Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. We also don't take the exception and try to make it the norm to invalidate all others. We try to understand the why of the exception, not to validate or invalidate but to add to our understandings of life and science.
    10
  2. Carole Sanchez I'm not getting this post at all. What do the Republicans have to do with this? The guy is a Democrat and it was his fellow Democrat that forced him to leave his office. Not one Republican was involved.
    10
  3. Fknmando ! Then why don't you enlighten us? All I see are a bunch of ifs and maybes. If you have some information, let's up it. He was also criticised for defending a family friend who was a police officer. This officer chased a car involved in a drive by shooting in which two people were shot and eventually shot an occupant in that car. Salvas had known that police officer since he was a small child and publicly defended that officer's character. That also impacted Salvas's position. So, I guess you're right. There is more to the story. It demonstrates just how ridiculous the Democratic Party has become. Thanks for given me a chance to point that out. The extenuating circumstances only put an exclamation point on the intolerance of the "tolerant" party.
    10
  4.  @phillybeccio2782  "nobody"??? Are you sure about that??? If you have ancestors, immediate ancestors, who were native American, then YOU have native ancestry heritage. Do you know what? WHO CARES!!!! It means NOTHING. He's a fellow human being. His ancestry is fascinating, yet incidental and only a part of who he is. Quit obsessing about ethnicity and how that is the ONLY defining quality for a human being.
    10
  5.  @chucksmith9008  I grew up on a farm. Everyone that I knew had a gun of some kind in their home. EVERYONE. My dad shot a rabid cow and then hired a backhoe to bury it. My neighbour shot a rabid coyote in his backyard. We would shoot rabbits, ground hogs and crows that were in our gardens because we depended on the garden for food all winter. The nearest police station was 1/2 hour away and when a local bank was robbed, the robbers crashed their car and took off on foot into the countryside and it turned into 24 hour manhunt. Police were going door to door, this is in farm country, looking for the 4 men. A lot of people put signs on their doors saying things like this...."uninvited people will be shot" or similar until the fugitives were finally caught. We didn't feel like "big men". Our guns were tools we used for protection from the real threats to our lives and livelihoods and served a purpose no different than our tractors, hoes, hammers and screwdrivers did. My dad is now 90 and he still lives on the very secluded family farm and keeps his rifle accessible in case there is an issue that might threaten his security. He keeps it clean but he hasn't fired it in over 10 years. Quit stereotyping gun owners and pretending that this caricature, that you've created, proves your own moral superiority.
    10
  6.  @PirateRemy  A troll. Anytime I see these short comments that do nothing but call people names or make accusations, I know that we're dealing with a no mind troll. If you can't take the time to make a coherent comment that explains your position, you really have nothing to say. Any fool can say what you just said. But, you won't answer this, anyway. I'm talking into a howling wind.
    9
  7.  @SLJShortt  I just watched this video. Could you please be kind enough to let me know what it was that he said that is BS. I would really appreciate it.
    9
  8.  @JoshBeards  Dismiss the overall malpractice, of what happened, over a mistake in details. No matter the branch of service, those American service personnel didn't need to die. THAT is the over arching point that he was trying to make. That's NOT using them as a political tool. It's a transgression against those who were in service and needlessly died and we should acknowledge it. It's a transgression to ALL Americans.
    9
  9.  @johnmccain7076  Trump didn't use the FBI, DOJ and CIA because that would mean that he would send American agents into a foreign country to investigate that country's possible corruption. You can't just go ahead and do that. It's a jurisdictional issue. Nothing strange about it. Also, if the Biden's are involved with corruption in another country, it has to be investigated. You don't hold back on an investigation because it might hinder the political ambitions of someone you like. If that were the case, Democrats should NEVER investigate Trump. He's their political rival.
    9
  10.  @darkdan3379  What you mean is that she never heard a press conference that the MSM televised. They knew that televising then would hurt the Democrats. It was just like the Trump Covid daily press briefings. At first they televised them, but when Trump's popularity went up in the polls, they quit televising them and started showing edited snippets of those conferences. If you watched MSM, you WOULD think that she never held a press conference.
