Ships are lost all the time even outside war, look up ship accidents, espcially in military. It's no blow to anything, even less because it was an old ship that is about to be replaced anyway.
    111
  5. But it's no western freedom booth!
    75
  6. What people forget regarding western weapons is, that the only NATO country with vast amount of these is the USA, which has to entertain it's over 700 bases world wide. This alone is massily stretching their weapons supplies and of course they can't just go all out for something like Ukraine - what not only will bring us to WW3 levels but also drag in other nations like China for certain. So the question is not, how many weapons the west got in total, but what fraction of that they are able to waste.
    66
  7.  @realJimmy_Balls  Same today, Ukrainians fight with Russians against Nazis. The Ukrop Nazis even love to use the same flag as they did then.
    64
  8. Russia knows to differ between our crazy politicians and the people.
    58
  9. Clearly very solid build bridge, when such a massive explosion wasn't even able to take down the other road. Good luck bringing that bridge down with rockets... Even the damaged part is also the links, not the actual pillars = easy to repair.
    55
  10. Truce only works when both side accept it. Since the Nazi regime instanly said no, there simlpy was none. At best Russia decreased some of the far range attacks, but of course it can't just stop the actions at the frontline, when the other side fights on. Not reason to even try, even more because it would be a high risk to get attacked if you do that one sided.
    40
  11.  @kevinmulligan9055  They had a single and only partial mobilisation what is only focussed at a fraction of their reservists. Ukraine is going through the 10th conscription round soon and alerady sends invitations to women, because they run out of men willing to die for their shit show.
    35
  12.  @homeguardster  Fanatism, especially blind fanatism, does not help you, it destroys you.
    33
  13.  @redscope897  You don't get how modern warfare looks like. What you see on a map is no defense line or a wall or alike, it's the line behind which the firepower targeted at you brutally increases. They simply ran into a kill zone. That's around as hard as jumping from a cliff. It's not hard to jump. It's hard to survive it.
    30
  14. Well, reality and slowly drying by illness, hunger, thirst in your own stench isn't that heroic anymore as the fantasy - which likely also included an especially heroic victory.
    28
  15. Don't even know how you want to fight an enemy in a harbour city that can just be there with their battleship while you got nothing to even reach them... But I heared those Nazis called out for Ukraine to come to them, said they have stalled 14k Russian soldiers with their number of 3k (of course hiding behind civilians, that's why they don't let them leave).
    26
  16. But they get a lot of very expensive weapons! It costs so much money to bomb them. ~cynical~
    25
  17.  @homeguardster  Ukraine is down on the ground since monthes and only hold up by NATO who for some resason wants to see it utterly destroyed. But it even just bleeds out NATO. It can't hold this up for years, no matter how much money they print.
    24
  18.  @tommatokovic1018  The only thing not right is the idea people have by looking at a map with some lines and following 'news' about 'break throughs'. There is nothing to break through. These lines are no walls or fortified defenses or whatever. They are simply a line behind which the firepower targeted at you increases. Russia's army is not standing and such lines not even close. And that's why you can indeed drive in many kilometers behind such lines. There isn't anything that will just stop you - beside reason. Because it's absolutely not reasonable to do that, since the actual fact with the increased firepower still stands. That's why you get: a) BIG ADVANCES of the Ukro army. Because storming in like that is easy. b) BIG LOSSES of the Ukro army. Because storming in like that is stupid and suicidal.
    24
  19.  @AgentDoubleOSeven77  You mean where Russia showed that it know what tactic and strategy means and that they care for their soldiers and don't waste them over nothing, what explains why they got few losses and that of the Nazis are deasasterous, not because it's super soldier vs subhuman, but coup regime giving a fuck how many people they lose, while Russia doesn't waste their army for that.
    23
  20. You can tell a lot by the damage. Overall those damaged houses mainly look like smaller explosives - not a 500kg warhead. There are pictures and videos about what a FAB500 does, including creating a massive create in solid ground. It's easy to add 1 and 1 together how an appartment building would look like that would be hit by such a warhead. Since the Banderas Regime loves to hide behind civilians and civil structures, the chance that any of their anti air rockets which fail to hit their target by whatever meas, hitting one of those buildings around, isn't slim. Not talking about, that by all means it's not even unlikely that they do this on purpose, after all: it's what they sell for more billions of money (and they don't care for the damage done by that or the mountains of debt this creates THEY won't be the ones to pay back).
    22
  21.  @FizzFizzFizzFizzFizz  Better inform yourself about these countries and the context, you clearly got no clue about it.
    21
  22. More like "We could need another layer of cannonfodder right at the front."
    19
  23.  @carls2170  No, the opposite. Ukraine just rushed in without thinking.
    19
  24.  @СтаниславГрознов  If it would have been a fuck up, you would have massive loses on Russian side and near to none on the Ukrainian. Not the complete opposite. Area gains don't matter. If it would be about area gains, Russia would fight very, very differently.
