Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1.  @tlalanerampa4312  Typical of a troll. Make some kind of insult and then disappear.
    1
  2.  @elephantoflight3362  BS. He asked a question. Questions aren't propaganda. The question was quite the simple one. Do minorities need special help in order to succeed? The answer should have been a resounding "NO". People in minority groups are just as capable of success as anyone else who would apply themselves. It would seem that this judge doesn't believe that but we don't know because he wouldn't say what he believed. Why couldn't the judge be honest and tell us his opinion on the matter? It's either "No, minority members are as capable as anyone else" or "Yes, minority members need special help", The judge didn't want to admit what he thought because he was afraid that he might expose his personal biases.
    1
  3.  @elephantoflight3362  It's only loaded if you don't believe that minorities are capable of achieving success without help. That means that it's loaded if you're a bigot. It's loaded if you're forced to be honest. To ordinary, rational people, it's an easy question to answer. To the bigot, quite often it's in their best interest to avoid answering it. So, maybe you should try answering it. Do you think that a person, who happens to be a minority, needs special help to succeed?
    1
  4.  @elephantoflight3362  You didn't answer my question, did you? I wonder why. Is it because you don't WANT to answer it because you don't want to admit what you actually believe about minorities. I'll ask again. Do minorities need special help in order to succeed? Just answer it. If you asked me, I'd answer it, immediately. Why can't YOU answer it?
    1
  5.  @elephantoflight3362  Still making up excuses for why you won't answer the question. I gave you my answer. Why not give me yours? Do minorities need special help to succeed? I say that they don't...that they're quite capable of succeeding without special help. What do YOU think? Do they need special help or not?
    1
  6. That woman never said ONE word about Bragg or his policies. She lied about the deaths on Jan 6th and she refuses to acknowledge that bail reform is a Democrat idea. Also, it was De Blasio's administration, Democrat, that cut 1 billion dollars from the police budget in NY. How is this the fault of Republicans? What's more, Democrats are the party of equity and they want it everywhere, including the prison system. When you look at skin colour, as a mitigating factor to consider when sentencing, you're engaging in racial profiling. Too many blacks in jail......give black criminals a more lenient sentence so to reduce their population. Who cares what colour a person's skin is. If guilty, sentence them according to the crime, NOT what skin colour they might have.
    1
  7.  @cjuare123  We don't care about their financial status. It's not a double standard. If Soros were doing the audit, it would only be wrong if he were covering things up instead of exposing them. If he were exposing them.....good for him.
    1
  8.  @Havanorange  Because he doesn't need to be reminded about what his policies are at all times. It's because he knows what he's talking about and he's a good enough speaker to not need a teleprompter to talk to us. One minute your complaining about what he's saying and then you're snidely saying that he's incompetent. Notice that you don't hear the MSM talking about Florida so much anymore. He's getting things back in order remarkably fast and the MSM doesn't want the country to know about that. They feel its best to ignore him so we won't know what he's doing.
    1
  9.  @Havanorange  What do you need an outline for if you know what you're talking about? Of course he blows up at the stupid questions of reporters. He's trying to organise help for the tens of thousands of people who need it after the hurricane and the idiot reporters want to talk about climate change. How does that get fresh water, food, medical help and electricity to those who need it? How does that get information for what to do to get help? It would piss me off too when reporters are only caring about their own political agenda. It's the same when the reporter asked about the "Don't say gay" bill. It doesn't say that ANYWHERE in the bill and he called that reporter out on it. The MSM were determined to carry that message and it was a baldfaced lie. That the media would intentionally lie about a bill that wants for keep teachers from talking about sexually explicit topics to kids between the ages of 5 and 8, straight or gay but the media just wanted to cloud the issue with their lies. That would piss anyone off. Even you if they intentionally lied about something that you said. When I studied public speaking in college, I never used notes either. I would study my topic thoroughly so when I was asked question during the question period, I could answer them quickly and succinctly. That meant that I was organised enough to know that material and didn't NEED notes to refer to and I got an A as a final mark. You're the one that said that he was unorganised and that's why he doesn't use notes. I beg to differ. He doesn't use notes because he knows his stuff and that takes a great deal of hard work and organisation.