    9
  11. "Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day." That's the Democrats. "Teach a man how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." That's the Republicans. Sometimes a person may need help to get through the day but if you teach him how to get through the day on his own, you give him life's greatest gift. Self reliance and self esteem.
    9
  12.  @anahernandez4043  You hold them accountable by not voting for them. Every time a violent offender is released on bail and kills someone, we should be decrying that crime 24/7, including the judge's role in his release. When there's enough corpses laid out maybe the voting public will start to take notice, of these crime facilitating judges, and do something about it. That means publicity and lots of it. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Good Americans have been doing nothing for too long.
    9
  13. It's just a knife fight between a couple of overly spirited girls. What's the big deal?
    9
  14. They're silent because they don't want to be fighting ALL the time. I'm a bartender and I see it. Say anything positive about Trump and at least 4 or 5 people lose their minds. I've never seen such hate in my life. They just lose their minds. My boss insists that we have CNN on ALL the time. Every time Trumps face appears, even though you can't hear him, people's faces turn into a snarling mass of pure and abject hate. It's almost otherworldly, as if there's a demon inside them, taking over their bodies for an instant. I wish I was making this up but I'm not.
    9
  15.  @MarkLewis-l3f  What business is it of mine? Maybe because it's happening here as well but not to the same degree....but it could start. It could happen in your neighbourhood as well. Also, they ARE crossing the southern border. Remember when border guards were supposed to be whipping Haitians, from horseback, at the southern border? They were Haitians. Haitians have been encountered 53,900 times in 2022 and 76,100 times last year with no numbers this year available. So, YES they are crossing the border. Why would they do that? It's because they're NOT legal immigrants. They arrived at the border, from Mexico and declared that they were coming in, just like the millions who've came in the last 4 years. Even if you fly or sail into the United States, you're still crossing the border. We need better immigration policies. What we have now will tear this country apart. It's pitting Americans against each other, against the immigrants and even immigrants against one another. Look what it's doing in Britain. It's going to come here. Why would ANYONE want this.
    9
  16. "I'm gonna have to talk to my doctor's about that". That's it, everybody. TALK TO YOUR DOCTOR. Follow the president's example. Wearing a face mask will protect you, as well. It's harder to touch the most vulnerable parts of your face with a mask covering it. It's not foolproof but what really is.
    9
  17. @Artillery Horse Wow.....and they say Trump supporters are racist.
    9
  18.  @willzresurreccion6745  What is it that drives trolls like you?
    9
  19.  @notleftvsrightnationalismv4666  You realise that you're not funny, huh? You're a troll and a waste of space in this comment thread.
    9
  20.  Marco Polo1  Worse than that. I know Trump haters that say that it was Trump policies that had those kids put in cages. When you show them multiple links that prove that those pics were taken in 2014, they refuse to believe it, at least I think they do because that's when they refuse to talk about it. When I tell them that it was Trump that put a stop to putting kids in cages, they get mad and say that Trump is separating kids from their mothers. They just change the narrative and refuse to admit that their heroes, the Democrats, could do no wrong. They've lost all reason, even their sanity.
    9
  21.  @tonytucker948  MAGA is printed on ball caps, not hoods. I have yet to see huge brigades of MAGA hat wearers, setting fire to crosses and lynching citizens of the US. The last known lynching was in 1981. You lefties are sure fond of hyperbole.
    9
  22.  @talldavid30  Explain Daniel Shaver. See....2 can play at that game. You're making a point made on an emotional level. Now try doing it on an intellectual level.
    9
  23.  @talldavid30  You gotta be a troll. No person, in his right mind, would believe this.
    9
  24.  @cortical1  We don't have to imagine. Anything to do with Trump is magnified, exaggerated or fabricated and it's always to make him look bad. Throws a bit of fish food into a coy pond and they lose their minds. Takes a extra scoop of ice cream and it's the leading story for 2 days. A kid, in a MAGA hat just stands there while a guy beats his drum in his face and they have to close his school for a week out of fear of violence against the school and WAPO and CNN are sued and PAY out in a settlement. Imagine? Let's be real. We KNOW what would happen if Don Jr. had done this and SO DO YOU.
