Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Fox News" channel.

  1.  @gordonshumway6128  Like it or not, we still need politicians. People, who will do the work of organising society for mutual benefits. The problem is simple. Politicians are people and people are prone to be imperfect....that includes you and me. What you do, when it's time to vote, you vote for the person who has the best ideas, who has shown themselves to be able to get the job done, make sure that the warts don't overshadow the platform. If you have a problem with what he said, talk about them. Don't denigrate him as if that's settles any argument about his points. Behave like an adult and discuss ideas.....not people.
    2
  2.  @rektaldischarge7496  Since every American has a SSN, that would be the perfect way to deter voter fraud. However, I heard, numerous times, that requiring Americans to get proper ID to vote was racist. A dumb argument but that's what I heard. You're the one that brought up voter suppression and when I googled it, they cited that asking for ID was voter suppression. I don't see how it could. It would surely, in this computer age, help prevent those using false ID from voting because they run the risk of having duplicate SSN trying to vote and getting caught with a false ID. For some reason, Democrats think that this would be a bad idea. Catching people using false identifications is something the Democrats don't want to see happen. Voter ID makes sense. So what if there's another voting step. Who cares, as long as it prevents voter fraud and illegal ID use.
    2
  3.  @rektaldischarge7496  Do you mean that there are areas in Florida and Georgia where one can't get a driver's licence? Man, that sucks. If it is harder to register to vote in some areas, why not address those problem areas instead of just making accusations? You're insinuating that it's the Democrats that were hurt by this, so maybe they should help with transportation, school buses or the like to get voters to the polls. The ballots are still secret so it's not as if it can't be bi-partisan. I've already mentioned how there are people out there who use false ID all the time. SSN would make it a lot harder for people to do that. Also, why should a non citizen be able to vote. Are you saying that the next time I'm in the States and it's election time, I should be able to vote? That's nuts. Democrats went crazy over what they thought was Russian interference in the elections but they're fine with a system that might allow non citizens to vote? Isn't that election interference?
    2
  4.  @bobbykiefer4306  The free market can't regulate itself no more than a free society. Both are run by human beings and if history has taught us anything...people are corrupt. The market has to operate under the rule of law just like everyone else. You can't be free without the law and the law has to be based on certain guideline which are enshrined in the Constitution. Freedom isn't just being free of the tyranny of the government. It's also being free of the tyranny of your fellow citizens. That includes your neighbour, your spouse, fellow workers, your boss, the bankers and corporate bigwigs. Everyone of them is beholden to the Constitution. That means we can live our lives under the auspices of that Constitution, the way that we want to live. That means you cannot deprive anyone of their rights, not just by allowing them free speech and the rest but also by not stealing what belongs to them or intentionally causing them any type of harm be it physical or otherwise. The free market system still insists that you operate under the law. The banks were taking part in scheme that had to fail and they all knew it. That's the harm that I referred to and it infringed on the freedom of the average American. They stole from ordinary people. They corrupted the free market system. Corruption always infringes on human rights. That's why a government should never be involved in business...like socialists advocate for. The government is made up of people and history shows that people are notoriously corrupt. Just like we have separation of church and state, we also should have separation of the economy and state. That doesn't mean that there's no regulation. That means that we allow both the church and the market to operate within the confines of the higher power...the Constitution, so the rights of individuals aren't trampled.
    2
  5.  @josephr9930  Watch the video. It shows just how proactive he's been. They were on top of the situation right from the beginning and when Trump restricted travel to China, Biden called him a xenophobe. When he organised a task force, detractors said it was too white and male. NEVER offering help, just complaining, ostensibly no different than you are doing right now. Yesterday, Trump had a press conference in the morning and signed a bill for 8.3 billion in funds to fight the coronavirus. Then he flew to Nashville to talk to the victims of those tornados. Then off to Atlanta, to the CDC to bring attention to what was being done about the coronavirus. You're another one that's so vested in your hate for Trump, you find it impossible to even look at something that might put him in a good light. You're too blind with hate to realise that it's that very attitude, from the left, that's going to win the election for Trump, making the same mistake they made in the last election.
