Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@talldavid30
The Capitol was NOT in ruins. A couple of barriers were torn down, a few doors were wrecked but the building was being used the following day. Also, those Americans that are dead, all died of natural causes, except for one Trump supporter, who was shot.
There were over 50 thousand Trump supporters in Washington that day. Yet only a few hundred entered the building. Also, being strong doesn't mean that you have to be violent. That's YOUR interpretation of what was said. Not being weak can also mean just sticking to your ideals and not giving up. As for being conned, did you really believe the Brian Sicknick was killed in the line of duty? Did that phony funeral for the fallen hero, killed by rioters, really fool you? He died of a stroke the following day or hasn't anyone told you yet. Did you really fall for that staged event? Who's the fool, here?
3
-
3
-
Obama brought change....oh yeah, he sure did. By the time he was done as president, racial tensions hadn't been this strained since the Rodney King events, almost 25 years before he left office. Riots in Ferguson, Baltimore, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Dallas and police officers were being executed, including a young black woman, a mother and police officer, was shot in the head while sitting in her squad car. Why? Because the shooter was angry after listening BLM speakers.
Oh yeah, he brought change, alright. This country was on its way to being more divided than at any other time since the Civil war.
Thanks Obama.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@talldavid30
Your side looked the other way, last year, when BLM and Antifa, rioted, burned and looted to over 2 billion dollars in damage, over 25 dead and thousands injured. They stood behind the call to defund the police and now violent crime, in minority areas of the big cities, has skyrocketed due to less police protection. Also, they rioted all across the US when Trump was elected and even tried to break into the Supreme Court when Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed. Hundreds were arrested because of that riot.
For the first time in California history, population numbers are on the way down due to over taxation, high housing costs, homelessness, blackouts, expensive energy costs, poor fire management, crime in the streets (Poop patrols????),....yet, you want people to vote for the establishment that allowed these things to happen.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@QuietRefl4378
Is being viable the beginning of that life? Every one starts as a one-celled being. If dead, that's how it ends...a one-celled being. However, if alive, it grows and grows, until it reaches the point of being "viable". Viable is the point when it can live OUTSIDE the womb and that can even be less than 24 weeks however it's chances aren't as good.
At conception, the new life is a one-celled individual with it's own DNA that determines if it's male or female, blue eyed or brown, blonde or brunette. If analysed in a lab, that one cell will be recognised as a human cell. That human cell will grow and grow, unless something causes it to die. One of those "things" that would cause it to die is an abortion. This is scientific fact.
So....why is it religious morality that decides whether ending that life is right or wrong? Why can't an atheist come to the same conclusion, that it's immoral to end that life? Just as immoral as it is to end the life of a 6 year old child.
If you can answer that question, you'll have come a long way towards convincing people that abortion isn't immoral. Now...try to convince me that the one-celled being isn't alive.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@J C
First of all, Trump didn't dump this on the states. The Constitution did that. He was following the dictates of the Constitution, the law of the land. If you think the Constitution shouldn't be followed, you should say that but every President has taken an oath of office to uphold the Constitution. The articles of the Constitution are interpretive and this was the way that it was interpreted. Had Trump enforced a mandate on the states, he would have faced stiff resistance from the states, especially the Democrat states. Leaving it up to the states is the best way to seek cooperation and it worked to a degree. Cuomo and Newsom, both Democrat governors, have been supportive and praised Federal action.
The reopening guidelines are just that.....GUIDELINES. Guidelines are not laws and cannot be enforced, legally. If Georgia doesn't want to follow the guidelines, it's their right. If it's smart to not follow the guidelines, that's another question.
The guidelines are a list of suggestions for the states to follow. Trump thinks that they're a good idea. If Georgia, or any other state, doesn't follow them, there will be people that disagree with them, including Trump. In fact, if you think that Georgia is opening too quickly, then YOU'RE agreeing with Trump. If you think that Trump should FORCE Georgia to comply, then you oppose state rights, something that the Confederates fought FOR in the Civil War.
Are you beginning to see how complex this is? No matter what Trump did or how he handled the enforcement of the guidelines, he would be wrong and you'd have grounds to criticise. It's a win/win scenario for the chronic critics and I'm going to assume that you're a chronic critic of Donald Trump.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@jussayinmipeece1069
No....his tirade, if that's what you want to call it, is based on the idea that if an idea offends someone, you should never, EVER, be allowed to say it. Like that kid who was offended by the Biblical verses about love. What was his point? Was it that maybe those verses should never be discussed again because it might hurt his feelings?
In other words, he and all those easily offended, only want their views discussed and encouraged. They're no different than the religious zealots of the past, the ones that forced Galileo to recant his heliocentric model. That's the "four legs good, two legs bad" slogan. They're the new ideology, the "four legs", that is so good, and the old guard, the "two legs", that's so the bad. Remember, the animals revolted against the farmer, the four legs that revolted against the two legged overlord. Also remember, that book ended with the pigs walking on two legs and the slogan was adjusted to fit that change. In other words "Meet the new boss, Same as the old boss".
The American way is to allow each person the freedom to believe what they want and the right to express it without reservation and overt repercussions. That's NOT what the new SJW culture is all about. They are doing EXACTLY what the religious masters of old Europe were doing. They have their own ideology and don't you DARE say anything that might question it. The claim of offence is their weapon to shut you up.
3
-
3
-
3