Comments by "remliqa" (@remliqa) on "The Daily Show" channel.

  1.  @foosmonkey  Unlike you, I always question what ever information that is given to me. That is why I trust only verifiable facts. You on the other hand blindly believe conspiracy theory bullshit without even questioning the source or verifying if what they said is true.
    1
  2.  Kay  I know know that. Th US have been testing with those high powered laser for years (they mount them on warship and huge airplanes for mobile platforms). Heck the Chinese even experimented with a tank chassis mounted device (to disappointing result from what I remember). It's a jump to say they are used to start wildfires.
    1
  3.  @jondoe8054  "your buddy @remliqa has already linked a paper that cites evidence against yours and his/her argument " Only someone with compression problem would claim my link supported your notion.
    1
  4.  @foosmonkey  In other word you have no credible source whatsoever that support your arguments and can only resort o circular fallacy conspiracy theory .
    1
  5.  @jondoe8054  Again read the paragraph you quoted , in particular the last part " Those times were caused by large and rapid greenhouse gas emissions, just like humans are causing today". No only do it confirm the that greenhouse gases are the probable cause of climate change, but it reiterated that we are indeed facing a time of climate change, and this affects thing like severity of wildfire. Not only that , but you seem to ignore their explanation on hay this current climate change is different (because it's man made).
    1
  6.  @jondoe8054  "the paragraph is stating that the effects we are seeing today can be, and have been produced by the earth naturally, on its own, with or without humans" Again, you are conveniently ignoring that part where it says paragraph said that those changes were caused by the same thin that is happening today : the increased release of greenhouse gases . ""So yes, the climate has changed before humans" Again, no climate scientist EVER denied that climate change haven't happened before. They are stating that is current climate change is cause by human and the effect are severe , as shown by the wildfire. "The article doesn't differentiate between then and now like you are claiming " There are literally hundreds of articles link in my source , quite a few of them clearly delved into the difference between the all the ears of climate changes during our planet's history.
    1
  7.  @jondoe8054  It seem you have failed to quote a single post of mine that supported your strawman about arson. "most of the links in your source link back to itself." No, pretty much every single one of them of them posted links to outside sources (mostly academic) that shows proof of man made climate change and its effects. "the other abstracts it does link to are largely inconclusive. "potentially.. however, hard to predict; Inconclusive? pretty much very single one of them confirms the links of human to climate change. "it gives no evidence towards man made climate change. " {facepalam} Again, they're literally hundreds of links to third party independent academic source that shows such link. How did you miss them? "the comments in your article seem to agree with me as well on the veracity of your source's claims " Only if you cherry pick very few comment and ignore the hundreds of other comment that debunked the few one you cherry picked. I think this is the problem with you: you cherry picked a few line/phrase that seemingly agree with your points ( despite the entirely of the context of the article/paragraph/line contradicts yours) and the misquote/misconstrued it. This a form of confirmation bias and it doesn't help you understand the truth, in fact I think this is the source of your horrid comprehension problem and constant misunderstanding of the thing you read (including your own sources on arson and wildfire).
    1
  8.  @jondoe8054  ' "Your argument is "no, you're wrong"," And I've shown reasons why you're wrong. The same can't be said of you. Heck you even failed to quote my points that when I challenged you to prove your strawman. " I've given you direct quotes from your own source;" You mean the direct quote that confirm climate change is real and the are caused by increased emission of greenhouse gases, something I've been saying all along and you seem to deny. "so we can agree to disagree at this point" Trying to disagree on scientific fact like you are doing is insanity. "unless you are going to show me which of your sources specifically provides actual evidence that climate change is man-made and it's not just a hypothesis" Again, they are literally hundred of links in my source that supports this . Read them. "for the record, I'm not opposed to the idea, I just haven't seen you link any evidence towards your claim" Unless you count the literally hundred of scientific papers in my link that you conveniently ignores. "Obama doesn't seem to agree with you either though, as his actions pretty clearly show " Frankly . I don't give a shit what Obama believes . Scientific fact isn't constrained by such thing. "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System" Again, how is this in any way or form have anything to do with the wildfires or anything I said?
