Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1.  @LovingPrinceTamayuki  You're taking things into the extreme meaning of the words. It's an exercise in semantics. I'm talking about within the confines of human existence. The Marxist authoritarian view of collectivism is the eradication of the individual as much as possible. The opposite is free agency, again as much as is possible. That doesn't mean that there's no way that individuals can work together. It means that there's a choice in degree of how we will work together or not. At least speak within the realm of possible human existence.
    4
  2. Now she can claim that it wasn't HER that said it. Slimy as it gets.
    4
  3. @UCbp6XFXWKun_Az0p_kwZzzg Let's put it this way. Gay and lesbian people exist. It's childish to pretend that they don't. If they're going to exist and there's not a thing to be done about it, let them be like Dave Rubin and Arielle Scarcella. People who value freedom in all its forms. People who value freedom are the citizens that we need in this country and that includes those in the gay community. If you value freedom, you'll get it. If you don't....you're no different than the extreme leftists.
    4
  4.  @eazolan  Let's go to the extreme. They're ALL in school during school hours. There are no teenagers who are no longer in high school or college....nowhere. It just doesn't happen. Of course there are and you KNOW it.
    4
  5.  @Bfettrules  YOU asked about living on 25,000 dollars a year. I TOLD you that I was doing it (actually less) and now you're saying that I got it easy. I have to pay rent, hydro, heat, phone and internet. I gotta eat and keep dressed and I'M DOING IT. The only reason I said anything in the first place is because I KNOW that it can be done because I'm doing it and so is my neighbour. Now, you denigrate me for being able to do what you claim that you can't. You remind me of my son-in-law, who acts the same way that you do. I told him that I would show him how to save some money but he refuses, telling me that it's impossible. They order in 4 or 5 days a week and think that it's necessary. My daughter and him are there own worst enemies.
    4
  6. Actually, it never occurred to me that he would be crying tears of sorrow. I just assumed that he had to be laughing. Afterall, they were talking about Kamala.
    4
  7.  @bradleyboyer9979  It's hard to improve when you're woke and you're perfect. They'd never admit to ordinary human flaws. They're woke and know EXACTLY what society needs.
    4
  8.  @JohnCarterRocks  We just watched her lie on television. Is that what you call "journalism"? I don't. All she has to do is check out the current accepted curriculum in Florida schools but she didn't. She just went with the political flow. If she DID check it out, that PROVES that she's a liar. That other guy, Kindi, makes his money and reputation flogging his ideology. He knows better but doesn't care. It's lining his pockets and that's ALL he cares about. Also, you have no idea what "BATMAN for PRESIDENT" does for a living or what his professional credentials are, as if it matters anyway. Joseph Mengele had impeccable credentials as an anthropologist, in medicine and as a geneticist. Should we impressed with those credentials when evaluating his work at Auschwitz. Maybe you would but I'm not going to.
    4
  9. "It's impossible to rig the election and you're a conspiracy nut, that has to be censored, to suggest it" "What about Trump colluding with Russia to rig the election?" "Except that time."
    4
  10.  @moestietabarnak  Where did I say that an unlawful shooting by a police officer isn't a problem? I never said that once. I can object to it but that does NOT give me the right to burn down YOUR business of home, steal YOUR stuff, because that's what looting is, or shoot your 9 year old daughter, like what happened in Atlanta. Why can't I be outraged about those things? That was a little black girl in Atlanta. I was in tears when I heard about that and it was a BLM supporter who shot her. As long as there are criminals, committing major crimes in the world, and specifically in the US, and we want the police to stop them, there will be deaths. It's inevitable. In other words, you will always have reason to burn, loot and kill. It'll NEVER go away. It will be a perpetuating rage. Also, if you really thought that HUNDREDS of riots, over 3 months, being justified by the media and certain politicians, wasn't going to finally get some pushback out of fear and frustration, you're still delusional. Also, if you can't see that burning and looting is wrong, always and is NEVER justified, then you have no moral centre to guide you. Also, I made it perfectly clear that I DID NOT ENDORSE what happened in Washington. It was wrong and they should be prosecuted. Also, the looters should be prosecuted and we shouldn't have politicians, like Kamala Harris, donating to a fund for their legal fees. That a politician, that would do that, is going to become the Vice President, scares people and they will be angry that this is happening. If you can't see that then YOU are the problem. You don't want a middle ground nor would you accept an olive branch. You want YOUR ground and will take it by any means necessary.