    2
  6.  @QuietRefl4378  I JUST told you that me wife was ATHEIST and is strongly anti-abortion. She's NOT the only one. I wasn't even talking about ME yet you still went right back to me. Talk to my atheist wife. How does her atheism's moral beliefs give her the right to force her anti-abortions beliefs on you? THIS ISN'T ABOUT RELIGION. I said that in my comment and gave an example of a non-religious person you thinks abortion is wrong. Yet, you ignore it and go right back to making it all about religion. ONCE AGAIN. Is that fetus a living, growing, separate and unique human being or not? Answer THAT question. My wife quite understands why you won't. It forces you to think about morality outside of religion and you don't want to do that. Here's what she just told me. You're too cowardly to answer that question.
    2
  7.  @catholicfaithofmine2664  Because our lives are the heroes journey. That's why. The hero is the pinnacle of human achievement and it's what we should all aspire to be, even if it's just standing up for truth and loyalty, to always try to make the world a better place just by your existence. Why would you not want to be a part of that? That's my question.
    2
  8.  @herpderp1662  Fortunately, we have you, the internet genius, to set us straight. Thank you, oh wise one or is it "Yoda".
    2
  9.  @herpderp1662  As if your comment had any REAL information to present. It was a shot at media companies and at the people that watch them. There was a strong implication that the world was lacking in intelligence, except for you, the guy that can see through it all. As for proof, if FOX or CNN is bad, why aren't you offering proof of how they're on the same team? I didn't see any. Not a one. You're doing exactly what you're accusing me of doing and YOU did it first.
    2
  10.  @mikew764  Was it??? How would you know that? Was it because they said so? I thought that ACAB. When did that change?
    2
  11.  @ReeCooks14579  Apparently, they're not showing my response to you, in this thread. So, i'll repeat it in case you didn't read it. "Why wouldn't they speak in this manner? He's trying to convince you that he has your best interests as a priority because he wants you to vote for him. What else would he say? "I don't give 2 effs about you."? Every used car and insurance salesman talks like that. Are you saying that they're all in mental decline? Disagreeing with someone doesn't mean that they're in mentally unfit. That's as narcissistic as it gets. You're almost on par with Trump in that department if that's your attitude.
    2
  12.  @theverde7980  I don't want monopolies. Communists don't want corporations or businesses or private property.
    2
  13.    I know that you think that you're funny but the reason that Hillary lost is because she alienated the very voters that voted for Obama. She called possible voters deplorables and that they were irredeemable and then topped it off by telling white people what they should do and not do. 65% of the voting public is white and she denigrates them. Then she doesn't even bother to campaign in the swing states. I was shaking my head at the stupidity and arrogance and I was a Hillary supporter. It was the dumbest campaign strategy that I've ever seen and I saw the Democrat defeat coming. If she had told incest jokes, Trump would have an even bigger victory. And the Democrats haven't learned a thing by their defeat. In fact, they've doubled down, as evidenced by your comment, on their stupidity.
    2
  14.  @MrKGatl  Then why was Mykola Zlochevsky cleared of all charges and his frozen assets released when all this was going on? Why is he now under more investigations? The guy has been suspected and accused of corruption for years and has even been called a "mob" boss by Ukrainian politicians and journalists. Even Marie Yovanovitch testified, on Friday, that she had been briefed on the Biden situation. It was an issue and an investigation is warranted, especially with that tape of Biden bragging about threatening to withhold aid unless they fired a prosecutor. A prosecutor who may well have been looking into Burisma in the past. With him gone and a new, friendlier prosecutor in place, that may well be to the advantage of Burisma, it's owner and founder and their employees. They still haven't established any bribery in these hearings. Not even close. All 3 witnesses have said, quite bluntly, that they have no knowledge of bribery. No bombshell evidence, in spite of what the MSM has been trying to push. We're all still waiting for that evidence. Maybe it will show up this week. Maybe not.
    2
  15.  @MrKGatl  The Biden situation is that Hunter Biden was working for a man, who had fled the country and had 23 million dollars in bank assets frozen due to possible corruption. The situation is that Joe Biden had the prosecutor, who had led the investigation into Mykola Zlochevsky, Hunter's boss, fired and he did it by using American taxpayer money to put pressure on the Ukraine government to get it done. Had Donald Trump Sr. did that for the boss of Donald Trump Jr., would that seem right to you? I wouldn't like it....yet for some reason, you don't even want to acknowledge that this sounds a bit fishy. Is your hatred of Trump that deep, that you would allow that possible corruption to go unchecked, as long as it GETS Trump?
