Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Alexander Mercouris" channel.

  1. Since Urkaine is an utterly failed state, Russia can just wait it out regarding Odessa. Not unlikely that Ukraine will fall apart anyway and then you can go take Odessa as easy as Crimea.
    3
  2. What is that "embarassement" talk all the time? Since when do we call terror attacks an embarassement for the victim?
    3
  3. Reminds me of US fascism in Korean war, when they were pushed back by China and during the peace talks started to bombard Korean civilians even more, since it could bring them in a better position to get more land. Did not work by the way - beside causing the death of many thousand more civilians. Meanwhile a very good way to WORSEN your position in peace talks is to have not much of your army left because you sent it to the slaughter.
    3
  4. It's simply a disaster. Absurd who people can ignore how terrible this is.
    3
  5.  @blue_diamond_gem  How? They started with hundredthousands of soldier and many more were forced into service by the fascistis regime. Over the last monthes they lost way more than those 15k. Why should they collapse now from 15k?
    3
  6.  @philippe2715  Could also shoot down certain satelites used for such strikes. Russia is able to do this.
    3
  7. Sure, those mythical ukrainian anti ship missiles Azov Nazis likely fire out of their asses. We haven't seen any of them in real action, the last sunk ship was not damaged at all. And that river crossing thing looks more like an Ukrainian raid stopped anyway.
    3
  8. Liberal = neoliberal = capitalists? Or in what way? When you hear "liberal" in the west they close to never mean liberal, but neoliberal = economical 'liberal' = plutocracy.
    3
  9. We talk about Nazis. We talk about peopole who got as core of their ideology that genocide of millions of 'subhumans' is fine. It's not about if whole Ukraine would do that. You don't need many people for it. Just a few crazies and then people in the background, who deliver the support, because it's useful for them. What has NATO done to this day that makes people think, that they care about if a single Ukraines lives in the end? All these weapons they send has already caused way more death than any dirty bomb would cause. And the whole point would be to blame it on Russia anyway, so it can't really be tooo absurd and sick, in contrary, the more disgusting it is, the more useful for the plan.
    3
  10. As usual, USA is trying to ruin the rest of the wold while itself sits there far away from it all and waits to rob the burning rests...
    3
  11. The case with Melnyk in germany was, that he openly denied on a youtube blog "Andrij Melnyk, Botschafter der Ukraine - Jung & Naiv: Folge 580" (only german, though), that Banderas and alike were fascists and that they are indeed heroes. While he was hard to hold as an ambassador that why (because overall that goes in direction of Holocaust denial what is a crime in germany), it's not like our government and even less media cared THAT much about it. Yeah, sure, he better should go back to Ukraine now (where he was promoted!), but for example even our main stream media still love to quote that man in not in a bad way at all.
    3
  12. Already is. It's insante to throw away so many lives for pretty much nothing.
    3
  13.  @ChuckAmadi  Go on with your Nazi talk, Adolf.
    2
  14. Don't get how peopel are surprised about it. The Nazis do terror attacks on the city, so overall it's no surprise when people want to leave until this is solved.
    2
  15. Bit naive to think, that the west wouldn't 100% blame it on Russia and that anyone going against it wouldn't be treated the same way as all the people who go against the narrative now: as outsiders, as enemies and worse.
    2
  16.  @monjaspoerl4439  Usual thing with nazi regimes. It's the prize you pay for not learning from the past...
    2
  17.  Jamieray Z  The fuel will quickly become the quickets problem. Tanks burn a lot of it and Ukraine has massive energy problem including fuel and to transport it. Overall Russia can just focus to push that further and NATO could send 2000 tanks, they simply lack the ability to move them.
    2
  18. It's pointless to just make some holes into a bridge. If you want to destroy a bridge you must damage/destroy the carrying structure at best to the point in which its own weight makes it crumble. Holes in any other part don't matter much at all.
    2
  19. No, they were not. You are defeated when you hold against it, by that waste the lives of your soldiers, what Ukraine/NATO loves to do with the lives of Ukrainian soldiers (overall it seem that NATO just wants to thin out Ukraine's population...) and lose that fight. If you fall back to lure in the enemy to counter him with much less effort and danger for your own troops, that's simply what you call military strategy and tactics.
