Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. 8
  2. 8
  3. 7
  4. 7
  5. 7
  6. 7
  7. 7
  8. 7
  9. 7
  10. 7
  11. 7
  12. 7
  13. 7
  14.  @jimmcloughlin  Estimates for the deaths of the famine, brought on by collectivisation in China, put in motion by Mao, run as high as 55 million. That's in the fifties, NOT WW2. Then there was the cultural revolution that started in the mid sixties and lasted 10 years. Add that to the famines, and it may be as high as 70 million. These are deaths, not due to wars, but to the disastrous policies of the Chairman Mao and his associates. Then there were the disasters of Stalin and Lenin. Once again, not due to WW2, but to the famines caused by collectivisation of farms and the horrors of their police state. These are deaths brought down on their OWN people. Then the famines of the Soviet Union, brought on by the same communist policies under Lenin and Stalin. Around 5 million in 1923 and maybe as many as 7 million in 1933, including around 3.5 million Ukrainians. Then another 1.7 in the Gulags. Who knows how many millions have died in North Korea in the 20th century. Another 2 million in the killing fields of Cambodia by the communists there. Around 1 in 4 Cambodians died because of Pol Pots great agrarian society. These are just the numbers from the main communist powers. We have no idea on the numbers in the Iron Curtain countries of those times, or Cuba, Zimbabwe and other socialist regimes. These are all deaths NOT through foreign invasions or wars. These are deaths caused directly from the policies of the communist governments. I have references for all of it. All you gotta do is ask.
    6
  15. 6
  16. 6
  17. 6
  18. 6
  19. 6
  20. 6
  21. 6
  22. 6
  23.  @queent3343  Haven't you seen any of the school board meetings where parents were reading from books that were recommended reading for primary school children. Some of it so explicit that the school board members told the parents that it was too offensive to read at this meeting, yet those books were in the classroom and school library. Maybe you should see the TikTok videos about the teachers of kindergarten to grade 3, talking about their sexuality, holding pride parades for the little tykes, drag queen story time and more. Besides, even if none of this was true (which it isn't), why not make sure that teachers don't talk about sexually explicit material to little kids whether it be LGBTQ or STRAIGHT. It's just not necessary. What's really strange is that Dave Rubin and his husband have been guests of Desantis and he even congratulated them on the adoption of their little babies. Why would a man, who supposedly hates gays, do that? You're the one that so filled with hate that you won't dig deeper into the topic. You WANT the divide. It makes you feel superior somehow that you're better than those "bigots". Watch "The Quartering" here on YouTube. He's got all kinds of videos showing teachers who brag about how they've come out to their students of a very young age and how good it makes them feel. What kind of narcissism, must a person have, to find validation from 6 year olds? Why would a teacher even talk about their personal life let alone their sexual preferences to little kids? It's just plain weird.
    5
  24. 5
  25. 5
  26. 5
  27. 5
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30.  @almosthuman1398  " I allowed you to get there under your own steam." How magnanimous of you. You "allowed" me to do it. Sounds condescending to me. The roles of procreation has been the defining factor on how we defined men and women throughout all of human history. To carry out those roles depends on the plumbing. If you don't have the plumbing, you can't get pregnant. That means that you're NOT a woman. Our survival depends on this binary relationship. One carries the sperm. The other the egg. We need it to ensure genetic diversity to survive. So how do we describe the binaries that take part in procreation? The one that carries the sperm is the man. The one that carries the egg is the woman. Beattie became pregnant using donated sperm. That implies that he carried the egg which means that biologically he's a woman. You can dress him anyway you want, surgically remove body parts, give him drugs but his body still functioned as a woman. He carried the egg and then had full female capabilities that enabled him to carry a child to birth. That will NEVER happen to me. I'm NOT a woman. I do not and will NEVER have those capabilities. I am a man. Not because I wish it or feel it or passionately want it. I'm a man because that's what my body developed me to be. Neither the doctor or my parents assigned my manhood to me at birth. NATURE did. Biology. My role was clearly defined by how my body was designed and it defines its role in the perpetuation of my species. That's been the clear designation of gender all through history. In fact, 20 years ago people would have laughed at the ideas of multiple gender roles. The entire Beattie thing is a game of sleight of hand.
    5
  31. 5
  32. 5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 5
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4