    4
  11. I can't think of any Democrat that has any real leadership ability. The Republicans have all kinds of them as long as they stay away from the old swamp Rinos. They're just Dems with an "R" behind their name.
    4
  12.  @Fredman5551  Question....Is it a valid statement or not? Answer.....youre not very bright, are you? If I were your grade 5 teacher, I'd have to dock you for answering a question with a question, for not capitalising, and "youre" should be written as "you're". And you're actually asking ME if I'm bright. SMH.
    4
  13. @D. So then why didn't he call the authorities. He's NOT the police. Had she made an illegal right hand turn, while driving, could he have pulled her over and started ragging on her? Any woman would have been terrified in that case, yet she's not supposed to be when she's alone in a park? Had she been your mother, you wouldn't be so cavalier about it.
    4
  14.  @Aanthanur  Of course there's a culture war. It's not with armies and guns but one of ideals. It's running quite deep and there have been many social casualties. Those who lost their businesses or jobs due to BLM riots. Those who lost scholarships due to a stupid tweet they made when they were 14 or because a trans male decided to compete with girls in high school athletics. Those who are afraid to speak up in class because it may offend someone and have to face severe backlash. Families who won't speak to one another because of who they voted for. Friends who drop you because you believe something that they don't. A media that is flogging a narrative and ignores the truth. That's the culture war and it's hurting people.
    4
  15. Why does anyone hate? I've never been able to figure that one out. I can understand being against someone or group that commits or supports heinous acts but to hate them? It seems so pointless. Worse, it will rot you to your very soul.
    4
  16. I gave a thumbs up but I'm a boomer. I can't stand the "woke" ideology and I see it as the biggest danger to the west, today. Glad that there are young folk that can see that, too.
    4
  17.  @curlywurly1767  Do I ever get the push back when I try to tell people that Fascism has its roots in Socialism. People get quite upset about it. Can't help the facts. National socialism is the natural outcome of communism. Just look at China. They came out of Marxism but found that to succeed, as a nation, they had to move to a state controlled economy instead of a state owned economy. A subtle difference but enough to mitigate the inevitable failure of Marxism as a viable economic system. Modern China is the closest country today to Fascist Italy and Germany.
    4
  18. I remember when Anita Bryant spoke out against gays because of her Christian faith. People called her out and rightly so. Many decried her Christianity because of their stance of gay rights. Funny thing now, try to say the same about Islam and their stance on homosexuality. Even try to say it and you're labelled a Islamophobe. Yet, those you criticised Anita Bryant and her Christian views were never call Christianophobes. Why is that? The same goes for women's rights. The evidence is clear. Muslim women are treated as second class citizens in their religion. The Koran and the Hadiths are quite explicit in their status....how a woman's testimony is worth half that of a man's, how she must obey her husband, how a man can have four wives, but a woman only one husband, how a woman is cursed by the angels for refusing sex to her husband and so on. Even mentioning this will label you a racist. If you say one thing about the Muslim concept of Jihad and martyrdom, many will reply by talking about the Crusades and European colonialism. It seems to me if the Crusades are wrong and they're implying that they are, then why isn't Jihad wrong? I just don't get the double standard.
    3
  19. How did Kushner screw Trump on domestic issues and Covid policies? I'd like to hear your perspective on this in greater detail.
