Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Timcast"
channel.
-
24
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
@gabepizza
The media is, by proxy, slamming all those who are fighting the virus. Jim Acosta, going on about lack of PPE's and masks and that he heard if from "un-named" administrators is slamming FEMA and Army Corps of Engineers, all the top medical people like Dr. Fauci and Dr. Brix. It's not only asking why Trump didn't act sooner. It's asking why the good Doctors didn't use their influence and expertise to expose the lack of caring from Trump.
Why didn't Acosta frame his questions differently. He could have NAMED an administrator that was having problems getting needed material and asked what this guy should do to help in acquiring things that is needed. Challenge the president to offer solutions. Trump said that they had the needed equipment. Have him show the chain of procurement and how it works. Ask the president, POLITELY, what department this administrator should contact. Instead, he leaves the impression that he never did talk to any administrator and this entire dialogue was engineered by Jim Acosta as vehicle of denigration, bereft of facts and unfounded allegations. If Trump would have come through, Acosta would have done a good turn by helping people in dire need. If Trump had failed in any capacity, Acosta would have shown where Trump was failing. No conjecture. No vague allegations but a real time line of events.
However, Acosta would NEVER do that because if Trump came through, THAT would counter the news picture that Acosta was trying to paint. It's not about the news or the facts, it's political theatre and that has nothing to do with being a Trump supporter or not. Acosta is a journalist...not the opposition party.
You can apply that same weakness to almost all the MSM.
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
@Fact Checker
Are you saying that, in another 8 weeks, it will be 40 million dead? That's the logical and mathematical conclusion of exponential growth.
There will be more deaths, but it won't be exponential. It's impossible. Pandemics run a course. It always has throughout history. Once enough people, a percentage of the population, have been exposed to the disease, in a given area, the new infected cases decrease dramatically.
The flattening of the curve is designed, not to decrease overall exposure, but to spread that exposure over a longer period of time so hospitals aren't driven to over capacity. That's what would have caused higher death rates. So far, the US has been very successful at keeping cases below the capacity line and flattening the curve.
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
@igen vagy nem
When I was going to school, starting in the fifties and ending in the early seventies, parents paid little attention to what was going on in our schools. My parents hardly knew my teacher and would visit once maybe twice in a school year. I think my generation, I know that I did, acted in the same way. We thought that they were being taught, like we were, the basics, math, English, history and the rest and that, in our public schools, there was no such thing as indoctrination. There wasn't when I was in school and started when my kids were there but it wasn't that prevalent, yet. Participation awards seemed stupid but harmless. It was at the turn of the century that it really started. These are the ones in primary school, then, that are now in their twenties and are the hotheads in universities now.
It wasn't that their parents didn't care. I don't think a lot of them didn't realise that this kind of thing was even possible. There's been no precedence in American schools of this type of thing. We were ALL naive in how dangerous this could become. It was way beyond our comprehension where this could lead to. If you tried to tell me, in 1984, that this was going to happening today, I wouldn't have believed you. I mean, hundreds of genders.....that's crazy, and everyone alive back then would have said the same thing. We under estimated how stupid people could actually be.
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14