Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Sky News Australia"
channel.
-
108
-
83
-
53
-
50
-
40
-
31
-
24
-
24
-
@erichufnagel3474
They didn't go broke. They are being FORCED to stop farming. The Netherlands was one of the most productive farming nations in the world and farmers were prospering and were 2nd, in terms of finances, in food exports. It's ideology that shutting those farms down.
Also, for the rest of the farms to remain profitable, food prices will have to go up, affecting the poorest people of the nation. As this "food" ideology spreads around the world, food production will go down and prices will go up. It's basic economics. That will have a HUGE impact on the 3rd world. Sri Lanka tried the same thing as the Netherlands are now and their food production went down around 30%. That's devastating for a poor nation. Inflation went from around 5% to over 130% in 2 years.
You're doing what you're doing on your own choice and at your own pace. If it doesn't work, you can slow it down or reverse those choices where it hurt you, financially, the most. Dutch farmers aren't given that option.
As a world wide practice, this could spark outright starvation. The Covid epidemic lockdowns have forced over 250 million people BACK into abject poverty. Abject poverty is earning less than $1.90 A DAY, American. Not an hour....A DAY. They make LESS in a week than the minimum wage per hour in California or where I live, in Ontario, Canada. If you force food production down...how many MORE people are going to be facing that kind of oppressive poverty and starvation. These are UN numbers.
All this to appease the idea of "responsible eating" as described by Klaus Schwab of the WEF.....a millionaire elitist who believes that he knows how to "reset" the world in his own image. He's convinced all his fellow elitists and industrialists that this is the way to go and it's going to destroy the most prosperous economies this planet has ever seen. The prospects are horrific.
23
-
22
-
22
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@coop-nr6nm
That's where I disagree. They were extremely to the left as far as economics go. Not so much as communists but the Party would mandate in what direction the economy would operate. The owner of any company was at the command of the Party and all aspects of business was handed down from the Party. What to produce, how much, where to get raw materials, who to hire and the owner and his management staff answered to the Party officials who were put in place in lieu of union officials. If the owner of a company failed at his duty to the Party, the company would be confiscated. It was all about Party control. Economically, China uses almost the exact same methods as Nazi Germany did. The only reason that people think right wing, when talking about Fascism is because Germany was Fascist and they were also obsessed with nationalism. Italy was fascist as well but their nationalism wasn't as strident as it was in Germany.
Nazi Germany did NOT have a free market system, which means it wasn't a capitalist country, like the US. A centralised economy is socialist, a lot more socialist than Sweden or Denmark, which practise a free market economy. Socialism is left wing and Germany's Party called themselves the National Socialist German Workers' Party. They even double down on the Socialist label by adding "Workers".
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@jillionairess
I'm NOT talking about ALL teachers. It's like crime. I'm not talking about all citizens when I say that there should be laws against crime. This law is put into place to protect against that small percentage that are abusing their positions. MORE than that, it codifies when it is age appropriate to begin sex education as part of the curriculum. That's it. Most parents are uncomfortable with strangers talking about sex to their 5 and 6 year old. This assures them that this can't happen until the time is right. Now they know.
The NEC, America's top teacher's union, voted to keep teaching CRT, even if it's against the law to teach it. First they deny that it's being taught. Then they vote to continue teaching it. If you want to understand the perils of CRT, listen to James Lindsay's "New Discourses" lectures on YouTube.
More so, if you want to hear about how far left ideas have permeated into schools, watch Karlyn Borysenko here on Youtube. It will introduce you to some of the things that this law is supposed to cover.
I doubt very much that you'll bother though. You prefer your happy cosy little world where ALL teachers are wonderful.
Don't, for one minute, think that I'm against teachers. That's being hyperbolic and intentionally blind. My brother and his wife are teachers and some of my teachers have been absolutely wonderful. However, there has been an influx of far left ideologues into our schools, media and governments that no one should ignore. If you want to ignore what could be happening...that's up to you but don't expect the rest of us to put our heads in the sand with you. The information is out there and if you're not lazy you can find it. I've given you 3 sources to start with but it takes work and a curiosity to find out what it is that we're concerned with.
I can lead a horse to water but I can't make it drink. You have to be thirsty enough to find out what the concern is. You don't want to find out the hard way.
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@ldjman1
I don't know whether each story is true or not. I have to do some fact checking. If it ends up that there are things being said that aren't true, THAT'S when I make my decision on THAT story. I don't go in calling it a lie. That would negate the need for fact checking, first of all, and it also assumes that everything they say is false, which means if a story is true, I'd be going around thinking the opposite, on some kind of illogical principle and assumptions.
I only call a story untrue when I have the evidence that backs me up. Otherwise, I remain SILENT. If there's something in this story that you disagree with, let's talk about it. Specifics....that's what's important, not your "fake news" allegations.
And why would you assume only "domestic" news sources tell the truth. I've heard our own national news network, the CBC, tell some amazing whoppers. I know that they are whoppers for one reason. FACT CHECKING. I didn't assume it to be false. I fact checked and the facts told me that they were either wrong or worse....lying. That's the logical and honest way of deciding on the veracity of news stories.
7
-
@jillionairess
My 10 year old granddaughter announced that she was bisexual. Her 7 year old sister teased her by calling her trans. She became indignant and said that she was proud of being a woman.
Indoctrinate.....I don't know. Bizarre....without a doubt.
They were taught this in school. A year later, there was a controversy about teaching Indigenous Studies in school. I asked her what 8X7 was. She didn't know and said that she didn't like math. I told her that maybe she should learn basic mathematics before she went onto such a specific area of study. Once again, she got all indignant. She asked me if I knew that they put Indigenous kids into schools and beat them. White people did that. I told her a friend of mine attended one of those schools. Apparently, her teacher told her class all about that too. I asked her if she knew about Indigenous religions, the foods that they developed, the wars and how the Iroquois completely wiped out the Huron nation. Did she know that the American founding fathers borrowed ideas of forming a union from the Iroquois Federation and that the Iroquois outlawed cannibalism after they formed their union. Apparently, these were never discussed. I told her that what she was talking about was known as "Grievance Studies" Of course, she had no idea what that meant. She was only 11 at the time.
Indoctrinated....I still don't know. However, this is stuff that is rather inappropriate in a primary school setting, being taught by a person that her parents barely knew. None of this was taught to my kids when they were in school but that was in the 80s and 90s.
I'm not going to say that your experiences didn't happen but just because it hasn't been your experience, it doesn't happen at all. I've never been sexually abused but I'm willing to bet it happens.
By the way, my granddaughter is now 16, she's shaved her head bald and wears the most bizarre makeup in some kind of androgynous display of self identity. Was it because she was indoctrinated in school? I can't say but I know her older brother just shakes his head and rolls her eyes at her and says that this specific teacher, that he also had, is a kook. Does that ever set her off.
7
-
7
-
7