    3
  20. Protesting free speech by invoking their right to free speech. Logical.
    3
  21. I'd like to know what presentation you're talking about. It sure would help to make sense of your comment.
    3
  22.  Jesse Leiby  Yes, because people are corrupt. The writers of the Bill of Rights understood that and why the founders put this into print and made it a requirement of law. That's not going to stop people from trying to get around it. However, without it, you have no weapon to fight those who ignore those rights. A weapon, that might fail at times, is better than no weapon at all and leaving you with hands tied and your head a punching pad.
    3
  23. What are you talking about?
    3
  24.  @Aristocratic_Utensil  Don't act like a friggin leftie. Do you agree with what he said in his monologue or what? That's what's important. We NEED everyone that we can get to defeat the Marxist maggots that are eating away at our freedoms. He has influence and you'd throw him right back into the arms of the nutbars. Not a very smart strategy.
    3
  25.  Echo Foxtrot  Communism and Fascism are 2 different sides of the same coin. China, today, is the closest thing we have to Fascism. An economy, that runs under the full control of the state. That's how Nazi Germany operated and how China operates today. Mussolini was once the head of the Italian Communist Party. He took that socialist idea and morphed it into National Socialism. That's exactly what China has done. Hitler and and the CCP took those ideas and made it their own. Of the 3 countries that I've mentioned, 2 of them morphed from Communism to Fascism. It's not a big step.
    3
  26. I remember those J6ers chanting "Death to America" It was REALLY scary. I was terrified when I saw all those 6ers walking between the tourist velvet ropes, taking selfies and then going home. "Those two" are nuts.
    3
  27.  @laurabusse1832  I asked 2 hours ago. My curiosity is starting to wane. A couple more hours and it'll devolve down to scepticism.
    3
  28.  @sthubbins4038  Of course he wanted to "find" those votes. If they existed, he wanted to find them. Who wouldn't? Even you'd want to find them....if you thought that they existed, especially if those votes would help your cause. Isn't it strange that when Trump questions the irregularities of the election, it shakes the entire foundation of the Republic. Yet, when Obama did it in 2005 and Hillary did it in 2016.....that's legit and no problem. Especially when there was absolutely NO proof of collusion, yet Hillary STILL carries on about it and Adam Schiff, even though he claimed that he has irrefutable proof, never presented the proof and STILL claims that there was Russian collusion. The riots in 2016, against Trump, was no big deal and only righteous but the riots on Jan 6th.....horrific. The inconsistency is remarkable. And before you tell me that I'm being a hypocrite, I think that the rioters were wrong in BOTH cases and should be prosecuted. Rioting is WRONG and I don't care who does it. We live in a land that is supposed to live by the rule of law. Everyone should honour that, at all times, not only when it suits their own agenda.
    3
  29. I dug out my trusty calculator and started ciphering. Given that the average truck is 50 feet in length, 50,000 trucks would stretch, bumper to bumper with no space in between them, from New York City to 60 miles short of Columbus Ohio. For us Canadians, that's from Windsor Ontario to just short of Cornwall. That 50,000 number is ridiculous. However, the Trudeau and the press went with the "fringe group" rhetoric and people believed it. Then when they found out that it was MORE than a "fringe group", they got all upset and the stories of how someone died because ER workers couldn't get to the hospital on time, started up on Facebook. In other words, they downplayed it and didn't prepare for it. Had this been an BLM rally, they would have been gloating over the size of it. Trudeau wouldn't have airlifted out and he'd be standing on the podium, beneficently smiling at the crowds who obviously (sarcasm) love him. Also, it was between 15 and 20 degrees below 0, in the Fahrenheit scale, in Ottawa. It's quite the turnout in that kind of cold.
    3
  30. She basically admitted that it was a biological question. Throughout all the higher species, it's quite clear what male and female means or man and woman, the definitive expression for humans. Sort of like sow and boar with swine, hen and rooster with chickens. It's man and woman for humans. It's a biological construct....NOT one of a social nature.
