Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Alexander Mercouris" channel.

  1.  @redscope897  See: against a working army you can't just drive by with your tanks and shoot other tanks. Does not work that way. Only works with brutal bombing campaigns with the gruond troops just picking up the rests.
    8
  2.  @kapalik68  Not really how it works, but of course the US oligarchs made their bucks with it - it's always the peopel who pay the price.
    8
  3. It's not that 'Ukraine' got any say in it. It's victim of fascists. Fascists inside who serve fascists outside and both just want to sacrifice Ukraine for their own gain.
    8
  4. Those negativ 80 became anti matter missiles, what explains the destruction. :o
    8
  5.  @charlesmartel6103  Even EU had to admit that Georagie started the war. The president who did that is by the way best buddy with Zelensky with an astonishing career in Ukraine, until he was so stupid to go back to Georgia where they imprisoned him for his crimes against the country and its people.
    8
  6. People for some reason love that "momentum" word. No, you don't need to have or use momentum. if you plan is to surprise your enemy and use that to your advantage, you should of course use this to the fullest, but even then you still have to look out to not push too far and run right into a trap. Russia's strategy the last monthes is completely different, though and is all about wearing down the enemy without putting the lives of their own soldiers at unncessesary risk. You don't need momentum at all for that.
    8
  7. They most likely mobilize to secure and build up the new areas.
    7
  8. All that talk about Rabotino (a <500 people village), that isn't even behind the first defenseline.
    7
  9.  @richardlafave2556  Child, they said 44 HIMARS ROCKETS were shot down. You propaganda bots are so badly trained.
    7
  10.  @PassivePortfolios  How does all the Russian equipment that Ukraine's army abandonded help Ukraine?
    7
  11. Child just because you see some destroyed vehicles does not mean that everyone died there. Overall pictures say, there were tank and those are not detroyed. It's overall not even clue WHO was destroyed there.
    7
  12. It's note even a 'clever' trap. Overall the fact alone, that these lines weren't defended well shows, that it's unimportant for Russia to hold that area. It was more just a simpe bait and they still fell for it. Overall it's likely that NATO simply gives a fuck about Ukrainian lives (and it seems more like they hope for getting rid of as many as possible, the less people Ukraine got, the easier it will be to suck it dry...) and the coup regime just blindly follows the orders of its master, while the military leaders of the Ukrainian army are silenced and have to follow order or be cut.
    7
  13. Sabotage indeed does not help much if you don't have not much more behind it. Overall: every nation got all kind of accidents, organized crime, corruption and whatever by the thousands every day, creating all kind of damage, but that doesn't make the nation fall apart. What was destroyed in Crimea today, Ukraine is losing every day and much more and it still takes months until they break down.
    6
  14. Overall Kiev coup regime talke about all his points for a long while and nothing really stood against it, including NATO involvement and the utter denial of NATO to want to talk about all these things. People COULD say: yeah, taht was just all talk. But that's like someone making jokes about killing someone all the time over and over and over again plus getting weapons and all - and when this target persons snaps saying "Hey, was all jokes!" And that on a national scale PLUS all the brutality already taking place including thousands dead and over 2 millions fleeing from such violence. Just absurd, trying to defend this.
    6
  15. But he does not care for lives, obviously.
    6
  16.  @arnoldsaunders7885  War only destroys real worth and burns a lot of values for that. War is the climax of stupidity and insanity.
    6
  17. It's more likkely that the 60 are true, because Ukrop Nazis are known for taking everything pretty much x10.
    6
  18.  @Seerwealth  Of course it was a trap. And Ukraine created it pretty much itself. You don't run right into like that. Even when you do this in medieval times that's a disasterous decisions. There is a reason why it's called FRONTline. And why one of the most used military strategis is flanking. If you storm in like that, you pretty much superflank yourself...
    6
  19. All the weapons are borderline worthless (in terms of military victims - you can of course still shoot at people with them) when you don't have the surveillance to lead them. Russia got al the surveillance there, while the satellite images NATO may be able to deliver don't allow full life coverage, what would be needed to follow at least a tactic to attack the Russian front, which got a wide circle of certain death around its front. NATO is used to fight people with ZERO surveillance, so they can move whereever and whenever they want, then use their artillery, bombers, drones and so on to just shoot at anything they want with close to zero counterfire. The situation in Ukraine is close to the opposite.
    6
  20.  @sonaruo  If Mortas would be the highest range weaponry you got, sure. But thay aren't.
    6
  21. The franatics attemps clearly point at a VERY hard grip of Azov on the whole regime. Not even such a big surprise, seeing how they also dominate the media, including the official one of Ukraine.
    5
  22. How Russia got these informations: they will simply just listening to it. We talk about complete chaotic structures, quite easy for a highly advanced army like Russia to find a way into communication - and just listen.
    5
  23. Funny that people thing that dirty bomb thing seems so farfetched, while Ukraine is literally bombarding a nuclear power plant and the west saying NOTHING toward it but trying to blame Russia (what of course simply does not work). If you destroy a NPP, you GOT a dirty bomb. Not a nuke, but a dirty bomb.
    5
  24. They gave me a good idea how to survive this crisis they brought. I just put a price cap on everything I need and don't give them more money than that. Pretty sure it will work very well!
    5
  25. Have you talked about that in the UN now 52 nations voted against condemning Nazism (includes Germany, Italy and Japan). A year ago it had 'only' been the USA and Ukraine - with USA voting against condemning Nazism for many years meanwhile...