    1
  10.  @jamesmccarte1609  It is one thing to want to disband a government agency and another to plant steel obstruction that could kill or severely injure someone. If Trump's pick had tried to physically destroy property, in a covert fashion, that would be a crime. To openly state an intention, which isn't illegal, and to try to do it through authorised and legal channels, is completely different than committing an illegal act that is intended to damage property and cause injury and suffering. If you can't see that, YOU are the problem. I might disagree with his desire to disband the EPA, but I'd never commit an illegal act in an attempt to stop him. I'd do it like a civilised human being and this has nothing to do with party politics. You're defending a dangerous and illegal practice. Once again....that makes you a part of the problem.
    1
  11.  @Grandpatim1959  Once again, the vague accusations of lies. Nothing of substance, just a "He lies" accusation. Also, his campaign isn't dying. The polls show he's neck and neck with Harris and doesn't seem to falling at all. Just another claim that isn't backed up by facts.
    1
  12.  @thenightingale7405  The reason why they can't protest outside a justice's home is so that one group can't intimidate or frighten those justices from ruling against the interests of those protestors. Groups like the KKK or QANON. I'm sure that you've heard of them. The KKK could have shown up at the homes of judges during the Civil Rights movement, when those who murdered Civil Rights workers were on trial. They could stand on public property, the street and obstruct the judge's attempt to go to work, letting him know that they were not going to stop until they got what they want, no matter how long it takes. This isn't a law to protect elites. This is to protect the rule of law.
    1
  13. I can't understand why these woke institutions are even bothering to put books in the school libraries. Most of the kids can't read anyway. Of course, I'm being facetious. Asra Nomani is absolutely correct. Our schools are a disgrace and many are indoctrination centres of hate and divisiveness. It's time we put a stop to this new dogma. Fire the teachers who refuse to teach basic skills and are obsessed with race and gender. They're tearing this country apart and it's being done intentionally. Putting up posters, in the schools, that say "Eff America" only shows the hatred in their hearts. It makes a mockery of their mantra of "Diversity, equity and inclusivity" and is as Orwellian as it gets.
    1
  14. Nadler's position appears to be that ONLY the government should audit the government. Everyone else...hands off.
    1
  15.  @abc33155  The reason that I assumed that you wouldn't respond is that I have NEVER received a response from someone who used the same comment multiple times. You are the very FIRST one. It's a pattern that I didn't expect to be broken and I'm very surprised that it was.
    1
  16. You realise that you don't have to buy stocks off of him. That's your choice. He's not forcing you to buy or do business with him.
    1
  17. She's "complaining". You make her sound like a whiner. Was that your intent? I'm thinking so, especially when you followed it up in the description when you made a point of saying that Riley "misgendered Lia Thomas".
    1
  18. They'll let us know what's disinformation and what's not. Sort of like the Hunter laptop story. Good thing that they were there to tell us that it was all Russian disinformation.
    1
  19.  @MrSamfala  It doesn't matter today who Trump appointed yesterday. Trump is no longer the president. Biden is. Stick to the topic.
    1
  20.  @bill-or-somthingbill4390  There's a hurricane coming. Don't you think that the reporter should be asking questions so he could inform his audience of what measures to take to keep them safe? How is asking a question about "racism" going to help anyone who's biggest concern is this category 4 hurricane. You worry about that question AFTER the hurricane and hopefully everyone is safe....you know....no loss of life. That reporter's job is to inform the public so everyone DOES come out alive and NOT to stir up trouble in the face of a life threatening emergency. This reporter is "rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic." so to speak.
    1
  21.  @scottfarner5100  Let's assume that you're right about everything. Explain to us all why Biden hasn't done a THING to alleviate the problem. Name one thing that Biden has done concerning immigration. Biden is the president now. It's up to him to fix the problem NOT some president that was voted out. Remember, Trump LOST the election. He has NO power. Biden does. So what's he doing about it?