    2
  20.  @maxmensch8910  What massives losses? You alwayys got losses, it's a modern war with weapons system that can fly or shoot up to 100s of km. It's not a video game that takes place on a 1qm km map and where your units all got some health bar and whatever.
    2
  21.  @CloneDAnon  Russia is 100% involved. They abuse Ukrainians as cannonfodder, but everything else is its war. And Ukraine can't win anyway, since even a win of NATO would be a total loss for Ukraine.
    2
  22.  @lonestar1233  Ukraine's army even with NATO support got nothing in common with the situation back then...
    2
  23. Moskva would have been the worst target to choose for that one shot they got. A very old ship with no importance in the SMO, borderline no offensive quality and also withotu any other meaning beside an historical and emotional one. Overall with Crimea around and how Russian militar technic works, Russia does not even need the missile ships, since they can easily use ground based launchers too to fire these missiles. There was not other attack like that so if it was Ukraine, they wasted that one shot they got on an almost half a century old ship that was borderline out of comission anyway.
    2
  24.  @stephenromey6348  Most likely - and they will overall just talked with their cannonfodder, that one of them will take the blame if necessary.
    2
  25. @Marcel Daman Small? You need several tons to damage a railroad bridged and even more when you actually want to destroy the pillar, what might not work at all as long as you don't plant it directly at the pillar, since even a detonation will still follow the easiest path = the main force will just fizzle out in thin air. That's why even that massive explosion/fireball didn't do much to the bridge. The pressure was only strong enough directly at the location of the truck/center of explosion and the other parts were damage by being linked to that crumbling bridge part, while even the other, not linked lanes beside it are close to undamage and just a bid blackened. The railroad bridge is built even more stable, since it must withstand even more weight, pressure and vibration from the trains. You would need a massive bomb for that and it's much harde to plant that on a train, which by the lack of numbers is much easier to control. Not impossible, sure, but just a little bomb will do nothing.
    2
  26. I indeed really don't get why people think this is some kind of race.
    2
  27. Since Ukraine is pretty much a rotting corpse, it should be easy to loot it after this. Question is, what outcome this will have for the people there.
    2
  28. Starting with a lie, since the War in Ukraine started 2014 - and even the current scenario started February 16, when the Ukro Nazis started their final attempt to finish the genocide in East Ukraine.
    2
  29. If they did not replace the warhead, an anti air one would do borderline zero to a bridge.
    2
  30. It's easy when you got something mobile. You just drive there.
    2
  31. Counter attacks against infantery is suicidal stupid. That infantery will just retreat, while the counter offense went right in the kill zone of the artillery...
    2
  32. Saw an a bit older documentation about the capitalistic system and how money in it is created. Not really anything new, but I 'loved' one remark of one of the banker guys in it, trying to explain the system. He explained how money is created by the banks as debt and how overall the person he was speaking to could work was much as he want, without the investors, this wouldn't be worth anything. This absurd view nicely explains the core of our problems - and how the get the idea, that they could break Russia. They really think, that it is all about the FIAT money.
    2
  33.  @nathanneiman  Looking at the losses at this point alone, Ukraine sacrificed a hell lot of pawns to just advance somehow to the other side. I don't see how they took something like a knight. Where?
    2
  34.  @michaelkatz275  Area doesn't matter at all, even less area the enemy clearly gives a fuck about.
    2
  35. USA was involved 100% if anything had happened beside the fire. How can you even think anything different? The whole war is an US proxy war.
    2
  36. Azovstahl and Mariupol is so imnportant, because the whole thing is kind of the capitol of the Azov Nazis, the most famout Nazi group in Ukraine. And if you peopel forgot: the destruction of the Nazis the goal of Russia, not the destruction of Ukraine.
    2
  37. Patriot is ridiculous expensive.
    2
  38. Even after so many years people think that Ukraine/NATO wouldn't be stupid enough to do something like that. It's hard to believe, how less fascists care about even the lives of their own soldiers.