    3
  31. That has "what" to do with giving children drugs and allowing them to surgically amputate healthy body parts? Although, I think it odd, if you're an adult, have at it and do your odd thing. However, don't abuse kids and pretend you're doing it for the best of reasons.
    3
  32.  @rashone2879  They're not protesting. They're communist activists, hoping to start enough chaos to start a full fledged revolution. They believe themselves to be a modern day version of Lenin, Che or Mao.
    3
  33. That's right....so vote for the Democrat politicians that are loudly supporting the violence. Makes sense to me. There are no Republican politicians in those cities that are having the violence issues. They're ALL Democrats. They have to ask for help, that's Constitutional law, and they won't because they don't want to give the Republicans the win on solving the problem.
    3
  34.  @DM-dk7js  When someone FORCES me to believe something, it DOES affect me. A person can talk all he wants about how Jesus saved his life and I don't care. The minute he forces others to believe it to be true, I object an object hard. That's harassment and it's wrong.
    3
  35.  @mikeemmons1079  RELAX, Mike. I think he was meaning it as a generic "our nation's" children. Or he may even be a father. I know a gay man, who has 2 kids and a lesbian woman who's a mother. If he IS a father, then he's correct to say "our children". Don't make assumptions. He's correct. Quit grooming children. Don't overthink it or start into accusations that may have no merit.
    3
  36. @Henry James I think it's funny that such an obviously intellectual giant, such as you, would stoop so low as to even watch Dave Rubin. That's DEEP sarcasm, in case you don't quite get it. I don't see anything that you've said that has any intellectual value. All you've done is come up with different ways to call someone stupid or an idiot. You've proven exactly my point. If our exchange is any indication of the "debates" that you like to see, then all we would see are insulting contests. That's great stuff for the small minded but for most of us it's just that...great stuff for the small minded and not what we want to waste our time on. Now, it's time you used your great intellectual prowess to call someone else an idiot. There is nothing more to be gained by talking with you.
    3
  37. @Henry James So even if he did....so what. You disagree with him on ONE thing. How does that take away from what some of his guests are saying? As a guy that worked constructions for YEARS, I get what he's saying...somewhat. Of course you have to have standards but if you've worked in that field, you know how power hungry those inspectors can be. It's infuriating. My brother in law was so enraged he chased one of them off the property with a shovel.....and he didn't come back. California is cursed with so many regulations that no one can build and the housing is price out of sight. It's killing our ability to afford to live.
    3
  38.  Matt Clark  I have to add one thing. There's too much hate against Trump. It's not even his fault. He took on the swamp and good on him. However, his personality was one that the media, big Tech and the bureaucracy, which is almost all allied with big government, could take advantage of. They did just that and those, that are easily swayed, fell for their biased and jaundiced views on him, not his policies, but him. I don't believe that there's any going back from there. I could be wrong because Biden's administration is looking to be a disaster but we'd be better off with someone that can't as easily be smeared as Trump was. Most people are too gullible.
    3
  39. Who cares. We all know what he means.
    3
  40. He didn't dismantle the response team. It was reorganised but it was still existed. Also, the first American case was found on Jan 20. Trump announced travel restrictions of Jan 31st. Singapore was the first announcing a ban on Jan. 23rd. Trump was called xenophobic for that decision and Mayor De Blasio, of New York, encourage people to go out as normal and to attend the Chinese New Year's parade on Feb 9th. Also, Trump organised a preliminary response team for the virus on Jan. 29th. Dr. Fauci, the top medical expert in the US, along with Dr. Brix, has said that this early restriction saved lives. In fact, Trump imposed those bans against the advice of WHO and their medical models who said restrictions wouldn't help at all. These are facts. This is a situation that hasn't happened in over 100 years. Anyone who expects a perfect response to an unprecedented event is rather deluded. Instead of laying blame for the past, focus on the now and the future. No one can change the past but they can sure affect what is happening today and tomorrow.