    9
  25.  @Cupid-Stunt  Another angry, bitter individual who has nothing positive to say. Cheer up, buddy. Life isn't so bad.
    9
  26. @Onikage5555 I think Beto has a brilliant campaign strategy. Tell the voters that they're all evil racists. They'll all repent and then they'll vote for him. I don't know why anyone hasn't thought of it before. OH...Wait. Hillary tried that. She called a large demographic "deplorables". That one went over well, didn't it? Yup.....thems Democrats....theys the smart ones.
    9
  27. As a person, I think Trump is a loudmouth and a braggart. As a president, I find little fault in the job he's done. As for Biden, he's been around too long, he seems to be degenerating, he has no policies except he hates Trump, he's associated with the movement to defund the police, that is obsessed with race, that makes excuses for rioting, is more about cosmetics (political correctness) than with real substance, wants to change long standing practices like the electoral college and the voting system, has no real stance on extended wars, seems to support globalism, specifically unbalanced trade with China, increased taxes, and have a whishy whashy immigration stance. So, the choice seems easy to me. Biden, and the Democrats, just aren't fit for the job. They need to retool the party membership and rethink their political position and ideologies before I'd even consider voting for them. My vote goes to the loudmouth and braggart.
    9
  28. They don't care. When Trump honoured the man who was killed by a released illegal immigrant and offered condolences to his brother in attendance, the Democrats just sat there with scowls on their faces. They couldn't put their hatred aside long enough to feel that man's pain and honour the man who had to die because of one illegal who could care less about the law or American lives. It was a disgrace.
    9
  29.  @oreli2556  The comment is about the video. It's absurd to allow men to compete with women in sports. If you're willing to believe in that type of absurdity, you may well be open to committing atrocities and rationalise those atrocities using absurd logic points. There's your topic. I'm amazed that it has to be explained to you.
    9
  30.  @kevlivinginabox  Can't talk about the topic on hand so you just call people names. Are you EVER going to leave the school yard?
    9
  31. Fknmando ! Wow. Since you obviously have trouble comprehending the situation, I'll repeat it for you. There was a drive by shooting. That's where a citizen drives by in a car and shoots people on the street or in their front yard. Apparently, this is against the law. This time 2 people were shot. Salvas's friend, the police officer, was called to the scene and was involved in a police chase involving the alleged car that took part in the shooting. The occupant of that car, a person strongly implicated in that ILLEGAL drive by shooting, tried to get away and was shot. You see, the police officer was pretty sure the guy had a gun in his possession. It's difficult to commit a drive by shooting without a gun....maybe even impossible so I'd say it was a pretty safe assumption. If the person was willing to shoot people on the street, he would likely be willing to shoot a police officer, as well. I don't know that for sure, of course, but....you know. I'd still go with it for safety reasons. Salvas knew the police officer and knew him as an honourable guy. He may not be but when you couple that with the circumstances of the shooting, I'd say he has a right to feel that way and to express how he feels. So....lets tie that in with the standing for the flag. I'm sure you've heard of Colin Kaepernick and the big kerfuffle over kneeling for the flag. This had to do with the police shooting of black youths and the belief in systemic racism in the legal system. Salvas said that he made that statement a year earlier, when this was big headlines. Now, I'm sure you can see where I'm going with this. One year after saying that he stands for the flag, Salvas defends a police officer, a family friend, who was involved in a police shooting of an man allegedly resisting arrest. Maybe his Democrat "friends" might have let him off the hook for defending his friend but I don't know. However, his saying that he stands for the flag, might indicate that he sides with police officers in a police shooting. Defending the police officer in a real shooting validates his stance of police shooting. That is what prompted the "that's insensitive" criticism. I've tied this up in a neat little package for you so you can fully understand what is happening here. Sorry if I'm seeming a little sarcastic (a lot, actually) but I have a feeling that you're being intentionally obtuse about the whole thing. You've implied that the alleged shooter in the drive by deserves to be declared innocent until proven guilty but the police officer shouldn't be given that right, given your statement that you don't know what a person is capable of when referring to the police officer. I'd say that's correct, to a degree. That police officer didn't know what that alleged shooter was capable of but he definitely had reason to believe that he could be extremely dangerous and that his own life was at stake. I guess the only way to know just how bad this guy actually was is to allow him to shoot the cop. Then we'd know for sure he was a bad guy. Makes being a cop rather hazardous though, don't you think?