    1
  22.  @chasethehistorian2003  You're the one that filling every comment section with snide remarks about him but none of it that says anything. If you think that he's such a failure, why don't YOU explain yourself?
    1
  23. Of course the media is worried about Kari Lake. She was the charisma to become the first woman president of the United States. The party of identity politics can't have the "fascist" party beat them at their own game and do it on merit, NOT on what demographic box you check off. Of course, she'll be labelled as the female face of the patriarchy.....except that they refuse to even define what a woman is. What surprises me is how anyone would still take the Democrats seriously.
    1
  24.  @jdfraed123  A lot of people realise that Roe V Wade was an unconstitutional decision. Even Ruth Bader Gingsberg said that if a case ever came before the Supreme Court , she'd be forced to strike it down on that basis. Overturning Roe V Wade was inevitable. If you have an issue with the abortion policies of your state, go to your state legislature, who are now responsible for those policies. On the Federal level, try to get the impossible done. Get abortion rights enshrined in the Constitution through an Amendment. Good luck with that. We're facing high inflation, energy issues, a slowing economy, war in Ukraine, looming food shortages....and you think that abortion is the biggest problem facing most Americans? You might have a surprise coming. Pro-choice is only an issue for those who are ideologically obsessed. The rest of us are worried about more important issues.
    1
  25. The introduction of capitalism, in China, turned their socialist society into a different type of socialism......Fascism.
    1
  26.  @TheBelegur  China is communist in name only. They've allowed privately owned businesses to operate but under the full control of the government. Companies, like Huawei, which are just arms of the CCP. That's exactly how the Nazis operated as well as the Fascists under Mussolini. Businesses are private, and will remain so, but they operate under the full control of the government. In true communism, there are NO private businesses. In fact, I'm quite confidant in saying that the only way for a communist government to succeed is to become a Fascist state. A form of socialism but organised in a different manner. Something that Mussolini, the communist leader that developed this idea and called "National Socialism".
    1
  27.  @TheBelegur  The Fascist system in Italy was different than the one in Spain, which was different than the one in Nazi Germany. Just because it doesn't EXACTLY match the one in China, doesn't mean that it's not a form of Fascism. If the CCP has half interest in business, that it implies that the other half is privately owned. That goes against everything that Marxism or communism stands for. communism definition: a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. If part ownership of a business is allowed, then it's NOT communism. Fascism definition: a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism. The Party and particularly, Xi Jinping, is the leader or dictator, as it were. He's officially the Paramount Leader, the Communist Party Leader, the Head of State and the Commander in Chief. He has a firm hand on his power. China is also VERY nationalistic. Look at the Uighur camps, in which they are being re-educated into learning Chinese, getting away from Islam and then integrating them around China so they can be assimilated into the Chinese culture. Not quite as aggressive as Nazi Germany but definitely leaning that way. From this, I'd say that China is closer to be a Fascist country than a communist one. Marx would NOT approve of what is going on in China, right now.
    1
  28.  @TheBelegur  I didn't dig those definitions out of my backside and it was YOU that said that businesses in China is partly privately owned. YOU said that. SO....If businesses have private ownership, in China, like YOU said, and communism is a system where the economy is owned by the workers, it CAN'T be communist. These are definitions from online dictionaries and an ownership system that you claimed to be true. They can CALL themselves communists, just like North Korea calls itself "the Democratic People's Republic of Korea". North Korea is definitely NOT a Democracy. Given the definition of communism and YOUR description of the Chinese economy, it's NOT a communist country. It call itself anything it wants. It doesn't make it so. Besides, what country would call itself a Fascist nation, today? It would be political and economic suicide.