    1
  9.  @jondoe8054  "Just because you keep saying it's there, doesn't make it true. I've read your source and it's references. They don't support what you are saying.' Stop lying. Why would you make such an obvious lie when anyone who clicks on my link can see those sources ? "it shouldn't be hard for you to directly link what I am unable to find, as you claim there are hundreds of papers that provide climate change is man-made" I already did. You just refuse to read any of them. It also seem enlightening that you abandon your OP about arson. Pretty pathetic obfuscation on your parts.
    1
  10.  @jondoe8054  "your refusal (or inability) to produce even a single paper, from the hundreds you've read, is pretty telling " Again, my link produce literally hundred of them (evident to everyone that clicked on my link) . The fact that you refuse to read them show intellectual cowardice on your part and speak volumes on your integrity. "I've posted plenty of articles on arson, and you had the same response to that argument, denial" Again I dare you to quote singe post of mine where I ever deny arsonist exist ? Or are you to cowardly to back this strawman as well?
    1
  11.  @jondoe8054  "i said msm is covering for them. that's nice you know arson exists." Again no one (especially MSM ) ever denied arsonist exist. I pointed that you insulation that MSM is "covering them up" i ludicrous and you have failed to provide single evidence they did. "I've used direct quotes from your source to support my case. " "that's what your link says. " Th fact that you refused to quote the entire paragraph showed how dishonest you are. The entire paragraph reads: "But there have been several times in Earth’s past when Earth's temperature jumped abruptly, in much the same way as they are doing today. *Those times were caused by large and rapid greenhouse gas emissions, just like humans are causing today*" The line yiu omit from actual full direct quote reaffirm that human are the cause of the current climate change. "I can't find the evidence you say is there. please help me" I just literally click on random link: https://skepticalscience.com/solar-activity-sunspots-global-warming.htm And immediately found evidence that linked human to climate change even with links to the third party academic sources that brought up the data . Th fact you couldn't be bothered to do so speak volume on your ability (or lack of) of information gathering or intellectual cowardice and dedication to preserve your bias induce wilful ignorance.
    1
  12.  @jondoe8054  Wow, You didn't even bother reading/checking your own link. That NBC link you provided literally said that the conspiracy theory was about antifa arsonist (something eve Oregon authorities deny) ., thus proving my point instead of yours. "Did you miss the part where the said greenhouse gases (CO2 eg) from human contributed most to Climate change? The funny thing is you aren't even denying that climate change contributed to the increasing intensity of wildfire.
    1
  13.  @jondoe8054  "here is the puyalupp arsonist showing allegiance to blm/antifa https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wo1M04ICkSw" Wow, just because one out of the dozen samples (which none of the rest express antifa views) you collected said that, it must means all of them are antifa conspirators . You pretty much confirms that you cherry picked data to reinforce you views while ignoring the overwhelming evidence that (how many of the rest were of the "arsonist" are antifa?) to the contrary. Don't you find it odd that a very single link you posted weaken your position further ? Maybe that is the reason why you sort to perfidy us with your misquote. One again you have cherry picked phrases and passage from works that confirms anthropomorphic climate change while ignoring the entirety of the context in which you butchered them from . Why am I not surprised at this r display of intellectual cowardice and dishonesty from you ... Why not share the oink to the actual articles in which you misquote them so all us can see for ourselves what they really say instead of your copy paste hatchet job?
    1
  14.  @jondoe8054  " you're moving the goalpost again in regards to both topics" You obviously didn't know what "moving goalpost means" "I have clearly shown you an antifa/blm member being arrested for arson, while also providing a link to nbc news claiming it is a conspiracy." Again your own source clearly state that only one of of the dozens (if we go by the totality of your claim, 20) so called arsonist expressed Antifa view (nor does it linked antifa to his arson tendency) . That is hardly proof that all arsonist are antifa, at least not to sane , thinking human.. Secondly your NBC news article clearly stated tat the idea that Antifa is responsible for the fires have been thoroughly rejected by all authorities, thus making your claim that they are behind this nothing but baseless conspiracy theory. "everything I copy pasted is from your source's actual paper, word for word. you can disagree with your source or refute it's claims, it's all there." You mean the paper titled "AR5 Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis — IPCC (their 5th assessment report)" ? . Anyone who reads that report or even the exact pages you misquote those phrases from can clearly see your attempt obfuscation . Funny how you think misquoting phrases out of context in few pages out of over 1 thousand pages support your point instead of showing how desperate you are..