    2
  39. Why? It's overall blown up to an absurd degree, as sad as every dead is. The attack on Crimean Bridge or even the terrorist attack with that car bomb in Russia itself would have been a much bigger thing in comparison. That soldiers can die when in war... well, yes, it's war. Nazi Ukraine loses x times that much every single day.
    2
  40. The videos they showed about it make no sense. The showed peopel lying on the street and tell the story, that Russian soldiers bound and executed them, while its pretty clear, that those people died from shelling. They likely killed those peopel with shelling and then just abuse our western war propaganda, that everything bad is Russian's fault.
    2
  41. Russia forgave us when we were Nazi germany and slaughtered millions of Russians. Still - it just makes it worse that 'we' learned NOTHING from that.
    2
  42.  @31mAyMgaYanga  NATO is a small village now?
    2
  43. Everyone is a critic as it is said. Overall most criticism I see lives in magical videogame- and movie land, but reality doesn't work like that.
    2
  44. Who ever would stay there in a frontline area ...
    2
  45. Less opinion would work well, this podcast today wasn't a good one, here the reason. 1. I wonder how many terrible bad decisions were made in military and political history because "Oh no, that would be emberassing." 2. War isn't a videogame. It's not that if you just make the right decisions you will be an invincible wall that just marches forward. When Ukraine, which got much more soldiers and full NATO amasses forces in one point, it CAN of course push forwards. It's still a terrible mistake and disgustingly without care for the lives of their soldiers, but of course this will 'work' in regard of pushing in the wanted direction. 3. The idea, that the Russian leadership would think, that some militia is strong enough to push back heavenly armed forces is just ridiculous. They did not think that. No one sane would ever think that. That's the whole point of the withdrawal. If the enemy makes an offenense like that, you don't throw away the lives of your peopel and push against it, you fall back and counter. 4. Stop using words like 'emberassing' and 'disasters' especially in such an absurd way. It's a disaster for the Ukrainian soldiers who are sent to to their death for nothing. For Russia it's not even close to anything of a disaster - it would be one, if they would be so stupid to hold against it and waste lives for that. Moral? Moral of whom? Internet soldiers? Russia clearly does not care at all what some people on the internet think.
    2
  46. It's absolute normal, to have a lot of outdated units around, which are not in active sevice anymore and not really fit to use, but when you run out of everything, you come up with it. NATO will also have delivered more of it, not even talking much about it. You can also repair units, which are partly destroyed or out of order, so you can per se put a single unit several times out of order, but of course it's hard to tell the difference from afar and overall every destruction is a real one, doesn't mean that it's a total loss by turned to dust. It's absoluet normal to have more units destroyed at the end than the armies started with. It's the reason why Russia started to destroy military production and repair stations and of course started to destroy infrastructure that carries stuff from NATO into Ukraine.
    2
  47. Sorry but @ Nazis in Azovstahl: look at the fanatism of such people in history. They will likely just kill everyone and themselves...
    2
  48. Always have to explain to peoplekm, that the GDP mainly means how much the life in a country is monetarized, not how productive it really is. As fictional exampoe, you could take 100 millionen people paying each other 100$ to swipe each others bottom (and all you need is a single 100% note to make the round) and you would generate a 1 billion GDP - without having actually creaeted anything or make anything different, those 100 million people still just swipe a behind, just that of another person and they pay 100$ to someone for that and take 100$ for from someone for that. If you have many people paying rent? Good for the GDP. If everyone owns the house or appartment they live in? Devastating for the GDP (additional pending on the way it is counted). Difference regarding the living situation itself? None. By the way: reusing and sellin existing things = terrible for the GDP, because for example a 2 second hand car is not seen as value in GPD. So wasting a hell lot of resources to play old stuff with new stuff instead of keep the old stuff working = terrible for GDP. GDP has a whole mountain of problems.
    2
  49. How do you want to sustein anything, when your actual attack cripples you like that already?
    2
  50. It's indeed typical for luring out a target into the open - or right into a cauldron. Ukrainian army falls for that since years and do not learn. Likely because all the smart people just deserted and they are run by the orders of fanatic politicians...
    2