    1
  29.  @TheBelegur  Then how are there millionaires in China. As of 2019, there are 4.4 millionaires in China. Read this. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/oct/21/china-overtakes-us-in-rankings-of-worlds-richest-people This is copied and pasted from that article. "The report says the “rapid transformation of China from an emerging nation in transition to a fully fledged market economy” helped create a record number of rich people." Do you see it? "a fully fledged market economy". That's capitalism...NOT communism. However, it's capitalist economy is strongly controlled by the government...and that's Fascism. I can find you all kinds of material that support my claim that people are allowed to own property....or wealth. Money is property and China has lots of people with lots of money. They own it however they must be loyal to the Party or they could lose it overnight. That's the same as in Nazi Germany. The families of those who tried to assassinate Hitler, lost everything they owned when the plotters were executed. Gone. The party allowed ownership as long as you were loyal to the Party and Hitler. The Party in China will allow you to own property....money....as long as you're loyal to the Party. There were no rich people in Mao's China or in the Soviet Union. There was an elite class but no one was allowed to accrue wealth and there was NO market economy.
    1
  30.  @Randy-md6xl  Being a fetus is just a stage of life of a specific being. A fetus, a baby, a toddler, an adolescent, a teenager, an adult, a senior....all stages of living. I find it weird, that the only stage, in my life that had no value, was when I was a fetus.....and I was a fetus. I was an embryo, too and a fertilised egg. I wasn't all that cute or communicative but that WAS me. I learned, when I was just a little kid, that if you didn't keep a chicken egg at the right temperature, the little chick inside would DIE. Actually die. A fertilised egg. We had fertilised eggs under a heat lamp and we took extreme steps to care for those eggs because we didn't want those chicks, inside the egg to die. Turning them every few hours and making sure that the temperature didn't vary. Yes.....the fertilised egg, inside that shell would DIE, expire and grow no more. "Life is the aspect of existence that processes, acts, reacts, evaluates, and evolves through growth (reproduction and metabolism)." Growth and metabolism. From the moment of conception, the new being starts to grow. In your case, it grew until it became the person that you are today. Had that growth been interrupted, at any time, even 2 weeks after conception, you wouldn't be here today.
    1
  31. I live in Canada and I go there with no problems. It's a beautiful country that uses an outhouse, so to speak, the outhouse being a metaphor for big cities. Know what to avoid....big cities.....as much as possible and you'll be just fine. The gun toting redneck, that lives in rural areas, is generally quite harmless. It's the gun toting city folk that you have to be afraid of.
    1
  32.  @scottfarner5100  She crossed 6 years ago and was a Canadian citizen. She went to live with an American in hopes of marriage that she met when he was in Canada. However, none of that matters. Refugee status has to do with those who come from a nation embroiled in wars and are displaced citizens due to the effects of that war. Asylum seekers are those who are faced with imminent threats of torture of persecution in their home countries. There is no WAY that everyone coming across the southern or northern borders, including my sister, meet or met those requirements. They're coming because they're having economic difficulties (they're poor) at home and they know that the current US administration won't question or enforce those asylum requirements. Also, separating children from the adults that are accompanying them, has NOTHING to do with asylum or refugee status. Having a child with you isn't an automatic indication of lawful refugee or asylum status and has NOTHING to do with those immigration laws. They're either running from wars, torture or persecution at home. If they can't show that they're facing such dangers at home, they can't seek asylum as refugees. That's the law. You can't show up with a child and say that you're a refugee and then say that this proves that you're a refugee or seeking asylum. It's an illogical claim. It's NOT the questions that determine refugee or asylum status. It's the answers. Can they show the requisite determination for legal immigration status as refugees or asylum seekers or not. That's the question. Rubber stamping requests and letting them come in to disappear into the country is a TERRIBLE policy. Also, if you're from Nicaragua, and you're being persecuted, you go to the nearest country (Honduras) to seek asylum. If they don't allow your case, you go to the next country, Guatemala and do the same. If refused, go to Mexico. There is NO evidence that this is happening. People are coming from all over the world, going to Mexico (not Canada) and then seeking asylum at the US border. They're doing it because the US is seen as a rich country and that's why they want to go there. It's also why, they're not going to Canada and heading south. Canada is already seen as a rich country and no one would come from there to seek asylum, which is why my sister was sent home and threatened with jail if she ever returned. You don't just claim to be a refugee. You have to prove it and this isn't happening at the southern border.