    9
  32.  poligney1  Grow up. If there's something that you're not buying, tell us what it is and give us the evidence to back it up. Florida is middle of the pack when it comes to deaths and cases per capita. If they're doing the wrong things to protect its citizens, why aren't they leading the pack? Answer the question and don't start calling me names.
    9
  33.  googlenazicompany5935  He's fighting the Ontario School of Psychiatry and the Canadian government so he can say and think as a free individual. If they're trying to suspend his medical licence, because of what he believes and for expressing those beliefs, he's fighting for free speech....which makes him a freedom fighter. Why don't you want the freedom to say what you believe to be true? Don't you think that your ideas are worth expressing? Or are you unable to think? Why are you so against your own freedom? I'm not getting it.
    8
  34.  @christopherreichle6670  Anyone who thinks that someone else is going to make them happy, be it the government, their employer, or even the people around them, are going to spend their lives very sadly and end up disappointed. It's up to me to find meaning and satisfaction in my life. Besides, being happy is the end of an Utopian rainbow. It doesn't exist. The way to a good life is in the ability to freely pursue that good life. Blaming others for what's going on in your head will get you nowhere. We are living in the most affluent times, for the average person, especially in the west, in human history. Yet, we still complain. I'll send you back 300 years. You'll be crying to come back to 2022 within the week. Furthermore, do you really think that if you dismantle capitalism, that working in a factory will become somehow....exhilarating? That it will lead to life of deep happiness? Good luck with that. Someone's still gotta make your shoes. There will still be a boss and he'll still expect you to get the job done, except now you'd be an enemy of the people if you don't show the expected enthusiasm. You're looking for happiness in all the wrong places.
    8
  35. @Donna Chump - DRAFT DODGER Where did you come up with that? Is that the standard reply to everything? Instead of name calling, why don't you address one of the points I made. I know that would require a little thought and name calling is so much easier but using the brain isn't going to hurt you. Honest......it won't.
    8
  36.  @SeekerOfTruth-b2i  Don't be a troll. Show a little ingenuity in your comments. Any parrot can say the same thing over and over again.
    8
  37.  Robert Miner  Who said anything about attacking the homeless? This is a social problem that the government in Oregon refuses to face. Worse, this is a problem that homeless aren't working on, either. There's lots of work out there, if you really want it and, with a little ingenuity, there are decent places to live. They're just not doing what they have to do get there. If you live a life, without hope or integrity, you end up in a tent beside the road. That's a fact of life.
    8
  38.  @justajawausingwifi4642  Nooooo.....logic is needed for all occupations. Just like an athlete who exercises their muscles in order to excel at their chosen sport, students exercise their brain so they can excel at their chosen vocation. If you don't challenge that brain, it turns soft, like the muscles of a potential athletes who refuses to challenge their muscles. If you're not taught to think logically, you're less apt to use logic in making basic decisions in your life and vocational choices.
    8
  39. Russian Bot, Inc. You don't have to be a racist to think that this guy is a POS. His behaviour was totally uncalled for and she deserved to be defended from that jerk. All you're doing is going for the lowest common denominator in an attempt to defend such incredibly bizarre behaviour. If someone talked to your mother like that and you defended her, would that make you a bigoted racist as well?
    8
  40. And I remember spending hours and money, trying to get a fake ID, so I could go to the movies and buy beer or get into clubs. I'll bet lots of these people did the same. Now they're saying that minorities don't have the smarts that they did as kids. Not even smart enough to get a legal ID. If they only knew how condescending they are.