    2
  16.  @coreyham3753  Listen to you. An immigrant, who came to the US legally, works hard to establish a business, is sitting in JAIL for going to work and YOU babble about Tucker. Why is so hard, for people like you, to understand that work is survival. That the people, who live in 3rd world countries that are starving, are the countries with no economy. Countries that are run by corrupt oligarchs that will only allow people to work for them and NOT for themselves, are the countries that have starving children. Now, Michigan is doing the EXACT SAME THING, deciding who works and why and you can't understand how this is the road to the same hell as those 3rd World Countries. You're like a 4 year old child who thinks that hamburgers magically pop into existence at MacDonald's.
    2
  17. @C T Of course. Yet, all the findings will be made readily available for anyone to see. I suppose we're going to have a special investigation into the investigation and then another special, SPECIAL investigation into the special investigation into the investigation. It's never going to end. You're like a flat earther. The lack of evidence is evidence in itself, of wrongdoing.
    2
  18.  @kristofergobbe4838  Irrelevant. They knew about the problems at Wuhan and they tried to keep it under wraps right along with the Chinese government. Now there are over 4 million dead around the world and counting and you want to deflect by making spurious accusations about Trump. Try to stay on topic. The Wuhan lab issue could be the biggest scandal in history. It's insane to try to steer us away from what potentially happened there.
    2
  19.  @richardcory5024  Jan 6th....an insurrection? That implies a revolution, an overthrow of the government. If that's so, it has to be the first one in years, centuries even, where the revolutionaries didn't bring any guns. NOT A ONE. Can you show me a chain of command? What the plan was once they occupied the Capitol Building? There were even little old ladies as part of this "revolutionary guard". A revolutionary guard that went home after a couple of hours. There was no military that stormed the Capitol building, to reclaim it from the insurrectionists. They went home, ALL on their own, just when the Capitol Building had been taken. It was no insurrection. It was a bunch of over excited idiots, who let their better judgement get out of control. That's all. It fizzled out and they went home because they had no plan. No one did. Quit over reacting.
    2
  20.  @michaelmolyneaux-swann  One issue is that she's there representing the American people. That includes ALL Americans, not just the ones that she likes. By snubbing the American anthem, she's, metaphorically, giving Americans the middle finger. She's crying oppression while the country proudly allows her to reach the highest levels of athletic competition and doing it on someone else's dime and its still not enough for her. "F U" to the very country that she lives in, basically saying "F U to me" because she's also a part of the country. No one is saying that she can't express her opinions. What they ARE saying is this is NOT the time or place to do it nor is it appropriate to insult all Americans. No country is perfect and neither is the US. She can express her views on how to better the country at any time that she wants but this wasn't any type of expression that is helpful. It was an insult and she meant it as one. If all you're going to do is whine and complain, we really don't want to hear it. If you have an issue and have suggestions to reach a resolution, express away. This does nothing but divide a country. It's pointless, mean and self serving.
    2
  21.  Ed Nunez  If Trump is guilty of something, then he should be held accountable. If Biden is guilty of something, he should also be held accountable. Don't deflect. The topic, RIGHT NOW, is about Biden corruption. It's illogical to claim that Trump is corrupt therefore Biden must be clean. One has nothing to do with the other.
    2
  22.  Ed Nunez  He lost, not in a landslide but he lost. However, what does that have to do with Hunter and Joe Biden? That's what this video is about. Do you know what the word "deflection" even means in this context? It means that when the topic is about one thing (Joe Biden being corrupt) and you keep trying to talk about something else (Trump losing the election). THAT'S DEFLECTION. Why do you refuse to talk about the evidence that shows that Biden might be a very corrupt person? I even conceded that if it's proven that Trump broke the law, he should be prosecuted, but YOU can't do the same with Biden? If it is proven that Biden is corrupt, should he be prosecuted or not? It's a very simple question. Face it head on....like a mature adult.
    2
  23.  @jerrymarasco8878  Thanks.