    1
  33.  @williamlauth279  "march peacefully and patriotically" and "because we are a party of law". That's what he said on J6th, 2021 before the it even started. Calling him names doesn't change that.
    1
  34.  @debbieassini8934  No, he said the "peacefully and patriotically" phrase shortly after 12:00. He finished his speech at 1:10 just as the rioters started throwing metal poles at security. At 1:45, the rioters surged past security. At 3:13 Trump tweeted asking people to remain peaceful. Trump was at the Ellipse, close to the White House, when he gave that speech. That's a 1.8 mile walk to the Capitol Building. The "peaceful and patriotic march" would have taken around 40 minutes according to Google Maps and that's on a normal day, not when there were tens of thousands marching. Trump was in the limo "grabbing the steering wheel away from the driver" a nonsensical claim. Everyone knew that there was going to be a large protest long before that day. Why was there more security in place? People asked for it. Even Trump did. Another thing, why wasn't there the outrage when BLM rioters threw Molotov cocktail and other projectiles at the White House and security? They even tried to set fire to the Church of the presidents, at the edge of the White House lawn. Trump and family had to go to a secure bunker for their safety. That's sure sounds like an insurrection where the president had to hide from a mob for his own safety. Yet, the media mocked and called him "Bunker Boy". There were fires all over Washington that day. I suppose that's a good insurrection as opposed to the bad one on J6. I say that BOTH were bad but there's no evidence that Trump planned the riot. It was supposed to be a protest and that's legal in the United States. According to Democrat supporters, burning, looting and attacking police is okay, depending on who does it. Violence should be called out, EVERY time, not just when it done by people that you don't like.
    1
  35. Yet, here's Larry Elder running for the presidency of the United States as a member of what the left decries as a white supremacist party. He came from extreme poverty and is now worth around 20 million dollars. Anyone who tells you that success is easy doesn't understand success OR life. Life is hard. What makes America a great country is that a black man, who grew up under Jim Crow and in extreme poverty, can aspire to and achieve such heights.....and I'm not even American and I say that. All a good, honest, hard working person needs is the freedom to be able to grow as a person. That's what America provided Elder and now the socialist left wants to take away from the rest of us. You can't legislate success. You can only attain it through hard work and the left is trying their best to inhibit those who have that work ethic.
    1
  36.  @willyboy7141  If you go in with guillotines, you'll go down in history with the likes of Robespierre, Lenin and Castro. Killing your opposition without a fair trial. I realise that we want to see action right now but they have to carry this out so EVERYONE knows. I have 2 good friends who had always refused to accept that the Democrats could be corruptible. They're both starting to realise that they were wrong. Had you gone in with guillotines, they, along with countless others, would have been appalled and never accepted what the Democrats were doing. We have to expose them.
    1
  37.  @pedalingprospector2007  Very few got arrested that day. That's correct. So why did the insurrectionists quit insurrectioning? They had possession of the Capitol Building, the first step in the overthrow of the government.....yet they stopped. There were no police or security to stop them. They weren't confronted by the National Guard. Why did those "revolutionaries" just go home after a few hours? Surely they didn't think that the insurrection was successful and Trump would continue to be president? No one was arrested for gun possession because no one had guns. The thousands of hours of video evidence doesn't show insurrectionists marching into the Capitol Building with guns. We'd be seeing the footage non-stop on MSM, if there were guns there. I think that you're dreaming.
    1
  38.  @loloLolo-vz6wx  The oil companies can't produce the oil because they can't get the permits to produce or ship it. The government forced the end of the Keystone pipeline. Are you that foolish to believe that the oil companies are refusing to produce because they don't want to make money? That's beyond ridiculous.