    19
  25. Stuff breaks all the time. what is emberassing about it? Hell, this dumb "flagship" nonsense makes no sense. People are so used to it being something special from movies. "This is the flagship of the blablabla, the most amazing ship of all". The ship was old, very, very old. And it was about to be replaced for that reason, becaue age means, that stuff breaks even easier and regarding technology is simply not that modern and fitting anymore. Military loses stuff all the time - normally it's just not in the MSM, that's all. USA even lost several nuclear weapons, ships, submarines and so on. A three times as big and half as old ship of the US navy just burned out two years ago right inside its own homeport. No one wrote about how "emberassing" this is - while it's clearly way more emberassing. If that really was a missile strike, it was likely with a hell lot of NATO support - what would be the main reason it's ignored by Russia in media. And it was a stupid strike, because the smaller ship are way more modern and way more dangerous than the Moskva, that did not really do much.
    19
  26. Jamming would be about signals coming from the outside. Just because the drone got some internal parameters running doesn't mean, that you can jam those. Overall, taking a normal computer, the only way to 100% secure a computer from being hacked is to simply allow no input at all - what is also likely the way to go with cheap drones. Since they are used against non moving targets, there are other ways to ensure, that they follow the pass without th need of any input from the outside, that could be changed, interrupted or even abused to take over.
    17
  27.  @FizzFizzFizzFizzFizz  Not even closely compareable.
    17
  28. Banderas Nazis mined the whole region there for years, never saw the Russian cry about that.
    17
  29.  @arthurtane6505  'Your' Nazi army lost thousands of soldiers in few days and billions in equipment. Even if they would have taken anything worthwhile, this would be a disters - and they didn't even do that. For losing so much, you would have at least some victory on the level of taking Mariupol for example to halfway get in the direction of maybe being acceptable (and even that...).
    17
  30.  @martinbartosik2440  You mean as long as you think like in a videogame, where your units just respawn or you endlessly buy new ones, hm? Reality does not work like that. At all.
    15
  31. What's the surprise? They lie as always and in the most absurd way.
    15
  32.  @youareliedtobythemedia  Well, there is this oddity, that Poland gave Ukrainians pretty much polish citizens rights and now Ukraine the other way around. This aside: would for sure not be a good deal for Poland, though it would likely, as usual, ignore the people anyway and the ones who sign such a merge would just lead a well paid life elsewhere, anyway - also as usual.
    15
  33. Nothing. Winning a war is not about areas, but the destruction of the enemies army at best with minimal own losses. Brutally wasting your army (or in case of Ukraine armies, since that's pretty much at least their third one meanwhile) is certain and brutal loss, no matter if you manage to take some area here and there.
    15
  34. The way Ukro/NATO fascists throw away the lives of those 700.000, they aren't even able to beat those 200k by the number game.
    14
  35. Railway is already working again (there is even a video).
    13
  36.  @honzo1078  Just absolute stupid to fight a battle you can't win when it is against an enemy, who mainly wants you to stop fighting.
    13
  37.  @redscope897  Warfare is not about territory. It's about destroying the enemy's army.
    12
  38. Must say it's a bit fascinating how much focus there is on that not even that big attack. While evere death is tragic, we talk about a war with 100.000s of soldiers and such death tolls especially on coup regime side every single day and much higher. With 100.000s of soldiers on the ground, there is simplay no way, that the enemy won't get lucky here or there. It's actually more a surprise when you see the massive NATO support the Nazi got, that this happens so rarely.
    12
  39. Oh, you can add much more to that. Most peopel for exampel don't know, what a brutal genocide the USA comitted in Korea, where the burned 18 cities completely to the ground (eye witnesses say, the destruction in germany 1945 was nothing in comarison) with hundredthousands of bombs and over 30.000t of Napalm.
    12
  40. They often enough CREATE them.
    11
  41. The attack was simply done by NATO - who exactly has presssed the button doesn't really matter. Unlikely that any of the NATO states would do something like that without OK from the US, not even UK and even less Poland or Ukraine, who would have too much to lose if they go against the will of their emperor.
    11
  42. On the pictures you got close to no equipment. People are used to videogames and movies, where something like that would be a vast amount of ammunition In reality this is close to nothing and Ukraine loses several times that much every single day.
    10
  43.  @coshyno  It's a quote from "Hamlet". It's about that the scenario of the play is driven by political corruption.
    10
  44. That dreaming of an Endsieg even with Tanks right in front of the core of your empire/nation is somehow something very typical for Nazis, don't know why. Must be the whole "superior" thing, there is simply no place in their minds for being the loser, no matter what.
    10
  45.  @vladtheimpala1  You do get, that there is near to no military forces in the majority of Ukraine left, right? Russia is simply not going to conquere Ukraine, they don't want it. They didn't even want to get Donbass. If Putin had been all about conquering Ukraine, 2014 had looked very different.
    10
  46.  @galimbertino4939  See: when you just can stom in like that, only an absolute braindead idiot would not think about a trap. And don't take the word 'trap' so lightly. To let your enemy come and put himsel in a brutal disadvantage he can't escape is just as much a trap as an ambush.
    10
  47. It's a very direct and easy choice - in contrary to our "elections" where most people just vote for some person or party who do what they want anyway and in most cases the absolute opposite of what they were voted for... Best example right in Ukraine itself: Zelensky was elected to END the war. Instead the made it 10 times worse and no burns down whole Ukraine for it (well, the part he can burn down).
    9
  48.  @charlesmartel6103  NEver happened, was failing air defense, because the Nazsi put them inside the cities.
    9
  49. What is not even new, OSCE has a history of that, sadly.
    9
  50.  @alanmcbride6658  Biggest prob was the airforce, something Ukraine is pretty much missing completely. NATO starts every war with a brutal bombing campaign.
    8