    2
  24. When a person says "I try my best to be honest" I'm good with that. No one is as honest as they should be and acknowledging a possibility that you have faults, that's honesty in itself. However, when a person says that they're honest, I'm not trusting them.
    2
  25.  @drbarafoo7208  What's wrong with you??
    2
  26.  Willie Baker  Change the subject, huh. Don't want to look stupid, anymore? Guess I can't blame you for that.
    2
  27.  Willie Baker  OMG. LOL. The entire narrative, on the blue side, is TDS, crying about white privilege, the patriarchy and supporting the riots all over the country. Over 70 days in a row of rioting in Portland, smashing things, attacking people and starting fires and Jerry "the Penguin" calls it all a myth. It's all about hate and anger. Another point in favour of you winning this contest.
    2
  28. @Ethan Hobigant Roche Chris Cuomo....."Since when to protests have to be peaceful?" A rather poor attitude. Especially when the very first Amendment of the Constitution says that we have the right to peacefully assemble to bring our grievances to bear. If a protest is called, I'm going to assume it's going to be peaceful. It would be a peaceful assembly and it would be lawful. I'm an individual but so is the assembly. A group making a singularity, just like the Jack of Clubs is one card of the singularity called a Deck of Cards. Lose that Jack of Clubs and the Deck of Cards becomes unusable. When someone in that assembly throws a brick, that singularity, called an assembly, is no longer peaceful. As an individual, protesting, I have 2 choices. I can stay, and quite likely watch that assembly escalate the violence or go home, thereby tacitly expressing my disapproval for how that peaceful assembly did NOT hold up to its promise. I go home and tell anyone, who asks why I left, that I left because the assembly was no longer peaceful. When the union, at a company that I worked at, went on strike, I stood on the picket lines with my fellow union members. When they started throwing rocks and smashing car windows, I went home. The strike, like those who assembled to protest, was peaceful and I took part. The moment it became violent, I left because that strike was no longer peaceful. Many people stayed and claimed that they didn't throw anything or didn't approve of the violence. I say that the inflated numbers by the presence the peaceful strikers gave the violent ones the courage to do their foul deeds. I say the same thing about the "peaceful" protesters. When the violence starts, go home. The protest is no longer peaceful. "could be white supremacists"? A rather weak statement. Sounds more hopeful that factual.
    2
  29.  @craigjohnson4302  I've made that case numerous times and you're the first one that's openly supported it. I've received a few likes but that's it. What really bothers me is that, at least to me, that ideal is self evident and no one seems to get it. It's as if no one has any principles, these days.
    2
  30. I'm Canadian and I've said this all along. All our leaders have to do is to sit down and talk with Trump and his team. Danielle Smith of Alberta just proved that. Trudeau is NOT the man for that. This idea of a trade war with the United States is insane. Pierre Poilievre is much better suited to negotiate with Trump than Trudeau. Too many people are letting hatred cloud their vision.
    2
  31.  @RT-tn3pu  What does it matter if he's rich. He's still supporting that woman, who lives in a mobile home, whose daughter went to play with a friend. Is that the right thing to do or not? Assessing this video on the identity of the person expressing his views is the very definition of bigotry. It's no different than calling a black man the "n" word and dismissing anything he says.
    2
  32.  @DdotRay86  Instead of generalised claims and incessantly insulting others, I'd like to hear, in specific terms, what you find wrong in what Tucker said in this video. You've been great at discussing those who make comments in this thread but you've, quite deftly, avoided any discussion on what Tucker has said. We could trade insults, ALL DAY, and we'd have accomplished nothing. We're not here to talk about people but to talk about the idea that maybe our liberties are eroding or not. Tucker has given examples of how that this may be true. Now.....you tell us how his examples and his assertions may be false. That would be a true discussion, one that is honest and on topic. My being brainwashed has nothing to do with the truth of Tucker's statements. Talk about the statements.....not about individuals or try to invalidate through denigration.
    2
  33.  @suburban404  And he was also the first surgeon to EVER separate conjoined twins who were joined at the head. No other surgeon would even attempt it but he did and was successful. It was an incredible feat of medical skill. I don't believer that the world was made in 6 days either, but I don't hate or judge him for believing it. Lots of people believe lots of dumb things. I accept people for what they are, warts and all. Apparently, YOU don't. You have a checklist and it appears that religion is one of the criteria that will incite your bigotry.