    5
  26. I see them using busses for the vote. Very smart Much too risky to use official buildings for that.
    5
  27. That attak was nothing to be proud of, it's that simple. It was a sneak attack on a soft, civil target = it got no protection and also had no militar worth. That's why Ukraine also did not like it. It did nothing to weaken Russia, just gave them reason to retaliate even harder. There is not 100% protection in reality, so strikes against soft targets are always possible - even strikes against military targets. Question is, how much it will cost you and the enemy.
    5
  28.  @andrewpease3688  The start wasn't poor at all. The sole reason it "didn't work out" was NATO fascism and Banderas being insane enough to burn down Ukraine for their greed, else this would have been over very quicky and little damage. Russia can't change that insanity part, but the troops aroujnd Kiev still pinned down the Banderas army with very few soldiers for such a giant city and country, a very well done pinning operation and that without burning down Kiev as NATO would have done. Attacks on infrastructure came monthes later when NATO and Banderas poxies started with terror attacks like on the Crimean bridge and they still hold back much more than NATO does in all of their wars.
    5
  29. Why? Le Pen is awesom for Macron, you peopel still don't get that the neo right wingers are the best buds of the old right wingers, eh?
    5
  30. That didn't even happen in 1.WW like that... They just copy/pasted some Hollywood action version of it.
    4
  31. Quite obvious, especially with that timine, that thos 300k will focus heavily on securing on the new areas of Russia. This will of course also free the heavy strike forces from that job and will also support them beyond that, massively.
    4
  32. USA really, really, really needs all of Russian resources for the future and Ukraine got some, too. It's all about wealth and power. War is never about anything else.
    4
  33.  @pr0methian  Tell your CIA propaganda officer to train you guys better, you got exactly one reply, it's dumb AND boring.
    4
  34. High stake poker game - thinks EU. Meanwhile the actual game played is chess - with EU throwing cards at the table, wondering why nothing works.
    4
  35.  @Skousen77  Wht will make it quite the mess with the combat range of such fighters, which is far below the traveling range.
    4
  36. Haste in general means higher risk. You can have situation in which you should act fast to not lose an advantage, but even then the risk still remains. There is nothing in Ukraine that forces Russia to act faster.
    4
  37.  @mamacryright5740  EU is far right since start, child, it's created that way.
    4
  38.  @xenusceptic  Yeah, imagine you are are a reasonable person and just can't get in your head the insanity of Nazis and their super suicidal Endsieg fantasies. How foolish.
    4
  39. That wave plan would be absolute stupid (plus in deep disdain of human life...). Normally as defender you want to force the attackers into something like that, that they are not able to attack all at once and every part of your front. To do that on purpose as attacker is... absurd. And - everything aside how disgusting it is to just sacrifice the lives of your soldiers like that - to send in your worst soldiers last is the icinig on that cake of insanity.
    4
  40.  @mayo911  Standard tactical behaviour to do that. Retreat from a hard to defend position, let the enemy come and counter attack it, simply summarized. People don't get, that the border areas of the Russian hold territory are not where the majority of its righting forces are. Just look a the range of used weapon systems and you may imagine how it really works. The line on the map is nor wall nor any other kind of defense line you have to or even can break through. It's the line behind which you get in range of way more weapon systems. To cross that line and 'capture' the area behind it isn't hard at all. It's just extremely dangerous.
    4
  41. Who ever cares about that anyway.
    4
  42.  @michaelkatz275  Because it's in a good positions and Iran got no prob to work with Russia that way? Most satellites move pretty fast around the earth (so they can stay closer earth, the closer you get the faster the satellite must be to stay in an orbit, countering the gravity of earth), so you only got certain time windows with every of these satellites to look at the stuff you want to see. There are of course also geo stationairy satellites, but those travel along the equator with the spin of earth (and appear by that 'stationary') - and they have to be around 36.000km away from earth for that (since they HAVE TO travel at this exact speed or they wouldn't stay above that certain spot, obviously).
    4
  43. 88 tanks, eh? From germany? To Nazis? 88? The number Nazis love so much, because 88 = HH = Heil Hitler?
    4
  44. The whole situation sounds very odd. It's looks more like a tried raid of Ukraine, which then led to a battle with some destroyed vehicles on both sides. I see no reason for Russia to cross a river that is still contested like that, it's not needed in modern times with more than enough range to first clear the other side for good.
    4
  45. Really don't know why he focusses so much on that number. It's not like they come up with absurd numbers. It may differ a bit, because overall it's still a guess when for example they destroy a factore or depot and can't look inside and count every single one. But overall the absolute exact numer does not matter. Take 100-200 more or less, doesn't change anything.
    4
  46.  @rohanmehta1339  In that case the moral of Ukraine would be on the sea of the floor at this point. And losing military equipment is something normal. It would be way worse to have lose the crew than the ship. Again: the Moskva is not even a new and modern ship. It's more like kicking grandpa instead of choosing to fight his children. Will this demoralize the children? Or just make them angry?
    4
  47.  @homeguardster  Sure, Adolf, sure.
    3
  48.  @marshalleubanks2454  Problem is, USA is not used to at all to get attacked.
    3
  49.  @saxoncelt9823  Annoying for Crimean citizens. No impact at all on the military, which can just use landing ships and alike for transport or just use the landbridge - ignoring how Crimea has a massive military HQ anyway.
    3
  50. It seems there are tunnel leading to the trainstation, those are very likely blocked by Russian army or Donbass militia.
    3