Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. 12
  2.  @MrKGatl  It was the company that Biden's son was working for that was being investigated. Specifically the founder of the company, Mykola Zlochevsky, who had fled the company in 2014 and was living in London. He was Hunter Biden's boss. This guy had 23 MILLION dollars frozen, in lieu of the results of investigations into his activities. Strangely, shortly after this prosecutor was fired, that 23 millions dollars was released. The following year Zlockevsky was cleared of all charges and he returned to the Ukraine. Next thing you know, he was accused of graft, the result of telephone conversations he had with the current president of the Ukraine at the time. He was also accused of giving out bogus licenses to his own companies when he was Ecology Minister back in 2012. He's left the country again and is now living in Monaco. You have to ask yourself why Hunter Biden was working for an energy company in the Ukraine. He had zero experience in energy, was drummed out of the American military for testing positive for drugs, he couldn't speak the language and his boss benefited from the firing of the prosecutor by his father. That final point might be the only reason he was worth the 63,000 dollars he was making a month as an executive there. Even Marie Yovanovitch was briefed on the poor image of Hunter Biden working for a man who was suspected of corruption. That was revealed in her testimony. It was also mentioned by George Kent in his testimony and was reported on by Politico 3 years ago. The Obama administration wasn't comfortable about this situation, at all, so why wouldn't Trump want to look into it. Especially, with the video available where Joe Biden brags about telling the Ukraines that he was taking his money home with him if they didn't fire this specific prosecutor. Maybe it WAS all innocent but if it had been Donald Trump Jr. working for Burisma and a corrupt owner, would you be so forgiving? I doubt it.
    12
  3. 12
  4. 12
  5. 12
  6. 12
  7. 12
  8. 12
  9. 12
  10. 12
  11. 12
  12. 12
  13. 12
  14. 12
  15. 12
  16.  GoldenState  The thing is that there are those who criticise Trump as a knee jerk reaction. The same ones that bragged about providing money to build a fence for border security at the Mexican border are calling him "racist" for wanting to build a wall for security. The inconsistency has reached the point of being ridiculous. Trump has just signed a prison reform bill with support from a great many Democrats but the MSM hardly reports on it. Trump signs into place an initiative to get involved in a UN effort to help women entrepreneurs around the world and MSM say nothing because it doesn't fit their "misogynist" narrative of the guy. MSM has hardly even mentioned his 800 million dollar economic opportunity zone initiative because that flies in the face of their "racist" claims. However, he gives the college football champs pizza and hamburgers, they act as if he poisoned them. They refuse to give him any credit for stopping the nuclear testing by the North Koreans and either ignore it or spin it so as to denigrate the guy. That's why the strong defence that his defenders are showing him. If they don't MSM would drown him in their hate. That doesn't mean he's always right, though. He has made proposals to cut SS and Medicare. I don't like that. I'm nervous about his support of the new government claims in Venezuela, as well, and worry that he may get involved militarily in their political mess. I don't like that idea at all. Trump shoots off at the mouth and will say the most embarrassing things. We all know that but we also know that he's been the most accessible president in modern history so we put up with his bombastic rhetoric. Guys like Acosta and Lemon just criticise continuously and can't even formulate a question to ask the president that isn't couched in a criticism or an attempt to trap him in some kind of inconsistency. Acosta could have the president's ear but he wastes his time attacking instead of asking. MSM wants to demonise the man and don't care about the issues and will use anyone to tear the guy apart. The prime example of this are how they treated the Covington kids. They could care less about what really happened. They saw an opportunity to use them against Trump and the consequences to those boys didn't matter. MSM has disgraced itself in how they report the news around Trump. A little honesty is all we ask for and they refuse to provide it.
    12
  17. 11
  18. 11
  19. 11
  20. 11
  21. 11
  22. 11
  23. 11
  24. 11
  25. 11
  26. 11
  27. 11
  28. 11
  29. 11
  30. 11
  31. 11
  32. 11
  33. 11
  34. 11
  35. 11
  36. 11
  37.  @popweaselcrunch  The point is, there should be no secrets kept between children and ANYONE that's directed at the parents of those teachers. Also, that song, by Dolly Parton, that was banned was NOT at the insistence of parents. It was the principle of the school that told the kids that they couldn't sing it in a pageant. Not parent motivated at all and that's what this video and discussion is about. Keeping information from parents. I can also counter with a school board that told their marching band that they couldn't sing the hymn "How Great Thou Art" So banning doesn't just come from "conservatives" There are standards that they try to maintain because they are dealing with CHILDREN. Have you seen the pictures in the book "Gender Queer"? If I showed those pictures to a kid at the local splash pad, they'd arrest me. I won't even describe what those pictures showed. It's not appropriate for minor children. Another book meant for 7 and 8 year old kids is called "Not My Idea". This book shows a contract that implies that white people made a pact with the Devil to gain land, riches and power. It's being held by a being that has a cloven hoof and a tail. It's in the schools. It's CLEARLY a divisive idea, meant to make white kids feel guilty and defensive and any minority children react with resentment and anger. There is also a part where a 7 year old calls her mother a liar. Why is it necessary to tell 7 year old kids that their parents could be liars? Could that not cause a rift between a child and their parents? I don't want this being read to my children and I'M NOT RELIGIOUS AT ALL. I repeat. I'm NOT religious. So quit assuming what people think or believe based on your narrative of a certain demographic. That's an assumption built on your own biases and it sucks. Once again......I'm NOT religious.
    10
  38. 10
  39. 10
  40. 10
  41. 10
  42. 10
  43. 10
  44. 10
  45. 10
  46. 10
  47. 10
  48. 10
  49. 10
  50. 10