Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Sydney Watson"
channel.
-
832
-
107
-
87
-
67
-
62
-
33
-
31
-
23
-
19
-
19
-
16
-
@skknireeker9073
And that's the logic that's can't be argued against. I say that the transgender has biological advantages and you say "But they're women".
I say that they weren't women a year ago so their bodies still have male qualities that give them advantages and you say "But they're women".
I point out that it's telling that a transgender absolutely SMASHES the women's weightlifting record in their first year of eligibility and you say "But he's a woman".
I say 2 transgenders, who couldn't make the boy's high school track team last year, break the girl's state high school track records and you say "But they're women".
They're are no facts, no anomalies, no sudden amount of women's records being broken by transgender athletes that will ever make you stop and think about the implications. All you'll keep repeating, like a demented parrot, is...."BUT THEY'RE WOMEN"
This is unbelievably lacking in intellectual discourse or logic or any consideration for fairness. No human being, with even a modicum of integrity, would EVER claim bragging rights, by wearing an Olympic medal, when they've went form a category of sports where they were mediocre at best, to one where they're now the superstar. Integrity would demand that this should be a source of shame.
We have weight classes in sports for a reason. We don't just say "But they're all women" and call that a reason to do away with weight classes. Calling them women does not negate the fact that they're also transgenders, something that a lot of the women's athletes cannot claim.
To your mind, all transwomen are women. You'll never admit that not all women are transwomen and that this could be where the REAL problem lies. You only want to examine YOUR side of the coin.
14
-
13
-
11
-
11
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@joepublic3933
Right now, the Voter Integrity Fund is presenting official records of 40,000 instances of people voting twice. 40,000 cases. Should we ignore that? Maybe next election, it'll be 80,000 cases of double voting or 200,000 cases. What is the magic number that will convince you that we SHOULD investigate? Of do we only do it when your personal favourite candidate is the target of this type of fraud.
If they don't straighten this out, the American elections will be nothing more than a show. No better than having a vote in North Korea. The outcome will eventually become predetermined. Is this really what you want?
Remember, these are actual records that show double voting. Wrestler Nahshon Garrett, left Arizona, 5 months ago to train in Tennessee. Official records, in Arizona, show that he received a ballot, in the mail, and that he voted. However, he insists he didn't vote in Arizona and that he voted in Tennessee. The records show that he did vote in Tennessee but they also show that he voted in Arizona. Is he lying? If he's telling the truth, then someone voted for him. No matter how you slice it, this is a fraud by someone and there are 40,000 more JUST LIKE IT. The FBI is looking at those records right now.
.....but YOU think we should move on.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@AndrewFishman
I loved the 70s and 80s and I was an adult. I loved the 60s, too, but it was a lot scarier. Nuclear war was the big scare, especially during the Cuban missile crisis. However, we didn't have our TVs on or weren't on social media 24/7. I do remember, as a kid, on hearing a booming explosive sound, off in the distance, being afraid that it (the nuclear war) had started. That it was all over and I wouldn't be here in a few minutes.
That was scary. It wasn't some vague, 12 years from now, threat. It was right now, at any second. I may not see morning, that was a real fear. I remember that clip that Sydney showed about the little girl and the flower. That was only a part of it. By the 70s, a lot of that fear had dissipated, thankfully.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1