    3
  41.  @cadengrace5466  So you really DON'T care that her in laws died because of Cuomo's policies. You're no different than the rest of them. You think that you are, but you're not. You're quite willing to overlook the dead seniors that Democrat governors are responsible for, because of some weird political sensibility that you have. "Dead to me" My God. There are REAL dead people, senior lives that those governors just threw away and you're going on about "pretend" dead people. You sure do have your priorities on straight. You won't listen to one of the strongest voices against those who committed those atrocities because of politics. No wonder this country is in the trouble it is. No sense of integrity or ethics left. All you care about is your side.
    3
  42. @Registered User So you really find it hard to believe that a government would build a concentration camp but call it something else? Wow, that's gullible. Nearly every large atrocity, in history was caused by governments. Wars, genocides, mass imprisonments (concentration camps) and police state overreach, were government actions. Yet, you still refuse to believe that your government has your best interest at heart. Yup.....you're as gullible as the people in 1935, Nazi Germany. "They'll never do that. You're exaggerating". Keep telling yourself that, when your neighbour rats you out and you go to jail for doing basically nothing.....Soviet Gulag style.
    3
  43.  @DimitriTheBarbarian  Ah.....the smear job. Always a good tactic.
    3
  44.  @chinmusic2722  A man, accused of rape, is honoured by football players. What a disgrace.
    3
  45. If only the rest of the party would be as tough as Jim Jordan. Then they'd have the strength to get the "woke" stuff out of our lives.
    3
  46.  @lookupverazhou8599  I'm living in Canada, right now. Trudeau can talk to me all he likes. He's not going to like what I have to say, though. I doubt that he will talk to me. He'll call me a white supremacist and that'll be his rationale for not having to engage in difficult conversations.
    3
  47.  @shanecorning5222  They have MORE, in many cases. There is Mohawk land about 30 miles from where I live and the natives there are quite prosperous. The things that the individual Mohawks have today, would boggle the minds of the Mohawks of 600 years ago. Now if you're talking about power, no. At least not the political power they had after they joined the Iroquois Confederation. Then they were the most powerful influence of this area. If that kind of power is important to you, then you're correct. However, times change, just as it has for all of us around the world. 600 years ago, my ancestors were living as peasants, in the Netherlands, subservient to the nobility that was the way of life in Europe, of that time. They couldn't move, take part in trade or do anything that we can now, as free people. Racial identity and its importance has changed. Now, we're more about nations as political units and we try to include all ethnicities as part of the nation state. That's life in the US and Canada, in spite of some of issues involved. A kid, growing up in squalor, can become a multi-millionaire overnight. It happens all the time. People become quite affluent through hard work and dedication and race isn't the determining factor. I've worked with Native construction workers, who have nice homes, drive big fancy trucks and have a good life. It's all relevant to where the native lives and what he/she wants in life.
    3
  48.  @shanecorning5222  The infamous "winners of history" meme. It's always the last resort when you have no evidence or argument. It's the guaranteed win, in the minds of those who don't want to do the real legwork to understand human history. That's what it is.....human history. Human history because we're ALL human and to understand who we are as a species you have to understand us all, not some self styled narrative designed to show off your idea of personal morality. Also, I object to your characterisation of the natives as "losers". It's condescending and self serving.
    3
  49.  @venicebeachsportsnetwork6677  Only a socialist would take that old bit of wisdom and twist it to make it look as if the ONLY way to help a person is to GIVE him stuff. Was that how our ancestors did it? Super rich cavemen, helped others to the point that the average person in North America can own a home and car, eats regular, has the best health care in history (that includes the homeless). Any jackass can cut down a branch and make a pole. I did it when I was 8 years old. What I did appreciate was the older cousin who taught me how to use it effectively. I collected pop bottles till I had enough to buy some hooks and line and I WENT FISHING.
    3
  50.  @Leester-70  Then I'd say that "they" are failing.
    3