    1
  15.  @jondoe8054  "the nbc news article wasn't supposed to support my stance, I was showing you that it was incorrect in it's statement that antifa members were not starting fires" Another lie from you. you
    1
  16.  @jondoe8054  Okay, Youtube starts to bug out. It a sign that I should move on and leave you tour perfidious ways ( As if anyone would take you seriously after you shown your intellectual dishonesty and cowardice in this thread). I guess I just repeat my first and last paragraph of my last post (which they yeeted) instead of rewriting all my multiple paragraph , line by line rebuttal of your lies: ""the nbc news article wasn't supposed to support my stance, I was showing you that it was incorrect in it's statement that antifa members were not starting fires" Another lie from you. Kindly quote the part where I ever said that antifa member weren't starting fire?. My stance have always been : * there is no proof whatsoever the the wildfire are caused by massive arson campaign by political entities (including antifa) nor were the mass media "covering this up". Every single one of your own sources agrees with me*. The only one moving goalpost here is you. You went from "climate change weren't responsible for the intensity of wildfire" to " climate change us real and are responsible for the intensity of wildfire but human weren't the cause of it". You are misquoting the specific the phrases out of context of the report and ( the pages ) you edited them to make it vsmme that they are insludisve depsite the rest of therepoit (and page ) literally affirm human's role in climate change. Anyone who read the report or even the pages you "edited" would clearly see. You have shown you self to be liar lacking any integrity to honestly rebut me (hence you resorting to strawman and out of context edited misquotes) and don't even understand your own sources (which debunk your own points) .
    1
  17.  @jondoe8054  I provided an nbc article that said blm/antifa aren't starting fires, that it is a conspiracy " Read the NBV article. NBC clearly stated that that idea that Antifa itself (instead of a lone antifa supporter starting one fire) were starting the fires as pure conspiracy bukshit something Oregonian authorities (who arrested Jeffrey) themselves stated. Hence why they are still 100% correct. "I provided evidence that this was false with jeffrey acord " Jeffery was acting on his own accord, not on orders by any Antifa higher ups.. hence the idea that Antifa was responsible for the wildfire is still false . "where is the lie? " The fact that you have failed to provide a single quite from me proving that I said what you claim I said prove that you are a liar. That and the fact that you have bee misquoting/editing phrases from my sources to make that seem like they agree with you (pretty stupid and pathetic effort on your part considering anyone who follow those links can see the unaltered sources).
    1
  18. +KludyVille Racing Instead of going for obviously biased source such as Fox news or The White House Briefing that have been caught lying multiple times, why don't you check more neutral sources such as Phillip Defranco.
    1
  19. +Sooner Admirer What bulshit narrative is that?
    1
  20. +Sooner Admirer I watch something like Philip DeFranco instead. You know, news source which are less bias and more fair. Even there it did not do Trump any favours at all.
    1
  21. +CEOofFRESH1 Yes, I agree. The blazing stupidity; the unbridled asininity of average Americans that voted for Trump and still defended him despite all this is indeed shocking. Lets check the objective facts since you don't care for "subjective things ", shall we: Trump is both a bad person and an incompetent President ,only an idiot would try to deny this. Certain parties from Russian were confirmed to be meddling in the last election, the investigation is to reveal the degree and whether or not anyone from the Trump campaign were complicit to this. You do not know why Mueller needed to question Loretta Lynch thus anything you said is just speculation. There is nothing in your link shows Trump in a good light and Trevor Noah in a bad light. See , even the objective facts isn't favourable to Trump.
    1
  22. +Sooner Admirer Me being a liberal? ROFLMAO The term liberal, conservative, right or left politic have zero pertinent meaning to the political climate of my country so I do find your calling me a liberal to be quite hilarious. Though, if you really want to pigeon hole me into those irrelevant labels: I'm more of a conservative based on my social and political outlook. As for Philip Defranco: You can search his name on YouTube , his channel is of the same name. He refer himself as a centrist and he call bullshit when he see it whether it from mainstream (Fox and MSNBC), political divide (Democrats or Republican) , bullshit artist and conspiracy nutjob (Alex Jones and Tariq Nasheed) and even snowflakes ( SJW and alt right morons). Though I do find myself disagreeing with him so much that I won't subscribe to him, I do find him to be a fair in his reporting and respected him for it.Thus making him a good source of information. Check him out. You can thank me later.