    1
  39.  @Hasshodo  The bias against the people of Jewish heritage for one. The reason that those university presidents wouldn't condemn calls for genocide is due to a bias against the Jews. If a student wore a t-shirt that said "There are only 2 genders", that student would face a school suspension. Yet, if that student wore a t-shirt advocating for the annihilation, the death of Jews, that has to have context. Do you get it now?
    1
  40. Of course there's nothing to be done about reducing energy prices. We're the victims of OPEC. Victimhood is what the Democrats aspire to. It rules all their policies. "It's not our fault. It's their fault for oppressing us".
    1
  41. So....there are no billionaires. Bill Gates is as broke as I am. You really don't get economics, do you.
    1
  42. This is EXACTLY what Hitler and his Nazis did. Not close or somewhat resembling. EXACTLY. They combined with the unions and it became a de facto state union. This is National Socialism. California isn't becoming a Fascist state. What's amazing is that no one sees this.
    1
  43. I'm puzzled why the left hates the pregnancy centres so much. They're helping women who are pregnant. What's wrong with that?
    1
  44.  Dr.HLecter  I have NO idea what you're saying. First you say that non-citizen voting is Trump fear mongering. Then you say, sadly for because they CAN vote. Uh...WHAT? And why are you sorry for them and us? What are you talking about? I just don't get why you're pushing back on ensuring that only citizens vote? Would you want Russians coming here and voting? Or would that be fear mongering, too? However, Hillary is claiming that the Russians interfered to get Trump to become president. Is illegal voting one way that they did it? Your comment is confusing or I'm just thick because I'm not getting it.
    1
  45. The left WANTS the productivity to crash. It's how they're remaking the country and eventually the world. Make JUST enough to survive on and no more. If you try to manufacture any more, the superfluous that we wish for but don't need, that will add to the climate crisis. We'll become a nation, a world, that is always living on the edge of poverty, waiting for that natural disaster that will kill us. One hurricane, one ice storm, one drought away from disaster. It's necessary, according to the left, to save the planet. Sri Lanka is a prime example. They went green and the country is now going through pure hell. Empty shelves, food shortages and over 100% inflation. Is the left, in the west, looking at this and rethinking how they approach climate change? Not a chance. The Netherlands has enacted the same green policies and it appears that Trudeau is about to do the same thing in Canada. If people go hungry and starve or freeze in the winter, that's the price that we, the ordinary citizen, has to pay to have a planet.
    1
  46.  @Austin1990  Austin.....I think that those who fought with security and broke into the Capitol building were nothing but criminals and no better than the BLM and Antifa thugs, who burned, looted and attacked people for their cause. However, I still believe that we should look into election practices and even perform audits when needed. I think that this is reasonable for those on both sides. Arrests have been made for ballot harvesting, including one, Rachel Rodrigues, who was exposed by Project Veritas and is now facing charges. And yes, the election audits should be done to appease voters. If the process shows no wrong doing.....great. However, if there was wrong doing, let's work on the election process to ensure that it never happens again. Only an audit will show problems and that's the only real way to know how to fix those problems if they do show up.
    1
  47.  @mekanator108  Hollywood is just FILLED with them....right? LOL.
    1
  48. What's he doing to halt truancy and juvenile crime? He's having hearings. Hearings discourage crime. Everyone know that.
    1
  49. Name one. People like to call him a liar but you have to beg them for specifics. So name ONE lie in this video.
    1
  50.  @SCAR16L  I've tried to find out about her being with the WEF but all I got was vague and not what I would call definitive proof. Not like I would for Trudeau. He's espousing, publicly, a lot of the WEF policy points, including the draconian control ideas that they seem to love......for our own good, of course. I don't trust politicians as a rule. I expect them to earn my trust and it hasn't really happened yet. However, some things and some politicians are truly untrustworthy and that would include Trudeau and Biden. However, Gabbard had the opportunity to be a real force in the Democrat party. All she had to do is toe the party line and she refused to do that. That's one reason why I have to see REAL evidence of her involvement with the WEF. If you do have the definitive proof, it would be greatly appreciated if you show it to us.
    1