Comments by "Andrzej Barcelona FRLK" (@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @henryyoung7184  I do not need the war to continue. Let the Russians go home and take care about their own homes and industry, in dire need.
    2
  2.  @henryyoung7184  I think your data os nor accurate. I really doubt any military doctrine would be oriented to profit, however I'm sure NATO takes into account the economy of war (on both sides). Russia... whatever the doctrine is oriented to, they don't follow their own. About the percent, again what is your base? And perhaps do you know what's the percentage of the winter clothing defrauded in Russia?
    2
  3. The impact of the energy war - what is the balance of this war ?
    2
  4.  @henryyoung7184  You had mentioned military doctrine before, now going off topic.
    2
  5. Vsyo idyot po płanu. 3 day special operation.
    2
  6. I can point to analysis that confirmed to be right / correct, eg the foreseeing of brutal invasion 3 years ago.
    2
  7. Simple - Are there more Americans (or Europeans) emigrating to Russia or Russians to the USA (or the EU)? Why?
    2
  8.  @ordinarygg  Sure, toilet paper, that the Soviet Union started producing only in the 1960s
    2
  9.  @James-9999  Yes, yes,, it couldn't be, Russia has never invaded any country! Ukraine attacked Russia, because Russia wanted to join NATO and did not ask Ukraine for permission 😅 😉
    2
  10.  @Princip666  Thanks for your reply. Could you point to the moment(s) where is "how Russians did it" ? And - how is my post dishonest or irrelevant? Referring to the sluice gates, it's all the same - it's not annihilating the dam as a dam. it might effect the regulation abilities, but not the structure. Talking about the regulation, once again - you can reduce the volume of water (however you cannot 'stop it' for long), but you cannot "send" more than the river brings. I will be happy to read a book or books on hydrology that you've read, please recommend any.
    2
  11. Why Russia attacks , starts wars every few years ? When they stop doing so , someone may start thinking about it, not before
    2
  12. Several aircraft taken down and some dozen servicemen killed is not "unisono" sign.
    2
  13. Yes, lots of may be . The war. Can you make better?
    2
  14.  @KirbyAllen-s5l  What are the goals of this war, according to you? Because on the most important, political level Ukrainians won, they defended their independence, they have allies, then they have strategic initiative, on operational level Ukraine is carrying offensive... You say Ukraine is losing? Putin (Russia?) declared some phony aims, but none is achieved.
    2
  15. What is the lie here?
    2
  16. ​ @Princip666  Yeah, sure everything You included ? No reasonable argumentation, no evidence,
    2
  17. Where are these Americans here ? 😮
    2
  18. ​ @evgeniya7853 Are you against Putin's war now?
    2
  19.  @evgeniya7853  You haven't answer the question. Also, does it really matter whether you call Putin "European creature"? Yes or no?
    2
  20. Here we go again... The urban legend of NATO expansion ! USA was part of Minsk agreements etc?
    2
  21. Post colonial countries - this war is warning for them, what Chechnya, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia know
    2
  22. 🙈🙉🙊
    2
  23. Vladimir Vladimirovich himself said it's OK when Sweden and Finland joined NATO , what are you talking about?
    2
  24. Not American any more ? Make up your mind plz
    2
  25. Hello, as long as I agree with your perspective, I think the intent of promoting natality is late, it's effects if come, will be in 20 years
    2
  26. What makes D. Medvedev so angry then ?
    2
  27. Any argument pls?
    2
  28.  @NTraveller  What do you think? I think that it's very improbable , on the contrary to F-16s in Ukraine.
    2
  29.  @NTraveller  How would the nukes solve it ? In the improbable scenario would complicate a lot for Russia, as the reaction wouldn't be as limited as it is now. BTW the "philosophical sentence" about the planes and air defence isn't true in general (except perhaps for some special conditions, somewhere , some time 😀)
    2
  30.  @NTraveller  I'm afraid it's not so simple 😂 Anyway, nobody (North Korea?) is going to nuke Russia.
    2
  31.  @NTraveller  It is complicated international affair , afaik nothing indicates nuclear attack, even Russia isn't rattling that sabre any longer.
    2
  32.  @thornil2231  What people? Educated how? Not by OP anyway
    2
  33. What does Russia produce? Not much either
    2
  34. What's the sh*t , according to you?
    2
  35. Argument?
    2
  36. I think it hurts Russia, but they deny it (most of them, not only propaganda)
    2
  37. IF - this short word makes big difference 😊
    2
  38. ​ @googleyoutubechannel8554  You don't see it as a standard e.g. in Ukraine, in Syria it was different, in Africa yet different ...
    2
  39. Did APN say Russia would lose resources ? I think he means the working force, production ability, personnel and equipment replacing etc
    2
  40.  @geraldh.8047  Is this what I'm thinking it is? ⏩↗️
    2
  41. Don't say Japan, above all 😂
    2
  42. China at wara against India or China conquering Russia,?
    2
  43. Adolf Hitler commited suicide, to be exact.
    2
  44. Russia intercepted the transferred ammunition with its tanks , ifvs, AD radars, warships like Moskva , recently refineries...
    2
  45. ​ @evgeniya7853  Have you got any actual argument/s?
    2
  46. Here 😉 Суровикин Сурpовикинн
    2
  47. APN made a separate video about winning/achieving aims some time before.
    2
  48. Slaughter? But a lot, yes, along with Russian and other nationalities of the Federation, while they simply could go home. There's a lot to take care about there.
    2
  49.  @wber3530  Trolling, and poor.
    2
  50. The gas EU was buying was through pipelines, it wasn't LNG. Compare the amount and prices.
    2