    1
  23. +Sooner Admirer Oh, he's very consistent in his views .Regardless on whether or not I agree with him on many issues his integrity is without question.
    1
  24. +CEOofFRESH1 "I don't worship or look up to any politicians." So stop defending Trump, then. Not like he deserves defending. Instead of being so hung up on a man who is no longer in power, why not you take a look at who is currently in the Oval Office right now.
    1
  25. +Imran Khan What your suggestion then? Send troops to Syria ala what the American did with Iraq? Funny that no one here can even defend Trump and his action . All they can do is try to shift the conversation to someone else (Clinton and Obama eg). I guess even they knew how much in the wrong Trump is.
    1
  26. +marc Anthony That was the recording of the call to the widow of Staff Sgt. Mark De Alencar. The controversial call was to the the widow of Sgt. La David Johnson.
    1
  27. +Imran Khan A little gooogle search before posting can save plenty of embarrassment: https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
    1
  28. Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Bill Maher the dumbass who thinks that the rising popularity of superhero comic book movie was also the reason why Trump got elected?
    1
  29.  @AndiDuck  This is an interesting accusation that you threw on me . Kindly point to single line which in any of my post or anything on my channel ( likes, playlist etc. anything) that indicate I'm a Trumptard . I dare you.
    1
  30. @Star Traveler received
    1
  31. Okay, why the heck did youtube yeeted the entirely of my post but left a single word ("received") from it intact? WTF is wrong with youtube?
    1
  32.  @anthonyd2923  His horrid environmental policies, separating children form parent as punitive response , the death of over 200K American due to his selfish and incompetent handling of Covid 19, the lost of respect for USA from the rest of world, empowering ultra right nationalist, his horrible behaviour as human being (constant lying eg) (, his corrupt use of Presidential power ... I can go on and on. Oh, you also keep yapping about Trump's "China travel ban" let me repeat myself: LOL, this shit again. Did you even bother looking into what that so called "China travel ban" was all about. That order of his only stops foreigner form travelling to and from China to the US, it did absolutely nothing to stop US citizen (the ones that brought the disease back to US) from travelling to China and back nor did it provide meaningful contact tracing or quarantine for those. Not only was that xenophobic, but completely ineffectual at halting the disease.
    1
  33. @Star Traveler The only one with Trump Derangement Syndrome is the trumptards that still supported him despite what he have done.
    1
  34. @Star Traveler No one is denying China's culpability is the containment failure of the diseases in the early stages. However for countries like US, Brazil and Spain, they already have the real data even before the first case were reported in their countries (Trump knew how serious and deadly the disease is at least as early as February) but still downplays, lies and didn't take appropriate measure to protect their people . Instead people like Trump and Bolsanaro politicises Covid 19 .Trump even tried to discredit scientist and doctors who speak out about Covid 19 (including Dr Fauci himself), how is that different from China?. Only a fool couldn't see that Trump is far more responsible for the death of over 205K Americans. Oh, there is no real proof that the virus was man made. That is still conspiracy theory.
    1
  35. @Star Traveler So many thing factually wrong with what you just posted: "survival rate of those infected is 99.96%." No, the survival rate is around 97%, with around 3%(210K American already dead from Covid 19). " At every point in the evolving pandemic Trump relied on scientists, but the scientists didn't know much of anything about the new virus themselves! " This is also false. Trump have repeated contradicted scientist and medical expert on the matter and even issued decrees that ran opposite to what they suggested(mask wearing , hydroxychloroquine etc). The difference is Trump stops listening to the scientist when what they suggested ran contrary to his own uninformed opinions and what he believe would hurt his r-election prospects, his selfish desires cost lives.. "Fauci himself was saying in February that the virus "posed little or no danger" to the US." That again is false. The last statement from Fauci where he said such thing that was in January and even then he cautioned that the outbreak (which at that time was China affair ) was an evolving matter an they will revise the assessment as the situation develops. " Why is that Trump's fault?" Because not only did he do little to help curb the spread of the virus but his action (promoting conspiracy theories, undermining medical professional including Fauci, anti mask etc) helps spread the disease even further. "Trump was vilified by DemoRats as being a "xenophobe" when he shut down air travel from China very early on, in January!!" Because it was xenophobic and ineffective. Considering you are so ignorant that you repeated a point I already debunked multiple times, I will just repost what I wrote earlier: LOL, this shit again. Did you even bother looking into what that so called "China travel ban" was all about. That order of his only stops foreigner form travelling to and from China to the US, it did absolutely nothing to stop US citizen (the ones that brought the disease back to US) from travelling to China and back nor did it provide meaningful contact tracing or quarantine for those. Not only was that xenophobic, but completely ineffectual at halting the disease. "Lastly, you're also wrong about a "conspiracy theory" that Covid-19 could be a man-made pathogen, since a genetic scientist recently found evidence that its DNA had been tampered with because it has an element of the HIV virus. In other words, Covid-19 appears to be genetically modified in a laboratory, not a naturally occurring virus. " Wrong again . Most scientist agrees that there is zero evidence that the virus was made in a lab .As I said what you post are just debunked conspiracy theories. Unless you wanted to post link to your so called source, that is.