    8
  41.  @donschwartz8341  Trump was non-stop on Twitter, much to the dismay of a lot of the Republicans. He kept it up until Twitter banned him. Did you ever watch his press conferences? They didn't want to hear what he had to say. They just wanted to argue with him. He was on the networks, everyday in the early days of Covid. Then the MSM would cut away when he was saying something that they didn't like and interpret what he said to make him look bad. Eventually, they didn't even bother to show those daily press briefings on TV, except their edited versions, and Trump quit doing them. However, he would stop and talk to the press ALL the time. Not in formal press conferences but in "off the cuff" responses to the press questions.
    8
  42.  @BrownBrown-h7c  There is only one bakery on Staten Island that makes that pastry. Everyone knows that on Staten Island. It's easy to figure out for the locals. That's how everyone knew what bakeshop it was.
    8
  43.  @warrior-xd2xn  I should refer you to a previous comment that I made. Instead, I'll just copy and paste it so you won't have to search for it. "There was a guy, who phoned reporters from the Washington Post, disguising his voice so they called him "Deep Throat", that brought down a president. Why? Because those reporters thought that IF Deep Throat's allegations were true, this would be a HUGE scandal and they went full bore into investigating the veracity of those allegations from this mysterious source. That scandal was Watergate. Now, there's a laptop filled with videos and e-mails, a group of whistleblowers, a business partner, around 150 reports of suspicious bank transactions from 11 different banks, a video of Biden bragging how he threatened to withhold 1 billion dollars from Ukraine if they didn't fire a prosecutor, a guilty plea of tax evasion and a gun charge, a gun charge that resulted from that information from that laptop.......and the SAME newspaper that broke the Watergate Scandal, won't investigate ANY of this stuff. THEY WON'T EVEN INVESTIGATE!!!! The entire MSM is ignoring all this stuff." And YOU'RE talking about Republican logic? What about the "head in the sand" tactics that Democrats are using. They won't even investigate. I think that we BOTH know why.
    8
  44. @Toronto Rangers Wow. You've just explained why Trump won the last election.....and you approve. Well, Trump is rooting for your attitude. He'll win again. Bigotry is not the way to beat him. I'd thought you'd realise that after the last election. I guess you don't have to be in flyover America to say dumb things.
    8
  45.  @Chris-n2f9m  BOT.
    8
  46.  @darthmalagus  They won't have to work if they take on those jobs. All they have to do is repeat the same talking points. You don't have to be brilliant or hard working to do that. A clever parrot could do it.
    8
  47.  @anneanne9009  What you don't understand about the United States is that it is an aggregate of 50 states, each with its own ability to make its own policies and laws. That's part of the American Constitution, the agreement between the states to exist separately under one cooperative. If Trump were to intervene, he could only do so at the behest of all the states and to show that this state has transgressed the agreement between the States, or the Constitution. That's a process that is imposed by the president only under unusual circumstances and that imposition is extremely rare. The most famous imposition being the Civil war. This is a state's rights issue and must be settled on a state level first. If that fails, it must be brought before the Supreme Court, the court of the United States, which is sworn to protect the Constitution, NOT the president, Donald Trump at this moment. Trump does NOT have the power that you think he does.
    8
  48.  @kairidon3363  That's the dumbest response yet. What does it matter how often it happens when it shouldn't happen at all. It's against the law and it is EVERY time it happens. You're accepting of taking away someone's rights because it's happened before. That's NOT the approach that we should be taking. We should be saying that it should NEVER happen, that the law should always be adhered to. That's what we should be saying. Instead, you turn into group politics. I don't want to EVER see it happen. You seem to think that it's okay, because it's normal to take away a person's civil rights, that it's a normal way for a government to behave. I've never advocated for taking away any civil rights from anyone. If a person's civil rights are being violated, be it Democrat or Republican, it's WRONG. PERIOD. Now, let's uphold the US Constitution in every case, including this one.
    8
  49. Pierre was also a great admirer of Castro. I'm not a big fan of the guy and I'm going to make sure I don't vote for his son this fall either.
    8
  50. @s Since you're flooding this comment section with this single post, I'm going to assume that you've got the evidence to back it up. So, lets hear it. Until you do, I'm calling BS.
    8