    2
  34.  @georgemurphy2579  I'd like to think I'm not biased, but, being human, I suppose I might be. Who knows what evil resides in the deepest recesses of my heart. Having said that, I'd rather judge a person as an individual. I'd say that we're all unique and that to me is TRUE diversity and not the phoney "I can see your oppression" diversity that seems to be so pop these days. It's a choice I make. You're right about one thing, though. I don't like stupidity. I don't mind people that are wrong and are mistaken in their beliefs. To me, stupidity is when you persist in those beliefs, in spite of all evidence to the contrary. That's why AOC is stupid as far as I'm concerned. Morally right over factually correct. How stupid is that? Morality based on inaccurate facts isn't morality. It's judgement gleaned from gossip and BS. As for Candace, she's sharp. She cuts through BS like the sharpest sword ever forged. I can't help but admire that, even if I am racist (I'm white, you know). There's an honesty about that I wish I could say I possess. She's a special individual.
    2
  35. I remember doing my grade 12 chemistry exam. I answered every question and received a grade of 43 percent. My mom was so proud. She told me so. I answered EVERY question, she said. That was enough for me.
    2
  36.  @CityBoyNYC  Well.....I know that you're not acting in good faith. You just see another opportunity to act like an 8 year old bully in a schoolyard. If you behaved like an adult and showed us how you know this, I'd pay attention but now? Your claim doesn't mean a thing.
    2
  37.  @levelsandgear5644  So the high cost of housing, all the red tape, poor educational outcomes, high taxes, high energy costs, brownouts and the loss of jobs will continue. And all those with real skills will leave....like they're doing now. For the first time in California's history, the population has gone down. A state with the biggest gap between the rich and the poor. I'll bet that you're fairly well off and think that everything is just fine.
    2
  38.  @evanwest4751  Trump didn't promote violence at his rallies. He said that if anyone saw a person that was about to throw a tomato at his rally to forcibly stop them from doing so. That's not a promotion of violence. She didn't say that the FBI was pushing for Comey to leave. She said that individual FBI agents, not the FBI, had lost confidence in Comey, not nearly the same thing. She also recanted that statement. I'm not sure what pieces I'm to put together here. Are you saying that this proves collusion or something? Politicians lie. Now there's a shocker. You'll go down in history for that discovery and revelation.
    2
  39.  @burny6666  I asked for an example and you've spent more time explaining why you don't have to that then it would have taken to give me that example. Why are you avoiding this? I can't figure that out. Don't you have an example? You're so sure that she's a liar yet you won't give me an example. You want me to go to a press conference, listen to something she said and then determine if it's a lie or not. Maybe it's a mistake on her part. Mistakes aren't lies. If it isn't a lie or mistake, I have to do it all over again with something else she said. That's ridiculous. You said she was a liar. Now back it up with some facts and evidence. If you don't have a good specific example, just be honest and say so. It's like arguing with a flat earther that keeps telling me to do the research. You're so sure that she's a liar that you won't even give me an example. That's as illogical as it gets.
    2
  40.  @burny6666  I'm not trying to start a debate. You said she was a liar. You must have a reason for saying this and I'm assuming that you know what that reason is. All I'm doing is asking for an example. You must have one or else why would you call her a liar. Hiding behind the current consensus argument shows me that you're just parroting what what others have claimed and you've never questioned it. You're suffering from a logical fallacy. I could go through one hundred things that she said and prove everyone of them to be true and I've still not proved that she's not a liar. The reason for that is quite simple. It could be the 101st thing that was said that was the lie or the 110th or the 150th. I could never be satisfied that I looked deep enough. I'd have to examine EVERYTHING that she's ever said to prove that she's not a liar and that's impossible. That's why one is assumed innocent until proven guilty. You don't and quite often can never prove innocence. You can only prove guilt. I would say that to claim that she's a liar, you have the evidence. That's logical and the correct way to prove allegations. If you can't do it or refuse to do it, I have to question why and one possibility is that you don't have the evidence. Also, I'd lay money on it that everyone on the planet has lied at one point so your claim is one that carries no value. It could only carry real value if she openly and brazenly said something that she knew was false and then double down on that falsehood. Has she ever done that? If yes, show me how it's a lie and that she knew that it was a lie. If you can't prove it to me, you can't prove it to yourself and your claim is invalid.
