Comments by "remliqa" (@remliqa) on "The Daily Show" channel.

  1. 160
  2. 118
  3. 20
  4. 14
  5. 13
  6. 12
  7. 11
  8. 8
  9. 7
  10. 7
  11. 6
  12. 5
  13. 5
  14. 5
  15. 4
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. +CEOofFRESH1 You mean the same networks that defended Trump (FOX, Breitbart etc) despite everything he did and spreading the lies and fake news that you quoted here?The fact that you can quote their lies, fake news and misinformation they spouted pretty much shows that you're very familiar with all of them. "The man is responsible for the EU Migrant Crisis and half a million dead in Syria." "A. Armed terrorists in Syria to overthrow the government there, leaving a vacuum of power ISIS filled. B. Led the assassination of Gadfi, which again left a vacuum of power there." C. The aforementioned vacuums of power allowed millions of people to flood the EU, via Syria and Libya. You realise that Obama wasn't responsible for any of these right? All of those will still happened regardless of who was in power at the time. "D. Sold 100 billion of arms to Saudi Arabia who promptly used them against civilians in Yemen. The US have bee selling arms to the Sauds for decades bfore Obama came to powere .Even Trump was selling them arms (he was even bragging about it too), you want to blame Trump too?. They have been one of your closest allies there in the war against radicals there .(you realise that the ones they fought in Yemen had ties to?) "E. Won a fucking Nobel, and called for daily drone strikes like a week later." He didn't deserve that Nobel prize and even he himself knows and admit it, but how is that his fault? .Awarding him the Nobel Prize for just not being Bush is stupid and shortsighted , they should have save that for whoever replaces Trump(lol) "How you could have the chutzpah to NOT label Barack Obama a HORRIBLE MOTHERFUCKER, is beyond comprehension." Simple, because unlike Trump, he not responsible( there is no evidence that he's responsible for them) for almost all (especially the ones you highlighted here) the things they accused him of. Trump on the other hand were doing the thing they criticise him for (we got video evidence for crying out loud). Unlike Obama Trump deserves 98% of the criticism that is hurled at him. BTW, your "Hillary sold uranium to Russia thing: https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/ The funny thing is that you you ignore all the confirmed wrongdoing of the Trump foundation (siphoning charity monies eg) and campaign . They literally had one guy fired ( "Lock her up " chant sounds hilariously ironic) for "questionable ties" with Russia. As I said, nice selective memory you got there.
    3
  23. 3
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34.  @jondoe8054  Firs and formeost :don't multipoint. Youtube have a habit of not notifying people of replies if you multipost to it (it seem I missed quite number of yours due to this) . As someone who claim to be on youtubefor a long time you should have known this "quirk". Of course you could also be ,manipulate this "feature"to make it seem as if I can't respond to your points, many troll do employ this method as well. "the guy you are arguing with isn't saying the arsonists are using the technology I'm pretty sure. you are mixing up the two of us" No, I replied to both of you separately. He seem to argue that because those experimental tech exist, they must have been used in the forest fires. A dumb and insane position to take.. "they are calling it a conspiracy" Again, they aren't calling the idea of Arsonist exist as a conspiracy , they are calling the idea that a mass arson campaign based on political agenda is being orchestrated as a conspiracy and they're right about that. "same as what you are parroting" Nice strawman. Quote the part where that. I dare you. "especially when you just ignore the points that shatter your stance." Ignoring them? I've read every single one of your source and none of them confirm the existence of a mass arson comparing by any political affiliated groups. Something you would know if you actually read your own sources. "gamma knife surgery is one example, and it has been pretty widely used for some time" Again. look at the images of that device? You actually think people are carrying that thing around to start wildfire? " The technology is the exact same as the weapons, just scaled down" Which make it completely useless as weapon of any kind. "It's actually not even very complicated." I have to facepalm at this. "HS physics covers the concept and ancient greeks supposedly even had their own low tech versions" There have been no credible historic proof that the so called Greek beam weapon were effective or even exist. Greek Fire (which were used by the Byzantine ) were a completely different thin entirely (they're chemical weapon like napalm, not energy weapons. "are you going to address your linked source which agrees with me" Is your comprehension problem that bad? My source never agreed with you. They clearly sates that this phase of human cause Climate change is unlike anything that ever happened in history (they even explained how different it is ). Di you conveniently skip that part ?.
    2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1