    1
  36. @Star Traveler Firstly saying Covid 19 is subjective is like saying " The Erath is Flat is subjective". Disagreeing with hard scientific fact because your "intuition" or "feeling" doesn't like it is either the height of golden idiocy or plain abject insanity (something common among conspiracy theorist/conspiracy theory believers). Secondly, you can just google "was Covid 19 made in a lab?" and find multiple sources from scientist ( from Ohio state University i.e) which scientifically detailed why the claim that it was made in a lab is absurd. Heck even the source of the conspiracy theory (US intelligence agencies) stated they don't believe the virus was man made or altered in a lab .HINT: their actual reports (which was misconstrued by Trump and him supporters) was about the lack of procedural safety on contagious pathogen in Chinese labs (including in Wuhan), not about how the virus was ,man made (again, which US intelligence agencies deny as a possibility). In other words. the whole "Covid 19 was man made" bulshit have ben thoroughly debunked and is conspiracy theory garbage.
    1
  37. @Star Traveler Too lazy to do some real research instead of browsing QAnon, huh? HINT: here is a quote from ODNI (Office of the Director of National Intelligence ): "The Intelligence Community also concurs with the wide scientific consensus that the COVID-19 virus was not manmade or genetically modified," https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-lab-manmade-myth-debunked-2020-6
    1
  38. @Star Traveler I already did, read my previous replies.
    1
  39. Napalm. Preferably after igniting them on a large swath of land.
    1
  40. Did I just got banned? Quite a few of my replies are missing.
    1
  41.  @MR-intel  So how come a few (all except my first post a this last two post) were removed?
    1
  42.  @cheesecakelasagna  Food, it is possible to get all your water needs from food alone.
    1
  43. Apt description for Trump supporters.
    1
  44. Neither is black.. or white.
    1
  45. Yes, Trevor you're ignorant about both history of violence in Budhism and whether previous Nobel Peace Prize actually deserve them.
    1
  46.  @AJ-zv2sf  "How did Whitmer and DeBlasio handle it better? NYC has one of the top covid deaths and cases. And there are 120,000 plus cases, and over 6,000 deaths." Look at the number of infection.and death now. Both of them managed to eventually slow down the spread and death (which is why Texa and Florida seem to be overtaking them) despite their early inactions. The same can't be said of Trump . "NYC has 2x the amount of cases, and 8x more covid deaths than my country The Philippines. Let that sink in special agent, a city has 8x more covid deaths, than an entire *country*" So? the US have over 200K (with hundreds to over a thousand dying daily) death and million of infection (with tens of thousands more daily), yet you seem hesitant to blame Trump for his horrible mishandling of the disease.
    1
  47. Wasn't " Keep America Great" was a a slogan from The Purge movies ?
    1
  48. I dont' believe you on the dancer part . Show me video evidence so I can judge it myself.
    1
  49. The issue I have with banning all less than lethal methods of takedown (Taser eg) is that it may lead to less option of taking a suspect alive should thing escalates beyond control.
    1
  50.  @carlosilvestre3120  The problem is that also leaves them with less option when back up can' arrive on time or that the suspect can't be taken out by just one or two officer (due to factors like the suspects's strength, skill , level of adrenaline or being under the influence , mental/psychological state etc) without using the afore mentioned less than lethal take down (chokehold , taser etc). Considering that LE have lost livse to felonious act annually in the US, saying that have no reason to be afraid for their live when dealing with escalating situation is preposterous.
    1