    2
  41.  @leciabreen88  I see you're deftly sidestepping my comment. It wasn't Trump that told the people of NY to go out to their favourite restaurants and the big parade. Where was Cuomo when the Mayor and his staff were telling people to get out there and live it up? You're allowing your dislike of an abrasive president cloud your judgement. Don't think with your emotions. Use facts.
    2
  42.  @longboxdime  I know. I have a son-in-law like that. He was under quarantine and is going back to work tomorrow. I said it was a good thing and that the government can't be paying out forever. We have to work so they have the money coming in to hand out. He sort of hemmed and hawed but he really doesn't get it. He thinks that he's a slave and that's how his overlords have money and he doesn't. He's into the cult of envy.
    2
  43.  @eljisprincess1131  Then what are you worried about. Besides, they're contrails, condensed water vapour, created from the exhaust of jets. Water vapour condensing on carbon particulates and then freezing. The more water vapour in the air up there, the bigger the contrail. It's EXACTLY how clouds are formed. Water vapour condensing around natural particulates in the air. No particulates...no clouds. Same as the contrails. Exhaust particulates are discharged through the jet exhaust system and if the air is humid enough, has enough water vapour, you'll see contrails behind the jets. It's science. You learn about it in school.
    2
  44.  @eljisprincess1131  They may have done some experimenting, like cloud seeding, but those trails in the sky aren't that. It's an impossibility. Those trails that you see are hundreds of miles long. There's not a plane big enough to carry that amount of spray. Also the cost would be out of this world. Besides, why bother. According to the conspiracy guys, the Covid vaccine will get us all. Just because things look unusual, don't automatically jump to a conspiracy. It's neither scientific and can be irrational. Keep looking into the science of clouds and how they are formed. There's enough bad things in the world to add a fear of clouds to the list.
    2
  45.  @rickybobby9840  If we want to clear it up, we start with the problem that is sitting right in front of us right now. This "everybody does it" is diversionary and only invites a paralysed response. This is happening right now. Put a stop to it. Don't cloud things up by pointing fingers everywhere else. Deal with the problem at hand. When that's dealt with, go on to the next one and if that happens to be Ted Cruz...so be it.
    2
  46.  @gruemonkey1145  LOL. I use that expression all the time.
    2
  47.  @lynnentler5725  Healthy diets and exercise do help us to live longer but diseases like smallpox and polio don't care about your lifestyle. Lifestyles have nothing to do with the disappearance of those diseases. Vaccines are. Every year, there are up to 500,000 deaths to the flu every year. That's 1/2 MILLION. Are that many dying from the flu vaccine? Not a chance. Flu is a bad disease and millions died from after WW1. You might change your tune when people around you start dying from a new strain of the flu because they thought that the vaccine is worse than the disease.
    2
  48.  @NorthRunner64  What you're saying is that the local government has failed in how the police force is formed and applied. The local government. Who has formed the local government for over 40 years? The Democrats. It is the responsibility of the mayor and the city council to set the tone and policies of their policing force. If the problem is systemic, then it's the fault of the local government. In other words, Democrats have been in control and are responsible for the systemic racism in the Minneapolis police force. I'm glad we have THAT cleared up. Maybe, the good folk of Minneapolis, knowing this will elect a government that's NOT Democrat, next time.
    2
  49.  @polygraphliedetector  LOL. So 17 Walgreen stores DIDN'T close their doors because of theft. Their official statement is just BS. Same as the Target statement. They're lying so FOX can lie. The shoplifting issues in San Francisco is real. Any serious internet search will verify it but you won't do that. You hate FOX that much that people could rob you blind and if FOX reported it, you's say that you gave it away. What does it matter who reported it? What matters is whether it's true or not.....unless truth isn't important to you and that would explain a lot.
    2
  50.  @TS-wh4ey  It's amazing, isn't it. They just made it up and then they validated it by basically saying that our history is bunk. It's kind of similar to their saying of "Trust the science". They don't really want you to trust the science. They don't even care to know what science is. They just want you to trust them. That mentality makes me nervous.
    2